DCF ITN 2122 005_Addendum 002.pdf

Addendum No. 002

DCF ITN 2122 005

Workforce Development Substance Abuse & Mental Health

And Office Of Child & Family Well-Being

DCF Addendum Template (PMT‐12‐2122) Effective April 2022

Solicitation Number: DCF ITN 2122 005

Solicitation Title: Workforce Development

Response(s) Due Date: May 12, 2022

Addendum Number: 002

Addendum Date: June 2, 2022

FAILURE TO FILE A PROTEST WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 120.57(3),

FLORIDA STATUTES, OR FAILURE TO POST THE BOND OR OTHER SECURITY REQUIRED

BY LAW WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED FOR FILING A BOND SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER

OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 120, FLORIDA STATUTES.

DCF ITN 2122 005- Workforce Development is hereby amended as follows, all other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain in effect. All additions are highlighted in yellow, and words stricken are deletions:

Change No. 1

Section 5.2.1 Programmatic Reply Scoring:

The Department’s Evaluators will independently evaluate each Programmatic Reply in accordance with the following criteria:

Criteria Relative

Value Possible Points

1. Company Qualifications and Experience The vendor’s company structure, subcontractors and experience and capability to deliver its proposed solution including the vendor track record providing services similar to the ones specified in this solicitation.

12% 150

2. Core Team Qualifications The skills and prior relevant experience of the vendor’s leadership team, staff and resources the vendor will use in implementing its solution.

4% 50

3. Services Approach and Solution- Learning Management System The vendor’s articulation of its solution and the ability of the solution to meet the requirements of this solicitation and provide additional value regarding a Learning Management System, accessible to the public at no charge, via a Department-approved website.

44% 42%

4. Services Approach and Solution- Administration The vendor’s articulation of its solution and the ability of the solution to meet the requirements of this solicitation and provide additional value regarding the administrative tasks specified Standard Contract Part 2 (APPENDIX IX), Section C-2.

42% 550

TOTAL 100% 1,300

Addendum No. 002

DCF ITN 2122 005

Workforce Development Substance Abuse & Mental Health

And Office Of Child & Family Well-Being

DCF Addendum Template (PMT‐12‐2122) Effective April 2022

Change No. 2

Evaluation Criteria 1: Executive Overview, Section 4.2.4.2 Scoring is corrected to read:

Criteria: The vendor’s company structure, subcontractors, and experience and capability to deliver its proposed solution including the vendor performance providing services similar to the one specified in this solicitation.

Provide a brief executive overview demonstrating an understanding of the solicitation purpose and the needs specified in this solicitation. The Executive Overview includes a brief description of the vendor’s organization, leadership credentials, approach for Scope of Work services, management of Performance Specifications, and means of completing Deliverables.

Section Considerations Maximum Possible Points

Points Awarded

4.2.4.1.1

1. To what extent does the reply describe vendor’s approach and philosophy, including mission statement, core values, and vision?

The reply should demonstrate an organizational philosophy that aligns with the Department’s mission and the goals of the project.

(Superior 21-25; Good 16-20; Adequate 11-15; Poor 6-10; Insufficient 0-5)

4.2.4.1.2

2. To what extent does the reply describe vendor’s organization and governance structure?

The reply should demonstrate clear lines of authority including corporate affiliations and a lean, efficient, and effective administrative model.

(Superior 21-25; Good 16-20; Adequate 11-15; Poor 6-10; Insufficient 0-5)

4.2.4.1.3

3. To what extent does the reply describe the vendor’s and subcontractor(s)' ability to successfully complete the work?

The reply should demonstrate the capacity to complete the work, either through their own resources or subcontracting.

(Superior 41-50; Good 31-40; Adequate 21-30; Poor 11-20; Insufficient 0-10)

4.2.4.2

4. To what extent does the reply describe the vendor’s approach to subcontracting and retaining subject matter experts?

The reply should demonstrate a systematic approach to identify, recruit and retain subcontractors and subject matter experts.

The reply must include a completed Subcontractor List (Appendix IV) for each proposed subcontractor and subject matter experts, if known.

(Superior 21-25; Good 16-20; Adequate 11-15; Poor 6-10; Insufficient 0-5)

(Superior 41-50; Good 31-40; Adequate 21-30; Poor 11-20; Insufficient 0-10)

Total: 150