Combo - W50S6V26Q0008.pdf

Militat Quasi Tigris Quisque “Each Fights Like a Tiger”

COLORADO AIR NATIONAL GUARD

140TH WING

BUCKLEY SPACE FORCE BASE COLORADO

COMBINED SYNPOSIS/SOLICITATION

Requirement Title: Optimizing the Human Weapon System Pre-Habilitative Services

Solicitation Number: W50S6V26Q0008

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price

Solicitation Issue Date: 8 July 2026

Questions Due Date: 16 July 2026

Response Deadline: 29 July 2026 @ 10:00 AM MDT

Point(s) of Contact: 140th Contracting Office: 140.WG.MSC@us.af.mil

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in RFO FAR 12.202, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Government intends to use simplified acquisition procedures for evaluating quotes and awarding the resulting purchase order in accordance with RFO

FAR 12.203.

2. This solicitation is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ).

3. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through:

Federal Acquisition Circular 2026-01 Effective 03/13/2026

4. This is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside in accordance with RFO FAR 19.106-2.

5. The North American Industry Size Classification System (NAICS) code associated with this requirement is 621340 - Offices of Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapists, and Audiologists which has a small business size standard of $12.5M and the FSC/PSC associated with it is Q518 - Medical—Physical Medicine/Rehabilitation.

REQUIREMENT INFORMATION

Description:

The OHWS initiative is designed to improve quality of life and readiness by decreasing injury rates, most notably for the high rate of spine injuries incurred by fighter pilots. OHWS is designed to meet the unique physical needs of fighter jet pilots. Fitness and conditioning is accomplished through a comprehensive, coordinated, multi-disciplinary physical training program focused on the movement and strengthening of the spinal musculoskeletal system. The purpose of providing the services of OHWS to our rated pilots is to reduce frequency and severity of injuries and time lost from service, improve mailto:140.WG.MSC@us.af.mil long term quality of life, optimize human performance/ readiness, avoid injury prior to occurrence, increase pilot production, and support pilot retention.

Place of Performance FOB Point:

FOB Destination

Buckley Garrison 246 S. Aspen St Bldg 701 Aurora, CO 80011

Line Items:

The anticipated structure of the resultant contract is as follows:

CLIN Description Unit of Issue Quantity Total 0001 The Contractor shall provide all non-personnel services to include all labor, equipment, and materials to accomplish the following: OHWS Services, Base Period

Month 12

1001 The Contractor shall provide all non-personnel services to include all labor, equipment, and materials to accomplish the following: OHWS Services, Option Period 1

Month 12

2001 The Contractor shall provide all non-personnel services to include all labor, equipment, and materials to accomplish the following: OHWS Services, Option Period 2

Month 12

3001 The Contractor shall provide all non-personnel services to include all labor, equipment, and materials to accomplish the following: OHWS Services, Option Period 3

Month 12

4001 The Contractor shall provide all non-personnel services to include all labor, equipment, and materials to accomplish the following: OHWS Services, Option Period 4

Month 12

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement Attachment 2: Provision & Clauses

SEE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) FOR REQUIREMENTS. OFFERORS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PWS IN ITS ENTIRETY PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A QUOTE.

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Vendors must submit this completed form and fill in all required sections along with any additional required documents with quote. Failure to follow instructions will make vendors quote considered nonresponsive.

Please provide the following information with your quote:

Company Name: ____________ UEI Number: _______________ Cage Code: _______________ Payment Terms: _________________________ FOB: Destination Shipping Cost included? N/A

All companies must be registered in the System for Award Management at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ to be considered for award. The Government will not provide contract financing for this acquisition. Invoice instruction shall be provided at time of award

FAR provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Products and Commercial Services, applies to this acquisition. As prescribed in FAR 12.301(b)(1), the following addendum is provided for this solicitation and hereby amends any language therein:

- Quoted amounts need to be net prices without tax

- Quotes, attachments, and all other correspondence as listed in this solicitation must be emailed to all points of contact (POCs)

- All questions are to be submitted in writing by the specified date and time above.

- Quotes are due by the specified date and time above.

- Quotes shall not exceed 10MB in size -Documents submitted will not be longer than 5 pages per attachment

NG Agency Protest Program

NG Agency Protest Program is intended to encourage interested parties to seek resolution of their concerns with the National Guard (NG) as an Alternative Dispute Resolution forum, rather than filing a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or other external forum.

National Guard Protest Procedures Contract award or performance is suspended during the protest to the same extent, and within the same time periods as if filed at the GAO. The NG protest decision goal is to resolve protests within 35 calendar days from filing. An agency protest may be filed with either the Contracting Officer or the NG Agency’s Protest Decision Authority, but not both, in accordance with NG protest procedures.

To be timely, the protests must be filed with the periods specified in FAR 33.103. To file a protest under the NG Agency Protest Program, the protest must request resolution under that program and be sent to the address below:

National Guard Bureau Office of the Director of Acquisitions/ Head of Contracting Activity

ATTN: NGB-AQ-O

111 S. George Mason Dr.

Arlington, VA 22204 Email: ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-order-ombudsman@mail.mil

All other agency-level protests should be sent to the Contracting Officer for resolution at the address in the solicitation.

See FAR clause 52.233-2. NG Public-facing, general Protest information is found at:

https://www.nationalguard.mil/Leadership/Joint-Staff/Special-Staff/Director-of-Acquisitions/ Directorate of Acquisitions information for the contracting enterprise is found at https://gko.portal.ng.mil/ngb/STAFF/D01/D01/OI/Protests%20and%20Complaints/Forms/AllItems.Asp

EVALUATION CRITERIA

52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services

The Government will assess the offeror’s quote on three (3) factors: (1) Price, (2) Technical Capability, and (3) Past Performance.

The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer and reject any and all offers. The basis of award will be a conforming quote that represents the best value to the Government.

mailto:ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-order-ombudsman@mail.mil https://www.nationalguard.mil/Leadership/Joint-Staff/Special-Staff/Director-of-Acquisitions/

To facilitate the evaluation, the Technical Capability narrative should be specific, detailed, and complete to clarify and fully demonstrate that the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements for the accomplishment of this effort. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS; statements rephrasing the PWS or parts thereof; and phrases such as “standard procedure will be employed” or “well-known techniques will be used” etc., will be considered unacceptable.

The Government intends to make an award without conducting discussions.

Evaluation Factor 1 – Price

1.1 Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques in RFO FAR 12.204(a).

Through these techniques the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable and complete.

1.2 Reasonableness. The Government will evaluate the price reasonableness of the offerors' proposed prices to ensure that in its nature and amount, it does not exceed what would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

1.3 Completeness. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with offerors, but discussions are not anticipated or intended. Since discussions are not anticipated or intended, the Government requires complete proposals with respect to price. A complete proposal will include all information required by this solicitation.

1.4 Evaluation of Option Pricing. The Government will evaluate option pricing in accordance with 52.212-2(b).

Additionally, as part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (see FAR Clause 52.217-8) by adding one-half of the offeror's final option period prices to the offeror's total price. Thus, the offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, 1st option, 2nd option, 3rd option, 4th option, and 1/2 of the 4th option. This evaluation will not obligate the Government to exercise any option under FAR 52.217-8 or FAR 52.217-9. The total sum of the base period and all option periods will represent the Total Evaluated Price. The Total Evaluated Price must be determined as fair and reasonable by the KO prior to award.

Evaluation Factor 2 - Technical Capability

2.1 The evaluation of Technical Capability will assess the offeror's proposed approach and understanding of the requirements. While the offeror is required to meet all sections of the PWS, the following paragraphs will specifically be evaluated to determine whether the offeror is capable of providing the needed services:

2.1.1 Paragraphs 5.1.6.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, and 5.2.6

Adjectival Rating

Description

Acceptable The offeror's technical approach is specific, detailed, and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirements, including robust plans for staffing and quality control.

The government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable The offeror's technical approach is vague, lacks detail, or fails to provide clear, actionable plans for the specified scenarios. The government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Evaluation Factor 3 - Past Performance

Miller, Michelle L Ms CIV NG NGB ARNG Note: These paragraphs are the ones that should be addressed in the instructions sections above (instead of “PWS Section 5”).

MARTINEAU, LUCAS C MSgt USAF ANG 140 MSG/MSC Updated.

3.1 The evaluation of this factor will assess the risk of unsuccessful performance of the offeror’s proposed approach by evaluating past efforts of a similar scope, magnitude, and complexity as the requirement described in the PWS.

3.2 Contracts submitted as Past Performance will not be considered if the Government determines them to be not Recent, not Relevant, or lacking any credible past performance information. If the offeror does not have a record of Recent and Relevant past performance information upon which to base a meaningful assessment, they will be rated as "Neutral", which is neither favorable nor unfavorable. If no Past Performance records exist, the offeror shall include a certified statement with their offer that no past performance information is available.

3.3 The offeror may also be evaluated on past contract performance information utilizing internal Government or private source information and the Government reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation. The Government may contact any of the references the offeror provides. In addition, the Government may review any past performance information reported to Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and any data obtained from other sources available i.e. government database, past contract files, etc.

3.4 In evaluating the offeror's past performance, the Government may compare the offeror's deliveries or performance to the contract's original delivery or performance schedule, unless the delay was Government-caused.

Schedule extensions that were the fault of the offeror, even if consideration was provided, may be counted against the offeror.

3.5 Past Performance Confidence Assessment

Adjectival Rating

Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(End of provision)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government in terms of price, and other factors considered. The offeror must provide enough information in their quote that the Government can determine if what is being provided conforms to the PWS requirements, otherwise the quote will be considered nonresponsive (sufficient information is defined as photos, product literature, or links to manufacturer data/specs).

AGENCY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS & CLAUSES

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting.

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance.

52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

Please see Attachment 2 for additional applicable provisions & clauses