DHS_S&T_LRBAA_18-01_-_060418.pdf

2018 Long Range Broad Agency Announcement 18-01

Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate

Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA) 18-01

LRBAA 18-01

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION LINKED TITLE

1 LRBAA INTRODUCTION

2 PROCESS OVERVIEW

3 ELIGIBILTY

4 RESEARCH TOPICS

5 PROCESS DETAIL

6 TERMS AND CONDITIONS

7 CONTACTS

8 LRBAA ATTACHMENTS

1 LRBAA Introduction

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate announces a modernized Long Range Broad Agency Announcement (LRBAA) featuring improved communications, transparent needs, submission options, and a faster response to your submissions. The LRBAA’s purpose is to fund scientific and technical projects across a spectrum of science and engineering disciplines that significantly improves or increases a capability to the Department’s operational environment and the Homeland Security Enterprise.

DHS S&T is interested in receiving research concept materials that meet one of the following three types of research areas:

• Type I (New Technologies): Scientific study and experimentation directed towards advancing unique state-of-the-art research, technology development, and demonstration. Emphasis for this type classification is on research and development, with technology demonstration in an operational environment;

• Type II: (Unique Prototype Technologies) Includes the development of prototypes that require a proof of concept, including technology demonstrations in an operational environment; and

• Type III: (Advance State of the Art Technology Improvements) Increases scientific discovery or improvements in technology, materials, processes, methods, devices or techniques. Includes technology demonstration in an operational environment.

LRBAA awards may consist of basic and applied research contracts, grants, cooperative agreements and/or other transactions agreements, to include technology development and demonstration. This LRBAA will NOT pursue the following solutions:

• Technical, engineering, or other types of support services, inclusive of “contracting”-type services;

• Evaluation of another contractor’s performance/program;

• Research consortia, association, partnership or a combination, as of businesses or investors, for the purpose of engaging in a joint research and development venture for a particular purpose;

• Mature products; or

• Development of a specific system or hardware solution.

The DHS S&T LRBAA 18-01 is a five (5) year announcement and will remain open until June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). This announcement may also contain topics with a limited open submission period. Industry Engagement materials are due by June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, EDT or as indicated in this announcement in order to be further considered for an invitation to participate in the LRBAA’s Phase I-Virtual Pitch and Phase II-Written Proposal.

Please be advised that the response dates associated with Phase I-Virtual Pitch and Phase II- Written Proposal will be the date specified in the notification letter provided to you and not the LRBAA completion date of June 3, 2023, 11:59PM, EDT, referenced above.

Technical and cost proposal (or any other material) development costs will not be reimbursed.

Technical and cost proposals (or any other material) submitted in response to this LRBAA will not be returned. However, depending on the markings on the materials, DHS S&T will adhere to FAR policy on handling source selection and proprietary information. It is the policy of DHS S&T to treat all materials as proprietary information and to disclose their contents only for the purposes of evaluation. Please note only unclassified Materials may be submitted via the LRBAA website. Classified information must not be transmitted via the LRBAA website.

Awards under the LRBAA will depend on the quality of proposals received and the availability of funds. The Government reserves the right to select all, some, one or none of the invited proposals received. , and/or to accept proposals in their entirety or to select only portions of proposals for award. The Government reserves the right to award without exchanges or discussions. Award decisions will result from a scientific and best value determination as further detailed in this announcement. Awards may take the form of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) –based contracts; or grants, cooperative agreements, Other Transaction Agreements (OTA), or interagency agreements to appropriate parties should the situation warrant.

The applicable laws and regulations governing a particular award will depend on the selected award type as referenced in the previous paragraph. DHS S&T will also facilitate access to laboratory and operationally relevant test and evaluation facilities, where reasonably available. In the event that an Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor is a Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDC), Department of Energy National Laboratory, or other federal entity, DHS S&T will work with the appropriate sponsoring agency to issue an interagency agreement pursuant to the Economy Act (31 USC 1531) or other appropriate authority. In many cases, other elements of the U.S. Government are pursuing related technologies. In such cases, S&T will leverage those technology development efforts wherever it is practicable and efficient to do so.

DHS S&T LRBAA Submission Portal Website: https://baa2.st.dhs.gov

2 Process Overview

Process-Overview

The LRBAA begins with an Industry Engagement period. During the Industry Engagement period Project Managers (PMs) engage with interested sources in order to identify a broad range of qualified sources in the scientific and industrial community. Qualified sources may be invited by a S&T Scientific Review Officer to participate in the two-phase proposal process consisting of a Phase I-Virtual Pitch and a Phase II-Written Proposal. Submission requirements and details are further outlined in this announcement.

A Phase I-Virtual Pitch proposal will not be accepted from any Source that has not been invited to submit. Offerors that submit to and participate in the Phase I Proposal-Virtual Pitch may be invited by a Scientific Review Officer to participate in the Phase II-Written Proposal. Unique proposals submitted to the Phase I-Virtual Pitch that meet high priority technology requirements https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/ but exceed available funding may not be immediately invited to submit a Phase II-Written Proposal. Phase II-Written Proposals will not be accepted from an Offeror that has not been invited to submit.

The below chart maps the DHS S&T LRBAA process from the initial submission to award. The three primary submission and evaluation processes are indicated in orange and contain hyperlinks to submission, evaluation and administrative details. (Also see Section 5)

Long Range Broad Agency Announcement Process Flow Chart

Learn More-Click on Orange Boxes

Submission and Evaluation Timeframes

The following timeframes have been established for the LRBAA submission and evaluation process. Sources and Offerors should allow 2-5 days at the end of each assessment or evaluation period for administrative processing and notification. In some instances, the assessment or evaluation period may be extended due to the availability of subject matter personnel required

Industry Engagement Phase I-Virtual Pitch Offeror

Material Preparation

Prepare & Submit Written Proposal

Phase II-Written Proposal

Sources Submit

Research Concepts

Written Proposal 25 pages

Performs Qualified Source Assessment for the Peer Review Panel. DHS S&T Program Managers will work closely with sources and offerors to keep them informed of their submission and assessment status.

Process Timeframe Industry Engagement Assessment Response and follow-up by S&T within 10 Days Part I-Virtual Pitch presentation material Must be submitted to the LRBAA Submission

Portal within 14 Days of written notification Part I-Virtual Pitch and Evaluation Scheduled within 21 Days of the presentation material’s due date Part II-Written Proposal Must be submitted to the LRBAA Submission

Portal within 45 days of written notification Part II-Written Proposal Evaluation Completed by S&T within 21 days of the written proposals due date

NOTE: The Government may obtain support from both Federal SMEs and support contractor when completing LRBAA proposal evaluations. Support contractors may be used to provide administrative assistance to federal employees who are involved in the evaluation of full proposals. Administrative assistance would include tracking the proposals through the review process and assigning proposals by system assigned number or proposal title. Contractors will have limited system access which does not include the capability to read or review proposals. As the activities typically carried out under the LRBAA do not involve advisory and assistance services (A&AS) contractors evaluating or analyzing proposals, the limitation in FAR 37.203(d) will not apply. If the conflict described in FAR 9.505-4 is found to exist, S&T will ensure that the contractors conclude the necessary agreements, which are kept on file, before proprietary information is shared.

Eligibility

All responsible sources are eligible to submit Industry Engagement materials under this LRBAA.

Foreign or foreign-owned sources are advised that their participation is subject to foreign disclosure review procedures, applicable export control laws, and other applicable federal laws, regulations, and policies pertaining to U.S. Government business with foreign entities.

Potential sources may include independent organizations, single entities, or teams from private sector organizations, Government laboratories, airport authorities, FFRDCs, and academic institutions. FFRDCs, including the Department of Energy National Laboratories and Centers, are eligible to respond to this LRBAA individually or as team members with eligible principal sources, as long as they are permitted to respond to such announcements under their applicable sponsoring agreements.

DHS S&T particularly encourages submissions from small businesses. However, no set aside of any kind will be made. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Minority Institutions (MIs), small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran owned small businesses, and HUBZone small businesses are encouraged to participate in the process and to join other entities as team members..

4 Research Topics

Protecting our nation can be complex—from rapidly evolving threats to longer-term efforts that require our attention. To fully understand the needs of our operational components, DHS S&T and Components routinely identify priority needs that require R&D solutions. The current six key mission areas are:

Securing Aviation Protecting from Terrorist Attacks Securing Borders Securing Cyberspace

Preventing Terrorism Managing Incidents

These priority needs drive DHS’s R&D investments. DHS S&T and Components look for the following types of solutions:

1. Over the horizon, future innovations that will transform the way homeland security operators accomplish their missions.

2. Near-term capabilities that will solve current operational challenges and meet the Department’s R&D needs.

3. New applications of technologies to respond to emerging threats to the homeland.

For more information about how DHS compiles these needs, visit our website at https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ipt and https://www.dhs.gov/publication/stfrg-project-responder-5-report to download our annual Integrated Product Team and Project Responder reports describing the process and priority capability needs in further detail.

(Note: Additional details for each topic listed below can be found on the DHS S&T LRBAA Submission Portal located at https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/)

SECURING AVIATION (SEC AVN)

The aviation security environment presents a constant demand to detect evolving threats while moving passengers, baggage, and cargo safely and quickly through checkpoints and promoting a positive passenger experience. The end goal is to provide non-invasive security screening at our nation’s airports while preventing terrorist attacks and ensuring speedy and lawful trade and travel.

Priority R&D needs and topics for securing aviation are:

https://baa2.st.dhs.gov/

High-Throughput Cargo Screening (01)

Cost-effective Electronic Imaging for Bulk Air Cargo (02)

SEC AVN 02-01: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- Detect explosives and other contraband in Cargo skids and pallets

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Air cargo is transported on both dedicated cargo aircraft but a significant amount is also transported on passenger aircraft. Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums of liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. Submitters must provide their development plan to produce mature systems which can scan full-size air cargo skids at operational speed and ultimately cost under $500,000 as production units once development is completed. Proposed scanners must be able to cope with the wide varieties of air cargo, as described above.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: Develop low cost screening systems (<$500,000 per unit in production quantities once fully developed) that can detect explosives and other contraband in Cargo skids

SEC AVN 02-02: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- High Penetration Screening Capability for Dense (consolidated) Air Cargo Skids.

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Air cargo is transported on both dedicated cargo aircraft but a significant amount is also transported on passenger aircraft. Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums of liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. Submitters must provide their development plan to produce mature systems which can scan full-size air cargo skids at operational speed and which will provide imaging of dense cargo. Proposed scanners must be able to cope with the wide varieties of air cargo as described above.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: High penetration screening capability for dense (consolidated) air cargo skids. As a benchmark, high penetrations skid scanners will be capable of imaging through 10 mm of steel.

SEC AVN 02-03: Detect Explosives and Contraband in Air Cargo- Algorithms and Detection Systems

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Air cargo screening is challenging because of the diversity in the commerce transported and the complexity of the supply chain. Air cargo is transported on both dedicated cargo aircraft but a significant amount is also transported on passenger aircraft. Cargo diversity presents screening challenges because systems must be capable of screening a variety of items from organic material such as flowers, fresh or frozen meats, to metal parts or metal drums of liquids. Skids of cargo may be homogeneous, or could contain tens of small parcels or boxes from multiple vendors. Cargo screening is performed by private companies so cost effective solutions are essential and software tools to assist the system operators to better detect anomalies in the cargo are important. In addition to explosives, there is a growing interest in detecting contraband such as opioids which may be hidden in air cargo. The government is interested in developing dual-use systems which may detect both explosives and illicit cargo.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 3-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: Development of algorithms and systems to detect contraband (such as fentanyl) in air cargo skids, as well as explosives

Passenger Identification and Vetting (03)

SEC AVN 03-01: Screening at Speed-Passenger Screening Technologies

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that assist in screening three hundred or more passengers per hour with minimal need for divestiture of headwear, footwear or personal items.

Technologies shall contribute to a system of systems that provides detection at TSA’s highest security detection standards. Technologies would ideally be capable of adapting or upgrading quickly to respond to emerging threats. Of highest interest are technologies that contribute to a system of systems that can adapt dynamically to TSA-provided individual risk assessments.

Technologies shall be networkable and support cybersecurity best practices.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

Rapid Detection and Alarming of Explosives (04)

SEC AVN 04-01: Detection Canines-Canine Structure and Function

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Canine R&D Structure and Function, part of the program focusing on the more basic understanding of canine behavior, genetics, olfaction and cognition of this detector to improve operational efficiencies and training methods.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I

TRL SOUGHT: 4-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-02: Detection Canines-Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids, specifically targeting the creation of low cost, non-hazardous emerging threat and conventional explosive training aids, with state-of-the-art laboratory technology for odor validation to the level of canine detection. The program is also interested in odor generalization analysis studies to reduce requisite numbers of trained odors.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II

TRL SOUGHT: 4-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-03: Detection Canines-Canine Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and Testing of Canine Training Aids, specifically targeting the creation of low cost, non-hazardous emerging threat and conventional explosive training aids, with state-of-the-art laboratory technology for odor validation to the level of canine detection. The Program is also interested in odor generalization analysis studies to reduce requisite numbers of trained odors.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 7-8 TRL at CONCLUSION: 8

END OBJECTIVE: Tools, techniques, and knowledge to better understand, train, and utilize the detection canine, and improve proficiency of the DHS/Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) detection canine teams.

SEC AVN 04-04: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Advanced Algorithms and System Integration

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and maturation of threat detection and false alarm reduction algorithms, for explosives, their precursors, and/or other prohibited items; the integration of these algorithms into operational or prototype systems; and demonstration of these algorithms in real time operation. The algorithms should be deployable to improve performance of existing or future EDS systems.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 04-05: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage- Development/Maturation of System Components and Subsystems

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and maturation of system components (such as X-ray Sources and Detectors) with performance and advanced characteristics necessary to evolve laboratory and experimental prototypes into full up X-ray system designs able to meet the Advanced X-ray Systems requirements. This includes multi-energy and spectroscopic array-capable detectors, sources which support adaptive and diffractive imaging, and general improvements in efficiency and resolution. Components may be used upgrade existing systems or serve as key elements of novel system design.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 04-06: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Advanced X-Ray System Development

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Development and testing of full up system engineering design models (EDMs) (TRL 6-7 level of maturity). The goal is to achieve a significantly enhanced capability to robustly detect explosive threats, reduce primary baggage screening false alarm rates on all explosive threat classes, and increase passenger baggage screening throughput under real life operating conditions. The government seeks novel system concepts or novel improvements to existing system designs which will deliver enhanced operational performance.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I, II

TRL SOUGHT: 3-4 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 6-7

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 04-07: Explosive Detection in Checked Baggage-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Third-party test and evaluation capabilities relevant to aviation security and similar environments. Test articles which provide meaningful simulation of the checked baggage explosive detection environment. Analytical capabilities which will allow rapid, meaningful determination of system performance and provide direction for future system development. Specialized modeling and simulation capabilities that inform and support testing and evaluation activities are also of interest.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 9 TRL AT CONCLUSION: 9

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

END OBJECTIVE: The Checked Baggage Program seeks to improve detection capabilities of currently deployed EDS systems as well as create novel approaches to solve explosive detection.

While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checked baggage scenarios (check point scenarios, other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

Distinguishing Threats from Non-threats on Passengers (05)

SEC AVN 05-01: Screening at Speed-Passenger Analysis

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that identify and assess the security risk presented by passengers at the aviation checkpoint. These technologies may be intended for deployment within the immediate checkpoint, or in a more distributed fashion throughout an airport or similar venue. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes proposals regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

Efficient and Accurate Detection of Complex Threat Concealment on Passengers and Carried Property (06)

SEC AVN 06-01: Screening at Speed-Accessible Property Screening

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks hardware and software technologies that screen the accessible property of three hundred or more passengers per hour with minimal need for the separation of liquids, aerosols, gels, or electronics from baggage. Technologies shall contribute to a system of systems that provides detection at TSA’s highest security detection standards. These technologies would be able to be certified to TSA’s Accessible Property Screening System standards standalone or when integrated with other systems. Technologies would ideally be capable of adapting or upgrading quickly to respond to emerging threats. Of highest interest are technologies that contribute to a system of systems that can adapt dynamically to TSA-provided individual risk assessments. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program

(STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: S&T seeks systems that can meet or exceed TSA’s Accessible Property Screening System security standards, and significantly accelerate the overall throughput of accessible property. This acceleration may come from a reduction in the current need to divest certain items (electronics, liquids, aerosols, gels, etc.) from bags, a reduction of false alarms, faster processing, improved human-systems integration with Transportation Security Officers, or other means. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 06-02: Screening at Speed-Enabling Capabilities

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks component technologies that improve the overall capabilities of traditional checkpoint systems and their operators. These upgrades, complements, or add-ons to systems may bolster an existing capability (such as passenger screening systems or accessible property screening systems), add a new and orthogonal capability, or improve the passenger or operator experience while maintaining current security capabilities. Unique research materials to alter existing security systems should be bolstered by engagement and support with the appropriate vendors. All systems should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

SEC AVN 06-03: Screening at Speed-Security Architecture

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

Current checkpoints consist of sensors (X-ray systems, bottled liquid scanners, passenger screening systems, explosive trace detection systems, etc.) that operate relatively independently.

S&T seeks designs and implementation plans for gaining improved performance by integrating existing or future security capabilities into a system of systems. Proposed architectures may have creative means to combine layouts, primary screening modalities, secondary screening and alarm resolution capabilities, distributed sensors, analytics, data from beyond the traditional checkpoint, and other parameters that improve the overall security posture. Performance upgrades may encompass improved security, throughput, passenger experience, reliability, or other factors. All components should conform to cybersecurity best practices and support capabilities to enable risk-based screening as well as TSA’s Security Technology Integration Program (STIP).

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture. The end objective includes systems that are interconnected to collect and utilize security data more effectively to meet TSA’s highest security standards at throughputs of 300+ passengers per lane, per hour. The systems will also more efficiently occupy space at the checkpoint to optimize value per square foot.

SEC AVN 06-04: Screening at Speed-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The Apex Screening at Speed Program is pursuing transformative R&D activities that support a future vision for increasing security effectiveness while dramatically reducing wait times and improving the passenger experience. These future capabilities will be interconnected through non-proprietary interfaces in a system of systems that is more secure, efficient, flexible, and adaptable than currently deployed sensors.

S&T seeks third-party test and evaluation checkpoint capabilities relevant to aviation security and similar environments to accelerate the certification and deployment of checkpoint screening systems under TSA’s Passenger Screening Program and Electronic Baggage Screening Program.

Specialized modeling and simulation capabilities that inform, accelerate, develop and support testing and evaluation activities are also of interest.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 4-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-8

END OBJECTIVE: The checkpoint of the future seeks to improve the passenger experience while enhancing detection capabilities. While the primary focus of the portfolio is on aviation security, technologies that also apply to other checkpoint scenarios (other modes of transportation, special events, etc.) are of interest as well. S&T understands that ‘silver bullet’ technologies that solve all possible threat scenarios are unlikely, and welcomes unique research materials regarding new capabilities that address specific threats within a broader system-of-systems security architecture.

PROTECTING FROM TERRORIST ATTACKS

(PROT)

Protecting the American people from terrorist threats and attacks is the reason DHS was created and remains our highest priority. Terrorists seek sophisticated means of attack, including chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) weapons, and cyber-attacks.

Biological threat security, in particular, focuses around the prevention of release as well as detection of and protection against biological threats and hazards known to pose particularly high risk to the nation.

Priority R&D needs and topics are:

Personal Protective Equipment for all CBRNE Hazards (01)

Modeling and Predictive Analytics for Decision Making (02)

Disease and Biological Threat Detection, Identification, and Classification in Field Operational Environments (03)

PROT 03-01: Foreign Animal Disease Vaccines and Diagnostics.

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Establish a dedicated broad spectrum vaccine, metaphylactic and biotherapeutic discovery program(s) using novel or improved vaccine platforms. Develop a portable or hand-held rapid diagnostics platform for foreign animal diseases

CLOSING DATE: The last date to submit Industry Engagement research concept materials is 11:59 PM EST on August 3, 2018.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I: (Up to $3M in research funding available)

TRL SOUGHT: 3-5 TRL at CONCLUSION: 6-7

TRANSITION CUSTOMER or PROGRAM: PIADC-USDA-DHS, APHIS, NBAF

END OBJECTIVE: Expanding countermeasure discovery and development of new and emerging animal and zoonotic infectious diseases using cutting edge broad spectrum vaccines, and metaphylactic and biotherapeutic technologies. Developing end-user friendly, rapid diagnostic platforms for agricultural pathogens.

Biological Attack Verification (04)

SECURING BORDERS (SEC BORD)

Our borders are vital economic gateways that account for trillions of dollars in trade and travel each year. Border security presents complex challenges due to geographic locations, modes of transportation, trade and travel volume, and transnational criminal organizations. DHS works to secure our borders through the deployment of personnel, infrastructure, and technology— including sensors, radar, and aerial assets—and investments to modernize the ports of entry.

Priority R&D needs for border security are:

Cross-border Tunnel Detection, Surveillance, and Forensics (01)

Infrastructure Tunnel Surveillance (02)

Integrated and Improved Sensors, Systems, and Data (03)

SEC BORD 03-01: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Detection, Tracking and Classification-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Detection, Tracking, and Classification: Unmanned Aircraft Systems can represent a threat to people, critical infrastructure, and border alike. Technologies and methods to detect, track, and classify UAS's in complex environments, including the determination of intent. Unique research material for test and evaluation of technologies to detect, track, and locate the pilot controller of a UAS vehicle. .

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 5-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: The end objective of this effort is develop and demonstrate innovative, reliable, easy-to-use, and easy-to-deploy technologies that allow the Department of Homeland Security Components to accurately and consistently detect, track, classify, and conduct threat assessments of Unmanned Aerial Systems in variable and complex environments.

SEC BORD 03-02: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Detection, Tracking and Classification-Develop Advanced Technology

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Detection, Tracking, and Classification: Unmanned Aircraft Systems can represent a threat to people, critical infrastructure, and border alike. Technologies and methods to detect, track, and classify UAS's in complex environments, including the determination of intent. Unique research material for developing advanced technologies to detect, track, and locate the pilot controller of a UAS vehicle. .

TRL SOUGHT: 5-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: The end objective of this effort is to collect unique research material that address and explore the development and deployment of innovative, reliable, easy-to-use, and easy-to-deploy technologies that allow the component customers of the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate to accurately and consistently detect, track, classify, and conduct a cursory threat assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in variable and complex environments.

SEC BORD 03-03: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Mitigation-Test and Evaluation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Mitigation: Unmanned Aerial Systems can represent a threat to people, critical infrastructure, and borders alike. Technologies and methods to mitigate either the UAS aircraft, communications links, or the controllers in environments which may be complex and/or urban. Modifications or adjuncts to existing systems that extent their capabilities to include mitigation also fall under this topic.

TRL SOUGHT: 5-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: The end objective of this effort the development and deployment of innovative, reliable, easy-to-use, and easy-to-deploy technologies that allow DHS Components to accurately and consistently mitigate Unmanned Aerial Systems in variable and complex environments.

SEC BORD 03-04: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Mitigation-Develop New or Advanced Capability

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Mitigation: Unmanned Aerial Systems can represent a threat to people, critical infrastructure, and borders alike. Technologies and methods to mitigate either the UAS aircraft, communications links, or the controllers in environments which may be complex and/or urban. Modifications or adjuncts to existing systems that extent their capabilities to include mitigation also fall under this topic.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: 5-6 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7

END OBJECTIVE: The end objective of this effort the development and deployment of innovative, reliable, easy-to-use, and easy-to-deploy technologies that allow DHS Components to accurately and consistently mitigate Unmanned Aerial Systems in variable and complex environments.

Actionable Intelligence Gathering and Sharing (04)

SEC BORD 04-01: Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: Improvements in this capability can include: (1) Research, development, tools, and technologies to improve the detection, analysis, and understanding of human trafficking, including contextual factors that may influence incidences and patterns of human trafficking; (2) knowledge to better understand human trafficking as a process and its impacts on individuals, communities, the United States, and the systems within; and (3) gap analysis to identify aspects of human trafficking (victims or perpetrators) in greatest need of empirical research.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type I

TRL SOUGHT: 1-3 TRL at CONCLUSION: 3

END OBJECTIVE: Advance operationally-relevant, end-user focused applied social and behavioral science research that will enable decision makers, inform policy makers, and assist operational partners in mitigating the human and monetary costs of human trafficking.

SEC BORD 04-02: Non-Intrusive Screening of Cargo and Bulk Packages to Detect Synthetic Opioids and Other Illicit Drugs

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The ability to non-intrusively screen cargo, containers, or bulk packaged materials to detect synthetic opioids and other illicit drugs being smuggled into the United States at Border Ports of Entry (BPE) and International Mail Facilities (IMFs). Topic seeks technologies that result in improvements to screening capabilities for end-users to include

(1) advanced technologies that offer three-dimensional imaging; (2) technologies that will enable end-users to discriminate illicit materials from lawful materials; and (3) technologies that enable end-users to continue normal operations with minimal disruption to flow of commerce.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II

TRL SOUGHT: 5-7 TRL at CONCLUSION: 7-9

END OBJECTIVE: A technology that improves non-intrusive screening capabilities to detect and interdict illicit drugs with minimal disruption to the flow of commerce, is likely to be adopted by end-users, and has a path to transition and/or commercialization.

Dark Aircraft and Vessel Detection, Tracking, and Interdiction (05)

Expedited People Screening (06)

Maritime Surveillance and Communications in Remote Environments (07)

SECURING CYBERSPACE (SEC CYB)

DHS has identified strengthening the security and resilience of cyberspace as a priority in its Quadrennial Homeland Security Review efforts. Priority areas for safeguarding and securing cyberspace are:

• Strengthen the security and resilience of critical infrastructure

• Secure the federal civilian government information technology enterprise

• Advance law enforcement, incident response and reporting capabilities

• Strengthen the ecosystem:

o Drive innovative and cost effective security products, services and solutions throughout the cyber ecosystem o Conduct and transition research and development, enabling trustworthy cyber infrastructure o Develop skilled cybersecurity professionals o Enhance public awareness and promote cybersecurity best practices o Advance international engagement to promote capacity building, international standards and cooperation

DHS S&T identifies, develops and delivers new cybersecurity technologies, tools, techniques, and next-generation capabilities that enable DHS and the nation to defend and secure current and future critical systems and networks against cyberattacks. We leverage public-private partnerships to identify real-world requirements for innovative technology solutions, which are developed with the partners and transitioned into the marketplace. Some examples of priority cybersecurity R&D needs include:

• Distributed cloud-based communications and monitoring

• Industrial control systems, cyber sensors, analytics, and prevention

• Metrics for cybersecurity effectiveness, severity, and comparison

• Data capture of networked devices for forensic examination

Website: www.dhs.gov/cyber-research

Distributed Cloud-based Communications and Monitoring – Associated/Related Efforts (01)

SEC CYB 01-01: Cyber Enabled Networked Physical Systems http://www.dhs.gov/cyber-research

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: This is a critical time in the design and deployment of Cyber Enabled Networked Physical Systems (CNPS). Advances in networking, computing, sensing, and control systems have enabled a broad range of new devices. These systems are being designed and deployed now, but unfortunately security is often left as an additional feature that will be bolted on later. Industry is driven by functional requirements and fast moving markets. The design choices being made today will directly impact next several decades in transportation, emergency response, medical devices, and so forth. To address these challenges, CSD is engaging in efforts to build security into the design of these critical systems.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: TRL at CONCLUSION:

END OBJECTIVE: Results of this topic should provide new and novel capabilities and solutions to assist DHS, Operations, and Law Enforcement components to improve the understanding and confidence of DHS and the Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) on how CNPS leverage network environments (trusted and untrusted), devices, and sensors to compute and communicate processes and the security risks and challenges associated with the appropriate level of automation, Machine-to-Machine (M2M), communications, learning, and intelligence.

SEC CYB 01-02: Internet of Things (IoT) Security (IoTSEC)

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The research and development of tools and techniques to aid DHS mission and operations components, law enforcement entities, and Critical Infrastructure (CI) asset owners and operators (to include IT and Internet Infrastructures) in addressing the security gaps between existing traditional IT networks and the broad range of new IoT devices being designed and deployed without security considerations.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type II, III

TRL SOUGHT: TRL at CONCLUSION:

END OBJECTIVE: Results of this topic should provide new and novel capabilities and solutions to assist DHS mission, operations, and law enforcement components to securely leverage, integrate, and interact with IoT systems that affect their operations and assets.

Objectives include Detecting, Authenticating, and Updating IoT devices, sensors, and systems to gain comprehensive and near continuous knowledge of an IoT environment.

SEC CYB 01-03: National Research Infrastructure of Cyber Security Experimentation

TOPIC DESCRIPTION: The results of this topic will catalyze and support the research, and development of advanced experimental research tools, technologies and methodologies as broadly available national resources. Indicators of the success of this program objective will be the realization of experimental research capabilities, and approaches that reach beyond today’s state of the art.

TOPIC RESEARCH SOUGHT: Type III

TRL SOUGHT: 2-3 TRL at CONCLUSION: 3

END OBJECTIVE: The Cybersecurity Experimentation of the Future (CEF) Testbed will provide cybersecurity researchers with the ability to run experiments on an unclassified secure “virtual internet,” through contained environments that can safely test advanced defense mechanisms against live threats without endangering operational networks. The CEF Testbed will provide the cybersecurity research community with a complex test capability and infrastructure (networks, tools, methodologies, tech support) to support national-scale testing of advanced cybersecurity technologies in an open, non-proprietary environment.