Combined Air Force Reserve MATOC _ Synopsis.pdf

Synopsis for Air Force Reserve A-E Services MATOC

General Information Document Type: Synopsis Notice Solicitation Number: W912QR25R0029 Classification Code: C219- Architect and Engineering Services Due Date: Wednesday, 15 October 2025

Contracting Office Address:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District, 600 Martin Luther King Place, Louisville, Kentucky 40202

SYNOPSIS: INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT (IDC) FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) SERVICES SUPPORTING US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) LOUISVILLE DISTRICT MILITARY DESIGN, AIR

FORCE RESERVE MISSION - COMBINED UNRESTRICTED AND SMALL BUSINESS

DESCRIPTION:

1. CONTRACT INFORMATION

1.1. This synopsis: selections made, and contracts awarded therefrom will be in accordance with the Architect-Engineer (A-E) Statue as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 36.6 and Engineering Pamphlet (EP) 715-1-7. Firms will be selected for negotiation based on demonstration of competence and qualification for the required work.

1.2. Throughout the synopsis, the terms “firm”, “A-E Firm”, “Contractor”, “consultant” and “prime” are used synonymously. These terms represent legal entities including individual firms as joint-ventures and mentor-protégé joint ventures. These terms, however, do not represent prime and subcontractor (or subconsultant) relationships.

1.3. This procurement will be conducted under Product and Service Code (PSC) C219-Architect and Engineering- Other: General; and NAICS 541330- Engineering Services. The business size standard is $26M. In accordance with FAR 19.503, Reserves, this acquisition will be issued under one synopsis as an Unrestricted MATOC providing for a small business reserve. IAW FAR 19.504(c), all task orders will be reviewed for the reserve. If FAR 19.504(c) cannot be met, fair opportunity will be provided to all MATOC holders. The proposed MATOC will target seven (7) unrestricted awards and five (5) small business awards which will share the $150M capacity. The maximum number of awards will be dependent upon the quality of the SF 330’s submitted by the offerors as the Government intends to select all the most highly qualified offerors in each pool for negotiations. Each IDC will have a five (5) year contract period of performance consisting of a five-year base period. The anticipated performance period for the proposed contracts shall be from FY26-31, dependent upon the date of the last contract award. The wages and benefits for service employees (see FAR 22.10) performing under these contracts must be equal to those determined by the Department of Labor under the Service Contract Act, as determined relative to the employee’s office location (not the location of the work).

1.4. IDCs awarded from this synopsis shall be administered by the USACE, Louisville District Engineering Division, for use on federal AE service requirements under the jurisdiction of the Louisville District (LRL).

1.5. Work shall be issued by negotiated firm-fixed price task orders. Selection for task order awards shall be made in accordance with USACE Memo, Updated Procedures for the Selection of Task Orders on Architect-Engineer (A-E) Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDCs), 1 April 2025. The MATOC Task Order selection board will evaluate the firms’ existing SF 330s against the criteria required by the proposed projects. When a task order is to be awarded, the Contracting Officer or their designee will notify firms under contract by the issuance of a Task Order Requirement Notice (TORN). If at least three Small Businesses appear highly qualified to perform the work, then the Small Business reserve will be issued the TORN. All TORNs will include a short summary of the scope of work and task order-specific selection criteria. The Simplified TORN process will be used when the selection board concludes that the Government already has sufficient information in the existing SF 330s to determine the most highly qualified firm to perform the task order requirement and that supplemental information is not needed. The Request for Supplemental Information (RSI) TORN process may not be routinely used, but will be used when the selection board determines that available information within the existing SF 330s is insufficient to determine the most highly qualified A-E firm to perform the task order requirement. All firms under contract will be promptly notified upon a selection decision. If the TORN process is replaced by another A-E selection method during the life of the proposed contract(s), then it is the intention of USACE to follow the updated Task Order selection process.

1.6. Other-than-small-business A-E firm that intend to subcontract shall express its intent to meet the small business goals of the SF 330, Section C, by identifying subcontracting opportunities with small business and small business partners the firm has previously used or would consider using. If selected for negotiation, the other than small business A-E firm will be required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 219-704 as part of its Price Proposal.

The Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be evaluated in accordance with AFARS Appendix DD.

This plan is not required with this submittal but is required with the selected Offerors’s price proposal for negotiations.

1.7. To be eligible for contract award, an A-E firm (including Joint-Ventures (JV) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM). Register at https://sam.gov/. Note that an A-E firm or JV need not be registered to submit an SF 330 in response to this synopsis. When the most highly qualified firms are notified of their selection and issued a Request for Price Proposal (RFPP), firms should have a reasonable time in which to register in SAM. This notwithstanding, it is solely the A-E firm’s responsibility to register in SAM and be registered in SAM prior to submission of a price proposal. If an A-E firm is currently registered in SAM, the SF 330 submitted in response to this announcement should include the applicable Commercial and Government Entity Code (UEI).

1.8. Upon selection of the most highly qualified firms, the solicitation (RFPP) documents will only be made available in electronic format. No CD-ROMs or hardcopy documents will be distributed.

1.9. Contractor performance evaluations: In accordance with FAR Subpart 36.604-Performance Evaluation, A-E contractor’s performance will be evaluated throughout the performance of the contract. The USACE follows the procedures outlined in EP 715-1-7 to fulfill this FAR requirement.

Performance evaluations shall be prepared in the Contracting Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), which is a web-based system. CPARS/Past Performance evaluations will not be provided based on the IDC; instead, evaluations (interim, final or both as applicable) will be prepared for each A-E services contract/task order in excess of $35,000 or more. Past performance evaluations may also be prepared for contracts below $35,000. After an evaluation (interim or final) is prepared https://sam.gov/ by USACE, the firm whose performance has been evaluated will have the ability to access, review and comment on the evaluation for a period of 60 days. Current information about the system used for CPARS can be found on the CPARS website, https://www.cpars.gov. If the firm wishes to participate in the performance evaluation process, access to CPARS is the sole responsibility of the firm.

1.10. As a contract specifically procured by the Louisville District for the U.S. Air Force Reserve, the selected firms and relevant sub-consultants will be required to attend an annual two-day partnering workshop in Louisville, KY for the life of the contract. This workshop will require the attendance of representatives from the selected firms to define the Government's expectations, create a positive working atmosphere, encourage open communication, and to identify common goals. Cost for these sessions will be borne by the selected firms.

2. PROJECT INFORMATION

2.1. This acquisition tool will be used by LRL primarily for design of infrastructure projects related to military real property owned and operated by the United States Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) in support of the Air Force Reserve Mission in all fifty (50) states including U.S. territories. At the government’s discretion, this contract may be utilized for projects outside the Air Force Reserve mission.

2.2. Pre-Design Services may primarily consist of the following:

2.2.1. Studies in support of planning or design

2.2.2. Planning and Programming, to include planning charrettes in support of military vision, development, standards, and programs, and DD1391 preparation.

2.2.3. Site Investigations

2.2.4. Development of Area Development Plans and Vision Plans

2.3. Design Services may primarily consist of the following:

2.3.1. Parametric Estimating

2.3.2. Preliminary Designs and Charrettes, including Project Definition (Code 3)

2.3.3. Partial Designs (Plans and Specifications)

2.3.4. Full Designs (Performance Plans and Specifications and Prescriptive Plans and Specifications)

2.3.5. Preparation of documents for Design-Build RFPs (Request for Proposals) including design analysis and plans.

2.4. Services during Construction may primarily consist of:

2.4.1. Engineering During Construction

2.4.2. Construction Phase Services

2.4.3. Quality Assurance, Investigations, Material Testing, and Inspections

2.5. Project scopes may include:

2.5.1. Repair and modernization of existing facilities

2.5.2. Design of new facilities or utility systems of various types, sizes and complexities

2.5.3. Historic Preservation (including preservation, rehabilitation and restoration)

2.5.4. Anti-terrorist/Force Protection Criteria

2.5.5. Sustainable design utilizing LEED and Third-Party Certification (TPC) rating tools

2.5.6. Cost engineering using Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES)

2.5.7. Economic Analysis of Alternative Design Approaches

https://www.cpars.gov/

2.5.8. Life Cycle Cost Analysis

2.5.9. Value Engineering Studies

2.5.10. Topographic and Utility Surveying

2.5.11. Cybersecurity analysis and implementation

2.6. The selected offeror will be solely responsible for the designs that they produce and will become the designer of record or Design-Build RFP preparer for each individual project on their contract.

Projects may consist of planning, design, and related services for military projects. Typical projects may include design of facilities such as:

2.6.1. Aircraft and Vehicle Maintenance Shops (Aircraft Hangars, Work bays, Special Training Facilities, Storage and Support Spaces)

2.6.2. Airfield Paving

2.6.3. Training Simulator Facilities

2.6.4. Communication Buildings and Navigation Aids – Air Traffic Control Towers

2.6.5. Operational Buildings- Access Controlled Facilities, Sensitive Compartmented Information

Facilities (SCIFs) Supply Facilities

2.6.6. Secure Arms Storage Facilities

2.6.7. Covered equipment storage

2.6.8. Open equipment storage

2.6.9. Administrative Buildings

2.6.10. Housing and Community Facilities

2.6.11. Airmen Dormitories

2.6.12. Personnel Support and Service Facilities- Dining Halls, Public Safety Stations

2.6.13. Morale, Welfare and Recreation Facilities

2.6.14. Other facilities unique to AFRC and military installations.

2.7. All technical aspects of design work will be required to comply with the current technical criteria that includes U.S. national code and regulations, the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), DoD Criteria and Standards and USACE Engineering Regulations. If this contract needs to be utilized for secondary missions, the RSI TORN process will be utilized to determine the most highly qualified firm. The intention is for the SF 330s submitted in response to this synopsis to provide information most related to the primary mission of the Air Force Reserve.

3. SELECTION CRITERIA

3.1. The primary selection criteria are listed below in descending order of importance.

Criteria A – Professional Qualifications Criteria B – Specialized Experience and Technical Competence Criteria C – Capacity Criteria D – Past Performance

Depending on the number of SF 330 submissions received, the government may establish a Preselection Board to determine the highly qualified firms. The Selection Board will then fully evaluate highly qualified firms’ SF 330 submissions to determine the most highly qualified firms.

3.2. CRITERIA A – Professional Qualifications (SF 330, Part I, Section E)

The government will consider the education and current registration, licensure/certification (s), years of experience, longevity with the firm, as applicable, of each person named in Block 15. It will also consider the person’s relevant project experience provided in Block 19. More weight shall be given to experience with full-design type projects, that are of comparable scope magnitude and complexity to that described above in the paragraph titled Project Information as well as demonstrating the person’s role and specific tasks to do so. Key Personnel disciplines requested in this solicitation will be higher-weighted criteria during the evaluation process. Superfluous submissions will not be considered.

3.3. CRITERIA B – Specialized Experience and Technical Competence (SF 330, Part I, Section E & F)

The government’s evaluation of Specialized Experience and Technical Competency will consider example projects in SF 330 Section F that demonstrate the Specialized Experience and Technical Competencies below. The government’s evaluation will also consider how these same Specialized Experience and Technical Competencies are demonstrated in the individual team members’ resumes in SF 330 Section E. Projects submitted in section F may be given additional consideration when directly related to criteria listed below and are a project for the United States Air Force or Air Force Reserve.

3.3.1. Use of Building Information Modeling and Civil Information Modeling per USACE requirements

3.3.2. Use of UFC 1-200-01 (Department of Defense Building Code)

3.3.3. Use of UFC 3-410-01 and HVAC design for military construction projects

3.3.4. Use of UFC 3-600-01 and fire protection design for military construction projects

3.3.5. Use and understanding of AFRCH 32-1001 Air Force Reserve Command Standard Facility

Requirements

3.3.6. Understanding of the Louisville District Design Guide

3.3.7. Understanding of Air Force Reserve installation-specific requirements such as Installation

Design Guides, environmental requirements, and master specifications

3.3.8. Construction cost estimating using MCACES

3.3.9. Performance of design charrettes

3.3.10. Experience with Cyber-Security

3.3.11. Use of SPECSINTACT software

The Design Quality Management Plan (DQMP) included in Section H will be considered when evaluating Specialized Experience and Technical Competency of the offeror. No other information included in Section H will be used to evaluate Criteria A or Criteria B.

3.4. CRITERIA C – Capacity (SF 330, Part I, Section H)

The government’s evaluation of the offeror’s capacity narrative and associated tables, figures, etc.

included in SF 330 Section H will consider the offeror’s ability to complete the work in the required time with the understanding that this contract may require multiple design teams to work multiple task orders at various locations simultaneously.

3.5. CRITERIA D – Past Performance (SF 330, Part I, Section H)

Past performance evaluation will focus on quality of work, compliance with performance schedules, cost control, management performance, and will consider (1) the performance evaluations provided in Section H for the projects in Section F and (2) any performance evaluations in the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for the UEI numbers of any firms or offices listed in the SF 330 or for any of the projects included in Section F. Performance evaluations completed by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or equivalent role on the contract are preferred. While all performance evaluations may be considered, those for projects listed in Section F and projects with similar scopes of work will receive the most consideration when evaluating past performance. In addition to CPARS, the board may seek information on past performance from other sources.

4. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

4.1. ALL RESPONSES TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY BY 2:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON 15 October 2025. THROUGH THE PROCUREMENT INTEGRATED

ENTERPRISE ENVIRONMENT (PIEE) SOLICITATION MODULE.

4.2. A User ID and Password are required to access PIEE. Offerors are required to self-register as a Vendor or Contractor with the user's CAGE code(s) and must have an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to the PIEE registration process.

4.3. Instructions for registering in PIEE:

4.3.1. Navigate to https://piee.eb.mil/

4.3.2. Select “Register” [top right], or go to

https://piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/registration/notice.xhtml

4.3.3. Select “Vendor”

4.3.4. Create a User ID and Password and follow the prompts [next]

4.3.5. Create Security Questions [next]

4.3.6. Complete your User Profile Information [next]

4.3.7. Complete your Supervisor or Approving Official Information [next]

4.3.8. Complete Roles:

Step 1. Select SOL-Solicitation Step 2. Select Proposal Manager Step 3. Click Add Roles Step 4. Fill in your Location Code (CAGE Code) [next]

4.3.9. Provide a justification for your registration [next]

4.3.10. Follow the remaining prompts to submit your registration.

4.4. Instructions for Electronic Proposal Submissions in PIEE Solicitation Module:

4.4.1. Log into PIEE and select the Solicitation Icon.

4.4.2. Enter search criteria to find the solicitation. (Search Criteria can be the complete solicitation number, Solicitation Open Date, Response Due Date, Product or Service Code, NAICS, Set Aside code, Place of Performance Zip Code, Contracting Office DODAAC, or Status).

4.4.3. The search results display. Select the Solicitation Number link to open the solicitation.

4.4.4. The solicitation displays. The information is view only.

https://piee.eb.mil/ https://piee.eb.mil/xhtml/unauth/registration/notice.xhtml

4.4.5. Scroll down to see the Contract Information and Attachments. The Attachments can be viewed by selecting the File link. Scroll back up to the top of the screen and click the Offer tab.

4.4.6. Click the Offer tab to Add and review current offers on the Solicitation. Click the Add button to add an offer to the Solicitation.

4.4.7. Select the applicable CAGE Code for which submitting the offer for. The list is prefiltered based on the CAGEs in the Proposal Manager’s profile.

4.4.8. Upload the attachments that comprise the offer by selecting the Choose Files link.

4.4.9. After entering all necessary information enter a Signature Date and Click the Signature button.

4.4.10. The “Sign Document” pop-up window will be displayed requiring the user to enter a Digital

PIN and One Time Password (OTP). Click the “Sign and Submit” button to continue.

4.4.11. After successfully adding the Offer a success message of the submission will be displayed and the offer displayed collapsed. Users may expand and view all their offers on a Solicitation.

4.5. Upload Completion & Deadline: Offerors are highly encouraged to become familiar with the PIEE Solicitation module well in advance of the proposal due date. Interested Offerors shall submit proposals no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within PIEE Solicitation module.

Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.

4.6. File Names: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure that their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention: Each filename shall begin with the solicitation number, followed by the word “RESPONSE”, followed by your firm’s name, and finally a brief file description.

EXAMPLES:

“W912QR25R0009 FIRMNAME SF330 Part I.pdf” “W912QR25R0009 FIRMNAME SF330 Part II.pdf”

4.7. Additional/special instructions and clarifications for SF330 submission are as follows:

4.7.1. SF 330, Part I, Section C:

SF 330, Part I, Section C- Block 11- Roles in this contract shall use the nomenclature as listed in Selection Criteria B, Part I, Key Disciplines

4.7.2. SF 330, Part I, Section D:

SF 330, Part I, Section D, Organization Chart shall not be more than one page and may be formatted to 11” x 17”

4.7.3. SF 330, Part I, Section E:

SF 330, Part I, Section E, Block 14 shall be in whole years, no partial years. Each resume shall not exceed two (2) pages. Prepare a separate Section E for each person. Indicate whether the prime contractor or subcontractor employs the key personnel.

4.7.3.1. Firms shall provide the key personnel per the disciplines listed below. To demonstrate qualifications, resumes for persons filling these disciplines are to be provided in Section E and the role listed in Block 13 shall use the exact same discipline nomenclature as listed below. An individual shall not serve in more than on (1) role. Additionally, all key personnel shall be shown on the organizational chart in Section D. The following key disciplines are required and limited to two resumes per discipline.

4.7.3.1.1. Project Management

4.7.3.1.2. Architecture

4.7.3.1.3. Civil Engineering

4.7.3.1.4. Electrical Engineering

4.7.3.1.5. Mechanical Engineering

4.7.3.1.6. Structural Engineering

4.7.3.1.7. Cost Engineering

4.7.3.2. The proposed lead project manager(s), architect(s), or engineer(s) in each discipline must be registered, licensed, or certified in a state or commonwealth or territory within the United States and possess a professional license to practice in the appropriate professional field for which he/she is offered. A project management professional (PMP) certificate can be considered as additional consideration for a project manager. Cost engineers shall be a Certified Cost Engineer (CCE), Certified Cost Consultant (CCC), Certified Cost Professional (CCP), or hold an equivalent accreditation. Identified key personnel may be more highly evaluated if the person(s) participated as a member of the A-E firm or a significant subconsultant in the example project submitted in the SF 330 Section F and shown in G.

4.7.3.3. Specialized Personnel: Provide a resume for one person identified against each discipline below:

4.7.3.3.1. U.S. Registered Communication Distribution Designer (RCDD) accredited by the

Building Industry Consulting Service International (BICSI) and possessing a current active RCDD registration.

4.7.3.3.2. BIM / Computer Aided Design (CAD) Manager

4.7.3.3.3. Registered Fire Protection Engineer

4.7.3.3.4. Licensed Interior Designer

4.7.3.3.5. LEED Building Design and Construction (LEED BD+C) Accredited Professional (AP)

- if not covered by key personnel above.

4.7.3.3.6. Building Commissioning Specialist - if not covered by key personnel above.

4.7.3.4. Relevant Project Experience (Section E, Block 19): All key personnel shall have a minimum of ten (10) years of design experience in their discipline demonstrated by projects with scope, magnitude, and complexity comparable to this solicitation.

Specialized personnel shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in their discipline demonstrated by projects with scope, magnitude, and complexity comparable to this solicitation. Relevant projects are those that reflect experience performing in their respective discipline. Relevant project information should be brief and highlight specific roles and tasks performed by the key personnel; project type; scope; and costs. Maximum of five (5) projects will be listed for each resume. Additional consideration will be given to projects that are more recent, and construction is considered substantially completed.

Note: The projects provided for this criterion may also be used to address Criteria B.

4.7.4. SF 330, Part I, Section F:

4.7.4.1. Firms shall submit a maximum of ten (10) example projects.

4.7.4.2. Project – A stand-alone design contract award or a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as a project.

4.7.4.3. Completed project – All projects not considered to be substantially complete, to include projects that were never constructed, may be considered less favorably. A project is considered substantially complete if the project can be used for its intended purpose. For Section F (Block 22), projects with a construction completion date more than six (6) years prior to the date of this solicitation may be considered less favorably. If the project was not constructed, the project must have a satisfactory or better CPARS and Period of Performance end date (as listed in the final CPARS) within the last six (6) years.

4.7.4.4. In block 24, include in the project description, the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performance that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined in paragraphs 3.b-d above.

For projects performed as a subcontractor or a JV involving different partners, identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project.

4.7.4.5. In Block 25, the firm name and role(s) should be the same as proposed in Section C and indicate the % of the project that the firm performed in the role(s).

4.7.4.6. If the firm is a JV, project performed by the JV should be submitted; however, if the JV does not have such experience, offerors shall submit at least one project from each JV partner. Mentor-protégé firms the SBA Mentor -Protégé program will be evaluated pursuant to the applicable statutes and regulations governing the SBA Mentor-Protégé program.

4.7.4.7. Pictures, illustrations, etc. are highly encouraged, but are not required.

4.7.5. SF 330, Part I, Section G:

4.7.5.1. All key personnel from Section E shall be included and Block 28 shall only be “X’ if the person performed the same role as listed in Block 27.

4.7.6. SF 330, Part I, Section H:

4.7.6.1. No project information included in Section H shall be evaluated for Criteria A.

4.7.6.2. No specialized experience and technical competence or professional qualifications included in Section H shall be evaluated for Criteria A.

4.7.6.3. Section H shall only include past performance information for the projects included in

Section F. To demonstrate quality of past performance, for each project presented for Criteria D, the SF 330 Submission shall include only one of the final or most recent Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR). If a CPAR is not available, the SF 330 submission shall include only one of a final or recent NAVFAC/USACE/USGS Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). In the event of a conflict between a PPQ and CPAR submitted to demonstrate past performance for the same example project, the CPARS shall govern.

*CPARS reports/PPQs do not count toward the page limitation.

4.7.6.4. Design Quality Management Plan (DQMP):

Each offeror shall produce a detailed Design Quality Management Plan including the following items:

4.7.6.4.1. An explanation of the firm's management approach

4.7.6.4.2. Management of sub-consultants (if applicable)

4.7.6.4.3. Procedures for obtaining local, state and federal regulatory permits in a timely manner

4.7.6.4.4. Procedures for dealing with design features unique to localities nation-wide (like soil conditions, seismic requirements, climate factors, etc.)

4.7.6.4.5. Quality control procedures to include the roles and responsibilities of checkers

(for plans, specification, design analysis and electronic documents)

4.7.6.4.6. Risk management and mitigation processes, procedures to ensure that internal resources are not over committed

4.7.6.4.7. A narrative explaining of the chain of command to include individuals that will serve as the single point of contact for the contract and other senior leaders which are responsible to ensure successful execution of task orders

4.7.6.4.8. An organizational chart showing the inter-relationship of management and various team components (including sub-consultants).

4.7.6.5. The offeror shall include a brief narrative addressing capacity, however, only the numbers in the SF 330, Part II shall be used to evaluate the adequacy of personnel availability.

4.7.6.6. Only the information included in Section H shall be evaluated except for the Organization Chart, which is in Section D.

4.7.6.7. For Knowledge of Locality, please only include additional information to evaluate the areas being requested; do not copy and paste information from Section E and/or Section F.

4.7.7. Page Limits and Formatting

4.7.7.1. SF 330 Part I shall not exceed 100 pages total; CPARS do not count toward page limit.

4.7.7.2. Cover Letter, Table of Contents, or any dividing pages do not count towards the total.

4.7.7.3. Section E, limited to 2 pages per resume

4.7.7.4. Section F, limited to 4 pages per project

4.7.7.5. Section H, Quality Management Plan, Capacity to Perform Work and Past Performance 5 pages

4.7.7.6. All pages shall be 8.5” x 11”, except one page 11” x 17” is allowed for the organizational chart in Section D.

4.7.7.7. Font size shall be 12 point.

4.7.7.8. Font sizes for tables, figures, or charts are at the discretion of the submitter, but it shall be legible and large enough to be easily read by the evaluator.

4.7.7.9. Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled.

5. INTERVIEWS

The government intends to hold interviews with the most highly qualified firms (FAR 36.602-3(c)) via email. Only the most highly qualified firm and two most highly qualified alternates will receive interview questions to resolve or clarify information regarding a firm’s experience, capabilities, capacity, organization, management, quality control procedures and approach for this project.

6. INQUIRIES

Prospective offerors should submit inquiries related to this synopsis in accordance with the following:

For information related to amendments, and other important updates, please check SAM.gov Contract Opportunities.

All inquiries are to be submitted by bidder inquiry in ProjNet at the URL below.:

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm

To submit and review synopsis inquiry items in ProjNet, respondents will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register, go to the ProjNet web page above and click on the QUICK ADD link. Select agency as USACE and enter the Inquiry Key for this solicitation, your email address, and then click CONTINUE. Fill in all required information and click ADD USER. From this page, you may view all inquiries or add an inquiry. Each interested party will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed.

The Solicitation Number is: W912QR25R0029

The ProjNet Inquiry Key is: R9Z798-DI462Z

The Government will not entertain any further inquiries after 15 October 2025.

The POC for this synopsis is Ryan King at Ryan.M.King2@usace.army.mil.

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm