OMNIBUS AMENDMENT 0001.DOC

5. PROJECT NO.

CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR AC- KNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 10-83)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

BY

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required) (If applicable)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X) (X)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 4/07/2010 24-101A-2606 OASAM Office of Procurement Services U. S. Department of Labor

RM S4307

200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington DC 20210 OASAM Office of Procurement Services U. S. Department of Labor

RM S4307

200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington DC 20210 To all Offerors/Bidders

DOL110RP20850

03-24-2010 X x x THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO POST RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS (SEE CONTINUATION PAGE).

TOVA C. STEIN

CONTRACTING OFFICER

CONTINUATION PAGE

Question 1: REDACTED is an 8(a) firm specializing in program evaluation, data analysis/management and IT support services. I would greatly appreciate it if you could let me know whether the above referenced solicitation is a single-award or multiple-award contract.

Response to Question 1: We anticipate a single-award contract.

Question 2: Is this a new requirement? If not then who is the incumbent and what is the contract number?

Response to Question 2:

The work under this contract combines work previously provided under various contracts with new requirements. The incumbent contractors for some of the work under this requirement are:

Smart Innovative Solutions, LLC contract number: DOLJ099A28949

POP: 6/01/09-5/31/10, contract value: $626,767.50

Smart Innovative Solutions, LLC contract number: DOLJ099A29350

POP: 6/1/09-5/31/10, contract value: $542,551.76

Smart Innovative Solutions, LLC contract number: DOLB099A28963

POP: 6/15/09-5/31/10, contract value: $374,690.90

Qsack and Associates, INC. contract number: DOLJ099A28900

POP: 6/15/09-5/31/10, contract value: $127,335.60

Qsack and Associates, INC. contract number: DOLJ099A28901.

POP: 6/24/09-5/31/10 contract value: $194,616.00

Tcoombs and Associates, LLC contract numbers DOLJ099A28899

POP: 6/9/09-5/31/10 contract value: $601,004.64

Manila Consulting Group, INC. contract number DOLJ099A28907

POP: 6/1/09-5/31/10 contract value: $1,054,199.99

Question 3: Is this entire package a set aside for 8(a) firms and other firms should not apply? The notation at the top of Section B refers to the set aside.

Response to question 3:

This requirement is set aside for 8(a) firms only, under NAICS Code 541512.

Question 4: Is this a “presolicitation” or an actual RFP? The database service that highlighted it called it a “presolicitation” which may or may not be followed by an RFP.

Response to question 4:

The RFP was posted along with the presolicitation announcement on FedBizOpps.Gov.

Question 5: I am following-up on the efforts discussed under DOL110RP20850 OMNIBUS and am trying to determine whether or not the new notice is linked to a previously cancelled notice titled Information Technology Support for the ETA Office of Performance and Technology (released under DOL089RP20614). Is this something you may be able to assist me with?

Response to question 5:

This is a new solicitation.

Question 6: We are very interested in this opportunity and wonder if you could clarify one area of interest. I understand the existing system was developed by PROTECH. Could you tell me if PROTECH had a contractor working for them in this project, or was this an internal effort?

Response to Question 6:

Yes, PROTECH had multiple contractors work on these efforts.

Question 7: The following are a few questions pertaining to Solicitation # DOL110RP20850 (Omnibus):

Question 7a: Section 1.5.1 Work Performed Offsite (Page 8 of RFP) Question 7.a.1: Is the Contractor required to keep a mirror environment of the DOL Protech Environment or will the contractor use Citrix to access the DOL Protech Environment from their Off-Site development Center?

Response to Question 7.a.1:

The contractor has to have a mirror development environment if offsite work is deemed necessary by the government.

Question 7.a.2: If the Contractor is required to keep a mirror environment will DOL provide all the necessary equipment and core software for the environment?

Response to Question 7.a.2:

No.

Question 7b: Section H.2 Personnel Qualifications (Page 18 of RFP) Question 7.b.1: Is the Contractor expected (or required) to submit 1 person for each qualification category?

Response to Question 7.b.1:

No, offerors must propose enough personnel to fill the number of hours estimated for each labor category.

Question 7.b.2: Is the Contractor expected to submit named or redacted personnel resumes and qualifications?

Response to Question 7.b.2:

Please refer to page 91, ADDENDUM TO 52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2004), of the RFP.

Redacted proposals shall not contain ANY identifiable information which would allow the technical evaluation team to deduce the offeror’s identity. For example, the redacted (sanitized) copies of the proposal must be free of identifiers such as: the offeror’s name, any logo or marking associated with the offeror, the company’s location and/or address, the company’s DUNS number, the company’s Cage code, the names of any individuals that the offeror intends to propose as well as the names of officers or employees that the offeror employs, has employed, or intends to employ.

Question 7c: When is the last date that you will accept questions on this solicitation?

Response to question 7c:

Please refer to page 95 of the RFP, “Any questions pertaining to this solicitation must be submitted in writing via email with subject line: Questions to RFP DOL110RP20850 (no telephone inquiries will be accepted) to Lesa Llewellyn (Llewellyn.Lesa@dol.gov ) no later than 12:00 PM EST April 9, 2010. Responses to questions submitted, if/as appropriate, will be responded to via an amendment to the solicitation only, which will be posted to FEDBIZOPS on a weekly basis.”

Question 8: We haven’t spoken before but I noticed solicitation DOL110RP20850 out on the web. The work we are doing supporting egrants is a very small part of the omnibus solicitation but traditionally the business has been run through our GSA Schedule. Is this the new way you are planning on buying our services? DOL is one of our biggest customers and I just want to make sure we support you.

Response to question 8:

This solicitation and resulting contract award has no impact on the Handysoft contract.

Question 9: The government is requested to clarify on the Proposal Submission requirement mentioned under “ADDENDUM TO 52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2004)”. We are unclear on how many copies of each volume needs to be submitted including the redacted copies? Please clarify.

Response to question 9:

Please review page 91, Proposal Submission and page 92, C. Page Count (chart).

Question 10: The government is also requested to clarify on whether the Past Performance Questionnaires needs to be submitted directly by our client directly through email?

Response to question 10:

Yes, Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted directly to Lesa Llewellyn by email at Llewellyn.Lesa@DOL.GOV.