D.2 Attachment Saginaw County HCHV CRS QASP.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25025Q0526
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) contract with Saginaw VA Medical Center. The QASP outlines performance standards and monitoring procedures for a community-based residential program serving homeless veterans, with six key performance areas: records keeping, invoice accuracy, discharge planning, veteran satisfaction, residential outcomes, and facility management. Each performance area has specific metrics, such as 95% accuracy requirements for documentation, 55% positive veteran exit rates, and 100% compliance with safety and privacy guidelines.
The surveillance plan details monitoring methods including direct observation, periodic inspections, status meetings, and complaint tracking, with the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) responsible for performance assessment. If performance standards are not met, a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) process is established to document issues, require corrective actions, and potentially support future contractual decisions. Quarterly performance assessment meetings are mandated, with the government retaining the right to conduct unannounced file inspections at any time.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| D.3 Attachment Wage Determination 2015-4865.docx | DOCX document | |
| D.4 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire_Saginaw.docx | DOCX document | |
| HCHV Solicitation for Saginaw Michigan 36C250-25-Q-0526.docx | DOCX document | |
| D.1 Attachment Immigration Certification.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV)
INTRODUCTION
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed to evaluate Contractor actions while implementing this Performance Work Statement (PWS). It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring Contractor performance for each listed objective on the Service Delivery Summary (SDS) in this contract.
The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services the Contractor is required to furnish.
PURPOSE
The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. The role of the Government is quality assurance to ensure contract standards are achieved.
This QASP does not detail how the Contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the Contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In this contract the quality control program is the driver for product quality. The Contractor is required to develop a comprehensive program of inspections and monitoring actions. The first major step to ensuring a “self-correcting” contract is to ensure that the quality control program approved at the beginning of the contract provides the measures needed to lead the Contractor to success. This QASP explains the following:
· What shall be monitored
· How monitoring shall take place
· Who shall conduct the monitoring
· How monitoring efforts and results shall be documented
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the Contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards. The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix is incorporated within this QASP to include performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine Contractor performance and shall compare Contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) defined below for each performance requirement.
| Task |
| Standard |
| Performance Threshold/ |
Acceptable Quality Level
| Surveillance Method |
| Performance Acceptable/ |
Unacceptable
A. Records keeping for homeless Veterans
1. 95% of daily sign-in sheets are signed by the Veteran;
2. 95% of Individualized Care Plans (ICP’s) are completed within 14 days of admission
3. 95% of progress notes are completed for Veterans to outline services provided in accordance with PWS
95% of randomly selected cases
Review by Saginaw VAMC staff monthly, quarterly, and annually with random reviews
YES ☐
NO ☐
B. Accuracy of Invoices
1. 95%)Invoices submitted to the COR for payment have the accurate per diem rate, number of bed days billed, dates, and the Contractor identification information.
2. 95% of the invoices will be submitted in conjunction with the daily sign-in sheets to allow the COR to verify the accuracy of the invoice.
3. 95% of invoices are submitted to the COR by the tenth of each month.
95% of the time
Review by COR monthly
YES ☐
C. Discharge Plans
1. 95% Veterans are continually engaged in discharge planning with Contractor’s staff, in conjunction with Homeless Program case manager. This discharge planning includes discussion of available and appropriate housing placements and treatment options.
2. 95% of the Contractor’s discharge forms are submitted to the COR on a monthly basis with the daily sign-in sheets and invoice.
3. 95% of the discharge forms are completed accurately to reflect the type of discharge and housing placement upon discharge.
Review by COR on a monthly basis
YES ☐
D. Homeless Veteran Satisfaction
1. 95% Veteran satisfaction rate with the services provided by the Contractor;
2. 95% of complaints received by the Contractor are dispositioned within 24-48 hours of the complaint by the Contractor;
3. 95% of complaints are reported to the COR within 24-72 hours of the complaint
Review by COR on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis
YES ☐
| E. Residential Outcomes |
| 1. In conformance with VHA National Homeless Program Performance Measures; at least 55% of Veteran’s discharged from the Contractor’s facility will have a positive exit; |
2. no more than 20% of those Veterans discharged from the Contractor’s facility will have a negative exit.
| 55% positive exits; no more than 20% negative exits |
| Monthly review by COR |
| YES ☐ |
| F. Emergency housing and facilities management |
| 1. 100% compliance with the facility meeting fire, safety and Americans with Disabilities Act, and Licensure |
2. 100% compliance with Veteran privacy guidelines. The facility has adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure conformity to confidentiality
| 100% of the time |
| COR and HCHV Liaison review monthly, quarterly, and annually with random audits |
| YES ☐ |
SURVEILLANCE
The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
A. Direct Observation. Direct observation shall be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance. All Performance Standards B. Periodic Inspection. Evaluate outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Annually or unscheduled, as required. All Performance Standards C. Progress or status meetings. All Performance Standards D. Complaints. Complaints from agency personnel shall be passed to the COR for correction. All Performance Standards
STANDARD
Customer complaints shall not exceed the thresholds cited above for each performance objective. The COR shall notify the Contracting Officer (CO) for appropriate action.
DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
A. Acceptable Performance: The Government shall document performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action B. Unacceptable performance: When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the Contractor. This shall normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the Contracting Officer (CO). In turn, the CO shall present the CDR to the Contractor.
The Contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR shall specify if the Contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the Contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR shall also state how long after receipt the Contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the Contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs shall become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
PROCEDURES
The COR shall inspect to ensure Contractor compliance with the appropriate section of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) periodically. The evaluator shall record results of inspection, noting the date and time of inspection. If inspection indicates unacceptable performance, the COR shall notify the CO of the deficiencies within 3 business days. Contractor shall be given notification to correct the deficiencies within a reasonable amount of time, on a case-by-case basis. The CO shall have the final authority on the amount of time the Contractor has to correct the deficiency.
FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
During contract performance, the COR shall periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed. Performance Assessment Meetings shall be conducted quarterly. The Government may, at its discretion, choose any time, announced or unannounced, to have VA personnel inspect the contractor’s files
The COR shall meet with the Contractor quarterly to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT
| 1. CONTRACT NUMBER |
| 2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS DISCREPANCY |
| 3. TO: (Contracting Officer) |
| 4. FROM: (Name of COR) |
5. DATES
a. CDR PREPARED
| b. RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR: |
| c. ACTION COMPLETE |
6. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)
| 7. SIGNATURE OF COR |
| Date: |
| 8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER |
| Date: |
| 9a. TO (Contracting Officer) |
| 9a. FROM (Contractor) |
10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
| 11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE |
| Date: |
12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION. (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)
14. CLOSE OUT
| NAME |
| TITLE |
| SIGNATURE |
| DATE |
CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED
COR
CONTRACTING OFFICER
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .