Combination Solicitation Synopsis OCSA Coin Contract BPA.pdf

Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases

1. Solicitation Number: W91CRB-25-R-A024

2. Title: The Office of the Chief of Staff Army (OCSA) Commander’s Coins Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA)

3. Classification Code: R712 – Coin Minting

4. NAICS Code: 339910: Jewely and Silverware Manufacturing

5. Response Date: 05 September 2025 due via email to the Primary Point of

Contact listed in SAM.gov for this combined synopsis-solicitation.

6. Description: This solicitation is for a contractor to produce, customize, and deliver coins to the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army. These coins are used by the Chief of Staff, Vice Chief of Staff, Sergeant Major of the Army, and Director of the Army Staff to recognize Soldiers and Department of Army (DA) civilians for exceptional performance, thereby improving morale. The goal is to establish a single source for high-quality, customized coins that meet the specific requirements of Army Senior Leaders and are maintained in stock to support their official travel schedules.

Disclaimer: This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested, and a written solicitation will not be issued.

NOTICE: THIS PROCUREMENT WILL BE CONDUCTED USING A TIERED

EVALUATION OF OFFERS. THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WILL BE

UTILIZED:

This acquisition is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. Only offers from qualified small businesses will be considered. Award will be made to the responsible small business offeror whose offer is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government, considering all evaluation factors outlined in this solicitation.

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to evaluate and award a contract without discussion with offerors (except for clarifications as described in FAR 52.215-1 Instruction to Offerors – competitive acquisition).

Therefore, offerors’ initial offers should contain the offerors’ best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

FOR OFFERS TO BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE, THEY MUST MEET ALL

THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THE SOLICITATION AND

BE COMPETITIVE IN TERMS OF MARKET PRICES, QUALITY, AND DELIVERY.

This acquisition is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ).

The following notes apply to this announcement:

The Period of Performance (PoP) for this BPA will be 5 (five) year period from date of established agreement. The agreement will have a Not to Exceed (NTE) price of $795,100.00. The Government will make payment using a Government Purchase Card or via WAWF, and each agreement holder will submit a summary invoice per Call. The Contracting Officer and the Ordering Officer are authorized to issue a Call under this BPA.

The solicitation documents and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-04

For purposes of this acquisition, the associated NAICS code is 339910. The small business size standard is 700 employees.

Contract Line Item (CLIN) Structure: The following is a list of contract line-item number(s) and items, quantities and units of measure, (including option(s), if applicable):

Item Description Unit Cost

CSA Signature Coin $ CSA Generic Coin $ VCSA Signature Coin $ VCSA Generic Coin $ SMA Signature Coin $ SMA Generic Coin $ DAS Staff Badge Coin $ DAS Circular Coin $

Specifications/Requirement: SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLED OCSA Coin Contract Performance Work Statement

Delivery: Deliveries will be made to the Pentagon Remote Delivery Facility.

Deliveries will be specified at each call order.

I. Evaluation Criteria - The specific evaluation criteria to be used are as follows:

The Government is contemplating awarding a single award commercial, Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basic Blanket Purchase Agreements for a five (5) year period from date of established agreement. The agreement will have a Not to Exceed (NTE) price of $795,100 and a maximum dollar amount of $25,000.00 for each individual Call. The Government will evaluate, and award based on the evaluation criteria below.

In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation, a rating of acceptable for past performance rating, and price determine to be fair and reasonable.

The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation:

- Technical evaluation The technical acceptability element of the evaluation will be a determination as to whether the proposed product meets the specifications in the attached PWS. The Technical element of the evaluation shall be based solely on information furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for locating or securing any information, which is not identified in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, vendors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the Government to determine whether the product meets the performance characteristics and specifications of the requirement. If the offeror proposes to modify a product so as to conform to the requirement of this solicitation, the offeror shall include a clear description of such proposed modifications and clearly mark any descriptive materials to show modifications.

- Past performance of offeror Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable rating basis.

An “Acceptable” rating is defined as the Government having reasonable confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. An “Unacceptable” rating is defined as the Government having minimal confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. The ratings will be based upon past performance information submitted by the offeror, as well as any other past performance information the Government obtains. The offeror shall submit two (2) records of past performance from the past 36 months with their offer. Only offerors rated “Acceptable” will be eligible for award. No past performance record will be considered acceptable.

- Price Price will be evaluated based on the total proposed price, including options, (if any).

Consistent with a best value trade-off, the Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest-priced offeror if a higher-priced offer provides a significantly more advantageous solution, considering the superiority of its Technical proposal. The Government anticipates awarding a contract without discussion.

In accordance with FAR 32.003, contract financing cannot not be provided for this acquisition.