Attachment 1(F) Past Performance Survey Ratings Guidelines.doc

DOC document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Court Security Officers for the Central District of IL (7th Judicial Circuit) and Northern District of FL (11th Judicial Circuit)
Solicitation number
DJMS-12-R-0020
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 1(F) - Past Performance Survey Rating Guidelines

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment to A002 - L SECTION-L.8 - Extend Proposal Due Date.doc DOC document
A002_DJMS-12-R-0020.doc DOC document
A001_DJMS-12-R-0020.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(C) PART 2 OF 2 N-FL COST SUMMARY SHEETS.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 1(D) Pricing template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Responses to Offerors Questions.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(C) PART 1 OF 2 C-IL COST SUMMARY SHEETS.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 1(H) CPARS Update Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 7(B) Section J Annual Training.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2(K) - FD-258.pdf PDF
DJMS-12-R-0020_Final Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(A) - CIL DAN Local 151 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 4(A) - USMS Directive Use of Force.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(A) - CIL RI Local 150 CBJA.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(E) - Standard Form 1034.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(E) - CSO Form 007.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(B) - CSO Form 004.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(A) - CSO Form 002.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Interagency Acquisition Agreements.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1(A) - NFL PEN PC Local 163 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 4(B) - USMS Directive Less-Than-Lethal Devices.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(E) Past Performance Survey.doc DOC document
Attachment 2(M) - CSO Form 015.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(I) - CSO-234.pdf PDF
Attachment 7(A) CSO Semi-Auto Handgun Qualification Course.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - List of Govt Acronyms.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(A) - CIL PER Local 117 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(G) Past Performance Reference Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment 2(C) - CSO Form 005.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(A) - NFL GAN Local 165 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(G) - CSO Form 009.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(A) - NFL Tal Local 166 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(L) - CSO Form 012.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(F) - CSO Form 008.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(J) - CSO Form 014.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(D) - CSO Form 011.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(A) - CSO Form 001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(C) PART 1 OF 2 C-IL COST SUMMARY SHEETS.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 3(B) - CSO Form 003.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(N) - Standard Form 85P.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(C) PART 2 OF 2 N-FL COST SUMMARY SHEETS.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 1(B) NFL Seniority Dates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2(D) - CSO Form 006.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(H) - CSO-229.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(F) MAR.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 1(B) CIL Seniority Dates —
Attachment 1(A) - CIL Spg Urb Local 112 CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(C) - CSO Form 010.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(D) Pricing template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 49

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAGE

Past Performance Survey Rating Guidelines

Summarize contractor performance in each of the survey rating areas as Exceptional, . Assign each area a rating of either: 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the following rating descriptions as guidance in making these evaluations.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effect.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effect.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Attachment J1( F)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .