RFC_ANSWERS_DOL-ETA-15-R-00049_0002_2015_04_22_.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 782 KB Posted Apr 23, 2015

Attached to: Operation of the Little Rock Job Corps Center
Solicitation number: DOL-ETA-15-R-00049
Issued by: Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration

About this file

From the source

RFC Answers_ DOL-ETA-15-R-00049-0002

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Amendment_3.pdf	PDF	Jun 1, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049__0002.docx	DOCX document	Apr 23, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049_Amendment_0002.pdf	PDF	Apr 23, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049__Amendment_0001.pdf	PDF	Mar 27, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049__0001.pdf	PDF	Mar 27, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049__0001.docx	DOCX document	Mar 27, 2015
DOL-ETA-15-R-00049_LittleRock.docx	DOCX document	Mar 13, 2015

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Questions DOL-ETA-15-R-00049 - Amandment 0002 Per RFP Section L.8 - Requests for Clarification

Name	Email	Company	Questions	Answers	Amend RFP
			Under recently issued Job Corps Center RFPs the following requirements were to be included in the 20 page count Staff Resources Proposal (PRH Chapter 5) under the following:	As follows, e) and f):	Yes
			e) Corporate Oversight: Explanation of corporate services and support (General and Administrative services) that will be provided to this contract. Describe the experience and specific areas of expertise of corporate staff that will provide oversight.	Corporate Oversight was inadvertently omitted from RFP Section L L.6.I.3, and is reinserted as L.6.I.3 e) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes
			f) Staff Development & Incentives: A narrative detailing what efforts the contractor will make to develop retain, and reward staff. Include what specific incentives will be provided and how these may be earned. In addition, include what specific positions will be eligible for an incentive payment, timetable for such payment and whether or not such payments will be charged to this contract.	Staff Development & Incentives was inadvertently omitted from Section L.6.I.3, and is reinserted as L.6.I.3 f) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes

The Staff Development & Incentives provisions have been modified and have been relegated to Clause H.30, page 45 of the RFP. There is no Section H.30, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND INCENTIVES. See RFP Section L.6.I.3 f) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002. Yes

Was the Corporate Oversight provision inadvertently omitted?	Corporate Oversight was inadvertently omitted from L.6.I.3, and is reinserted as L.6.I.3 e) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes
If the corporate oversight provision was not inadvertently omitted can we discuss corporate oversight as part of the 20 page limit in the Staff Resources Proposal?	Corporate Oversight was inadvertently omitted from RFP Section L.6.I.3 , and is reinserted as L.6.I.3 e) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes
Although the Staff Development & Incentives provisions are identified in Clause H.30 can it still be discussed in the Staff Resources Proposal as part of the 20 page count?	There is no Section H.30, REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND INCENTIVES. See RFP Section L.6.I.3 f) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes
By elimination of both the Corporate Oversight and Staff Development & Incentives provision from the Staff Resources Proposal is the 20 page count limit only applicable to the Transition/Phase-out Plan?	Corporate Oversight and Staff Development & Incentives were inadvertently omitted from RFP Section L.6.I.3; and are reinserted as L.6.I.3 e) and f) in the conformed RFP under this Amendment 0002.	Yes

Will the government help a small company with payroll initially? I have performed on 5 government contracts but remain a small company with limited capital for now. No. The successful offeror shall posess the comensurate line of credit to begin JCC operations immediately upon award; sufficient to satisfy requirements of operating a Job Corps center’s operation for the first 60 days of operation or the ability to obtain same, e.g., a $3 million line of credit, evidence of a positive cash flow, etc. No

William Marshall wmarshall@paradigmworks.com Paradigm Works Group, Inc. C.1.A - Current authorization for the program cited is the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, should this be changed to cite the Workforce Investment Act of 2014? Yes, RFP will utilize current authorization, Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Pub. L. 113-128), 22 July 2014. See updated language C.1.A, per Amendment 0002. Yes

C.3.C13 - The table showing the Career Technical Training Offerings reflects five (5) On Center slots for ACT, shouldn’t these be shown as Off Center slots instead? The five (5) training slots for ACT will be Off-Center. See revised C.3.13 per Amendment 0002. Yes

C.13 - Please clarify if two (2) slots represent the equivalent of one (1.0) student in all cases for basic CTT and ACT represents the equivalent of a full-time student (e.g. ACT slots is equal to 2 students). For the purposes of defining training slots, one full-time student is equivalent to two (2) training slots. For example, a 15:1 student-to-teacher ratio translates to a 30:1 slot-to-teacher ratio. No

C.13 - Please clarify if ACT is on center or off center. As addressed above, the five (5) training slots for ACT will be Off-Center. See revised C.3.13 per Amendment 0002. Yes

C.3 C.14 - Concurrent training is shown as applicable to the contract. Please provide information about the external training provider including an MOU. Concurrent training is applicable to this contract, however, the selection of the exterrnal training provider and the development of the MOU between the contractor and selected training provider, is the responsibility of the contractor. No

G.3.2 - The Cost Incentive Fee write-up provided in Section G.3.2 shows a minimum cost incentive fee of 3.0% and a maximum cost incentive fee of 4.0% with a Target Cost Incentive Fee of 3.5%. These amounts do not agree with the percentages shown for Cost Incentive Fee on Attachment J-1 Cost Detail Template, or with the percentage on page 80 in Section L.6. I.4.c. Please clarify or revise. This has been revised as per Amendment 0001. No

M.4 - Please confirm the Subcontracting Plan is not required for this procurement as it is a small business set-aside. Not required for Small Businesses. No

J-10 - The Computerized Property Management Listing does not include the leased GSA vehicles used on the center. Please provide a listing of the GSA vehicles assigned to the current contract. We need this information for insurance costing purposes.		Yes - See J-10 per A-0002
	See
B.2 - Will the government please provide the NTE Ceiling levels (CRA, Equipment, CTST) for the Little Rock solicitation prior to the time of proposal submission?	See 'e' (Note) at the bottom of the last Section B page: NTE amounts will be provided at the time of award by the Contracting Officer and will not be part of the offeror's evaluated cost for the purposes of the Government's Best Value, Trade-off determination.	No

Is there a current, later than 2010, Dallas Regional CDSS Plan that we may access to insure that we are responding accordingly to regional expectations in both our Operations and BMP proposal? The Dallas Regional CDSS Plan is obsolete. To ensure that you are responding in accordance with Regional expectations, offerors shall respond as instructed in the RFP. No

What is the number and type of GSA vehicles (year, make and model will be helpful) assigned to the Center.

Yes - See J-10 per A-0002

We are requesting for the most recent MPO35, MSO20 and CTTRC for above procurement. Yes - See J-16 per A-0002

Yes - See J-16 per A-0002

Yes - See J-16 per A-0002 mailto:wmarshall@paradigmworks.com Sheet3 image3.emf image4.emf image5.emf

G13-2159N 2013 Ford FOCUS 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 157.00

G13-3841L 2012 Ford Focus 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 157.00

G32-0093N 2013 Thomas Built Other 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 1200.79

G32-0109N 2014 Blue Bird VISION 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 949.06

G43 0202N 2013 Chevrolet Express Van 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 264.00

G43-0500M 2012 Chevrolet Express Van 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 264.00

G43-0743P 2014 Chevrolet G2300 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 264.00

G43-1352H 2009 Ford F350 12/21/2014 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 313.00

Total: $3,568.85

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1/22/2015 Page 1 of 1Fleet Tracking Management System

LITTLE ROCK

VEHICLE LEASE REPORT

Reporting Period: 12/21/2014 - 1/21/2015

Tag Number Year Make Model Charge

Date Mileage

Surcharge Fuel

Vehicle Type

Other

Charges Total Cost image1.emf