CGC HEALY MPDE SOW.pdf

Statement of Work (SOW) USCGC HEALY (WAGB-20) – Main Propulsion Diesel Generator (MPDG) – 3x InspecƟons/Assessment and 1x RCFA InvesƟgaƟon

LocaƟon:

Long Range Enforcer Product Line Port Engineer Staff USCGC Healy (WAGB 20) 1519 Alaskan Way South SeaƩle, WA 98134 Phone: (206) 217-6815

Period of Performance:

Coordinate days onsite between: Contract Award Date - 28AUG2026

ObjecƟve 1:

Provide a qualified diesel engine technician familiar with New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) Model ZAV40 engines/gensets, to perform onsite inspecƟons and assessment of the #1, #3 and #4 MPDGs listed below. The technician shall inspect/assess each MPDGs current operaƟonal condiƟon, determine the severity of any deficiencies, and idenƟfy the repair/replacement parts or efforts required make equipment funcƟonal. Minor disassembly of the engine/genset internals is authorized; however, each engine shall be re-assembled to the extent of each MPDG’s exisƟng condiƟon. Brief operaƟon of engine may be permiƩed with the prior wriƩen authorizaƟon from

USCG.

MPDG #1: New Sulzer Diesel, Model 12ZAV40S, 7920 kW Genset, S/N: 2025/740386 MPDG #3: New Sulzer Diesel, Model 12ZAV40S, 7920 kW Genset, S/N: 2027/740388 MPDG #4: New Sulzer Diesel, Model 12ZAV40S, 7920 kW Genset, S/N: 2028/740389

ObjecƟve 2:

Provide a qualified marine surveyor familiar with New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) Model ZAV40 engines/gensets, to perform onsite failure invesƟgaƟon and Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA) of the #2 MPDG listed below. Major disassembly of the engine/genset internals is authorized, however re-assembly of the #2 MPDG is not required. If any components are idenƟfied where further offsite tesƟng is recommended, those are to be listed in deliverable 2.

MPDG #2: New Sulzer Diesel, Model 12ZAV40S, 7920 kW Genset, S/N: 2026/740387

Background:

There has been a catastrophic internal failure to MPDG #2.

Scope:

The contractor shall provide all labor and equipment necessary to perform the on-site inspecƟon, invesƟgaƟon, data gathering and technical assessments. The contractor shall also possess knowledge and/or have access to all OEM documentaƟon and proprietary system informaƟon as well as industry/regulatory standards. The contractor shall addiƟonally account for all personnel travel costs and shipping of tools/equipment related expenses, as needed.

Required Tasks:

Inspect each MPDG for overall material condiƟon, operaƟonal concerns, visible damage, leaks, abnormal vibraƟon, abnormal noise, overheaƟng, wear, and other signs of degraded performance.

Review accessible associated systems and components, including cooling, fuel, lubricaƟon, mounƟng, electrical, and control-related components.

IdenƟfy any discrepancies, failed components, degraded parts, or condiƟons affecƟng reliability, operability, or conƟnued service.

Assess and advise on the severity of each finding.

IdenƟfy recommended correcƟve acƟons for each finding.

IdenƟfy all parts and components that require replacement or repair.

Provide available part idenƟficaƟon for each item requiring replacement, including part number, nomenclature, quanƟty, and recommended source informaƟon if known.

IdenƟfy any items requiring immediate acƟon, scheduled repair, monitoring, or follow-on troubleshooƟng.

Provide a verbal out-brief to the designated government representaƟve before deparƟng the vessel.

The cuƩer’s availability for onsite inspecƟon and data collecƟon is limited to the POP listed above.

Required Report Deliverable 1:

The contractor shall provide a wriƩen report for the #1, #3 and #4 MPDGs no later than 5 working days aŌer contractor’s physical departure from the vessel, or no later than 04 September 2026, whichever occurs first.

The report shall include:

Summary of inspecƟon performed Detailed findings Severity assessment for each finding Recommended correcƟve acƟon for each finding A consolidated parts list of all items recommended for replacement or repair Part number, if known, for each recommended item Part descripƟon/nomenclature for each recommended item Required quanƟty for each recommended item Reason for replacement or repair for each recommended item Urgency, if applicable, for each recommended item Any addiƟonal troubleshooƟng or follow-on acƟons recommended Any inspecƟon limitaƟons or access restricƟons encountered

Required Report Deliverable 2:

The contractor shall provide an iniƟal wriƩen report for the #2 MPDG no later than 5 working days aŌer contractor’s physical departure from the vessel, or no later than 04 September 2026, whichever occurs first.

The report shall include:

IdenƟficaƟon of the primary component(s) or cause(s) that iniƟated the failure.

Detail contribuƟng factors (operaƟonal, mechanical, or material) for the failure.

A precise, chronological Ɵmeline of the event leading up to the loss of power, the engine

RPM surge, the primary igniƟon, and the secondary crankcase explosion.

Detail the necessity for follow-up Non-DestrucƟve TesƟng (NDT), Spectrographic Oil

Analysis (SOA), or Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) metallurgical or thermal analysis of any failed components.

List of any components for which further offsite tesƟng is recommended, to include recommended tesƟng.

RecommendaƟons to prevent similar future casualƟes on the remaining engines.

Required Report Deliverable 3:

The contractor shall provide a detailed wriƩen report for the #2 MPDG no later than 30 working days aŌer contractor’s physical departure from the vessel, or no later than 04 September 2026, whichever occurs first.

The report shall include:

IdenƟficaƟon of the primary component(s) or cause(s) that iniƟated the failure.

Detail contribuƟng factors (operaƟonal, mechanical, or material) for the failure.

A precise, chronological Ɵmeline of the event leading up to the loss of power, the engine

RPM surge, the primary igniƟon, and the secondary crankcase explosion.

Use of at least one structured analysis method (i.e. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), 5-Whys

Analysis, or Ishikawa (Fishbone) Diagramming) to map the failure path from the iniƟaƟng event to the secondary explosion.

Results of any Non-DestrucƟve TesƟng (NDT), Spectrographic Oil Analysis (SOA), or Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) metallurgical or thermal analysis of any failed components.

RecommendaƟons to prevent similar future casualƟes on the remaining engines.

Vendor QualificaƟons:

Engine Technicians shall be qualified to perform inspecƟons and assessments of New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) Model ZAV40 engines/gensets and/or other large marine engines/gensets with rotaƟng piston design. Technicians must have a minimum of 5 yrs of demonstrable experience, via resume, in diesel engine inspecƟons and assessment.

Submit the resume of each Technician at the Ɵme of proposal.

Independent Marine Surveyors shall be qualified to perform RCFA of New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) Model ZAV40 engines/gensets and/or other large marine engines/gensets with rotaƟng piston design. Surveyors must have a minimum of 7 yrs of demonstrable experience, via resume, in performing class society root marine root cause incident invesƟgaƟon and reporƟng. Submit the resume of each Surveyor at the Ɵme of proposal.

It is the government’s understanding that Wärtsilä North America, Inc. (Cage Code 5GRT4) is now the authorized Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) for New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) engines/gensets.

Government-Furnished Support:

The government will provide access to the cuƩer, escort as required, access to each MPDG and the related spaces as operaƟonally available.

Ships Force will provide available operaƟonal logs, maintenance history, casualty informaƟon, and equipment idenƟficaƟon data as available.

Points of Contact:

Project Manager – LCDR Andrew Constant – Andrew.S.Constant@uscg.mil

Asset Manager – LTJG Igor Guerrero – Igor.Guerrero@uscg.mil

Exclusions:

This scope only includes inspecƟon, data collecƟon, assessment, and reporƟng.

Repairs, replacement of parts, and follow-on correcƟve maintenance are not included unless separately authorized.

Removal of shipboard interferences and non-engine skid equipment will be performed by Ships Force.

Fluid removal, collecƟons and replenishment will be performed by Ships Force.

Acceptance Criteria:

The services will be considered complete upon:

CompleƟon of the on-site inspecƟon and assessment of the #1 MPDG, #3 MPDG and #4

MPDG.

o CompleƟon of a verbal out-brief to the onsite designated government representaƟve on preliminary findings.

o Delivery of the wriƩen inspecƟon/assessment report within 5 working days of the onsite assessment.

CompleƟon of the on-site invesƟgaƟon and Root Cause Failure Analysis (RCFA) of the #2

MPDG.

o CompleƟon of a verbal out-brief to the onsite designated government representaƟve on preliminary findings.

o Delivery of the iniƟal wriƩen RCFA report within 5 working days of the onsite assessment.

o Delivery of the detailed wriƩen RCFA report within 30 working days of the onsite assessment.

InvitaƟon for Bid (IFB) EvaluaƟon:

Award will be made to the vendor responsible whose quote represents the Best Value to the

Government, price and non-price factors considered. The Government will evaluate quotes using the streamlined evaluaƟon of commercial services under FAR 12.602. The Government will evaluate quotes based on two factors:

1. Technical Capability (Personnel Resumes)

2. Price

Technical Capability is significantly more important than Price. Under Technical Capability, the

Government will evaluate the submiƩed resumes to ensure the lead engine technician holds demonstrable experience on New Sulzer Diesel (NSD) Model ZAV40 plaƞorms and the marine surveyor possesses accredited experience performing class society Root Cause Failure Analysis

(RCFA). The Government reserves the right to tradeoff technical superiority of proposed personnel for price to ensure the operaƟonal safety of the vessel's propulsion systems.