About this file

Evaluation Factors for Award

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
1449_Continuation_final.pdf PDF
Price_Schedule-Vessels_final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Offeror_Info_Page.doc DOC document
Vessel_Contractor_Invoice.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Written_Proposals_final.pdf PDF
SOW_-_Final.pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Data_Worksheet_1.docx DOCX document
Additional_Clauses_final.pdf PDF
DJM-13-A44-Q-0016.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

(Attachment # 4)

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

VESSEL RELOCATION, STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & DISPOSAL SERVICES

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO AND DISTRICT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-13-A44-Q-0016

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. EVALUATION PROCESS

The contract will be awarded to the responsible company whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, based on the evaluation of Technical

Capability, Past Performance, and Price.

Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

(a) Technical Capability will be presented to the Government by means of a Written Proposal and via the Government’s observations at a site visit. The specific technical evaluation sub-factors, which must be addressed in the Written Proposal, are set forth below. The responses to each section of Technical Capability must contain an adequate description of the services being offered in sufficient detail for the Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) to determine that your company can meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(b) The Technical Capability factors and sub-factors below will be used by the Technical Evaluation

Board (TEB) to comparatively evaluate each company. All responses must be presented to the

TEB in the Written Proposal, and the current or proposed storage facilities must be available for the TEB members to conduct a Site Inspection.

(1) FACILITY, STAFFING, AND SECURITY

(i) Describe how your firm’s current or proposed storage facilities (wet and dry dock) meet the requirements of the SOW.

(ii) Describe how your workforce (including sub-lets), will meet the requirements of the SOW.

(iii) Describe and provide a written copy of the Physical Security Plan for storage facilities (wet and dry dock).

(2) RELOCATION

(i) Describe the relocation process upon receipt of the STO to include towing, tugging and piloting as well as the equipment to be utilized.

(3) INITIAL INTAKE, STORAGE, AND MAINTENANCE

(i) Describe the dry dock initial intake process of a vessel.

(ii) Describe the wet dock initial intake process of a vessel.

(iii) Describe the contents of a case file and explain how it will be established and maintained.

(iv) Provide a detailed explanation of how dry dock maintenance services will be provided, controlled, and documented.

(v) Provide a detailed explanation of how wet dock maintenance services will be provided, controlled, and documented.

(Attachment # 4)

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

VESSEL RELOCATION, STORAGE, MAINTENANCE & DISPOSAL SERVICES

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,

DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO AND DISTRICT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS

SOLICITATION NO.: DJM-13-A44-Q-0016

(4) DISPOSAL

(i) Describe the advertising and marketing methods to be used.

(ii) Describe the entire online auction process from preview day through the USMS receipt of sale proceeds and paperwork (security, registration and documentation, etc.).

3. PAST PERFORMANCE

(a) In investigating an offeror’s performance, the Government may consider the information provided by the Contractor as well as information obtained from other sources, including past and present customers and their employees; other federal government agencies (including National

Institutes of Health Contractor Performance System), state and local government agencies;

consumer protection organizations and better business bureaus; former subcontractors; and others who may have pertinent information.

(b) The offeror is required to provide a completed worksheet “Past Performance Data Worksheet”

(Attachment #6) for three (3) similar and relevant Federal Government or Commercial contracts worked on within the last three (3) years.

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, and will receive a neutral rating.

4. PRICE

Each price quote will be evaluated for reasonableness. Price reasonableness is a comparison of the proposed price with the prices proposed by other offerors, the Government’s estimate, current prices for the same or similar services, current market conditions, as well as other relevant measures.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .