QASP_Campus_Wide_Doors.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24126Q0497
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5.10_Rpt14_April23_30583.pdf | ||
| EP-25---Door-Assemblies-Fire-Doors-Inspection-Report.pdf | ||
| 36C24126Q0497_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24126Q0497.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24126Q0497.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wage Determination 2015-4019 rev 33.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 852.219-75 Limitation on Subcontracting.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 FAR 52.212-1.pdf | ||
| ADDENDUM to 52.212-2 EVALUATION -Deviation Aug 2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
Campus Wide Doors and Fire Door Inspections and Repairs Service Contract
1. INTRODUCTION
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is developed for the Campus Wide Doors and Fire Door Inspections and Repairs Service Contract. It provides a structured method for Government oversight of contractor performance in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW).
The contractor is responsible for quality control and ensuring compliance with all contract requirements. The Government performs quality assurance to verify acceptable performance.
2. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS)
The following table summarizes measurable performance standards, acceptable quality levels (AQLs), and surveillance methods used by the Government.
| Performance Standard |
| Performance Threshold (AQL) |
| Surveillance Method |
| Quarterly inspections of all fire/smoke doors per NFPA 80 |
| 95% timely completion; 100% safety issues identified |
| Random sampling, documentation review |
| Quarterly reports submitted within 14 days |
| 100% on-time; ≤5% documentation errors |
| COR review |
| Emergency repair response within 4 hours |
| 98% compliance |
| Review of logs and calls |
| Annual report accuracy and completeness |
| 100% on time; 100% inventory accuracy |
| Cross-check with quarterly data |
| Material/parts proposals within 14 days |
| 95% compliance |
| COR tracking |
| Safety compliance (PPE, LOTO, Badging) |
| 98% compliance |
| Random inspection |
3. SURVEILLANCE METHODS
The Government employs the following surveillance methods:
Random sampling of inspection results 100% inspection of safety-related deficiencies Review of contractor reports and documents Periodic on-site visits Customer complaint tracking
4. DEFECT IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTION PROCEDURES
If defects are identified, the Government QA will notify the Contractor Quality Control Inspector (QCI). The contractor must correct minor issues within 24 hours and emergency issues within 4 hours. If a dispute arises, the COR will make the final determination. Repeated failures will be elevated to the Contracting Officer for action.
5. CUSTOMER COMPLAINT PROGRAM
Customer complaints may be submitted to the COR. Valid complaints must be corrected within 2 hours of contractor notification. No more than three valid complaints per month are acceptable.
6. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Contracting Officer (CO): Provides contractual authority and determines corrective actions.
COR: Performs surveillance, reviews documentation, verifies performance, and validates defects.
Contractor QCI: Implements contractor QC plan, corrects deficiencies, and coordinates with the COR.
7. ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVELS (AQLs) Emergency response: 98% compliance Routine service timeliness: 95% compliance Quarterly inspection completion: 95% Documentation/report accuracy: 95% Safety compliance: 98% Maximum customer complaints: 3 per month
8. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
The COR will assess performance monthly and annually using reports, logs, safety review results, and complaint records. Performance will be documented and used for contract administration and CPARS evaluations.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .