FBO_LRBAA_18-01_Amendment__2_-_110618.pdf

2018 Long Range Broad Agency Announcement 18-01

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate

Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA) 18-01

AMENDMENT 2

LRBAA 18-01

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION LINKED TITLE

1 LRBAA INTRODUCTION

2 PROCESS OVERVIEW

3 ELIGIBILTY

4 RESEARCH TOPICS

5 PROCESS DETAIL

6 TERMS AND CONDITIONS

7 CONTACTS

8 LRBAA ATTACHMENTS

1 LRBAA Introduction

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate announces a modernized Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA) featuring improved communications, transparent needs, submission options, and a faster response to your submissions. The LRBAA’s purpose is to fund scientific and technical projects across a spectrum of science and engineering disciplines that significantly improves or increases a capability to the Department’s operational environment and the Homeland Security Enterprise.

DHS S&T is interested in receiving research concept materials that meet one of the following three types of research areas:

• Type I (New Technologies): Scientific study and experimentation directed towards advancing unique state-of-the-art research, technology development, and demonstration. Emphasis for this type classification is on research and development, with technology demonstration in an operational environment;

• Type II: (Unique Prototype Technologies) Includes the development of prototypes that require a proof of concept, including technology demonstrations in an operational environment; and

• Type III: (Advance State of the Art Technology Improvements) Increases scientific discovery or improvements in technology, materials, processes, methods, devices or techniques. Includes technology demonstration in an operational environment.

LRBAA awards may consist of basic and applied research contracts, grants, cooperative agreements and/or other transactions agreements, to include technology development and demonstration. This LRBAA will NOT pursue the following solutions:

• Technical, engineering, or other types of support services, inclusive of “contracting”-type services;

• Evaluation of another contractor’s performance/program;

• Research consortia, association, partnership or a combination, as of businesses or investors, for the purpose of engaging in a joint research and development venture for a particular purpose;

• Mature products; or

• Development of a specific system or hardware solution.

The DHS S&T LRBAA 18-01 is a five (5) year announcement and will remain open until June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). This announcement may also contain topics with a limited open submission period. Industry Engagement materials are due by June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, EDT or as indicated in this announcement in order to be further considered for an invitation to participate in the LRBAA’s Phase I-Virtual Pitch and Phase II-Written Proposal.

Please be advised that the response dates associated with Phase I-Virtual Pitch and Phase II- Written Proposal will be the date specified in the notification letter provided to you and not the LRBAA completion date of June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, EDT, referenced above.

Technical and cost proposal (or any other material) development costs will not be reimbursed.

Technical and cost proposals (or any other material) submitted in response to this LRBAA will not be returned. However, depending on the markings on the materials, DHS S&T will adhere to FAR policy on handling source selection and proprietary information. It is the policy of DHS S&T to treat all materials as proprietary information and to disclose their contents only for the purposes of evaluation. Please note only unclassified Materials may be submitted via the LRBAA website. Classified information must not be transmitted via the LRBAA website.

Awards under the LRBAA will depend on the quality of proposals received and the availability of funds. The Government reserves the right to select all, some, one or none of the invited proposals received. , and/or to accept proposals in their entirety or to select only portions of proposals for award. The Government reserves the right to award without exchanges or discussions. Award decisions will result from a scientific and best value determination as further detailed in this announcement. Awards may take the form of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) –based contracts; or grants, cooperative agreements, Other Transaction Agreements (OTA), or interagency agreements to appropriate parties should the situation warrant.

The applicable laws and regulations governing a particular award will depend on the selected award type as referenced in the previous paragraph. DHS S&T will also facilitate access to laboratory and operationally relevant test and evaluation facilities, where reasonably available. In the event that an Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor is a Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC), Department of Energy National Laboratory, or other federal entity, DHS S&T will work with the appropriate sponsoring agency to issue an interagency agreement pursuant to the Economy Act (31 USC 1531) or other appropriate authority. In many cases, other elements of the U.S. Government are pursuing related technologies. In such cases, S&T will leverage those technology development efforts wherever it is practicable and efficient to do so.

DHS S&T LRBAA Submission Portal Website: https://baa2.st.dhs.gov

2 Process Overview

Process-Overview

The LRBAA begins with an Industry Engagement period. During the Industry Engagement period Project Managers (PMs) engage with interested sources in order to identify a broad range of qualified sources in the scientific and industrial community. Qualified sources may be invited by a S&T Scientific Review Officer to participate in the two-phase proposal process consisting of a Phase I-Virtual Pitch and a Phase II-Written Proposal. Submission requirements and details are further outlined in this announcement.

A Phase I-Virtual Pitch proposal will not be accepted from any Source that has not been invited to submit. Offerors that submit to and participate in the Phase I Proposal-Virtual Pitch may be invited by a Scientific Review Officer to participate in the Phase II-Written Proposal. Unique proposals submitted to the Phase I-Virtual Pitch that meet high priority technology requirements https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/ but exceed available funding may not be immediately invited to submit a Phase II-Written Proposal. Phase II-Written Proposals will not be accepted from an Offeror that has not been invited to submit.

The below chart maps the DHS S&T LRBAA process from the initial submission to award. The three primary submission and evaluation processes are indicated in orange and contain hyperlinks to submission, evaluation and administrative details. (Also see Section 5)

Long Range Broad Agency Announcement Process Flow Chart

Learn More-Click on Orange Boxes

Submission and Evaluation Timeframes

The following timeframes have been established for the LRBAA submission and evaluation process. Sources and Offerors should allow 2-5 days at the end of each assessment or evaluation period for administrative processing and notification. In some instances, the assessment or evaluation period may be extended due to the availability of subject matter personnel required

Industry Engagement Phase I-Virtual Pitch Offeror

Material Preparation

Prepare & Submit Written Proposal

Phase II-Written Proposal

Sources Submit

Research Concepts

Written Proposal 25 pages

Performs Qualified Source Assessment

Scientific Review Officer for the Peer Review Panel. DHS S&T Program Managers will work closely with sources and offerors to keep them informed of their submission and assessment status.

Process Timeframe Industry Engagement Assessment Response and follow-up by S&T within 10 Days Part I-Virtual Pitch presentation material Must be submitted to the LRBAA Submission

Portal within 14 Days of written notification Part I-Virtual Pitch and Evaluation Scheduled within 21 Days of the presentation material’s due date Part II-Written Proposal Must be submitted to the LRBAA Submission

Portal within 45 days of written notification Part II-Written Proposal Evaluation Completed by S&T within 21 days of the written proposals due date

NOTE: The Government may obtain support from both Federal SMEs and support contractor when completing LRBAA proposal evaluations. Support contractors may be used to provide administrative assistance to federal employees who are involved in the evaluation of full proposals. Administrative assistance would include tracking the proposals through the review process and assigning proposals by system assigned number or proposal title. Contractors will have limited system access which does not include the capability to read or review proposals. As the activities typically carried out under the LRBAA do not involve advisory and assistance services (A&AS) contractors evaluating or analyzing proposals, the limitation in FAR 37.203(d) will not apply. If the conflict described in FAR 9.505-4 is found to exist, S&T will ensure that the contractors conclude the necessary agreements, which are kept on file, before proprietary information is shared.

Eligibility

All responsible sources are eligible to submit Industry Engagement materials under this LRBAA.

Foreign or foreign-owned sources are advised that their participation is subject to foreign disclosure review procedures, applicable export control laws, and other applicable federal laws, regulations, and policies pertaining to U.S. Government business with foreign entities.

Potential sources may include independent organizations, single entities, or teams from private sector organizations, Government laboratories, airport authorities, FFRDCs, and academic institutions. FFRDCs, including the Department of Energy National Laboratories and Centers, are eligible to respond to this LRBAA individually or as team members with eligible principal sources, as long as they are permitted to respond to such announcements under their applicable sponsoring agreements.

DHS S&T particularly encourages submissions from small businesses. However, no set aside of any kind will be made. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Minority Institutions (MIs), small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran owned small businesses, and HUBZone small businesses are encouraged to participate in the process and to join other entities as team members..

4 Research Topics

Protecting our nation can be complex—from rapidly evolving threats to longer-term efforts that require our attention. To fully understand the needs of our operational components, DHS S&T and Components routinely identify priority needs that require R&D solutions. The current six key mission areas are:

Securing Aviation Protecting from Terrorist Attacks Securing Borders Securing Cyberspace

Preventing Terrorism Managing Incidents

These priority needs drive DHS’s R&D investments. DHS S&T and Components look for the following types of solutions:

1. Over the horizon, future innovations that will transform the way homeland security operators accomplish their missions.

2. Near-term capabilities that will solve current operational challenges and meet the Department’s R&D needs.

3. New applications of technologies to respond to emerging threats to the homeland.

For more information about how DHS compiles these needs, visit our website at https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ipt and https://www.dhs.gov/publication/stfrg-project-responder-5-report to download our annual Integrated Product Team and Project Responder reports describing the process and priority capability needs in further detail.

(Note: Additional details for each topic listed below can be found on the DHS S&T LRBAA Submission Portal located at https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/)

SECURING AVIATION (SEC AVN)

The aviation security environment presents a constant demand to detect evolving threats while moving passengers, baggage, and cargo safely and quickly through checkpoints and promoting a positive passenger experience. The end goal is to provide non-invasive security screening at our nation’s airports while preventing terrorist attacks and ensuring speedy and lawful trade and travel.

Priority R&D needs and topics for securing aviation are:

https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/

High-Throughput Cargo Screening (01)

Cost-effective Electronic Imaging for Bulk Air Cargo (02)

SEC AVN 02-01: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- Detect explosives and other contraband in Cargo skids and pallets

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Some air cargo is transported on dedicated cargo aircraft, but a significant amount is transported on passenger aircraft. Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums containing liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies, so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. Submitters must provide their development plan to produce mature systems which can scan full-size air cargo skids (48” x 48” x 65”) at operational speed (at least 24 skids per hour), and ultimately cost under $500,000 as production units once development is completed. Proposed scanners must be able to cope with the wide varieties of air cargo, as described above. Standards for screening air cargo require updating and additional definition based on the diversity or types of air cargo. Submitters must provide a plan to develop appropriate test standards for testing cargo screening equipment.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE:

Develop low cost screening systems that can detect explosives and other contraband in air cargo skids and pallets.

SEC AVN 02-02: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- High Penetration Screening Capability for Dense (consolidated) Air Cargo Skids.

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Some air cargo is transported on both dedicated cargo aircraft, but a significant amount is also transported on passenger aircraft.

Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums of liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies, so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. Submitters must provide their development plan to produce systems which can scan full-size air cargo skids (48” x 48” x 65”) at speeds exceeding 24 skids per hour and which will provide imaging of dense cargo. Proposed scanners must be able to cope with the wide varieties of air cargo as described above. Proposals for automated explosive threat recognition algorithms to be hosted on these cargo skid scanners are also invited.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE:

Air cargo skid screening solutions which are less than $500,000.00 (US) in production quantities.

SEC AVN 02-03: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- Algorithms and Detection Systems

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Some air cargo is transported on both dedicated cargo aircraft, but a significant amount is also transported on passenger aircraft.

Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums of liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies, so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. Submitters must provide their development plan to produce systems which can scan full-size air cargo skids (48” x 48” x 65”) at speeds exceeding 24 skids per hour and which will provide imaging of dense cargo. In addition to explosives, there is a growing interest in detecting contraband such as opioids which may be hidden in air cargo.

The government is interested in developing dual-use systems which may detect both explosives and illicit cargo. Proposals for automated explosive threat recognition algorithms to be hosted on these cargo skid scanners are also invited.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: High penetration screening capability for dense (consolidated) air cargo skids.

Passenger Identification and Vetting (03)

SEC AVN 03-01: Screening at Speed-Passenger Screening Technologies

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that assist in screening three hundred or more passengers per hour with minimal need for divestiture of headwear, footwear or personal items.

Technologies shall contribute to a system of systems that provides detection at TSA’s highest security detection standards. Technologies would ideally be capable of adapting or upgrading quickly to respond to emerging threats. Of highest interest are technologies that contribute to a system of systems that can adapt dynamically to TSA-provided individual risk assessments.

Technologies shall be networkable and support cybersecurity best practices.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

Rapid Detection and Alarming of Explosives (04)

SEC AVN 04-01: Detection Canines-Canine Structure and Function

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Canine R&D Structure and Function, part of the program focusing on the more basic understanding of canine behavior, genetics, olfaction and cognition of this detector to improve operational efficiencies and training methods.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I

TRL SOUGHT: 4-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-02: Detection Canines-Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids, specifically targeting the creation of low cost, non-hazardous emerging threat and conventional explosive training aids, with state-of-the-art laboratory technology for odor validation to the level of canine detection. The program is also interested in odor generalization analysis studies to reduce requisite numbers of trained odors.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II

TRL SOUGHT: 4-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-03: Detection Canines-Canine Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids, specifically targeting the creation of low cost, non-hazardous emerging threat and conventional explosive training aids, with state-of-the-art laboratory technology for odor validation to the level of canine detection. The Program is also interested in odor generalization analysis studies to reduce requisite numbers of trained odors.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 7-8 TRL at CONCLUSION: 8

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-04: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Advanced Algorithms and System Integration

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and maturation of threat detection and false alarm reduction algorithms, for explosives, their precursors, and/or other prohibited items; the integration of these algorithms into operational or prototype systems; and demonstration of these algorithms in real time operation. The algorithms should be deployable to improve performance of existing or future EDS systems.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 04-05: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage- Development/Maturation of System Components and Subsystems

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and maturation of system components (such as X-ray Sources and Detectors) with performance and advanced characteristics necessary to evolve laboratory and experimental prototypes into full up X-ray system designs able to meet the Advanced X-ray Systems requirements. This includes multi-energy and spectroscopic array-capable detectors, sources which support adaptive and diffractive imaging, and general improvements in efficiency and resolution. Components may be used upgrade existing systems or serve as key elements of novel system design.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 04-06: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Advanced X-Ray System Development

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and testing of full up system engineering design models (EDMs) (TRL 6-7 level of maturity). The goal is to achieve a significantly enhanced capability to robustly detect explosive threats, reduce primary baggage screening false alarm rates on all explosive threat classes, and increase passenger baggage screening throughput under real life operating conditions. The government seeks novel system concepts or novel improvements to existing system designs which will deliver enhanced operational performance.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve

SEC AVN 04-07: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Third-party test and evaluation capabilities relevant to aviation security and similar environments. Test articles which provide meaningful simulation of the checked baggage explosive detection environment. Analytical capabilities which will allow rapid, meaningful determination of system performance and provide direction for future system development. Specialized modeling and simulation capabilities that inform and support testing and evaluation activities are also of interest.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 9 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 9

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve

Distinguishing Threats from Non-threats on Passengers (05)

SEC AVN 05-01: Screening at Speed-Passenger Analysis

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that identify and assess the security risk presented by passengers at the aviation checkpoint. These technologies may be intended for deployment within the immediate checkpoint, or in a more distributed fashion throughout an airport or similar venue. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes proposals regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

Efficient and Accurate Detection of Complex Threat Concealment on Passengers and Carried Property (06)

SEC AVN 06-01: Screening at Speed-Accessible Property Screening

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that screen the accessible property of three hundred or more passengers per hour with minimal need for the separation of liquids, aerosols, gels, or electronics from baggage. Technologies shall contribute to a system of systems that provides detection at TSA’s highest security detection standards. These technologies would be able to be certified to TSA’s Accessible Property Screening System standards standalone or when integrated with other systems. Technologies would ideally be capable of adapting or upgrading quickly to respond to emerging threats. Of highest interest are technologies that contribute to a system of systems that can adapt dynamically to TSA-provided individual risk assessments. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program

(STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: S&T seeks systems that can meet or exceed TSA’s Accessible Property Screening System security standards, and significantly accelerate the overall throughput of accessible property. This acceleration may come from a reduction in the current need to divest certain items (electronics, liquids, aerosols, gels, etc.) from bags, a reduction of false alarms, faster processing, improved human-systems integration with Transportation Security Officers, or other means. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 06-02: Screening at Speed-Enabling Capabilities

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks component technologies that improve the overall capabilities of traditional checkpoint systems and their operators. These upgrades, complements, or add-ons to systems may bolster an existing capability (such as passenger screening systems or accessible property screening systems), add a new and orthogonal capability, or improve the passenger or operator experience while maintaining current security capabilities. Unique research materials to alter existing security systems should be bolstered by engagement and support with the appropriate vendors. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 06-03: Screening at Speed-Security Architecture

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

Current checkpoints consist of sensors (X-ray systems, bottled liquid scanners, passenger screening systems, explosive trace detection systems, etc.) that operate relatively independently.

S&T seeks designs and implementation plans for gaining improved performance by integrating existing or future security capabilities into a system of systems. Proposed architectures may have creative means to combine layouts, primary screening modalities, secondary screening and alarm resolution capabilities, distributed sensors, analytics, data from beyond the traditional checkpoint, and other parameters that improve the overall security posture. Performance upgrades may encompass improved security, throughput, passenger experience, reliability, or other factors. All components should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture. The end objective includes systems that are interconnected to collect and utilize security data more effectively to meet TSA’s highest security standards at throughputs of 300+ passengers per lane, per hour. The systems will also more efficiently occupy space at the checkpoint to optimize value per square foot.

SEC AVN 06-04: Screening at Speed-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks third-party test and evaluation checkpoint capabilities relevant to aviation security and similar environments to accelerate the certification and deployment of checkpoint screening systems under TSA’s Passenger Screening Program and Electronic Baggage Screening Program.

Specialized modeling and simulation capabilities that inform, accelerate, develop and support testing and evaluation activities are also of interest.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

PROTECTING FROM TERRORIST ATTACKS

(PROT)

Protecting the American people from terrorist threats and attacks is the reason DHS was created and remains our highest priority. Terrorists seek sophisticated means of attack, including chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) weapons, and cyber-attacks.

Biological threat security, in particular, focuses around the prevention of release as well as detection of and protection against biological threats and hazards known to pose particularly high risk to the nation.

Priority R&D needs and topics are:

Personal Protective Equipment for all CBRNE Hazards (01)

Modeling and Predictive Analytics for Decision Making (02)

Disease and Biological Threat Detection, Identification, and Classification in Field Operational Environments (03)

PROT 03-01: Foreign Animal Disease Vaccines and Diagnostics.

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Apply biological-based, pathogen agnostic medical countermeasure vaccine and diagnostic platforms to develop foreign animal and emerging zoonotic livestock disease vaccines and diagnostic assays candidates for testing and evaluation. Provide conceptual design and implementation strategies for modeling and analysis of foreign animal and emerging zoonotic livestock disease pathogens (at regional and national scales). Product candidates are strongly recommended to have industry involvement, and meet USDA CVB, National Veterinary Stockpile and/or National Animal Health Laboratory Network requirements (as applicable).CLOSING DATE: The last date to submit Industry Engagement research concept materials is 11:59 PM EST on August 3, 2018.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I: (Research))

TRL SOUGHT: 3-5 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: PIADC-USDA-DHS, APHIS, NBAF

END OBJECTIVE: Expand countermeasure discovery for new and emerging animal and zoonotic infectious diseases using cutting edge broad spectrum vaccines, and metaphylactic and biotherapeutic technologies. Develop end-user friendly, rapid diagnostic platforms for agricultural pathogens.

Biological Attack Verification (04)

SECURING BORDERS (SEC BORD)

Our borders are vital economic gateways that account for trillions of dollars in trade and travel each year. Border security presents complex challenges due to geographic locations, modes of transportation, trade and travel volume, and transnational criminal organizations. DHS works to secure our borders through the deployment of personnel, infrastructure, and technology— including sensors, radar, and aerial assets—and investments to modernize the ports of entry.

Priority R&D needs for border security are:

Cross-border Tunnel Detection, Surveillance, and Forensics (01)

Infrastructure Tunnel Surveillance (02)

Integrated and Improved Sensors, Systems, and Data (03)

Actionable Intelligence Gathering and Sharing (04)

SEC BORD 04-01: Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Improvements in this capability can include: (1) Research, development, tools, and technologies to improve the detection, analysis, and understanding of human trafficking, including contextual factors that may influence incidences and patterns of human trafficking; (2) knowledge to better understand human trafficking as a process and its impacts on individuals, communities, the United States, and the systems within; and (3) gap analysis to identify aspects of human trafficking (victims or perpetrators) in greatest need of empirical research.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I

TRL SOUGHT: 1-3 TRL at CONCLUSION: 3

END OBJECTIVE: Advance operationally-relevant, end-user focused applied social and behavioral science research that will enable decision makers, inform policy makers, and assist operational partners in mitigating the human and monetary costs of human trafficking.

SEC BORD 04-02: Non-Intrusive Screening of Cargo and Bulk Packages to Detect Synthetic Opioids and Other Illicit Drugs

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The ability to non-intrusively screen cargo, containers, or bulk packaged materials to detect synthetic opioids and other illicit drugs being smuggled into the United States at Border Ports of Entry (BPE) and International Mail Facilities (IMFs). Topic seeks technologies that result in improvements to screening capabilities for end-users to include

(1) advanced technologies that offer three-dimensional imaging; (2) technologies that will enable end-users to discriminate illicit materials from lawful materials; and (3) technologies that enable end-users to continue normal operations with minimal disruption to flow of commerce.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II

TRL SOUGHT: 5-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-9

END OBJECTIVE: A technology that improves non-intrusive screening capabilities to detect and interdict illicit drugs with minimal disruption to the flow of commerce, is likely to be adopted by end-users, and has a path to transition and/or commercialization.

Dark Aircraft and Vessel Detection, Tracking, and Interdiction (05)

Expedited People Screening (06)

Maritime Surveillance and Communications in Remote Environments (07)

SECURING CYBERSPACE (SEC CYB)

DHS has identified strengthening the security and resilience of cyberspace as a priority in its Quadrennial Homeland Security Review efforts. Priority areas for safeguarding and securing cyberspace are:

• Strengthen the security and resilience of critical infrastructure

• Secure the federal civilian government information technology enterprise

• Advance law enforcement, incident response and reporting capabilities

• Strengthen the ecosystem:

o Drive innovative and cost effective security products, services and solutions throughout the cyber ecosystem o Conduct and transition research and development, enabling trustworthy cyber infrastructure o Develop skilled cybersecurity professionals o Enhance public awareness and promote cybersecurity best practices o Advance international engagement to promote capacity building, international standards and cooperation

DHS S&T identifies, develops and delivers new cybersecurity technologies, tools, techniques, and next-generation capabilities that enable DHS and the nation to defend and secure current and future critical systems and networks against cyberattacks. We leverage public-private partnerships to identify real-world requirements for innovative technology solutions, which are developed with the partners and transitioned into the marketplace. Some examples of priority cybersecurity R&D needs include:

• Distributed cloud-based communications and monitoring

• Industrial control systems, cyber sensors, analytics, and prevention

• Metrics for cybersecurity effectiveness, severity, and comparison

• Data capture of networked devices for forensic examination

Website: www.dhs.gov/cyber-research

Distributed Cloud-based Communications and Monitoring – Associated/Related Efforts (01)

Human Aspects of Cybersecurity-Associated/Related Efforts (02)

SEC CYB 02-01: Identity Management

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Research and development of architectures, technologies and processes needed to enhance the security and trustworthiness of systems and services.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II, III

TRL SOUGHT: TRL at CONCLUSION:

END OBJECTIVE: Architectures, technologies and processes needed to enhance the security and trustworthiness of systems and services.

SEC CYB 02-02: Data Privacy

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Develops, tests and evaluates technical and knowledge solutions for the management of privacy threats and vulnerabilities that arise from socio- and technical policies and operations. The project’s R&D focuses on privacy risks related to:

• Connected sensor devices, mobile computing and sensor platforms http://www.dhs.gov/cyber-research

• Automation and autonomous systems

• The delivery of digital services

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 2-5 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6

END OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the Data Privacy Program is to help society realize the benefits of information technologies in the three stated contexts (connected devices and sensors, automation and autonomous systems, and digital services delivery) while minimizing their negative societal impact. Strategies for minimizing potential risks to privacy must consider a range of opportunities, from minimizing data collections to proper safeguarding of data once collected to controlling how data is used. To achieve this objective, Data Privacy calls for applied research and advanced development along a continuum of challenges, from how people understand privacy in different situations and how their privacy needs can be formally specified, to how these needs can be respected and how mitigation and remediation can be accomplished should privacy expectations and interests be violated. Finally, Data Privacy emphasizes the need to transition research results that address governmental and commercial stakeholder’s needs so that they can improve practice as necessary and appropriate.

SEC CYB 02-03: Cyber Risk Economics (CYRIE)

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Cybersecurity is a multidimensional problem that demands interdisciplinary attention. The CYRIE program supports research into the business, legal, technical and behavioral aspects of the economics of cyber-threats, vulnerabilities and controls.

CYRIE R&D emphasizes empirically based measurement, modeling and evaluation of:

• Investment into cybersecurity controls (technology, regulatory, and legal) by private-sector, government and private actors;

• Impact of investment on the probability, severity and consequences of actual risks and resulting cost and harm;

• Value of the correlation between business performance measures and evaluations of cybersecurity investments and impacts; and

• Incentives to optimize the investments, impacts and value basis of cyber-risk management.

TRL SOUGHT: 2-5 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6

END OBJECTIVE: Priority R&D needs for this program are analytics and metrics for cybersecurity effectiveness, severity, and comparison. The CYRIE program endeavors to improve value-based decision making by those who own, operate, protect, and regulate the nation’s vital data assets and critical infrastructure. As such the program looks beyond the traditional economics view of incentives for cybersecurity – where individuals are assumed to be rational actors who know how to maximize their well-being – and considers a broader array of factors that include business, legal, technical, and behavioral factors. In this way CYRIE R&D can more effectively address strategy and tactics for cyber risk avoidance, acceptance, mitigation, and transfer.

Network and Systems Security-Associated/Related Efforts (03)

SEC CYB 03-01: Distributed Denial of Service Defense (DDoSD)

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Distributed Denial of Service Defense – Denial of service attacks are pervasive and have the potential to disrupt critical network infrastructure. Topics of interest include:

• Efforts that leverage existing policies and practices to mitigate DDoS attacks;

• Techniques that adopt existing technologies for near term DDoS protection; and

• Novel approaches for understanding and mitigating new forms of DDoS.

TRL SOUGHT: TRL at CONCLUSION:

END OBJECTIVE: Results of this topic should provide new and novel capabilities and solutions to assist federal, state, and local agencies investigating cybercrimes.

SEC CYB 03-02: Federated Enterprise Environments (formerly Cloud Computing Security)

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Research and Development to build upon security in Federated Enterprise Environments—including secure protocols to protect data flow to, within and out of the federated environment; command and control (C2) infrastructure for federated environments; incorporation of adaptive defenses into federated environments; preserving data integrity; privacy constraints;

privacy-preserving computation/contract generation; and systems to identify unauthorized activity.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: TRL at CONCLUSION:

END OBJECTIVE: Research and development results of this topic should provide innovative technologies, techniques, and processes towards the creation, operation, and maintenance of federated enterprise environments and the related C2 infrastructure. Objectives include enabling local decision making given global knowledge, and the seamless incorporation of various cybersecurity technologies and techniques (Moving Target/Dynamic/Adaptive Defenses, privacy preserving and multi-party computing, deception, etc.) into federated enterprise environments.

Results are also sought to protect any cloud-based infrastructure that enables federated enterprise environments.

SEC CYB 03-03: Application for Network Measurement Science (ANMS)

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Security focused measurement and analysis for all aspects of cyberspace. This includes the Internet (e.g., Autonomous Systems, routers) or other networks (e.g. Industrial Control Systems (ICS)) that may connect to the Internet, via a static or dynamic (possibly intermittent) connection. Security focused measurement includes but is not limited to algorithms, tools, techniques, data and analysis for enabling security, from global scale to the individual user. A particular application area is SEAC: Small Enterprise Assistance for Cyber (pronounced seek), which has the goal of providing a system or method for small enterprises with limited resources to improve their security posture. This is a broader effort to develop systems or provide access to tools and/or analysts for identification and remediation of cyber incidents.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II, III

TRL…