CONSULTANT_REFERENCE_CHECK.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- WS90100120-B
- Issued by
- Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona
About this file
This document is a Consultant Reference Check instruction package issued by the City of Phoenix, Office of the City Engineer's Design and Construction Procurement section, for the SUB-REGIONAL OPERATING GROUP - 91ST AVENUE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AERATION REHABILITATION ENGINEERING SERVICES project (OPENGOV ID NO.: WS90100120). The reference check process requires consulting firms to submit performance evaluations from three agencies or entities for which they have recently provided similar services. Completed evaluation forms must be submitted to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on October 16, 2026, with all submissions directed to attention Christopher Balderrama, Contracts Specialist II. The package includes a sample cover letter template for firms to use when requesting references and detailed instructions for reference providers to complete the Consultant Performance Evaluation Form.
The reference check scoring system allocates up to 7 points per reference, with a maximum of 21 points available from three references. Each evaluation assesses consultant performance across seven categories: business relationship quality, team consistency from proposal to completion, problem-solving proactivity, on-time and on-budget scope completion, work quality, innovation and efficiency recommendations, and willingness to contract again. Ratings are scored on a scale of 1 to 4, with 1 representing Unsatisfactory (0.25 points), 2 representing Poor (0.50 points), 3 representing Good (0.75 points), and 4 representing Excellent (1.0 point). Completed reference evaluation forms become public record and may be released upon request to the consultant or other entities.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONSULTANT REFERENCE CHECK INSTRUCTIONS,
FORM, AND SAMPLE LETTER
The attached Consultant Performance Evaluation Form is to be provided to the agencies or entities for which your firm has recently provided services similar to those requested for this project. Provide the evaluation form to the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project to complete and submit to the email box listed below.
The first three references submitted will be accepted and the scores utilized as part of the evaluation process. Each reference check is worth up to 7 points for a total of up to 21 points available.
The form is to be completed by the agency or entity and uploaded to the (email box) at:
soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov
The procurement identifier is:
OPENGOV ID NO.: WS90100120
SUB-REGIONAL OPERATING GROUP - 91ST AVENUE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AERATION REHABILITATION ENGINEERING SERVICES
Also attached is a sample performance evaluation cover letter that may be used when sending the reference check request.
Sample Consultant Performance Evaluation Cover Letter
Sample Cover Letter Contact Name Address of Reference
(Your Name) is responding to a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) from the City of Phoenix Office of the City Engineer’s Design and Construction Procurement section.
The City is requesting reference information related to our past performance. As a part of the response submittal process, the City is requesting performance evaluations from agencies that our firm has performed services for either in the past or is currently receiving services.
I would appreciate your cooperation in completing the attached Consultant Performance Evaluation form and return by email the completed form by 12:00 pm Phoenix time on October 16, 2026, to soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov attention:
Christopher Balderrama, Contracts Specialist II City of Phoenix, Office of the City Engineer, Design & Construction Procurement Email Address: Christopher.Balderrama@phoenix.gov Telephone Number: (602) 495-3790
Failure to submit the Consultant Performance Evaluation form by the above date will have a negative impact on the proposal we submit for this service. Your cooperation in submitting this form by this date is appreciated.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact (your name) at (your telephone number).
Sincerely, INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Evaluate the Consultant’s contract performance in each of the rating areas listed below. On the Consultant Performance Evaluation form, circle the rating from 1 to 4 that most closely matches your evaluation of the Consultant’s performance. Comments are not required but appreciated. Every rating area must be scored.
The Design and Construction Procurement section will use the information from this form to evaluate firms competing for contract award. This completed form will become public record and upon request, will be released to the Consultant or any other entity.
Please submit the completed form to the address indicated on the bottom of the Consultant Performance Evaluation form.
Thank you for your time and your cooperation.
WS90100120 - SUB-REGIONAL OPERATING GROUP - 91ST AVENUE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AERATION REHABILITATION ENGINEERING SERVICES
CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR ___________________________________
(firm name)
In the box below, provide the project title, contracted services provided by the firm, and start and completion date of services. This form is to be completed by the Owner, or the Owner’s representative directly responsible for oversight of the project. The project services evaluated must be relevant to the services of this project. Every rating area must be scored.
RATINGS: Summarize the Consultant’s performance and circle the number below that corresponds to the performance rating for each category. Please see the rating scale.
1 = Unsatisfactory (.25 pt.); 2 = Poor (.50 pt.); 3 = Good (.75 pt.); 4 = Excellent (1.0 pt.)
| HOW WOULD YOU RANK THE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE FIRM? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| WAS THE TEAM PRESENTED IN THE PROPOSAL THE TEAM THAT WORKED ON THE PROJECT TO COMPLETION? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| WAS STAFF PROACTIVE IN SOLVING PROBLEMS THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED ON THE PROJECT? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| WAS THE CONTRACTED SCOPE OF SERVICES COMPLETED ON TIME AND WITHIN BUDGET? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE QUALITY OF WORK PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM ON YOUR PROJECT? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| DID THE FIRM RECOMMEND EFFICIENCIES OR PROVIDE INNOVATIVE IDEAS OR SUGGESTIONS? |
| 4 |
Comments:
| WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH THIS FIRM AGAIN? (YES = 1 point) |
| YES |
NO
Comments:
TOTAL SCORE
(MAXIMUM 7 POINTS)
Reference Evaluation Provided By:
Name and Title: ___________________________________________________________
Agency/Organization: _____________________________________________________
Date: ____________________________
Telephone Number: ________________________
Email completed form by October 16, 2026, by 12:00 pm Phoenix time to:
soq.referencechecks@phoenix.gov
*EMAIL SUBJECT LINE SHOULD REFERENCE OPENGOV ID NUMBER
The document should reference the project number and firm for which the reference check is being submitted. If no project number is available, reference the service and firm for which the reference check is being submitted.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .