CRSTier2StormwaterRFQ~1.pdf
PDF 666 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ice Center License or Permit Agreement
- Solicitation number
- S-C00200-00003273
- Issued by
- Lane County, Oregon
About this file
Central Receiving Station Tier 2 Stormwater Corrective Action Response RFQ
This Request for Quotes (RFQ) is issued by Lane County Waste Management Division in Eugene, Oregon, to secure a qualified firm to perform a Tier 2 Corrective Action Response for the Glenwood Central Receiving Station (CRS) located at 3100 East 17th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97403. The CRS has exceeded geometric mean benchmarks for Copper and Zinc at outfall 004 and Copper and Lead at outfall 008 under the 1200z Stormwater Permit, triggering mandatory corrective action. The selected firm will be responsible for completing a comprehensive Tier 2 report, securing Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) approval, and implementing corrective actions or mass reduction measures. Required deliverables include a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan (SWPCP) appendix with a Tier 2 report, mass reduction waiver request or background waiver request, properly sized treatment measures for substantially similar discharge points, an active or passive treatment proposal with rationale for control measure selection and projected pollutant concentration reductions, and a plan stamped by a registered Professional Engineer (PE). Quotes must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 29, 2022, to Jesse Berger at jesse.berger@lanecountyor.gov. Critical permit deadlines include submission of the proposed Tier 2 corrective action response to DEQ no later than December 31, 2022, with DEQ approval or denial notification within 60 calendar days. Implementation of corrective actions or mass reduction measures must be completed no later than September 30, 2024, with completion notification to DEQ required within 30 calendar days. The contract term extends through completion and acceptance of corrective action implementation.
Quoters must provide company contact information, Oregon business licensure status, relevant experience with Tier 2 corrective actions under Oregon's 1200z Stormwater Permit, and a proposed cost for the complete Tier 2 Corrective Action Response and implementation. The RFQ requires submission of a standard contract template along with the quote. Award will be made to the qualified vendor whose quote is determined to be most advantageous to Lane County considering both cost and qualifications. The evaluation and final award decision rests with the County Administrator. Lane County reserves the right to reject any or all quotes, issue subsequent requests for quotes, negotiate with vendors regarding scope and contract terms, and request additional information from quoters. No pricing, set-aside designations, or incumbent information is specified in this RFQ. Site visits can be accommodated upon request, and the 1200z permit and maps are available upon request.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Ice Center 2022 RLOI.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Quotes
Central Receiving Station Tier 2
Stormwater Corrective Action Response
Waste Management Division
OVERVIEW
Lane County Waste Management is seeking a qualified firm to perform a Tier 2 Corrective Action Response for its 1200‐z Stormwater Permit at the Glenwood Central Receiving Station (CRS) located at 3100 East 17th Avenue Eugene, OR 97403. CRS has exceeded the geometric mean of Copper and Zinc at outfall 004 and has also exceeded the geometric mean of Copper and Lead at outfall 008, triggering the requirement for a Tier 2 Corrective Action Response.
The selected firm will be responsible for completing the report, securing DEQ approval, and implementing corrective actions or mass reduction measures within the required deadlines.
According to the County’s 1200z permit, Tier 2 Corrective Action and Reporting must include:
1. A SWPCP appendix including: Tier 2 report, a Tier 2 mass reduction waiver request, or a Tier 2 background waiver request as described in Oregon’s current 1200‐z permit.
2. Properly apply and size approved Tier 2 corrective action responses and mass reduction measures to all substantially similar discharge points.
3. The Tier 2 report must include a proposal for active or passive treatment. This may include a combination of source removal, control and treatment measures, with the goal of achieving the benchmarks in this permit. The report must include the rationale for the selection of the control and treatment measures, the projected reduction of pollutant concentrations and the schedule for implementing these measures.
4. An Oregon registered PE must design and stamp the portion of the SWPCP that addresses these controls.
5. Additional information on the requirements are listed in DEQ’s Tier 2 Revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan Checklist Instructions, attached to this RFQ.
Deadlines:
1. Proposed Tier 2 corrective action response to DEQ no later than December 31, 2022 (six months after the end of the full reporting year that triggered Tier 2), unless DEQ approves a later date.
2. DEQ will notify the permit registrant within 60 calendar days of receipt of the Tier 2 Report whether the proposed Tier 2 corrective action is approved or denied.
3. Tier 2 corrective action(s) or mass reduction measures(S) must be installed and implemented no later than September 30 (a year and nine months after the Tier 2 proposal corrective action response submittal deadline) unless DEQ or agent approved a later date. If the permit registrant changes the specifics of the corrective actions before implementation, revisions must be submitted and approved by DEQ before implementation. Corrective action revisions do not change the Tier 2 implementation deadline.
4. No later than 30 calendar days from implementing Tier 2 corrective actions or mass reduction measures, the permit registrant must inform DEQ of the date of completion. This notification requirement also applies to facilities with an implementation deadline established in the previous permit.
5. No later than 30 calendar days from implementing all Tier 2 corrective actions or mass reduction measures, the permit registrant must submit all new and modified control measures and any associated changes to monitoring or discharge points within a SWPCP revision.
This request is to provide all material, plans, labor and equipment to accomplish this work. All work shall be completed in compliance with all federal, state and local requirements. The County will issue a contract to the selected firm using a standard Lane County contract form, a copy of which is available upon request. The term of the resulting contract will extend through completion and acceptance of the implementation of the corrective actions and reduction measures.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF QUOTES
Quoters should be aware that the findings of County staff will result in a recommendation. The final decision of actual award of an Agreement rests with the County Administrator, as appropriate.
The award shall be to the Eligible Quoter(s) whose Quote is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the County in overall value, considering both cost and qualifications. (LM 21.110)
DEADLINE
Please fill out Attachment A at the end of this document. Type directly into the document and return, along with a pdf copy of your standard contract template, all via email, to Jesse Berger, jesse.berger@lanecountyor.gov (see Contact Information) no later than 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, June
29th, 2022.
ADDITIONAL TERMS
In evaluating the Quotes and selecting a Vendor, County reserves the following rights:
To reject any Quote, and may for good cause, reject any or all Quotes when it is in the public interest to do so;
To issue subsequent requests for Quotes, if desired;
To negotiate with any Vendor to further amend, modify, refine, or delineate its Quote, and the Agreement price as it is affected by such negotiation of scope of services, and specific Agreement terms;
To request additional or more detailed information from any Quoter
CONTACT INFORMATION
All questions regarding this project and request shall be directed to Jesse Berger at the contact information below. 1200z permit and maps available on request. Site visits can also be accommodated.
Thank you for participating.
CONTACT:
Jesse Berger Engineer Associate Lane County Waste Management 84777 Dillard Access Road Eugene, OR 97405‐2926 541‐521‐6580 Jesse.berger@lanecountyor.gov
ATTACHMENT A
INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED WITH QUOTES
1. Company Name and contact information (email, office phone, cell phone if available) for Quote process.
2. Is your firm licensed to do business in the State of Oregon?
3. Please list relevant experience with regards to Tier 2 corrective actions in Oregon’s 1200z Stormwater Permit.
4. Proposed Cost for the Tier 2 Corrective Action Response and implementation?
Tier 2 Revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan Checklist Instructions
Industrial Stormwater Discharge 1200-Z Permits
Created by: Krista Ratliff Last updated: 7/21
Tier 2 Parameters Only exceedances of the geometric mean from statewide benchmarks are subject to Tier 2 corrective action. Please see the tables below for a list of the statewide parameters and associated benchmarks.
Table 4 from the permit: Statewide Benchmarks
Georegion pH s.u.
Total Copper mg/L
Total Lead mg/L
Total Zinc mg/L
TSS
mg/L
BOD
mg/L
Total Phosphorus mg/L
E. coli organism/100 mL Columbia Slough 5.5-9.0 0.0172 0.102 0.242 30 24 0.16 4061
Portland Harbor 5.5-9.0 0.0152 0.242 0.242 30
Cascades 5.5-9.0 0.016 0.018 0.068 100
Coastal 5.5-9.0 0.017 0.0392 0.086 100
Columbia River Mainstem
6.0-9.0 0.023 0.21 0.35 100
Eastern 5.5-9.0 0.031 0.0772 0.16 100
Willamette Valley 5.5-9.0 0.0152 0.112 0.142 100
Marine Waters 6.0-9.0 0.025 1.10 0.46 100 1Columbia Slough dischargers are only subject to benchmark monitoring, no impairment monitoring 2Applied regional translators
Monitoring point, Parameter and Corresponding Geometric Mean Exceedance
• Please indicate the monitoring point, as identified on the Site Plan in your Stormwater Pollution Control Plan and also on your Discharge Monitoring Report.
• Please indicate the parameter, units and geometric mean associated with each monitoring point exceedance.
• Please note, if you are not sampling all of your stormwater discharge points and your pollution control plan has identified substantially similar effluent based on a site analysis and/or monitoring, then you must install the same treatment on those representative discharge points.
Once implemented, you must sample substantially similar discharge points for the parameters that triggered Tier 2.
Projected Reduction of Pollutant Concentration Treated Please provide the projected percent reduction in concentration for the proposed treatment measure associated with the corresponding geometric mean exceedance. Regardless if a facility is proposing one treatment system to address more than one geometric mean exceedance or multiple treatment measures with the goal of reaching a single benchmark, please list the percent reduction for each parameter. The projected percent reduction should reduce the pollutant discharged to or below the benchmark.
Tier 2 Checklist Instructions
Created by: Krista Ratliff Last updated: 7/21
Percent of Design Storm Volume Infiltrated Please provide the calculated percent of the design storm that will be infiltrated for the drainage basin being addressed, if applicable. Facilities choosing to submit a Tier 2 Mass Reduction Waiver request need to evaluate their site and show how the remaining mass load of pollutants discharged are at or below the mass equivalent of the statewide benchmarks. In addition, provide the information requested in the Tier 2 Waiver table. This calculation may result in discharge above the benchmark values. The revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan must provide data and analysis to support this mass load analysis determination, including the detailed description of the measure(s).
Design Storm Criteria
Precipitation Data
1. Determine the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall depth for the facility using latitude and longitude; this information can be found here: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ohd/hdsc/noaaatlas2.htm
2. Determine the Water Quality Design Storm amount by locating your facility’s zone on the Oregon Department of Transportation’s Water Quality Design Storm Factor map, attached below.
Multiply the 2-year, 24-hour storm rainfall depth from Step #1 by the appropriate factor (50%, 67%, or 75%). The majority of the state will use 50% of the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall depth. For example, if the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall depth according to NOAA is 3.0 inches, and the facility is in Zone 6 on the map below, 3.0 x 50% = 1.5 inches. The Design Storm amount is 1.5 inches.
3. Design to a minimum storm size of 0.7 inches in 24- hours in order to capture the first flush of industrial pollutants, even if the calculation from Step #2 is fewer than 0.7 inches.
4. Compare the calculated Water Quality Design Storm to the facility’s local jurisdiction’s water quality design storm and use whichever is more stringent.
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ohd/hdsc/noaaatlas2.htm
Created by: Krista Ratliff Last updated: 7/21
More information is available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/GeoEnvironmental/Pages/Hydraulics- Manual.aspx
Please simply indicate the page numbers of the stamped plan or waiver for the following items:
Rationale for the Selection of the Measures The permits require the revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan include data and analysis to support the selection of each treatment best management practice or infiltration measure.
Schedule for Implementing Measure Please include the expected implementation schedule for the proposed measures. The permit deadlines include:
• Submit a proposed Tier 2 corrective action response to DEQ or agent no later than December 31
(six months after the end of the full reporting year that triggered Tier 2) unless DEQ or agent approved a later date.
• Complete construction and implement treatment or mass reduction measures no later than Sept 30 (a year and nine months after the Tier 2 proposal corrective action response submittal deadline) unless DEQ or agent approved a later date.
Cost of proposed Tier 2 Response
Created by: Krista Ratliff Last updated: 7/21
As part of the rationale in the selection of the measures, the facility must consider cost. In order to meet the implementation schedule, it is highly recommended that all proprietary, capital investment, permitting, operational and maintenance, as well as energy costs are evaluated.
Treatment System Schematic Please include design and site location information for proposed treatment measures. Registrants are responsible for meeting water quality standards, including assurance that any chemical treatment is nontoxic to aquatic organisms. Any state approved program may be cited, such as Technologies Assessment Protocol - Ecology (TAPE).
Operation and Maintenance Schedule All Tier 2 responses will require some maintenance overtime to optimize pollutant removal and manage break-through. Break-through happens when media is clogged or no longer treats the stormwater pollutants. Although each facility maintenance schedule will vary based on loading, this is an important component of the revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan. Schedule A.10.b.vii and Schedule A.10.e outline maintenance and repairs which must be recorded and available for review upon request of DEQ, agents or a local municipality. The revised Plan must include a projected maintenance schedule. DEQ recognizes this may vary once installation is complete. Please ensure any Plan revisions related to operations of control measures are submitted to DEQ or agents within 30 days calendar days after the change.
700 Lloyd Building at 700 NE Multnomah St., Suite #600, Portland, OR 97232
165 East 7th Avenue, Suite 100 Eugene, OR 97401
800 SE Emigrant Avenue, Suite 330 Pendleton, OR 97801
Clackamas Benton Lane Baker Hood River Sherman Clatsop Coos Lincoln Crook Jefferson Umatilla
Columbia Curry Linn Deschutes Klamath Union Multnomah Douglas Marion Gilliam Lake Wallowa Tillamook Jackson Polk Grant Malheur Wasco
Washington Josephine Yamhill Harney Marrow Wheeler
AGENT OFFICES
Clean Water Services 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway
Hillsboro, OR 97123 Includes Banks, Beaverton, Cornelius, Durham, Forest Grove, Gaston, Hillsboro, King City, North Plains, Sherwood, Tigard, Tualatin, and portions of Washington Co.
City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services
Water Pollution Control Laboratory 6543 N. Burlington Ave.
Portland, OR 97203-5452
City of Eugene Industrial Source Control
410 River Ave.
Eugene, OR 97404
Facility Name:
Permit
Schedule Page #
A.12.i
Monitoring Point Parameter Geometric
Mean Exceedance
Units Percent
Reduction in Concentration
Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or
Injected
A.12.f.iii.1
A.12.i.iii
A.12.f.iii.2 Stamped by PE
A.11 Notes:
A.12 Design storm in inches
Rationale for the selection of the measures
Proposed Tier 2 Corrective Action Response
Schedule for implementing these measures
For DEQ or Agent use only Revised SWPCP complete and acceptable
Cost of installation
Operation and maintenance schedule for treatment measures and/or volume reduction measures proposed
Treatment system schematic and operational plan
DEQ Industrial Stormwater Permits Tier 2 Revised Stormwater Pollution Control Plan Checklist
Date Revised Plan submitted:
File No.:
Comments (for official use only)Requirement
Instructions: Complete this form and submit with the revised SWPCP and engineered plan or waiver request.
Fill in the requested information in the highlighted cells and the appropriate page number(s) indicating the location of information in the revised SWPCP.
A.12.f
Information Required for Tier II Waiver Application
If applying for a Tier 2 waiver based on projected volume reduction, please provide the information below for each drainage area on your site. If no infiltration is proposed for a particular drainage area, simply fill out the first four (bolded) entries in the Tier 2 Waiver Table. Make additional copies if your site has more than three drainage areas.
Tier 2 Waiver Table
Drainage area name: Drainage area name: Drainage area name:
Value Page number
Value Page number
Value Page number
Area of drainage area (ft2)
Impervious area (ft2)
Runoff coefficients
Mass (with units) of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean (no infiltration)
Infiltration rate (gal/day)
Pond capacity, if applicable (gal)
Mass (with units) of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean (with assumed infiltration)
Mass (with units) of pollutant discharged assuming concentration equal to benchmark (no infiltration)
Approximate depth to groundwater
| Tier2StormwaterRFQ |
| stormwater-tier2 |
| Instructions Final_2021 |
| Tier II Checklist_2021 |
| PDF for Public |
TierIIWaiverTable 2_2021
| comments1: |
| Comments for official use onlyPercent of Design Storm Infiltrated or Injected: |
| Monitoring PointA12f: |
| ParameterA12f: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f: |
| UnitsA12f: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_2: |
| ParameterA12f_2: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_2: |
| UnitsA12f_2: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_2: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_2: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_2: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_3: |
| ParameterA12f_3: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_3: |
| UnitsA12f_3: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_3: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_3: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_3: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_4: |
| ParameterA12f_4: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_4: |
| UnitsA12f_4: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_4: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_4: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_4: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_5: |
| ParameterA12f_5: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_5: |
| UnitsA12f_5: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_5: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_5: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_5: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_6: |
| ParameterA12f_6: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_6: |
| UnitsA12f_6: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_6: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_6: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_6: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_7: |
| ParameterA12f_7: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_7: |
| UnitsA12f_7: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_7: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_7: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_7: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_8: |
| ParameterA12f_8: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_8: |
| UnitsA12f_8: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_8: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_8: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_8: |
| Monitoring PointA12f_9: |
| ParameterA12f_9: |
| Geometric Mean ExceedanceA12f_9: |
| UnitsA12f_9: |
| Percent Reduction in ConcentrationA12f_9: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedA12f_9: |
| Comments for official use onlyA12f_9: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedProposed Tier 2 Corrective Action Response: |
| Comments for official use onlyProposed Tier 2 Corrective Action Response: |
| Proposed Tier 2 Corrective Action ResponseA12: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedDesign storm in inches: |
| Comments for official use onlyDesign storm in inches: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedRationale for the selection of the measures: |
| Comments for official use onlyRationale for the selection of the measures: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedSchedule for implementing these measures: |
| Comments for official use onlySchedule for implementing these measures: |
| Stamped by PE: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedStamped by PE: |
| Comments for official use onlyStamped by PE: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedCost of installation: |
| Comments for official use onlyCost of installation: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedTreatment system schematic and operational plan: |
| Comments for official use onlyTreatment system schematic and operational plan: |
| Percent of Design Storm Infiltrated or InjectedOperation and maintenance schedule for treatment measures andor volume reduction measures proposed: |
| Comments for official use onlyOperation and maintenance schedule for treatment measures andor volume reduction measures proposed: |
| Revised SWPCP complete and acceptable: |
| Notes 5: |
| pages1: |
| submitted: |
| Drainage area name: |
| Drainage area name_2: |
| Drainage area name_3: |
| ValueArea of drainage area ft2: |
| Page numberArea of drainage area ft2: |
| ValueArea of drainage area ft2_2: |
| Page numberArea of drainage area ft2_2: |
| ValueArea of drainage area ft2_3: |
| Page numberArea of drainage area ft2_3: |
| ValueImpervious area ft2: |
| Page numberImpervious area ft2: |
| ValueImpervious area ft2_2: |
| Page numberImpervious area ft2_2: |
| ValueImpervious area ft2_3: |
| Page numberImpervious area ft2_3: |
| ValueRunoff coefficients: |
| Page numberRunoff coefficients: |
| ValueRunoff coefficients_2: |
| Page numberRunoff coefficients_2: |
| ValueRunoff coefficients_3: |
| Page numberRunoff coefficients_3: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration_2: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration_2: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration_3: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean no infiltration_3: |
| ValueInfiltration rate galday: |
| Page numberInfiltration rate galday: |
| ValueInfiltration rate galday_2: |
| Page numberInfiltration rate galday_2: |
| ValueInfiltration rate galday_3: |
| Page numberInfiltration rate galday_3: |
| ValuePond capacity if applicable gal: |
| Page numberPond capacity if applicable gal: |
| ValuePond capacity if applicable gal_2: |
| Page numberPond capacity if applicable gal_2: |
| ValuePond capacity if applicable gal_3: |
| Page numberPond capacity if applicable gal_3: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration_2: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration_2: |
| ValueMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration_3: |
| Page numberMass with units of pollutant discharged based on geometric mean with assumed infiltration_3: |
| ValueApproximate depth to groundwater: |
| Page numberApproximate depth to groundwater: |
| ValueApproximate depth to groundwater_2: |
| Page numberApproximate depth to groundwater_2: |
| ValueApproximate depth to groundwater_3: |
| Page numberApproximate depth to groundwater_3: |
| 778: |
| 779: |
| 777: |
| 782: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .