CN-370000-HW560-BF602A.pdf

DEP CONTRACT NO.

Task Assignment #: Module #: Grant #:

Contractor Name:

Contractor Representative:

DEP Contract Manager: Phone #:

DEP Site #:

Site Name:

Address(Street, City, County):

Phase:

Task Description [use additional pages if necessary]:

The Deliverable and Invoice Schedule is attached.

Final Deliverables:

Final Deliverable Due Date:

TASK ASSIGNMENT TYPE AND NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNTS:

FIXED FEE

RETAINAGE:

TOTAL TASK ASSIGNMENT VALUE: $0.00

DEP Task Manager:

DEP Contract Manager:

Contractual Authority:

Contractor Representative:

CC: Procurement Section (MS 93) Section Representative ________

TASK ASSIGNMENT NOTIFICATION FORM

COST PLUS FIXED FEE

COST REIMBURSEMENT

FIXED PRICE FEE SCHEDULE

Period of Performance:

Execution of Task Assignment through:

DEP will review the deliverables to verify that they meet the specifications of this contract and task description. DEP’s Contract Manager shall notify the Contractor of any deficiencies in the deliverable(s) and shall give the Contractor reasonable opportunity to correct noted deficiencies and provide a revised deliverable(s).

WCP TAFORM 01_18

HW560

SRPPM SRP18BF602A

Tetra Tech

Gerry Walker, P.G. Phone #: (850) 536-8126

(850) 245-8953Kelly Crain

COM_386141

Port of Fort Pierce aka: Former King Maritime Group

101 Port Avenue A, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950

Targeted Brownfield Assessment (TBA)

The Department approves this Task Assignment (TA) based upon the Cost Proposal and Level of Effort (CP/LOE) for soil and groundwater assessment activities, submitted to the Department on March 2, 2020 (revised March 21, 2020 and March 24, 2020) by Tetra Tech. The final deliverable will be a Targeted Brownfield Assessment (TBA) Report, received by the Department no later than June 19, 2020.

Targeted Brownfield Assessment (TBA) Report

06/19/2020

07/17/2020

$ 44,966.24 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00

Megan R. Johnson Digitally signed by Megan R. Johnson Date: 2020.03.25 12:41:55 -04'00'

Kelly Crain Digitally signed by Kelly Crain Date: 2020.03.26 10:59:53 -04'00'

Digitally signed by Jennifer Farrell Date: 2020.03.26 16:48:31 -04'00'

Digitally signed by: Gerald Walker DN: CN = Gerald Walker email = gerry.walker@tetratech.com C = AD O = Tetra tech OU = Tetra Tech Date: 2020.03.27 09:21:03 -04'00'

Gerald Walker

$ 44,966.24

Task Assignment Notification/Change Order Deliverables and Invoice Schedule Attachment

WCP TAFORM 04-2017

Contract Number:

Task Assignment #:

Deliverables:

Deliverable Deliverable Due Date

Invoice Schedule:

Requirements for Invoice Submittal Amount to be Invoiced

TOTAL COST

QAPP/Work Plan and HASP 04/15/2020

Field notes, photographic log, chain of custody, soil sampling logs, groundwater sampling logs. 05/15/2020

Targeted Brownfield Assessment Report 06/19/2020

Department approval of QAPP/Work Plan and HASP (Subtask 2) $ 8,061.76

Department approval of field notes, photographic log, chain of custody, soil sampling logs, and groundwater sampling logs (Subtask 3) $ 30,119.22

Department approval of Targeted Brownfield Assessment Report (Subtasks 1 & 4) $ 6,785.26

$ 44,966.24

HW560

BF602A

www.FloridaDEP.gov

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

Environmental Protection

Bob Martinez Center

2600 Blair Stone Road

Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400

Ron DeSantis Governor

Jeanette Nuñez

Lt. Governor

Noah Valenstein

Secretary

Memorandum

TO: Tetra Tech, HW560 Contract File

FROM: Kelly Crain, Contract Manager

DATE: March 25, 2020

SUBJECT: Negotiation Summary – SRP 18 Task Assignment (TA) BF602A

Port of Fort Pierce aka: Former King Maritime Group Facility ID # COM_386141 Targeted Brownfield Assessment (TBA) Activities

This TA is intended for conducting Targeted Brownfield Assessment activities at the Port of Fort Pierce aka: Former King Maritime Group site, located at 101 Port Avenue A, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950. The services are being conducted using federal funds from the State & Tribal Response Program (SRP) cooperative agreement that is administered by the Department on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Subtask 1: Project Management This subtask is a percentage of the overall project fees and has been negotiated as a contract rate. It includes project management, overhead, general and administrative, fringe and other direct costs. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $2,519.20.

Subtask 2: Site Reconnaissance, GPS Survey, QAPP/Work Plan, and Health and Safety Plan In accordance with an EPA directive, this subtask includes the completion of a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)/Work Plan, a Health and Safety Plan (HASP). Prior to compiling the QAPP/Work Plan and HASP, a site reconnaissance and GPS survey of previous and proposed sampling locations will be performed. The QAPP/Work Plan will provide a brief summary of the scope of work, tables and figures showing the proposed sample locations, laboratory and field quality assurance measures and procedures, and the findings from the site reconnaissance and GPS survey. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $8,061.76.

Subtask 3: Site Assessment Activities Under this subtask, Tetra Tech will coordinate utility location at the proposed sampling locations, collect 60 soil samples from 30 soil borings at select locations to assess soil contamination, and install seven temporary monitoring wells at select locations to collect groundwater samples to assess groundwater contamination. Soil samples will be collected from two depth intervals, 0-2 ft and 1 ft above the water table (estimated to be 3-4 ft interval). In addition to chemical analyses, soil samples from each interval will be collected for screening for organic vapors. Groundwater samples will be collected with a peristaltic pump and polyethylene tubing using low-flow sampling procedures for laboratory analysis. The soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed by TestAmerica. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $30,119.22.

http://www.floridadep.gov/

Negotiation Summary – Task Assignment (TA) BF602A Port of Fort Pierce aka: Former King Maritime Group

COM_386141

St. Lucie County Targeted Brownfield Assessment Activities March 25, 2020 www.FloridaDEP.gov

Subtask 4: Targeted Brownfield Assessment Report A Targeted Brownfield Assessment Report will be prepared detailing the field and laboratory results. This report will also include figures, maps, tables, and conclusions and recommendations for any future work. The agreed upon cost of this subtask is $4,266.06.

Summary The Department’s SRP Contract Manager and Tetra Tech’s Contract Manager have both agreed to the scope of work and associated costs. The final cost associated with this TA is $44,966.24. Documentation of these costs is included in the Cost Proposal/Level of Effort (CP/LOE) Form and CP/LOE letter provided by Tetra Tech on March 2, 2020 (revised March 21, 2020 and March 24, 2020), as well as the Task Assignment Form for BF602A prepared by the Department. The final deliverable must be received by the Department no later than June 19, 2020.

Tetra Tech, Inc.

1558 Village Square Blvd., Ste. 2, Tallahassee, FL 32309-2478

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

TetraTech/TAL-20-24 HW560-02

March 24, 2020

Department of Environmental Protection Waste Cleanup Programs ATTN: Ms. Megan Johnson MS #4535 Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400

Reference: Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Waste Cleanup Programs Consolidated Contract HW560

Subject: Revised Cost Proposal – Targeted Brownfield Assessment at Former King Maritime Group (AKA: Port of Fort Pierce), Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida

Dear Ms. Johnson:

Tetra Tech Inc., (Tetra Tech) is pleased to submit to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) this revised cost proposal to conduct Targeted Brownfield Assessment activities at the Former King Maritime Group Site at 101 Port Avenue A, Fort Pierce, Florida (See Figure 1).

This site is owned by St. Lucie County.

Two phases of site assessment activities, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Preliminary Contamination Assessment (PCA), have been conducted by St. Lucie County’s consultant, including the collection of 59 soil samples and collection of 47 groundwater samples.

In the County’s PCA report and application for CERCLA funding, eight areas of soil and/or groundwater contamination were described. Upon review of the assessment reports prepared for the County by Ardaman and Associates, several other areas or issues were identified that may also warrant further assessment. Table 1 provides a summary of all areas of contamination and issues proposed to be addressed. These areas are identified in Figure 1 (The attached figures are for general costing purposes only and new figures will be generated as part of the work plan subtask.

There is currently no locational data for the borings or monitoring wells used in the earlier phases of assessment at this site.)

Soil Contamination. Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) in soil is the contaminant of concern identified by the County and their consultant as being most significant across the site and requiring delineation and potentially soil removal due to the number of locations where its concentration is greater than the Florida Industrial Soil Cleanup Target Level (ISCTL).

TRPH is also present at some locations at concentrations lower than the ISCTL but greater than the Florida Residential Soil Cleanup Target Level (RSCTL), which also requires delineation under Chapter 62-780, FAC. This proposed scope of work includes additional soil sampling to complete vertical and lateral delineation of TRPH to below the Florida RSCTL at several locations. In addition to delineation, the TRPH, components need to be characterized using TPRH Fractionation analysis, the results of which may reduce the need for remediation (see FDEP Memorandum on

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

Chapter 62-770, F.A.C., Soil Cleanup Target Levels Application to Site Rehabilitation Decisions, February 1, 2011). The proposed locations, numbers of borings, sampling methodology and number of analyses for TRPH and TRPH Fractionation are included in Table 1.

Arsenic (As) was also found in soil at several locations exceeding its ISCTL and at many locations exceeding its RSCTL and the Florida Leachability to Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (LGCTL).

This proposed scope includes delineation of As at locations where it was found at concentrations exceeding the ISTCL and spot sampling for As at select soil boring locations to confirm its presence in areas where it was previously identified at concentrations exceeding the RSCTL. This will help FDEP in evaluating the appropriate remedy for what appears to be a widespread condition. The proposed locations, numbers of borings, sampling methodology and number of analyses for As are included in Table 1.

There were several other analytes identified in Tetra Tech’s review of previous reports and data for which there were FDEP soil criteria exceedances that may warrant further delineation or assessment. At one location in Area B, Lead (Pb) was found in a soil sample at a concentration significantly greater than its ISCTL and at another location (in Area C) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane (1,1,2- TCA) was found at a concentration exceeding its ISCTL. Also, at this Area C location, Isopropyl benzene was greater than its LGCTL in the soil. The proposed locations, numbers of soil borings, sampling methodology and number of analyses for Pb and 1,1,2-TCA are included in Table 1.

Groundwater sampling at the location of the Isopropyl benzene exceedance is proposed to evaluate its leachability. In addition, pesticides analysis of soil samples is recommended for two locations (one in Area C and one in Area D), which may be adjacent to a former citrus processing area.

These are also described in Table 1.

Groundwater. St. Lucie County’s application described two groundwater contamination issues that were identified in the previous work, As and Ammonia.

Arsenic concentrations above the Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL) were reported in groundwater samples from 10 locations scattered across the 12-acre site. These groundwater samples were collected from hand-installed temporary wells that were removed after sampling.

Before doing additional work to define the area of apparent As contamination, it is proposed that temporary wells be installed and sampled at seven of the locations where As concentrations were greatest using a conventional drilling methodology and low-flow sampling techniques that would minimize turbidity and other factors that could bias the results for As. As described in Table 1, at four of these locations select parameters will also be included in the analyte list to help evaluate leachability of soil contaminants of concern (Pb, TRPH, 1,1,2-TCA and Isopropyl benzene). Figure 2 shows the proposed monitoring well locations. The groundwater sampling rationale, proposed monitoring well locations, numbers of samples, sampling methodology and analytes for each well are included in Table 1.

During the Phase II ESA, Ammonia was detected in one of the temporary monitoring wells at a concentration exceeding its GCTL. Subsequently, additional temporary wells were installed and sampled during the PCA. At present, this work appears to sufficiently delineate the area of Ammonia contamination and additional assessment is not included in this scope of work. FDEP may determine that more work may be needed at this location to further assess Ammonia at a later date.

Services provided in this proposal will be completed as four subtasks including: Subtask 1, Project Management; Subtask 2, Work Plan and Health and Safety Plan (HASP); Subtask 3, Fieldwork

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com including Soil Sampling, Monitoring Well Installation, and Groundwater Sampling; and Subtask 4, Report. These subtasks will include the following activities:

Subtask 1 - Project Management: Project Management includes managing the project scope, schedule, and budget. The level of effort is based on the HW560 Contract requirements and assumes 14 hours for Task 1.

Subtask 2 - Work Plan & HASP: This task includes pre-intrusive field activities including a site reconnaissance and GPS survey of previous and proposed sampling locations; ; preparation of a Work Plan; and preparation of a Health and Safety Plan for the monitoring well installation and sampling activities.

Site reconnaissance. This project will be conducted under the supervision of a Senior Scientist (Scientist V) based in the Tetra Tech Tallahassee, FL office who is experienced in site assessment under the FDEP CERCLA/Brownfields program and will have direct contact with FDEP throughout the project. A Senior Scientist (Scientist IV) based in the Tetra Tech Stuart, FL office will be field operations lead for the project. Prior to other field activities, these individuals will conduct a site walkover with County representatives and locate and use a GPS (with sub-meter accuracy) to survey previous and proposed boring and well locations.

Work plan and Health and Safety Plan. After the site reconnaissance is conducted, the project work plan and HASP will be prepared by Tallahassee-based staff.

The level of effort assumes 23 hours for a Senior Scientist (Scientist V) for the reconnaissance and workplan review; 10 hours for a Senior Scientist (Scientist IV) for the reconnaissance; 21 hours for a Staff Engineer (office health and safety officer); and 5 hours for processing GPS data and figure preparation.

Subtask 3 – Soil Sampling, Well Installation, and Groundwater Sampling: This subtask includes subsurface utility location, monitoring well installation, groundwater sampling, soil sampling and other field activities. The field activities and level of effort summary are described below and the level of effort, subcontractor, equipment, travel, and supplies needed for this subtask are described in the cost estimate worksheets. Proposed sampling locations are described in Table 1 organized by areas shown in Figure 1. Monitoring well locations are shown in Figure 2.

Utility location. Prior to intrusive field activities, underground utilities on the property will be marked and all proposed monitoring well and soil boring locations will be cleared for underground utilities. In addition to the standard 811 one call location of public utilities, a private utility location service will be employed to clear proposed well and boring locations.

This service will be provided by GeoTech, a subcontractor that has provided these services in the past for Tetra Tech and FDEP. A TetraTech will be on site to coordinate the work provided by the subcontractor.

Monitoring well installation and shallow soil coring. Temporary monitoring wells will be installed at seven locations by a direct push drilling subcontractor. The wells will be small diameter (micro) PVC wells installed by a direct-push drilling contractor, each well will be completed to an estimated depth of 12-15 feet below land surface. Actual well depths and screen placement will be determined based on lithology and depth to groundwater encountered in continuous core hole advanced at each well site. Screens will be placed so that the upper 1/3 of the screen is above the water table. Each well will be constructed

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com of 1-inch-diameter PVC casing with a 10-foot-long pre-packed well screen, with a fine sand seal above the well screen. Clean bagged sand will be used to fill the annular space above the seal. As soon as the wells are installed, they will be developed by pumping until the discharged water is clear. By using this method for well installation, there will be no drill cuttings to collect as investigation-derived waste (IDW). Development water will be allowed to infiltrate into the soil near the well sites. After Tetra Tech completes sampling and a top-of-casing/water level survey, the wells will be abandoned in place by grouting using the tremie method, with the well casings cut off below land surface, and the surface restored to the pre-existing condition. While onsite for well installation, the drill rig will be used to cut asphalt and underlying base material at the soil boring locations to be included in soil sampling.

Soil sampling. Soil samples will be collected from 30 proposed boring locations described in Table 1. Soil samples will be collected from two depth intervals, 0-2 ft and 1 ft above the water table (estimated to be 3-4 ft interval). Specifics on soil sampling, including the analytical methods, are detailed in Table 1. The proposed sample depths correspond to the depths from which samples were collected during previous sampling events in order to compare. In addition to chemical analyses, soil samples from each interval will be collected for screening for organic vapors. Soil sample aliquots for all analytical categories except volatile organics will be collected using pre-cleaned stainless-steel hand augers and homogenized in Pyrex bowls (or approved alternative) prior to transfer to sample containers. Each aliquot for volatile organic compound analysis will be collected directly from the hand auger bucket using a syringe-type core sampler and transferred to sample vials according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 5035 methodology.

After sampling, excess soil will be returned to the boreholes and asphalt cold patch or concrete will be used to complete restoration.

Groundwater sampling. The seven temporary wells will be sampled after the wells have been developed and allowed to set for a minimum of 24 hours. Each well will be purged with a peristaltic pump and polyethylene tubing using low-flow sampling procedures and samples will be collected for laboratory analysis for As and other analytes as described in Table 1.

In addition, Quality Assurance/Quality Control samples will be collected for analysis. These include field duplicates for both soil and groundwater (1 per 10 sample minimum), equipment rinsate samples for both soil and groundwater sampling equipment (1 per 20 sample minimum), and one trip blank for volatile organics. Temperature blanks will be carried in all coolers.

A Trimble GeoXH hand-held global positioning system (GPS) will be used by Tetra Tech staff to survey latitude and longitude coordinates of the sampling stations during the reconnaissance and during soil and groundwater sampling. In addition, all monitoring well tops of casings will be surveyed by Tetra Tech staff to a common onsite datum and at least one synoptic set of depth-to-groundwater measurements will be taken prior to abandonment of the temporary wells.

The field personnel conducting monitoring well installation and sampling activities will mobilize from the Tetra Tech Stuart, FL office to minimize travel costs, commuting to the site from their home location. Total hours for the Tallahassee-based Senior Scientist (Scientist V) is 1. Total hours for the Stuart-based Senior Scientist (Scientist IV) and the Scientist, including utility location, equipment staging, field work and mobilization are 64 and 42, respectively. The field operations staff in Tetra Tech’s Stuart office assigned to this project have extensive experience with the FDEP Consolidated Contract and working specifically for the FDEP Waste Cleanup Program. All staff are thoroughly trained and experienced in FDEP standard operating procedures for collection of soil and groundwater samples.

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

Well installation and sampling activities should be completed in slightly more than 1 week.

Subtask 4 - Report:

The level of effort assumes 4 hours for a Senior Scientist (Scientist V), 40 hours for a Staff Engineer, and 4 hours for figure preparation. Report tasks include preparation of draft and final reports documenting the field activities, site conditions, and results of the sampling effort. The report will adhere to the FDEP approved template for Targeted Brownfield Assessment Reports.

It will include as appendix the detailed documentation and results of the assessment. The document will include a site location map, sampling location map, a map showing direction of groundwater flow, and maps showing contaminant concentrations in soil and groundwater. The appendix will also contain tables of summary information for the groundwater and soil samples collected, monitoring well construction, depths to and relative elevations of groundwater, summary data from the laboratory analyses, and comparisons of analytical results to FDEP groundwater and soil cleanup target levels. Appendices will also be provided that include the laboratory analytical data sheets, copies of field notes, groundwater sampling forms, field equipment calibration sheets, chain of custody forms, and photographs of the sampling sites.

Tetra Tech’s cost proposal is based on the following assumptions:

Site access to enter the property and complete the indicated fieldwork will be obtained by

FDEP.

The samples will be analyzed by TestAmerica using rates included in Contract HW560 unless otherwise noted. Tetra Tech will coordinate the laboratory’s reservation and analysis.

Electronic copies of all reports and field information (field notes, soil sample logs, groundwater sample logs, etc.) and laboratory results will be submitted to FDEP. Paper copies of reports and project deliverables will not be submitted.

The field activities will be scheduled once the project work plan is approved by FDEP.

The selected subcontractors provide the utility location and well installation services.

IDW will not be containerized.

Tetra Tech is prepared to begin work on this project following receipt of a signed FDEP task order.

A signed task order will reflect the approval of this proposal and authorize use of associated funding required to commence project activities. The total fixed price cost to complete the activities described above is $44,966.24.

Please find a cost summary attached that provides details concerning this cost proposal. Tetra Tech anticipates completion of this project on a fixed price basis and will invoice costs incurred at 100% completion based on approval of deliverables and in accordance with deliverable due dates.

Period of Performance Tetra Tech will schedule the site reconnaissance and begin work on the work plan and HASP upon receipt of the signed task assignment. Assuming no delays in conducting the site reconnaissance, the draft work plan will be submitted to FDEP within 21 days of task assignment and the subsequent field activities and subcontracted services will be scheduled as soon as the work plan is approved.

Draft and final deliverables will be provided promptly after laboratory results are reported from the sampling event.

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

If you have any questions, please call myself or Richard Hicks (850) 385-9899.

Sincerely yours, Gerald Walker, P.G.

Brownfields Program Manager rh/GAW

Attachments c: Kelly Crain, FDEP Justin Cross, FDEP Richard Hicks, Tetra Tech Jay McGovern, Tetra Tech Tallahassee File FDEP Contract HW560

Figure 1. Proposed Sampling Locations richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Callout A richard.hicks Callout B richard.hicks Callout C richard.hicks Callout D richard.hicks Callout F richard.hicks Callout G richard.hicks Callout H richard.hicks Callout I richard.hicks Text Box Areas of Focus for Supplemental Sampling Activities richard.hicks Rectangle richard.hicks Callout J

RICHARD.HICKS

Rectangle

RICHARD.HICKS

Callout E

RICHARD.HICKS

Text Box TRPH 11,400 at 2' Arsenic 37 at 2'

RICHARD.HICKS

Arrow

RICHARD.HICKS

Callout TRPH at SS-57 16,100

RICHARD.HICKS

Callout TRPH at SS-58 2,940

RICHARD.HICKS

Callout TRPH at SS-12 1,580

RICHARD.HICKS

Text Box

FIGURE 1

RICHARD.HICKS

Text Box As at SS-12 12.0

RICHARD.HICKS

Text Box TRPH at SS-19 1,310 Isopropyl benzene at SS-32 at 31 n-propyl benzene at SS-32 at 27.4

RICHARD.HICKS

Arrow

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

Figure 2. Proposed Monitoring Well Locations richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Oval richard.hicks Text Box Temporary well location richard.hicks Text Box

(SS-2)

richard.hicks Callout

TM-9R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-96R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-48R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-69R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-108R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-13R

richard.hicks Callout

TM-92R

RICHARD.HICKS

Oval

RICHARD.HICKS

Text Box

FIGURE 2

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

Table 1. Proposed Targeted Brownfields Assessment Activities and Rationale.

Area Issue Activity Details

Number of

Samples/Analytes Media

A

Area of TRPH contamination (above Industrial SCTL) identified in application for soil removal. Boundary not defined, TRPH not speciated. While sampling, confirm

As levels in soil.

Soil sampling (3 borings)

Characterize TRPH and complete vertical and lateral delineation. Install 1 boring at SS-27 location, sampling for TRPH by FL-PRO and TRPH fractionation, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls

(for TRPH) and 3-4’ bls (for TRPH/TRPH Fractionation) ; advance 1 boring to N side of SS-27 and 1 boring SW of SS-51 to complete lateral delineation, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-

4’ bls (both for TRPH). Also sample SS-27 location for As.

1- TRPH Fractionation;

6-TRPH; 2-As Soil

B

Area of TRPH contamination (above Industrial SCTL) identified in application potential site for soil removal.

Boundary not defined, TRPH not speciated. Also at location where Pb was detected at very high concentration. While sampling, also confirm As levels in soil.

Soil sampling (5 borings)

Characterize TRPH and complete vertical and lateral delineation of TRPH, As, Pb. Advance 1 boring at SS-2 location for TRPH per FL-PRO and TRPH fractionation; Pb and As, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls (for TRPH, As, Pb) and 3-4’ bls (for TRPH, TRPH fractionation, As, Pb);

advance borings to N, E, SW and SE and sample for TRPH, As, Pb to complete lateral delineation, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls (all for TRPH, As, Pb). Concrete may be present at locations at 2', will need to predrill with Geoprobe to clear

1-TRPH fractionation;

10-TRPH; 10-As; 10-

Pb

Soil

Location where groundwater not previously sampled for As or Pb.

Well installation, GW sampling (1 well)

Install temp well next to SS-2/TM-9, TD 15 ft, sample for As, Pb, TRPH to determine leachability.

Well will be installed with direct push equipment, 1-in PVC, with 10-ft prepacked screen, 15 ft td.

Well will be developed, then sampled using low flow purging technique.

1-As; 1-Pb; 1-TRPH Water

C

Area of 1,1,2- TCA and TRPH contamination (above

Industrial SCTL and above Residential SCTL, respectively) identified in application as potential site for soil removal. Boundary not defined, TRPH not speciated. Isopropyl benzene and n-propylbenzene also identified in soil above leachability limit. While sampling, also collect samples for Pesticides and confirm As levels in soil.

Soil sampling (2 borings)

Complete lateral delineation of 1,1,2-TCA, TRPH. Install 1 boring at SS-33 location, collecting samples for TRPH per FL-PRO and TRPH fractionation from 0-2’ below bottom of pavement base (for TRPH) and 3-4’ bls (for TRPH, TRPH Fractionation). Install 1 boring south of SS-33 to complete TRPH and 1,1,2-TCA lateral delineation, collecting samples for TRPH per FL-PRO and

11,2-TCA from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls. Also include analysis for pesticides associated with citrus packing house wastewater and As in samples from SS-33 location.

1-TRPH fractionation;

4- TRPH; 4- 1,1,2-TCA;

2-As; 2- Pesticides

Soil

Location where Isopropyl benzene and n-propyl benzene leachability not evaluated. Also, evaluate As in groundwater.

Well installation, GW sampling (1 well)

Evaluate leaching of VOCs. Isopropyl benzene detected above SCTL leachability limit in soil boring AB-96. Install temp well at AB-96/TM-96 location and sample for Method 8260b VOCs.

Well will be installed with direct push equipment, 1-in PVC, with 10-ft prepacked screen, 15 ft td.

Well will be developed, then sampled using low flow purging technique.

1-VOCs (8260b); 1- As Water

D

Area identified in application where Ammonia above

GCTL was found and generally defined as a potential area for groundwater remediation. Detections of As in soil and groundwater at this location above Industrial

SCTL/GCTL, consistent with other locations.

Soil sampling (1 boring) Resample for As in soil and evaluate pesticides in vicinity. Collect soil samples from SS-18/SS-

29 area (one location, two samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls) for As and pesticides.

2-As; 2 Pesticides Soil

E

TRPH was detected in 2' soil sample from boring location SS-26 within NW corner of SE Warehouse.

Concentration of As also above Industrial SCTL in sample from SS-26. TRPH/As concentrations in SS-25 to S did not exceed either SCTL.

Soil sampling (3 borings)

TRPH characterization and lateral delineation, verify As in soil at SS-26 location. Resample at

SS-26 location, install 2 additional borings NE and NW of SS-26 location, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls for TRPH. Collect TRPH fractionation sample from 0-2' interval. Also sample SS-26 location for As.

1-TRPH fractionation;

6- TRPH; 2- As Soil

Location where elevated As concentration was present in monitoring well TM-108 (at SS-26 location). Also a good location to evaluate TRPH leachability.

Well installation, GW sampling (1 well)

Install temp well next to SS-26/TM-108 location, TD 15 ft, sample for As, TRPH to confirm GCTL exceedances for As in TM-108 and evaluate TRPH leachability. Well will be installed with direct push equipment, 1-in PVC, with 10-ft prepacked screen, 15 ft td. Well will be developed, then sampled using low flow purging technique.

1-TRPH; 1-As Water

F Location S of NW warehouse where As was detected at a concentration greater than the Industrial SCTL.

Soil sampling (5 borings)

Delineate As in soil. Install one boring at SS-7 location and 4 borings around SS-7 location to delineate As in soil, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls for As.

10 -As Soil

G

Area identified in application where TRPH in soil from boring SS-12 exceeded Residential SCTL and a potential site for soil removal. Concentration of As was also at the Industrial SCTL.

Soil sampling (4 borings)

TRPH characterization and lateral delineation, verify As concentrations. Install 1 boring at location of SS-12, collecting samples for TRPH per FL-PRO (0-2 and 3-4 ft bls) and TRPH fractionation (3-4 ft bls), collect sample for As from both intervals. Install 3 borings (S of SS-12, SE of SS-52 and W of SS-52) to complete lateral delineation of TRPH. Soil sampling depths from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls, both for TRPH.

1-TRPH fractionation;

8-TRPH; 2-As Soil

Location wehre elevated AS concentration was present in monitoring well TM-69 (at SS-12 location. Also a good location to evaluate TRPH leachability.

Well installation, GW sampling (1 well)

Install temp well next to SS-12/TM-69 location, TD 15 ft, sample for As, TRPH to confirm GCTL exceedances for As in TM-108 and evaluate TRPH leachability. Well will be installed with direct push equipment, 1-in PVC, with 10-ft prepacked screen, 15 ft td. Well will be developed, then sampled using low flow purging technique.

1-TRPH; 1-As Water

H

Area identified in application where TRPH in soil from boring SS-58 exceeded In dustrial SCTL and a potential site for soil removal. Concentration of As was also at the Industrial SCTL.

Soil sampling (3 borings)

Characterize TRPH and complete vertical and lateral delineation. Resample at SS-58 location for TRPH by FL-PRO and TRPH fractionation, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls (for TRPH, TRPH

Fractionation) and 3-4’ bls (for TRPH); advance 1 boring N-NE of SS-11 and 1 boring SE of SS-

58 to complete lateral delineation to residential, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls

(TRPH all samples). Also collect samples from SS-58 location for As.

1-TRPH fractionation;

6-TRPH; 2-As Soil

I

Area identified in application where TRPH in soil from boring SS-57 exceeded In dustrial SCTL and a potential site for soil removal. Concentration of As was also at the Industrial SCTL.

Soil sampling (4 borings)

Characterize TRPH and complete vertical and lateral delineation, As characterization. Advance

1 boring and resample at SS-57 location for TRPH by FL-PRO, TRPH fractionation, and As, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls (for TRPH, As) and 3-4’ bls (for TRPH fractionation, As) ;

advance 3 borings to N, E and S of SS-57 to complete lateral delineation, collecting samples from 0-2’ bls and 3-4’ bls (TRPH all samples)

1- TRPH fractionation;

8- TRPH; 2-As Soil

J

In Phase II ESA, samples from 10 hand-installed temporary monitoring wells exceeded the GCTL for As.

Presence of As at several of these locations will be reevaluated, with data obtained from more conventional wells. A total of 7 temporary wells will be installed at several locations where As concentations were greatest.

Well installation, groundwater sampling for As (3 wells)

To verify As results from hand-installed wells sampled in Phase II ESA, use direct push rig to install temporary wells at 3 locations where elevated As concentrations were previously detected, TM-13, , TM-48, TM-92. These are in addition to the ones identified in Areas B, C, E and and G, which will be sampled for As plus other constituents. Wells will consist of 1-in PVC with 10-ft prepacked screens installed to 15 ft td. Wells will be developed, and sampling will adhere to low flow purging techniques.

3- As Water

Totals: 30 borings, 7 wells

Analytical methods:

TRPH soil and water - FL PRO

TRPH Fractionation soil- TPHCWG

As, Pb soil and water - USEPA Method 6010

Volatile Organics aoil and water- USEPA 8260b

Pesticides soil and water- USEPA Method 8081

TABLE 1. Proposed Sampling Rationale and Specifics, King Maritime Targeted Brownfield Assessment

Tel 850.385.9899 Fax 850.385.9860 www.tetratech.com

Attachment A

Contract HW560 Cost Estimate Spreadsheets and Backup Documentation

FDEP COST ESTIMATE

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Date: March 24, 2020

Task #: HW560 TA CSS- SubTask 1 Project Management

Site: Former King Maritime Group SubTask 2 Work Plan & HASP

Activity/Phase: Supplemental Assessment SubTask 3 Fieldwork - Soil and Groundwater Assessment

Project Manager: Megan Johnson SubTask 4 Report

SubTask 5

Totals 1 2 3 4 5

Labor Rate Category

$60.14 Project Manager (GW) 14 13.7

$55.00 Scientist V (RH) 28 23 1 4 0

$42.78 Scientist IV (SO) 74 10 64 0 0

$31.25 Scientist II (JE) 42 0 42 0 0

$25.83 Engineer I (MQ) 61 21 0 40 0

$36.48 Staff GIS Specialist (JM) 9 5 0 4 0

0 0 0 0 0

Total Hours 228 14 59 107 48 0

Direct Labor $7,435.88 $826.21 $2,417.63 $2,792.92 $1,399.12 $0.00

Overhead 143.00% $10,633.31 $1,181.48 $3,457.21 $3,993.88 $2,000.74 $0.00

Gen & Admin 12.20% $2,204.44 $244.94 $716.73 $827.99 $414.78 $0.00

Fringe 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Labor $20,273.63 $2,252.63 $6,591.57 $7,614.79 $3,814.64 $0.00

Other Direct Costs $371.80 $41.31 $120.88 $139.65 $69.96 $0.00

Travel

Vehicle Rental $624.00 $204.00 $420.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mileage Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Air Fare $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Per diem + Hotel $312.00 $312.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Travel $936.00 $516.00 $420.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Equipment Procurement)

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Procurement Fee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor (Services Procurement)

Transportation & Disposal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Drilling and Well Installation $6,265.00 $0.00 $6,265.00 $0.00 $0.00

Mobile Laboratory $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Surveying $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

IDW $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Utilities $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Subcontractor Subtotal $7,765.00 $0.00 $7,765.00 $0.00 $0.00

Handling Fee $776.50 $0.00 $776.50 $0.00 $0.00

Total Subcontractor Cost $8,541.50 $0.00 $8,541.50 $0.00 $0.00

Laboratory

Laboratory $10,092.00 $0.00 $10,092.00 $0.00 $0.00

Encore Samplers $70.00 $0.00 $70.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sample Shipping $624.00 $0.00 $624.00 $0.00 $0.00

Total Laboratory $10,786.00 $0.00 $10,786.00 $0.00 $0.00

Field Expenses

Personal Protection $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Expendables $227.50 $32.50 $195.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Drilling related) $368.60 $0.00 $368.60 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Analytical related) $625.65 $0.00 $625.65 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (IDW related) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Equipment (Other) $808.20 $141.65 $666.55 $0.00 $0.00

Total Field Expenses $2,029.95 $174.15 $1,855.80 $0.00 $0.00

Subtotal $42,938.88 $2,293.94 $7,402.60 $29,357.74 $3,884.60 $0.00

Completion Fee $2,027.36 $225.26 $659.16 $761.48 $381.46 $0.00

Total Estimated Cost $44,966.24 $2,519.20 $8,061.76 $30,119.22 $4,266.06 $0.00

REV: 03/23/17 Page 1

SITE :

SUBTASK 2: Work Plan & HASP

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Scientist V (RH) Tallahassee Office; Site Recon (including mobe/demobe)[20]; Review Work Plan and HASP[3] 23

Scientist IV (SO) Stuart Office; Site Recon (including mobe/demobe) [10] 10

Scientist II (JE) 0

Engineer I (MQ) Tallahassee Office; Prepare Draft, Final Work Plan[16], coordinate public utility locates [2], prepare HASP[3] 21

Staff GIS Specialist (JM) Jacksonville Office; Figure preparation, approximately 10 figures with proposed locations and previous results shown [5] 5

TOTAL LABOR 59

FIELD EXPENSES ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Equipment

Hand Auger $8.25 Each 0 $0.00

Monitoring Well Installation Kit $184.30 Day 0 $0.00

Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit $208.55 Day 0 $0.00

Expendables $32.50 Day 1 $32.50

Personal Protection (Level D) $28.00 Day 0 $0.00

Total GPS Station $141.65 Each 1 $141.65

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $174.15

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE

Air Fare $0.00 Each 0 $0.00

Van/Truck $97.00 day 0 $0.00

Car $68.00 day 3 Tallahassee, 2 dy, Stuart, 1 dy $204.00

Subtotal $204.00

Mileage Miles 0

TOTAL VEHICLE $204.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USAGE

MEALS

Scientist V (RH) $36.00 Day 2 $72.00

Engineer I (MQ) $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

HOTEL 0

Scientist V (RH) $120.00 Day 2 $240.00

Engineer I (MQ) $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

TOTAL PER DIEM $312.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER Media Method RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC Analysis

Subtotal $0.00

Unit Cost Quantity

Sample Containers Lot $0.00 0 $0.00

Encore Samplers Each $8.75 0 $0.00

Sample Shipping Coolers $104.00 0 $0.00

Subtotal $0.00

TOTAL LAB $0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST Units

TOTAL $0.00

Former King Maritime Group

SUBTASK 3: Fieldwork - Soil and Groundwater Assessment

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Scientist V (RH) Review field work deliverable [1] 1

Scientist IV (SO) Stuart Office; Field work (mobilization [10- 2 hr/day on site], utility location [8], monitoring wells, coring, develop, GPS locations [12], 64

TOC survey, soil sampling, decon [18], groundwater sampling [8], site restoration [4], field work deliverable [4]

Scientist II (JE) Stuart Office; Field work (mobilization [8- 2 hr/day on site], , TOC survey, soil sampling, decon [18], site restoration [4] 42 groundwater sampling [8], site restoration [4]

Engineer I (MQ) 0

Staff GIS Specialist (JM) 0

$0.00 0

TOTAL LABOR 107

FIELD EXPENSES ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Equipment

Soil Assessment Kit $208.55 Day 2 $417.10

Monitoring Well Installation Kit $184.30 Day 2 $368.60

Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit $208.55 Day 1 $208.55

Expendables $32.50 Day 6 $195.00

Personal Protection (Level D) $28.00 Per Person x Day 0 $0.00

Teflon Tubing (1/4-inch diameter) $1.95 Foot 0 $0.00

Total Survey Station $41.75 Each 1 $41.75

Peristaltic Pump $29.10 Each 2 Extra pump for well purging $58.20

Hammer Drill $50.95 Each $0.00

MiniRae 3000 PID $87.30 Each 0 Included in MW and Soil kits $0.00

Total GPS Station $141.65 Each 4 Trimble GeoXH $566.60

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $1,855.80

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE

Air Fare $0.00 Each 0 $0.00

Van/Truck $420.00 week 1 Staff members from Stuart (6 days) $420.00

Car $68.00 day 0 $0.00

Subtotal $420.00

Mileage Miles 0

TOTAL VEHICLE $420.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USAGE

MEALS

Scientist V (RH) $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

Scientist $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

Engineer I $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

HOTEL

Scientist V (RH) $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

Scientist $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

Engineer I $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

TOTAL PER DIEM $0.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER Media Method RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC Analysis

Metals Liquid 6010-As $11.50 7 4 1 duplicate, 1 gw eb, 2 s ebs $126.50

Metals Liquid 6010-Pb $11.50 1 3 1 duplicate, 1 gw eb, 1 s eb $46.00

Volatile Organics Liquid 8260 $135.00 1 2 1 s eb, 1 trip b $405.00

TRPH Liquid Florida PRO $84.00 3 5 1 duplicate, 1 gw eb, 3 s eb $672.00

SVOC Liquid 8270 $100.00 0 0 $0.00

Mercury Liquid 7470 $23.00 0 0 $0.00

Pesticides Liquid 8081 $90.00 0 1 1 s eb $90.00

Metals Soil 6010 -As $11.50 34 4 4 duplicates $437.00

Metals Soil 6010- Pb $11.50 10 1 1 duplicate $126.50

Volatile Organics Soil 8260 $135.00 4 3 1 duplicate, 1 eq blk, 1 trip blk $945.00

TRPH Soil Florida PRO $84.00 48 8 5 duplicates, 3 equip blks $4,704.00

SVOC Soil 8270 $100.00 0 0 $0.00

TRPH Fractionation (see note) Soil TPH-CWG $250.00 7 1 1 duplicate $2,000.00

Pesticides Soil 8081 $90.00 4 2 1 duplicate, 1 eq blk $540.00

Subtotal $10,092.00

Unit Cost Quantity

Sample Containers Lot $0.00 0 0 $0.00

Encore Samplers Each $8.75 8 TerraCore kits (1 per TRPH Frac sample); (7+1 dup) $70.00

Sample Shipping Coolers $104.00 6 priority overnight shipping FedEx $624.00

Subtotal $694.00

Note: TRPH fractionation rate in attached lab quote. TOTAL LAB $10,786.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST Units

Groundwater Protection Drilling $6,265.00 $6,265.00

GeoTek Utility Locate $1,500 1 $1,500.00

TOTAL $7,765.00

Former King Maritime Group

LEVEL OF EFFORT/EXPENSE WORKSHEET

SUBTASK 4: Report

LABOR CATEGORY *PROVIDE TIME REQUIRED FOR EACH PERSON

STAFF-TITLE WORK DESCRIPTION HOURS

Scientist V (RH) Tallahassee Office; Document review and editing 4

Scientist IV (SO)

Scientist II (JE)

Engineer I (MQ) 40

Staff GIS Specialist (JM) Jacksonville Office; Process GPS data, figure preparation 4

TOTAL LABOR 48

FIELD EXPENSES ITEM RATE COSTING UNIT USAGE TOTALS

Equipment

Hand Auger $8.25 Each 0 $0.00

Monitoring Well Installation Kit $184.30 Day 0 $0.00

Shallow Groundwater Sampling Kit $208.55 Day 0 $0.00

Expendables $32.50 Day 0 $0.00

Personal Protection (Level D) $28.00 Day 0 $0.00

Site Reconnaissance Kit $81.48 Each 0 $0.00

TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0.00

VEHICLE TYPE RATE UNIT USAGE

Air Fare $0.00 Each 0 $0.00

Van/Truck $97.00 day 0 $0.00

Car $68.00 day 0 $0.00

Subtotal $0.00

Mileage Miles 0

TOTAL VEHICLE $0.00

PER DIEM STAFF RATE UNIT USAGE

MEALS

Scientist V (RH) $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

Engineer I (MQ) $36.00 Day 0 $0.00

HOTEL

Scientist III (WO) $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

Engineer I (MQ) $120.00 Day 0 $0.00

TOTAL PER DIEM $0.00

LABORATORY COSTS

PARAMETER Media Method RATE # SAMPLES #QAQC Analysis

Volatiles Liquid 8260 $135.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Semivolatiles Liquid 8270 $100.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Pesticides Liquid 8081 $90.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Herbicides Liquid 8151 $150.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

TRPH Liquid Florida PRO $84.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Lead Liquid 6010 $11.50 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Total Dissolved Fe and Mn Liquid 6010 $23.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

COD Liquid SM5220 $25.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

BOD (5 day) Liquid SM5210 $25.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

Methane/CO2/02 Liquid 3810 $110.00 Standard Turn Around $0.00

In-line Filter (0.45 Micron) Each $17.50 $0.00

Subtotal $0.00

Unit Cost Quantity

Sample Containers Lot $0.00 0 $0.00

Encore Samplers Each $8.75 0 $0.00

Sample Shipping Coolers $104.00 0 $0.00

Subtotal $0.00

TOTAL LAB $0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR COSTS

NAME PURPOSE COST Units

TOTAL $0.00

Former King Maritime Group

Tallahassee Office; Draft and Final report preparation; description of field activities, summary of results, tables of soil and groundwater results, figures showing soil and groundwater locations and results and groundwater flow direction

REV: 03/23/17 Page 2

From: Coursey, Deborah <Deb.Coursey@testamericainc.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 12:43 PM To: Hicks, Richard Cc: Weinberg, Amy Subject: TRPH Fractionation Pricing

Richard, The unit price for TPH-CWG under the FDEP contract is $250.00 per sample.

Thank you, Deb

Deb Carey Coursey Client Relations Manager Special Assignments and Projects

Eurofins TestAmerica 4955 Yarrow Street Arvada, CO 80002

USA

Phone: 912-944-7837

E-mail: Deb.Coursey@testamericainc.com www.EurofinsUS.com | www.TestAmericainc.com

Amy- We have been asked by FDEP to put together a proposal for sampling a site that includes a building that once was a citrus packing plant. I wanted to see what pesticide methods TestAmerica can perform, the analytes, pricing and detection limits. I think we would be looking for residual concentrations of fungicides and insecticides in the wastewater from washing. Site went back to the 1930s. Anything you could steer me to would be appreciated.

Also, I do need a price for TRPH Fractionation (TPHCWG method) for soil. Can you give me a per sample price for that? It is not in our rate sheet for that contract with FDEP

GeoTek Services, LLC

19 February 2020

To: Richard Hicks Tetra Tech, Inc.

1558 Village Square Blvd., Suite 2 Tallahassee, FL 32309

From: GeoTek Services, LLC 4060 Sparrow Hawk Road

Melbourne, FL 32934

RE: Utility Locating Services – 29 Bore Locations, Port of Ft. Pierce, FL

Mr. Hicks, GeoTek Services is pleased to respond to your request for Utility Locating services at the Port of Ft. Pierce, Florida. We will scan a 10’ x 10’ area around the 29 proposed bore locations with the goal of locating underground utilities. We can only scan the easily accessible open areas for utilities. Note that we cannot scan beneath fixed objects such as vehicles, fencing, or buildings. We will scan as close as reasonably possible to fixed objects such as obstructions, landscaping, etc. Our deliverable will be marking paint and/or flags indicating the location of potential underground utilities. It is the client’s responsibility to protect and preserve all marks.

We will use both Electromagnetic Induction instruments as well as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to detect objects below the surface. Due to the nature of sub-surface detection and the physical laws governing radio wave propagation, some buried objects may not be detectable due to depth, obscuration, or a weak radar signature. GeoTek Services will use industry standard best practices to locate sub-surface objects; however some objects may not be detectable. Geotek Services does not guarantee that all underground objects can be found. GeoTek Services assumes no liability for any damages.

We request access to any as-built site plans of the scan areas prior to rendering services. Our fixed price quote for this effort is $1,500.00. No out-of-pocket expenses are expected for this project. This quote is valid for sixty days.

Best Regards, Martin (Bud) Connor GeoTek Services, LLC

4060 Sparrow Hawk Road ● Melbourne, FL 32934-8525 ● info@GeoTekServices.com ● 321.473.7498

COST QUOTE FOR

DIRECT PUSH WELL INSTALLATION SUPPORT

FDEP Brownfields Site

King Maritime (AKA: Port of Fort Pierce)

100 Terminal Drive

Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, FL

Tetra Tech is requesting a cost quote for providing direct push services for an FDEP site in Fort Pierce, St.

Lucie County, FL. The site is the historical Port of Fort Pierce, which is owned by St. Lucie County and is being redeveloped. This is an industrial property, mostly covered by asphalt pavement, that includes scattered industrial buildings and warehouses. Level D health and safety protocol should be followed.

Tetra Tech representative will be on site to coordinate. All site access will be obtained, and all utilities will be located via One Call by Tetra Tech in advance of subsurface work.