DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_6_Amendment_0003.doc
DOC document 61 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Information Technology Support Services 5 (ITSS-5) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DJJP-17-RFP-1022
About this file
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Amendment_0004_05.23.17.pdf | ||
| RFP_Section_Revisions_and_Clarifications_Information_05.22.17.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_1_Amendment_0003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_9_Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_5_Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_8_Amendment_0003.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Amendment_0003_05.11.17.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_A001_Attachment_1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_2.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_6.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_5.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_3.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_9.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_7.pdf | ||
| DJJP-17-RFP-1022_Attachment_8.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation DJJP-17-RFP-1022 (Amendment 3) Attachment 6
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
CONTRACTOR NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD:
DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:
Name (print)
Phone
| Contractor Role: |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Prime FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor
| Contract Type: |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Competitive FORMCHECKBOX Sole Source
FORMCHECKBOX
IDIQ Task Order FORMCHECKBOX Other
FORMCHECKBOX
Fixed Price or Fixed Unit Price
FORMCHECKBOX
Time & Materials or Cost Reimbursement
| Work Complexity: |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Difficult FORMCHECKBOX Routine
| Services Area: |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Local FORMCHECKBOX County
FORMCHECKBOX
State FORMCHECKBOX National
Please indicate your assessment ranging from Poor to Excellent in the boxes provided below. Rating definitions are found at page 4 below:
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
2. SCHEDULE:
(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
3. COST CONTROL:
(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(c) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(f) The Contractor made timely award to and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.
5. KEY PERSONNEL:
(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(b) The Contractor frequently proposed highly qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
NARRATIVE EXPLANATION (Please attached additional pages as necessary):
RATING SCALE DEFINITATIONS FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. Performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. Performance was accomplished with minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were (or will likely be) effective. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements or government oversight/assistance is necessary to meet requirements. Performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed corrective actions were (or will likely be) only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .