Attachment_6B_-_Past_Performance_Rating_Guidelines.pdf

PDF 62 KB Posted

Attached to
X-Ray Screening Equipment
Solicitation number
DJM-17-A32-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 6B - Past Performance Rating Guidelines

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DJM-17-A32-R-0006-0002_Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_A002_-_52.212-1_Addendum_-_Instruction_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
RFP_DJM-17-A32-R-0006_Questions_and_Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_District_Servicing_Locations.pdf PDF
DJM-17-A32-R-0006-0002.pdf PDF
SolicitationAmendment.pdf PDF
SolicitationAmendment.pdf PDF
DJM-17-A32-R-0006-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_A001_-_52.212-1_Addendum_-_Instruction_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Unredacted_X-ray_Screening_Statement_of_Work.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_-_52.212-2_Addendum_-_Basis_for_Award.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_-_52.212-1_Addendum_-_Instruction_to_Offerors.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_-_Unredacted_Product_Specification_Compliance_Worksheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_6C_-_Past_Performance_Survey.pdf PDF
Attachment_6A_-_Past_Performance_Information_Brief.pdf PDF
Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-__Pricing_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6A_-_Past_Performance_Information_Brief.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_X-ray_Screening_Statement_of_Work-_Redacted.pdf PDF
Attachment_6B_-_Past_Performance_Rating_Guidelines.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-__Pricing_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5_-_Product_Specification_Compliance_Worksheet_Redacted.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_52.212-1_Addendum_-_Instruction_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
DJM-17-A32-R-0006.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_52.212-2_Addendum_-_Basis_for_Award.pdf PDF
Attachment_6C_-_Past_Performance_Survey.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DJM-17-A32-R-0006

X-Ray Screening Equipment

Attachment 6(B) Past Performance Survey Rating Guidelines

Attachment 6(B)

Summarize contractor performance in each of the survey rating areas. Assign each area a rating of either: 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Marginal), 2 (Satisfactory), 3 (Very Good), or 4 (Exceptional). Use the following rating descriptions as guidance in making these evaluations.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not vet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .