Cost_Proposal_Other_Locations.pdf

PDF 62 KB Posted

Attached to
Process Server
Solicitation number
961-0908-26
Issued by
Tehama County, California

About this file

This document is a Cost Proposal Format for Process of Service issued by Solano County, covering multiple California counties including Alameda, Contra Costa, Napa, Sacramento, San Francisco, Sonoma, and Yolo. The cost proposal form is designed for proposers to submit pricing for various service types, including Completed Service, Not Found/Bad Address, RUSH Service, and Locate Service across different geographic areas. The proposal requires proposers to detail their exact cost amounts for the entire contract period, with costs inclusive of postage, preparation, mailing fees, and fuel costs. The proposed cost and technical proposal must remain valid for at least 120 days following the Cost Proposal opening.

The document indicates that Solano County reserves the right to award contracts to multiple proposers if deemed in the county's best interest, and proposers may bid on one or more counties or locations. The cost proposal must be completed precisely, with no additional text that could be interpreted as a qualification of the proposed cost. Failure to specify the Cost Proposal as required may result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive and rejected. The total cost will be evaluated according to Section 4 of the related Request for Proposal (RFP), and proposers are required to sign and date the document when submitting their cost proposal.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Exhibit_E_-_Current_Team_Legal_Pricing.pdf PDF
Exhibit_E_-_Current_Team_Legal_Pricing.pdf PDF
Exhibit_D_-_Scope_of_Work.pdf PDF
Exhibit_D_-_Scope_of_Work.pdf PDF
Process_Server.pdf PDF
Process_Server.pdf PDF
Cost_Proposal_Other_Locations.pdf PDF
Cost_Proposal_Solano_County.pdf PDF
Cost_Proposal_Solano_County.pdf PDF
Exhibit_C_-_General_Terms_6_12_18.pdf PDF
Exhibit_C_-_General_Terms_6_12_18.pdf PDF
Scope_of_Work.docx DOCX document
Scope_of_Work.docx DOCX document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

COST PROPOSAL FORMAT

For Process of Service for all other Counties and Locations

Proposer Name

NOTICE TO PROPOSER:

The Proposer shall indicate below the offered price for providing all services proposed including all services as defined in the Scope of Services of the subject RFP. This Cost Proposal must specifically record below the exact cost amount(s) proposed in the appropriate space(s) as required herein.

Said cost proposed must incorporate all cost for the proposed scope of services for the total contract period. Costs are to be inclusive of postage, preparation and mailing fees, and fuel costs. The proposer must sign and date the Cost Proposal.

The Cost Proposal shall detail only the cost proposed as required, and shall not detail any other rates, amounts, or information. It shall not detail any text that could be construed as a qualification of the cost proposed. If the Proposer fails to specify the Cost Proposal as required, the County shall determine the proposal to be non-responsive and reject it. The total cost will be evaluated as per Section 4.

Solano County reserves the right to award a contract to more than one proposer if deemed in the best interest of the County. Proposers may bid on one or more Counties/Locations.

COUNTY Completed Service

Not Found/ Bad Address

RUSH Service Locate Service

Alameda

Contra Costa

Napa

Sacramento

San Francisco

Sonoma

Yolo

All Other Areas In California

Outside California /International

Sub Total TOTAL

The proposed cost and the submitted technical proposal associated with this cost shall remain valid for at least 120 days subsequent to the date of the Cost Proposal opening and thereafter in accordance with any resulting contract between the Proposer and the County.

Proposer Signature Date

COMPLETE AND RETURN WITH PROPSAL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .