21._Attachment_G_Past_Performance.pdf

Offerors shall provide their references with the letter and questionnaire on the following pages. References are to complete the questionnaire and submit it directly to the Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist before the due date of the Request for Quote.

Questionnaires submitted by the offeror, will not be considered.

(Note: This item will not become part of the contract award)

ATTACHMENT G

Past Performance Information

DE-SOL-0006324

6 January 2014

Past Performance Reference

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information for Solicitation DE-SOL- 0006324

The Western Area Power Administration will be evaluating proposals received in response to the subject solicitation for contractor(s) for the Miscellaneous Facility Construction IDIQ. One of the integral considerations in the evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies/firms such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, and for the evaluation of their performance.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

You are urged to submit your comments on other similar contracts your entity has/had with the offeror. Any additional information that you think may benefit the Government in our evaluation of the offeror is appreciated. Please note that we may contact the offeror on problem areas or concerns identified, to determine whether corrective actions have been taken or are in process. The offeror is required by our solicitation to provide points of contact for each reference provided to the Government. The name of the individual completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed to the offeror.

Due to time constraints it is imperative that the questionnaire be completed and returned no later than February 5, 2014, to the undersigned, via e-mail at awright@wapa.gov, or by United States Postal Service mail at the address listed above.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 970-461-7523, or by e-mail at awright@wapa.gov.

Your time and effort is greatly appreciated.

Amy K. Wright Contracting Officer 1 Attachment

Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration Rocky Mountain Customer Service Region

P.O. Box 3700 Loveland, CO 80539-3003 mailto:awright@wapa.gov mailto:awright@wapa.gov

DE-SOL-0006324

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Part I – Contract Identification: Contractor/Offeror to complete Part I and provide questionnaire to reference/respondent to complete and submit to Government.

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________

B. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________

C. Project Title or Supplies/Services provided: ______________________________________

D. Total Contract Amount: ______________________________________________________

Part II – Respondent Identification: Complete the following information on your company.

You may be contacted for additional information pertaining to the performance of the contractor identified in Section I above.

A. Name: ____________________________________________________________________

B. Position and Title: ___________________________________________________________

C. Phone Number: ____________________________________________________________

D. Address: __________________________________________________________________

E. Relationship and time involved with contract: ______________________________________

Part III – Questionnaire

When responding to the following questions/statements below, choose the number on a scale of 1 to 6 which most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance.

The numbers correspond with the following: 1 = Unsatisfactory, 2 = Marginal, 3 = Satisfactory, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Exceptional, 6 = N/A.

1 2 3 4 5 6

1. Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

2. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the contract.

3. Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

1 2 3 4 5 6

4. Contractor met established schedules to complete the contract/project on time.

5. Contractor submitted progress schedules/reports as required.

6. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations as applicable.

7. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed and maintained communication to keep the project on schedule and minimize delays.

8. Contractor identified problems as they occurred, suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a team member.

9. Contractor provided experienced/qualified crew and crew leads with the technical abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

10. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

11. Contractor paid employees/Subcontractors/suppliers as required.

12. Contractor was responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals.

13. Contractor demonstrated ability to control costs.

14. Contractor provides accurate invoices that reflect actual work completed.

15. Check one box below that best describes your experience with the Contractor:

Unsatisfactory Contractor. We would not want to contract with this firm again under any circumstances.

Marginal Contractor. Numerous problems developed that were a result of their lack of cooperation and failure to perform work as required.

Satisfactory Contractor who met the minimum requirements of the contract.

Performance deficiencies, if observed, improved when identified by the Government.

Rework/warranty issues, if applicable, were performed; however, an aggressive inspection program was required to ensure compliance.

Very good Contractor with whom we would not hesitate to enter into another contract.

Problems encountered were minor and solutions were found with little difficulty.

Exceptional Contractor in every respect. Problems were solved in a spirit of teamwork. Quality work, timely service, and complete documentation were routinely achieved. We would pay premium prices to contract with them again.

16. NARRATIVE SUMMARY:

a. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in performance of the contract?

b. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in performance of the contract?

c. Please provide any additional comments concerning the contractor’s performance.