Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

BUSINESS BROKER FOR EUROPEAN AUTOHAUS

ASSET FORFEITURE DIVISION – COMPLEX ASSETS UNIT

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-14-A44-Q-0032

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. EVALUATION PROCESS

The contract will be awarded to the responsible company whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, based on the evaluation of Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price.

Technical and past performances, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

(a) Technical Capability will be presented to the Government by means of a Written Proposal. The specific technical evaluation sub-factors, which must be addressed in the Written Proposal, are set forth below. The responses to each section of Technical Capability must contain an adequate description of the services being offered in sufficient detail for the Technical Evaluation Board

(TEB) to determine that your company can meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(b) The Technical Capability factors and sub-factors below will be used by the Technical Evaluation

Board (TEB) to comparatively evaluate each company. All responses must be presented to the TEB in the Written Proposal.

(1) SUB-FACTORS

(a) Five (5) years’ experience in selling operating businesses and at least one (1) sale transaction of an ongoing automotive repair business.

(b) Key personnel with experience in selling operating businesses

(c) Marketing plan

(d) Soliciting process from advertising through the USMS receipt of deposit of offered sale amount and paperwork

3. PAST PERFORMANCE

(a) In investigating an offeror’s performance, the Government may consider the information provided by the Contractor as well as information obtained from other sources, including past and present customers and their employees; other federal government agencies (including National Institutes of Health Contractor Performance System), state and local government agencies;

consumer protection organizations and better business bureaus; former subcontractors; and others who may have pertinent information.

(b) The offeror is required to provide a completed worksheet “Past Performance Data Worksheet”

(Attachment #6) for three (3) similar and relevant Federal Government or Commercial contracts worked on within the last three (3) years.

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, and will receive a neutral rating.

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

BUSINESS BROKER FOR EUROPEAN AUTOHAUS

ASSET FORFEITURE DIVISION – COMPLEX ASSETS UNIT

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-14-A44-Q-0032

4. PRICE

Each price quote will be evaluated for reasonableness. Price reasonableness is a comparison of the proposed price with the prices proposed by other offerors, the Government’s estimate, current prices for the same or similar services, current market conditions, as well as other relevant measures.