CONSULTANT_REFERENCE_CHECK.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
91ST AVENUE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS CONTROL PIPELINE REHABILITATION ENGINEERING SERVICES
Solicitation number
WS90100101
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This is a Consultant Reference Check instruction document for the City of Phoenix, Office of the City Engineer's Design and Construction Procurement section, related to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Process Control Pipeline Rehabilitation Engineering Services project (OPENGOV ID NO.: WS90100101). Consultants responding to the Request for Qualifications must submit performance evaluations from three references representing agencies or entities for which the firm has recently provided similar services. The reference check forms must be completed by the Owner or the Owner's representative directly responsible for project oversight and submitted to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on September 18, 2026. The document provides a sample cover letter template and detailed instructions for reference contacts to complete the Consultant Performance Evaluation Form, which evaluates consultant performance across seven rating categories.

The reference check evaluation is worth up to 21 points total, with each reference submission valued at up to 7 points based on performance ratings in categories including business relationship, team consistency, problem-solving, schedule and budget adherence, work quality, innovation recommendations, and willingness to contract again. Performance ratings range from 1 (Unsatisfactory, 0.25 points) to 4 (Excellent, 1.0 point), with a maximum of one point awarded for indicating willingness to contract with the firm again. All completed reference forms will become public record and may be released to consulting firms and other entities upon request. Inquiries regarding the reference check process should be directed to Contracts Specialist Alissa Bahr at alissa.bahr@phoenix.gov or 602-256-4107.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONSULTANT REFERENCE CHECK INSTRUCTIONS,

FORM, AND SAMPLE LETTER

The attached Consultant Performance Evaluation Form is to be provided to the agencies or entities for which your firm has recently provided services similar to those requested for this project. Provide the evaluation form to the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project to complete and submit to the email box listed below.

The first three references submitted will be accepted and the scores utilized as part of the evaluation process. Each reference check is worth up to 7 points for a total of up to 21 points available.

The form is to be completed by the agency or entity and uploaded to the (email box) at:

soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov

The procurement identifier is:

OPENGOV ID NO.: WS90100101

Also attached is a sample performance evaluation cover letter that may be used when sending the reference check request.

Sample Consultant Performance Evaluation Cover Letter

Sample Cover Letter Contact Name Address of Reference

(Your Name) is responding to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) from the City of Phoenix Office of the City Engineer’s Design and Construction Procurement section.

The City is requesting reference information related to our past performance. As a part of the response submittal process, the City is requesting performance evaluations from agencies that our firm has performed services for either in the past or is currently receiving services.

I would appreciate your cooperation in completing the attached Consultant Performance Evaluation form and return by email the completed form by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on September 18, 2026, to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov attention:

Contracts Specialist – Alissa Bahr City of Phoenix, Office of the City Engineer, Design & Construction Procurement Email Address: alissa.bahr@phoenix.gov Telephone Number: 602-256-4107

Failure to submit the Consultant Performance Evaluation form by the above date will have a negative impact on the proposal we submit for this service. Your cooperation in submitting this form by this date is appreciated.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact (your name) at (your telephone number).

Sincerely, INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Evaluate the Consultant’s contract performance in each of the rating areas listed below. On the Consultant Performance Evaluation form, circle the rating from 1 to 4 that most closely matches your evaluation of the consultant’s performance. Comments are not required but appreciated. Every rating area must be scored.

The Design and Construction Procurement section will use the information from this form to evaluate firms competing for contract award. This completed form will become public record and upon request, will be released to the consultant or any other entity.

Please submit the completed form to the address indicated on the bottom of the Consultant Performance Evaluation form.

Thank you for your time and your cooperation.

91st Ave WWTP Process Control Pipeline Rehabilitation Engineering - WS90100101

CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR __________________

(firm name)

In the box below, provide the project title, contracted services provided by the firm, and start and completion date of services. This form is to be completed by the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project. The project services evaluated must be relevant to the services of this project. Every rating area must be scored.

RATINGS: Summarize the Consultant’s performance and circle the number below that corresponds to the performance rating for each category. Please see the rating scale.

1 = Unsatisfactory (.25 pt.); 2 = Poor (.50 pt.); 3 = Good (.75 pt.); 4 = Excellent (1.0 pt.)

HOW WOULD YOU RANK THE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE FIRM?
4

Comments:

WAS THE TEAM PRESENTED IN THE PROPOSAL THE TEAM THAT WORKED ON THE PROJECT TO COMPLETION?
4

Comments:

WAS STAFF PROACTIVE IN SOLVING PROBLEMS THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED ON THE PROJECT?
4

Comments:

WAS THE CONTRACTED SCOPE OF SERVICES COMPLETED ON TIME AND WITHIN BUDGET?
4

Comments:

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF WORK PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM ON YOUR PROJECT?
4

Comments:

DID THE FIRM RECOMMEND EFFICIENCIES OR PROVIDE INNOVATIVE IDEAS OR SUGGESTIONS?
4

Comments:

WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH THIS FIRM AGAIN? (YES = 1 point)
YES

NO

Comments:

TOTAL SCORE

(MAXIMUM 7 POINTS)

Reference Evaluation Provided By:

Name and Title: ___________________________________________________________

Agency/Organization: _____________________________________________________

Date: ____________________________

Telephone Number: ________________________

Email completed form by September 18, 2026 by 12:00 pm Phoenix time to:

soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov

*EMAIL SUBJECT LINE SHOULD REFERENCE OPENGOV ID NO.: WS90100101

The document should reference the project number and firm for which the reference check is being submitted. If no project number is available, reference the service and firm for which the reference check is being submitted.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .