Draft PWS - McConnell AFB ORC.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT

AT

MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, KANSAS

CONTRACT NUMBER:

9 AUGUST 2022

FY23 Version 1.1

CONTENTS

1.0 SCOPE

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 OVERVIEW OF ORC SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long-Term Management (as appropriate)

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

1.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

4.2 SCHEDULE AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS – INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

4.3 MILESTONE PAYMENT SCHEDULE

4.4 COST AND STATUS REPORTING

4.5 ORC DOCUMENT REPOSITORY

4.6 MEETING AND CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS

4.6.1 Meeting/Teleconference Support

4.6.2 Public Meetings and Hearings

4.7. SPATIAL DATA (MAP) REQUIREMENTS

4.8 INFORMATION SECURITY

4.8.1 Computer and Network Access Requirements:

4.8.2 Cybersecurity Reporting

4.9 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

4.10 PERMITS

4.10.1 Environmental Permits

4.10.2 Rights of Access to Non-AF Real Property

4.11 PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

4.12 REMOTE AND/OR AUSTERE SITES

4.13 SITE ACCESS

4.14 WORKSITE ACTIVITIES AND COORDINATION

4.14.1 Coordination of Activities

4.14.2 Hazardous Material, and Hazardous Waste Permitting and Reporting

5.0 CHEMISTRY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE

5.2 LABORATORY SELECTION

5.3 ANALYTICAL DATA MANAGEMENT

5.4 RECORD KEEPING

6.0 PLANS AND REPORTS

6.1 QUALITY PROGRAM PLANS

6.1.1 Work Plans

6.1.2 Health and Safety Plan

6.1.3 Construction Quality Plan

6.2 TECHNICAL PLANS AND REPORTS

7.0 SITE WORK

7.1 CONSERVATION

7.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD INVESTIGATION

7.3 SITE PREPARATION

7.4 DEMOLITION

7.5 SITE RESTORATION

8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROCESS APPLICATION

8.1.1 Conceptual Site Model Guidance

8.1.2 Exit Strategy

8.1.3 Performance and Optimization

8.2 TRANSITION OF WORK

8.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION

8.3.1 Design

8.3.2 Inspection

8.3.3 Delivery and Warranty

8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

8.5 INNOVATIVE AND PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES

8.6 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

8.7 ORDNANCE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.8 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.9 STUDY EFFORT INCIDENTAL TO REMEDY OR CORRECTIVE ACTION

8.10 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUPPORT

9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

10.0 POINTS OF CONTACT

11.0 KEY PERSONNEL

12.0 CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

1.0 SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at McConnell Air Force Base (AFB). This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration under the Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). The range of activities includes maintenance of established remedies, optimization at applicable sites, and achievement of site-specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at thirty (30) Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and 772nd Enterprise Support Squadron (ESS). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the AF has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators.”

1.1 Introduction

McConnell AFB is located in Sedgwick County in southern Kansas, adjacent to the southeastern boundary of Wichita. The base occupies approximately 3,100 acres of government-owned and easement land (approximately 2,582 acres are government owned and the remaining approximately 518 acres is leased or controlled by easement). Agricultural land transitioning to residential and commercial usage borders the base to the east and south, while industrial facilities border the north and west. In 1941, the Kansas Air National Guard was the first military unit to use the area for military aviation-related purposes. During World War II, other military units also used the base. The area was officially activated as McConnell AFB in 1951 when the Air Training Command began conducting B-47 combat crew training at the base. The government acquired the airport as a permanent military installation in 1953. The name was changed to Wichita AFB but later renamed to McConnell AFB in 1955. The Strategic Air Command was the host of McConnell AFB from 1958 to 1963. Tactical Air Command served as host until 1972 when the Strategic Air Command regained responsibilities with the 381st Strategic Missile Wing as the host unit. The host unit changed again to the 384th Air Refueling Wing (ARW), which later changed names in July 1987 as the 384th Bombardment Wing, Heavy. In June 1992, the host wing became a component of Air Combat Command and in September 1994, Air Mobility Command acquired responsibility. Currently, the 22nd ARW supports, flies, and maintains the KC-135R “Stratotanker” and the KC-46A Pegasus at McConnell AFB. The KC- 135R and KC-46A provide air-refueling operations worldwide for the U.S. and its allies.

Remediation activities at McConnell AFB are being conducted pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. Sites located off-base are regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act. Regulatory oversight is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 7;

however, the agency usually defers most RCRA and CERCLA activities to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE).

The Installation is being administered under a RCRA Corrective Action Permit dated 8 August 2007, USEPA RCRA Identification Number KS1571924140. The permit is up for renewal;

however, permit renewal is delayed due to other environmental issues. KDHE will officially assume lead agency authority from the USEPA after permit renewal is completed. Until that time, the 2007 permit remains in effect.

1.2 Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities needed to achieve the performance requirement described in Section 1.3 of the PWS inclusive of the POs listed in Table 1, Performance Table, and additional scope in 1.3.2. This PWS and enclosures listed below detail the project requirements needed to meet the AF objectives:

• Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions

• Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI) o Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet o Enclosure 2B – GFI CD o Enclosure 2C – Alternate Objective Site Consideration Summary

• Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Property (GFP) (NOT APPLICABLE) The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance (POP) in the most efficient and cost-effective manner as supported by a cost benefit analysis and exit strategy that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. However, costs should be commensurate with the level of effort required to achieve each PO and all potential technical contingencies within reason. Technical approaches that are simply reduced to a minimal level of effort with no well-planned contingencies provide no insurance to the Government that the POs will be achieved without work stoppages or change orders which is not in keeping with the intent of this performance based contracting effort. The AF is required to implement remedies as necessary to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) mission, by effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost-conscious framework.

The AF desires that all sites be cleaned up to standards that allow for the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. Accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are critical adjuncts to optimization success. In keeping with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-7020, the AF defines optimization under the ORC as: the reduction of contaminant mass and concentrations, reduction in LCC, or any combination of activities leading to acceleration of Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC) as a result of remedial implementation the Contractor undertakes, above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved Decision Document (DD).

The Contractor shall maintain compliance with all DDs/Records of Decision (RODs)/Proposed Plans/RCRA Permits that are currently in place until no longer required, or an alternate approach is approved. The contractor shall conduct DD/ROD amendments or Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) as required to implement new approach(es).

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission to include the sharing of information with 772 ESS, other AFCEC Contractors, and AF personnel; in cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the achievement of the POs in the Performance Period (PP) per Table 1 and work described in Section 1.3.2 of this PWS, and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within PP specified for each site. AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during the execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the POP. The Contractor’s local office presence will be relied upon to provide rapid-response actions for field activities and on-site meetings.

Site specific POs are identified in Section 1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table and in Section 1.3.2.

POs that are in keeping with standard DERP milestones are defined in Enclosure 1. In addition, for certain categories of sites, the AF has set POs based on current site conditions and consistency with the POP of the contract and ORC goal.

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

The scope of this contract is to perform environmental restoration services for the sites listed in Table 1 and Section 1.3.2. The ORC Contractor shall assume contractual liability and responsibility for achieving the POs. If the selected technical approach is not working, as demonstrated by the trends in the performance model, the Contractor shall develop and implement a revised technical approach to achieve the POs, including DD amendments, if required, to implement the remedial approach. This scope includes all known contaminants linked to the specific sites (includes contaminants on, under, or sourced at/migrating from the specific sites) without regard to quantity (e.g., plume size, concentrations). The AF remains statutorily responsible for all sites listed in Table 1 and work described in Section 1.3.2. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, as well as installation regulations, and is responsible for obtaining certifications and licenses required to complete all aspects of this project.

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial

Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RC or SC as PO for selected sites. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these objectives as identified in Table 1 and work described in Section 1.3.2. See PO definitions in Enclosure 1, Acronyms and Definitions. The performance components are described in Section 8.1.3.

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

Table 1 of the PWS identifies the following POs utilizing with optimization as follows: 1.

Remedy in Place (RIP) and Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) with Optimization, 2. DD Amendment (or ESD) with Remedy Implementation and RA-O with Optimization, or 3. RA-O with Optimization as POs for selected sites in accordance with the optimization initiative. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these POs as identified in Table 1 and work described in Section 1.3.2. See PO definitions in Enclosure 1, Acronyms and Definitions.

The optimization and performance components are described in Section 8.1.3.

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long-Term Management (as appropriate) Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or Long-Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the approved DD as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and LTM site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the PP. Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all contaminants of concern (COCs) and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

• Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint).

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

This section and the subparagraphs below describe the Alternate Objective Sites and a general overview of the work associated with these sites. Please see Table 1 and work described in Section 1.3.2 for specific elements of work required for each site with an Alternate Objective PO. These sites have complex attributes that have, to date, inhibited progress towards the achievement of RC. For Alternate Objective sites, as for all sites in Table 1 of the PWS where applicable, the Contractor shall maintain compliance throughout the POP of the contract with all existing regulatory requirements including but not limited to regulations, Federal Facility Agreement, RCRA Permits, final or interim RODs, or other equivalent remedial DDs. The Contractor is responsible for implementing changes to the monitoring program based on activities conducted in the Advanced Site Characterization (PWS Section 1.2.7.1) including the addition and decommissioning of wells in the monitoring well network as agreed by all parties and the addition of new delineation monitoring where new information indicates our understanding of the plumes is changed.

Based on technical review of existing site conditions/activities, the AF placed sites in the category of Alternate Objective if one or more of the following conditions exist:

1. Achieving RC is expected to require substantially longer than 30 years.

2. Achieving RC is unattainable with standard characterization and/or existing remediation technology due to technical or other limitations related to site conditions.

3. Achieving RC is anticipated to require advanced site characterization technologies to improve the Conceptual Site Model (CSM), determine appropriate remedial technology, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants.

The AF will use data and information obtained during execution of this PWS to determine restoration potential and future investment strategies at Alternate Objective sites. Each Sub- CLIN for the Alternate Objective sites will only be awarded if the activities are needed to determine the future investment strategy for the site. The decision to award each Sub-CLIN resides solely at the discretion of the AF.

For each Alternate Objective site, a summary of site-specific considerations is provided as GFI.

As with all GFI provided, this GFI is provided for informational purposes only; the Contractor remains responsible for developing their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the PO. The Contractor shall conduct project scoping sessions before work plan development and throughout the planning and execution of the project to meet the PO including the Installation Point(s) of Contact (POC[s]), the AFCEC Program Manager (PM) and Remedial Project Manager (RPM), the AF technical support team, and the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). Upon approval by the AF and the COR, the Contractor shall participate in scoping sessions with the regulators, as appropriate.

1.2.7.1 Advanced Site Characterization

Based on existing data, the AF has determined that the existing remedial approaches at the Alternative Objective sites are not achieving satisfactory remedial progress towards their intended goals. In order for the AF to determine the best path forward for these sites, the Contractor shall conduct Advanced Site Characterization to collect data to update and refine the CSM in order to achieve the following goals: (1) Fill data gaps; and (2) Collect data needed to:

(A) Determine why existing and previous remedial actions are not effective at achieving remedial progress; (B) Determine appropriate remedial technology(ies) based on site conditions;

C) Develop remediation design parameters for recommended technology(ies); and D) Determine extent and concentrations of recently regulated contaminants, if required.

Advanced Site Characterization includes one or more of the following three activities: (1) Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), (2) Revised CSM, and (3) Groundwater Monitoring Program Update.

1.2.7.1.1 Supplemental Site Investigation

The Contractor shall conduct an SSI to collect data necessary to improve the CSM, determine appropriate remedial technology, support remediation design and construction, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants. The Contractor shall implement advanced characterization methods, both established approaches and state-of-science techniques consistent with AF, regulatory, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC), and Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program/Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (SERDP/ESTCP) guidance to attain these objectives. Data collection includes better definition of the geology, hydrogeology, geochemistry, and/or source(s) and distribution of COCs, as required. The Contractor shall evaluate the need for, and collect the following data where appropriate: (1) Source Zone Delineation; (2) Source Mass/Extent1,2,3; (3) Vertical and lateral extent of contamination, if not sufficiently defined; (4) Plume Stability4; (5) Migration pathway, rates, and fluxes in 3-D; (6) Mass distribution; (7) Biogeochemical conditions and influences on contaminant degradation pathways; (8) Impact of recent and historical remedies on site conditions; and (9) Comprehensive Risk including the vapor intrusion pathway.

The SSI report shall document data collection efforts to include a risk evaluation, if appropriate.

The Contractor shall evaluate and provide recommendations regarding whether additional source control is needed or whether the plume, or portions of the plume, are amenable to natural attenuation by conducting source strength and plume stability evaluations as needed.

1.2.7.1.2 Conceptual Site Model

The Contractor shall develop a revised CSM in 3-D to include establishing or updating existing fate and transport models based on existing data and data gathered during the SSI. The CSM should cover the source area and the distal plume, to include the lateral and vertical extent of the contaminants in the context of geologic/hydrogeological parameters and the remedial actions conducted to date.

1.2.7.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Program Update

The Contractor shall evaluate the current horizontal and vertical well distribution to determine if the following can be properly evaluated:

Remedy performance in treatment areas Hydrogeology, plume geometry, horizontal and vertical plume stability, and matrix diffusion across site Plume migration through use of perimeter/boundary wells and sentinel wells Based on the well network evaluation coordinated and approved by the Government and regulators (if required), the Contractor shall optimize the monitoring well network to include adjusting sample collection frequency and the addition of new wells as appropriate. The Contractor shall update the Basewide or Site-Specific Monitoring Plan or another equivalent document, as appropriate.

1 ITRC. (2015). Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tool Selection.

2 SERDP/ESTCP. (2012). Matrix Diffusion Tool Kit.

3 USEPA. (2009). Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Sites with LNAPL.

4 USEPA. (2014). High Resolution Site Characterization for Groundwater Short Course, 23rd Annual NARPM Training Program.

1.2.7.2 Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation

Based on all existing data and data gathered during the Advanced Site Characterization, the Contractor shall evaluate the existing active and/or passive remedy(ies)5,6,7. The Contractor shall provide recommendations to augment, modify, and/or replace the existing remedy8. The evaluation and recommendations will include a cost-benefit analysis and evaluation of the usability, expandability, and/or discontinued use of any existing infrastructure. All remedy recommendations must include a performance model addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

Where necessary to evaluate the proposed technology, the Contractor shall conduct pilot scale technology demonstrations. The Contractor shall identify appropriate remedial technologies and target zones, design/plan, conduct, and evaluate the pilot and/or field scale technology consistent with AF, regulatory, and ITRC guidance. The Contractor shall determine performance monitoring criteria and identify a control sub-site (current state) for comparison and to evaluate results.

In some instances, achievement of RC may not be feasible with currently available technologies within a reasonable timeframe. If this is the case, Contractor shall develop and evaluate alternatives for site management that will be protective of human health and the environment. If this recommendation is made, it must include the rationale, recommended target when active remediation can cease, and a strategy for obtaining regulatory approval.

1.2.7.2.1 Cost/Benefit Analysis

The Contractor shall provide a cost/benefit analysis for proposed alternatives. Alternatives may include optimizing the remedy in the DD or other remedies with the potential for better performance. All alternatives identified should be evaluated against one another to determine which alternative can achieve RC in the shortest time and has the lowest overall LCC. The cost/benefit analysis should include:

• A focused analysis of alternative approaches, to include conceptual designs and engineering cost estimates. The analysis should identify the total cost of executing the optimized remedy (including the plan and reports).

• An estimate of the reduction of LCC of each alternative evaluated.

• Any risk inherent in implementing the alternative optimized remedy.

• A summary comparison of the LCC and risk of each alternative in a cost/benefit analysis that clearly states the recommended alternative.

1.2.7.3 Decision Document Amendment

Based on the results of the remedy evaluation and recommendation, it may be necessary to amend the DD to augment, modify, and/or replace the existing remedy. If warranted, the Contractor shall update the DD.

5 USEPA. (2010). Best Management Practices.

6 USEPA. (2014). Groundwater Remedy Completion Strategy.

7 ITRC. (2006). Performance-Based Management.

8 ITRC. (2010). Use and Measurement of Mass Flux and Mass Discharge.

1.3 Performance Requirements

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

Table 1 presents the POs, PPs, and Performance Standards associated with all installations/sites under this ORC. The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub- Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both Government and regulator) per the Performance Standard are required in writing. Additional scope discussion and limits can be found in Section 1.3.2.

Table 1: Performance Table

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard N/A Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Draft PMP within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF comments on the draft and update as necessary throughout the POP.

The AF will determine when whole document PMP updates are warranted

AF approval of PMP.

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

N/A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Draft QASP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF approval of QASP.

N/A Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS)

Draft IMS/MPS within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final IMS/MPS within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the

POP

AF approval of IMS/MPS.

N/A Basewide Quality Program Plans (QPP) for each Installation

Draft Basewide QPP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and regulatory approval of Basewide QPP.

FT006 Site Closeout Seven (7) years AF and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard FT007 RIP and RA-O with optimization in accordance with the approved ROD/DD Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly Operations and Maintenance [O&M] Reports, etc.).

FT008 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

LF010 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF011 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

LF033 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

LF034 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

OT547 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

OW026 DD Seven (7) years AF and regulatory approval of ROD/DD (i.e., AF and regulatory signatures on Final ROD/DD).

OW041 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

OW045 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

OW545 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SS001 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SS003 Alternate Objectives:

1) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program Update)

2) Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation (including results of any pilot study)

3) DD Amendment

Ten (10) years AF and regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Base-wide Monitoring Plan.

AF approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

AF and regulatory approval of ESD or ROD Amendment (i.e., AF and regulatory signatures on Final ESD or ROD Amendment).

SS012 Site Closeout Ten (10) years AF and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

SS014 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Five (5) years AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SS019 DD Ten (10) years AF and regulatory approval of ROD/DD (i.e., AF and regulatory signatures on Final ROD/DD).

SS044 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

SS548 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

ST017 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

ST024 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

TU036 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports, Monthly O&M Reports, etc.).

TU546 Alternate Objectives:

4) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program Update)

5) Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation (including results of any pilot study)

6) DD Amendment

Eight (8) years AF and regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Base-wide Monitoring Plan.

AF approval of the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

AF and regulatory approval of ESD or ROD Amendment (i.e., AF and regulatory signatures on Final ESD or ROD Amendment).

TU601 Site Closeout Five (5) years AF and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site Closeout Report and Well Abandonment Confirmation Report).

ZZ047 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ZZ048 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ZZ049 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land Use Control Inspection Reports).

ZZ052 DD Seven (7) years AF and regulatory approval of ROD/DD (i.e., AF and regulatory signatures on Final ROD/DD).

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits

In addition to the requirements identified in Table 1, the Contractor shall be responsible for:

O&M of all remediation equipment to include all wells associated with requirements in this PWS and well abandonment with AF and regulatory approval (if required) when the well is no longer necessary.

Establishing a quality control/quality process to ensure documents are of an acceptable quality and do not contain typos, formatting issues, contradictory information in tables and text, etc.

Contaminants for which there are promulgated federal, state, or local standards.

In the case of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate/Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOS/PFOA), Office of the General Counsel (OGC) approval for use of promulgated state or local Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) standards as Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements at the time of final solicitation

Contaminants which become regulated under new or revised federal, state, or local standards, or OGC approval for PFOS/PFOA, after award (e.g., reduction in MCL levels, promulgation of emerging contaminants, etc.) may be managed via modification.

Implementing Step 1 sampling (as well as Steps 2 and 3 if warranted) as described in “Interim Air Force Guidance on Sampling and Response Actions for 1,4-Dioxane at Operational and [Base Realignment and Closure] BRAC Installations,” dated 24 May 2013.

The Contractor shall perform the Step 1 sampling as described in the interim guidance for the following sites: No applicable sites under this ORC.

Management and disposal of waste media associated with PFOS/PFOA in accordance with the “AF Guidance Memorandum Establishing Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)- Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance” dated 05 September 2019. This guidance applies only to validated PFOS/PFOA sites. The following sites are validated PFOS/PFOA sites; therefore, the Contractor shall test waste media for PFOS/PFOA and dispose of it in accordance with the guidance.

• FT007, FT008, SS003, TU601

Ensuring that remedial actions do not negatively impact the distribution of any other contaminants and/or emerging contaminants (e.g., PFOA, PFOS, 1,4-dioxane).

The Contractor will provide annual updated base-wide groundwater potentiometric surface map, groundwater monitoring well locations, and groundwater plume maps by utilizing the most recent geographic information system (GIS) files.

• Maps will incorporate data from on-base sites included and not included in the ORC contract.

• The RPM will provide analytical data for sites not included in the ORC.

The Contractor shall be responsible for annually updating the existing McConnell AFB

Microsoft Access Groundwater Monitoring Well (GWMW) Database for sites included in the ORC contract.

• All GWMW construction details and logs, and/or well abandonment reports for sites not included in the ORC contract will be provided by the RPM.

• The Contractor will accomplish an annual inspection for all GWMWs included in the McConnell AFB GWMW database.

• The Contractor shall document the condition of each GWMW wellhead. This information shall be used to update the GWMW database, and to submit a well inspection report with recommendations for needed GWMW wellhead repairs.

• The Contractor is responsible for repairing GWMW wellheads for all sites included in the ORC contract.

• The Contractor is responsible for GWMW abandonments for all sites included in the ORC contract. This will include drafting a GWMW abandonments work plan approved by the AF and KDHE for proper disposal of abandonment waste, and submittal of all required documentation to the KDHE.

The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining and updating the Installation-Wide Groundwater Monitoring Plan (GWMP) for all sites included in the ORC contract. The Contractor will not revise the Installation-Wide GWMP without concurrence from the AF and KDHE and will submit revised documents to and the AF and KDHE for review and approval.

The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the Installation Control Implementation Plan (ICIP). This will include annual review and issuing revised ICIP documents as needed; accomplishing annual inspections for all sites included in the ICIP;

documenting inspection findings on a site ICIP inspection form; and submitting completed inspection forms to the RPM.

The Contractor shall revise the base Background Metals Study by incorporating all available soil and groundwater data.

The Contractor shall update the Installation Public Relation Plan every 5 years and submit it to the base RPM, PM, the ORC Contracting Agent, and 22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs Office (22 ARW/PA) for review and comment. The document is not considered final until all comments are addressed.

The Contactor shall demolish GW treatment buildings for legacy systems at Sites FT007, LF011, and SS001. One (1) legacy system is at Site FT007; one (1) legacy system is at Site LF011, and one (1) legacy system is at Site SS001. CDRL 0013

• Groundwater (GW) treatment equipment inside treatment buildings will be removed and either taken to the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office for resale, disposed of as hazardous waste, or turned over to 22nd Civil Engineering Squadron (22 CES/CEIEC) for recycling.

• The Contractor shall be responsible for the proper disposal all building demolition waste.

The Contractor shall remove extraction wells and manholes at Site LF011. CDRL 0020

• Two (2) wells are located within individual concrete containment vaults. The Contractor shall plug the wells in accordance with KDHE regulations and demolish containment vaults.

o The vaults are approximately 6-foot (ft) X 6-ft X 8-ft in dimensions, and the concrete is about 5-inches thick. One (1) well is 12-inches in diameter and the other well is 8-inches in diameter. Both wells are made of schedule 80 PVC, and are about 25-ft deep. The French drain system will remain in place.

• The extraction trench can be abandoned in place.

• The Contractor is responsible for removing and properly disposing of all well plugging and vault demolition waste.

• The Contractor is also responsible for drafting and issuing well abandonment planning documents to the KDHE, and completing and submitting all required well plugging forms to the KDHE. A letter report with copies of documents submitted to the KDHE will be issued by the contractor.

The Contractor shall provide an anticipated field schedule each week, organized by site and day, to the RPM each Monday.

The Contractor shall NOT be responsible for:

Reasonably unanticipated contaminants at sites identified in Table 1 (e.g., previously undetected mercury within a trichloroethene [TCE] plume); however, Contractors would be responsible for reasonably anticipated contaminants (e.g., vinyl chloride in a TCE plume).

Remediation or treatment of contaminants for which there are no promulgated federal, state, or local standards or AF agreements at time of contract award unless included via modification.

Official regulatory changes as documented in Administrative Code, laws, and regulations, e.g., decrease in residential Soil Cleanup Target Levels, Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels, etc., unless included via modification.

Sites not identified in Table 1.

Execution of modification of deeds or other real property documentation unless otherwise specified.

Remediation of sites with unexploded ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions

(DMMs), munitions constituents (MCs) present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard, and chemical warfare material (CWM).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes;

Department of Defense (DoD) and AF instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters (including AF policy and guidance for IRP, and Military Munitions Response Program; Executive Orders (EOs), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), American Petroleum Institute Codes, National Association of Corrosions Engineers, National Fire Protection Association, Steel Structures and Painting Counsel, National Electrical Code, Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and International Building Code including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this contract. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to identify and comply with all applicable requirements. In addition, the Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the DoD Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing and The U.S. AF Construction Management Implementation Guide.

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable documents for the Installations including RODs, ROD Amendments, ESDs, RCRA Permits and subsequent modifications, Risk Evaluation Corrective Action Program documents, the Endangered Species Act, other DDs, Deeds, waste management guidance, and conveyance notices.

The information provided in this PWS is not intended as a substitute for complete analysis of technical data available, nor is it intended to be a guide on how the Contractor should address achievement of the POs.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

GFI is contained in the Administrative Record (https://ar.afcec-cloud.af.mil/) or listed in Enclosure 2. The AF believes the documentation provided represents the most recent and appropriate documentation available for the Installation(s) and sites identified in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract. Specific documents not included in the Administrative Record or in Enclosure 2 may be made available following a request to the Contracting Officer (CO/KO), if the documentation can be distributed in a timely manner. Electronic format is not guaranteed.

The Contractor shall properly account for and manage all new and existing GFP procured and utilized at the Installations as-is where-is in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Lists of current GFP are provided in Enclosure 3. All Real Property installed during the contract shall be turned over to the Government consistent with procedures identified in Section 8.3.3.

The Contractor is responsible for providing all other supplies and equipment, not already installed, and not listed in Enclosure 3, that are required to achieve the POs of this contract. All AF-owned property, including real property used for remediation purposes must be maintained by the Contractor in accordance with applicable maintenance requirements and usability for the intended purpose. The Contractor is responsible for disposal of unneeded, unusable, or obsolete GFP as required, and transition of remaining GFP to other AF Contractors at the end of the contract POP. Prior to disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment listed in Enclosure 3, the Contractor shall coordinate activities with the CO/KO for disposition instructions.

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall implement a full range of environmental remediation activities as required to meet objectives of this contract and in accordance with all applicable or relevant and appropriate federal, state, and local laws and regulations; DoD policies; and Installation-specific orders, agreements, or rules. The Contractor shall supply all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to accomplish the work through the entire POP of the contract. The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, including performance measurement and fund status reporting.

The PMP, IMS, and MPS documents shall be fully integrated and consistent. Consistency shall be maintained throughout the POP by fully implementing programmatic change control processes compliant with EC 5.2.1 (Execution of Change Control Boards) and Project Management Institute guidance. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to clearly demonstrate an applied understanding and compliance with ORC requirements, application of guidance/requirements, and consistency between the PMP, IMS, and MPS. The Contractor shall create a single file for the IMS and MPS files and deliver them as separate files as required.

4.1 Project Management Plan

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed PMP. The PMP shall specify the project’s resources and tasks corresponding to the Sub-CLINs for this contract as required for the planning, execution, control, and completion of the stated POs. At a minimum, the PMP shall include the following sections: technical approach for achieving the POs in accordance with the PWS, management approach including sub-contractor management, organization and integration of the project team, schedule management, project controls, transitional activities, risk management, quality management, health and safety management, procurement management, security management, and communications plans. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) Program Management Plan (PMP) Guidance” latest version, as well as standard industry practice. Clarification on PMP content and the level of detail required to address the ORC program shall be provided by the COR.

The PMP shall demonstrate a comprehensive decomposition of each work package/PO deliverable and exhibit a clear and concise correlation between the PWS, IMS, and MPS. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the guidance for the Development of Contract Line Item Number Structures, Integrated Master Schedules, and Milestone Payment Schedules (CLIN, IMS, MPS Guidance) per the latest version of the “Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) PMP Guidance.”

The first draft of the PMP shall be due within sixty (60) calendar days of contract award. The Draft PMP and subsequent revisions shall be subject to AF review and approval. The Final PMP shall be due within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of AF comments on the Draft versions.

The Contractor shall maintain the PMP throughout the duration of the contract utilizing dated page changes and track change deletions and insertions (electronic copies) as practicable. Whole document PMP updates during the life of the ORC may be necessary based on the accumulation of small incremental changes or significant changes (e.g., contract requirements, technical approaches, risk and issue management, or key personnel). The Contractor shall prepare two whole document updates during the POP of the ORC. The AF will determine when PMP updates are warranted.

4.2 Schedule and Planning Requirements – Integrated Master Schedule The Contractor shall prepare and submit an IMS in hardcopy and in electronic format (Microsoft Project, Adobe Acrobat portable document file (.pdf), and Microsoft Excel).

The following are minimum AF requirements for the IMS:

• Presents a realistic sequence and timing of all activities and documents necessary to demonstrate achievement of the PO within the PP. The IMS shall demonstrate full compliance with the PWS, including achieving POs within the required PP.

• Utilizes a realistic calendar (i.e., work week of five eight-hour days, no submittals on Federal holidays, etc.), appropriate logic ties, clearly defined constraints, and identifies key points where risk mitigation/contingency actions may need to be taken.

• Includes the following columns in the exact order as shown below:

o Installation Name: Identify Enterprise Environmental, Safety, and Occupational

Health Management Information System (EESOH-MIS) Installation Name per Table 1. The Installation name must be included in the first line of every Sub- CLIN, at a minimum.

o Site Number: Identify EESOH-MIS Site ID per Table 1 and Site Alias, if applicable. The EESOH-MIS Site ID must be included on every line of the IMS where applicable.

o CLIN/Sub-CLIN: Identify CLIN and/or Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

The Sub-CLIN must be included on every line of the IMS.

Note Sub-CLINs for compliance activities (routine regulatory requirements to comply with binding agreements) are denoted as ####CX and Sub-CLINs for performance activities (remedial advancement or progress towards the PO) are denoted as ####AX.

o Task Description: Include detailed description of all activities (e.g., meetings, permitting, site access, work plans, mobilization, field work, documents, reviews, coordination with stakeholders, etc.) associated with achievement of the PO, and a clear indication of regulatory CERCLA and RCRA phase completions (e.g., RIP Achieved, RC Achieved, etc.) and PO achievement.

o Activities should not be grouped together; every activity must have a separate entry. The IMS must show separate activities for sample collection, sample analysis, data validation, Environmental Resources Program Information Management System (ERPIMS) upload, injections (mobilization, substrate injection, demobilization), and well installation (mobilization, drilling/well completion, demobilization).

o Start and Finish Dates: Document Start date and Finish date for each required activity and document, including appropriate durations and Government and Regulatory review periods in accordance with Section 6.2 of the PWS.

a.…