CONSULTANT_REFERENCE_CHECK.pdf

PDF 163 KB Posted

Attached to
PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WEST TERMINAL PARKING ENABLING
Solicitation number
AV15000082
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This document is a Consultant Reference Check form and instructions issued by the City of Phoenix Office of the City Engineer's Design and Construction Procurement section for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport West Terminal Parking Enabling project. The City requires responding firms to submit performance evaluations from up to three references representing agencies or entities for which the firm has previously provided similar services. Reference checks must be submitted by the Owner or Owner's representative directly responsible for project oversight and uploaded to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on September 11, 2026. Each reference check is scored on a scale of 1 to 4 across seven evaluation categories, with a maximum of 21 points available for the reference check component of the overall evaluation process. The evaluation categories assess the business relationship, team consistency, problem-solving capabilities, schedule and budget performance, work quality, innovation and efficiency recommendations, and willingness to rehire the consultant.

The reference evaluation form must be completed for each project reference and include the project title, contracted services provided, start and completion dates, and evaluator contact information. Scoring uses a scale where 1 equals Unsatisfactory (0.25 points), 2 equals Poor (0.50 points), 3 equals Good (0.75 points), and 4 equals Excellent (1.0 points), with the final question regarding rehiring potential worth an additional point. The completed forms become public record and will be released to the contractor or other entities upon request. A sample cover letter template is provided to assist firms in requesting reference evaluations from past clients. Firms should ensure that submitted references relate directly to the services required for this project to ensure relevant performance assessment.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONSULTANT REFERENCE CHECK INSTRUCTIONS,

FORM, AND SAMPLE LETTER

The attached Consultant Performance Evaluation Form is to be provided to the agencies or entities for which your firm has recently provided services similar to those requested for this project. Provide the evaluation form to the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project to complete and submit to the email box listed below.

The first three references submitted will be accepted and the scores utilized as part of the evaluation process. Each reference check is worth up to 7 points for a total of up to 21 points available.

The form is to be completed by the agency or entity and uploaded to the (email box) at:

soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov

The procurement identifier is:

OPENGOV ID NO.:

Also attached is a sample performance evaluation cover letter that may be used when sending the reference check request.

mailto:soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov

Sample Contractor Performance Evaluation Cover Letter

Sample Cover Letter Contact Name Address of Reference

(Your Name) is responding to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) from the City of Phoenix Office of the City Engineer’s Design and Construction Procurement section.

The City is requesting reference information related to our past performance. As a part of the response submittal process, the City is requesting performance evaluations from agencies that our firm has performed services for either in the past or is currently receiving services.

I would appreciate your cooperation in completing the attached Consultant Performance Evaluation form and return by email the completed form by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on September 11, 2026 to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov attention:

Lynette Chavez City of Phoenix, Office of the City Engineer, Design & Construction Procurement Email Address: lynette.chavez@phoenix.gov Telephone Number: 602-534-5789

Failure to submit the Consultant Performance Evaluation form by the above date will have a negative impact on the proposal we submit for this service. Your cooperation in submitting this form by this date is appreciated.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact (your name) at (your telephone number).

Sincerely, mailto:lynette.chavez@phoenix.gov

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Evaluate the Consultant’s contract performance in each of the rating areas listed below. On the Consultant Performance Evaluation form, circle the rating from 1 to 4 that most closely matches your evaluation of the contractor’s performance. Comments are not required but appreciated. Every rating area must be scored.

The Design and Construction Procurement section will use the information from this form to evaluate firms competing for contract award. This completed form will become public record and upon request, will be released to the contractor or any other entity.

Please submit the completed form to the address indicated on the bottom of the Consultant Performance Evaluation form.

Thank you for your time and your cooperation.

AV15000082 – PHOENIX SKY HARBOR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WEST TERMINAL

PARKING ENABLING PROJECT

CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR __________________

(firm name)

In the box below, provide the project title, contracted services provided by the firm, and start and completion date of services. This form is to be completed by the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project. The project services evaluated must be relevant to the services of this project. Every rating area must be scored.

RATINGS: Summarize the Consultant’s performance and circle the number below that corresponds to the performance rating for each category. Please see the rating scale.

1 = Unsatisfactory (.25 pt.); 2 = Poor (.50 pt.); 3 = Good (.75 pt.); 4 = Excellent (1.0 pt.)

HOW WOULD YOU RANK THE

BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE

FIRM?

Comments:

WAS THE TEAM PRESENTED IN

THE PROPOSAL THE TEAM THAT

WORKED ON THE PROJECT TO

COMPLETION?

Comments:

WAS STAFF PROACTIVE IN

SOLVING PROBLEMS THAT MAY

HAVE OCCURRED ON THE

PROJECT?

Comments:

WAS THE CONTRACTED SCOPE

OF SERVICES COMPLETED ON

TIME AND WITHIN BUDGET?

Comments:

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE

QUALITY OF WORK PERFORMED

BY THIS FIRM ON YOUR

PROJECT?

Comments:

DID THE FIRM RECOMMEND

EFFICIENCIES OR PROVIDE

INNOVATIVE IDEAS OR

SUGGESTIONS?

Comments:

WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO

CONTRACT WITH THIS FIRM

AGAIN? (YES = 1 point)

YES

NO

Comments:

TOTAL SCORE (MAXIMUM 7 POINTS)

Reference Evaluation Provided By:

Name and Title: ___________________________________________________________

Agency/Organization: _____________________________________________________

Date: ____________________________

Telephone Number: ________________________

Email completed form by September 11, 2026 by 12:00 pm Phoenix time to:

soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov

*EMAIL SUBJECT LINE SHOULD REFERENCE RFx NUMBER

The document should reference the project number and firm for which the reference check is being submitted. If no project number is available, reference the service and firm for which the reference check is being submitted.

CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR __________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .