Draft Att. 9 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Force Protection Small/Large
- Solicitation number
- N00024-21-R-2270
About this file
This document contains a draft past performance questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation for workboat docking services. The past performance questionnaire is to be filled out by offerors and their references to assess performance on prior similar contracts. It requests information on five performance factors: overall contract performance, technical performance, schedule performance, management performance, and customer relations. Ratings of excellent, good, acceptable, marginal, or unacceptable are to be selected for each factor, with optional comments. The related federal contract opportunity synopsis indicates this is a draft pre-solicitation for force protection small and large vessel services. It encourages review and feedback of the draft documents but notes this is not a final RFP and the government is not committed to any procurement. The Naval Sea Systems Command will be the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft Att 2 Specification Response Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft Att 1_2020-001 CNIC FP Sm Lg Specification DRAFT_04MAY21.pdf | ||
| Draft Att. 8 - Past_Performance & Experience.doc | DOC document | |
| Draft Solicitation 5-24-2021.pdf | ||
| Draft Att_3 - Spares.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft Att_10_-_CLIN_Pricing_Chart.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft Att. 7 - Technical Data Rights Assertion.doc | DOC document | |
| Draft Att. 5 Delivery Schedule.XLS | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Draft Att. 4 - Unique_Item_Identification_(UID).doc | DOC document | |
| Draft Att. 6 - Warranty Terms.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 8
CNIC Workboat Docking N00024-21-R-2270
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Introduction: This Past Performance Questionnaire is a means the U. S. Navy will use to assess Offerors' and their Subcontractors' past performance on service craft or other contracts. The Navy will review the information provided by the Offerors and their Subcontractors, and the information provided by their selected Customers/Past Performance References in the Questionnaire. The Navy may contact these customers/references and use other sources, if deemed necessary, to assess the Offeror's and/or Subcontractors' past performance.
Instructions to the Offeror: Fill out "Part 1: Contract Description" and send it along with the "Past Performance Questionnaire" to your Customers/Past Performance References. The Customers/References will fill out Part 2 and send it to the responsible NAVSEA Procuring Contracting Officer. See Section L of the solicitation for further instructions regarding this process.
PART 1: CONTRACT DESCRIPTION
Customer/Past Performance Reference (FSCM, CAGE, and DUNN number):
NAME OF CONTRACTOR BEING EVALUATED:
Contract Number:
Date Awarded:
Contract Type (e.g., Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, Cost Reimbursement, etc.):
Brief Description of the Scope of Work, and if applicable, any Challenges for the above contract:
Customer's Buyer, Procurement Agent, Contracting Officer, etc.:
Phone Number:
E-mail Address:
Customer's Technical Representative, Project Engineer, etc., if applicable:
Phone Number:
E-mail Address:
Contract Award Amount Including Options: $
Total Amount of Modifications Excluding Options Exercised: $ Total contract Value At Time of Contract Completion: $
Contract Completion Date Including Exercised Options:
Required original delivery schedule, actual delivery date, and explanation for any change from the original delivery schedule:
PART 2:
Past Performance Questionnaire
Instructions for Customers/Past Performance References: For each of the following 5 questions, please circle the adjectival term which best describes the Contractor’s performance for the contract identified in Part 1 above. In addition, each question has an optional “Comments” section, in the event that you wish to provide additional narrative information.
1.
Overall Contract Performance:
Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to the customer’s requirements, standards of good workmanship, safe practices, compliance with contractual terms and conditions, responsiveness to procuring activity changes, and ability to overcome program difficulties.
Excellent Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
Comments:
2.
Technical (Quality of Product):
Ability to successfully perform technical requirements of the contractual effort, accomplish proposed construction processes, methods, and procedures, utilize production facilities and equipment, overcome technical challenges by applying sound business principles, complete required work, responsiveness to technical direction, and ability to integrate as a team with the Government.
Excellent Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
Comments:
3.
Schedule Performance:
Ability to successfully meet the schedule requirements of the subject effort, develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules, ability to overcome schedule difficulties, and any terminations or serious considerations of terminations due to inability to meet schedule predictions.
Excellent Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
Comments:
4.
Management Performance:
Ability to successfully manage the contracted effort, including management of change, organization, manning, workload forecasting, material management (including Government furnished), accommodation of personnel from other Government agencies and authorized private contractors, accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract, quality and timeliness of cost reporting and estimating systems, and any terminations or serious considerations of terminations due to inability to meet cost predictions.
Excellent Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
Comments:
5. Customer Relations:
Degree of customer satisfaction based on the Contractor’s cooperative behavior, general business-like concern for the interest of the customer, customer focused practices, cooperative nature in resolving issues, and ability to solve problems without extensive guidance from procuring/supervising activity counterpart.
Excellent Good Acceptable Marginal Unacceptable
Comments:
Signature
Date _______________ Printed Name
And Title
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .