CDBG_PRO_Housing_Zoning_RFP_FAQs.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CDBG PRO Housing: Addressing Zoning, Permitting, & Building Code Barriers to Affordable Housing
- Solicitation number
- GR_4261_PROHOUSING
- Issued by
- Dane County, Wisconsin
About this file
This is a Frequently Asked Questions document addressing inquiries from municipalities regarding the Community Development Block Grant Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing (CDBG PRO Housing) Program administered by Dane County Department of Human Services in Wisconsin. The RFP solicits implementation-ready planning and policy projects from municipalities located within Dane County that address zoning, permitting, and building code barriers to affordable housing. Eligible activities include zoning and land-use updates, permitting process improvements, mixed-use development support, missing middle housing initiatives, housing barrier analyses, and ordinance drafting. Applicants must submit proposals by April 24, 2026 at 11:59 p.m. through the Dane County eProcurement Portal. The RFP established a question submission deadline of April 3, 2026. Awards are estimated for Summer/Fall 2026. The resulting contract will be effective upon execution for one year with mutual renewal options for up to four additional one-year periods, structured as reimbursement-based payments contingent upon achievement of specified milestones and completion of County-approved deliverables.
Proposals are evaluated on a 100-point scale addressing CDBG/PRO Housing Goals alignment (60 points), Cost and Budget Review (18 points), Leverage funds (4 points), Narrative description (12 points), and Experience and Qualifications (6 points), with applications scoring 60 or lower ineligible for funding. Dane County vendors receive five additional evaluation points, and adjacent county vendors receive two points. Administrative costs are not allowable; only direct project delivery costs including municipal staff time, professional services, legal services, community engagement, environmental reviews, and impact fees are eligible. CDBG PRO Housing funds may not supplant previously budgeted or committed funding but may supplement existing resources to expand scope, enhance quality, or accelerate timelines. Projects must document leverage commitment during contracting. Applicants must demonstrate that proposed activities could not occur without the PRO Housing funds and must use a logic model framework to identify local barriers and align them with eligible activities. Reporting requirements include monthly status reports, milestone-based progress reports, submission of adopted ordinances, final reports documenting outcomes, and performance measures as required by federal, state, or county requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CDBG PRO Housing Office Hours Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The following questions were asked by municipalities during the Office Hours held the week of March 16, 2026.
Q: If a municipality already has a contract with a consultant, can PRO Housing funds be used to pay for that consultant’s work?
A: Potentially yes, if the consultant work is for eligible PRO Housing activities, the costs are necessary, reasonable, and allocable, and the procurement complies with applicable federal requirements, including 2 CFR Part 200. Dane County may request contract and procurement documentation to verify compliance.
PRO Housing funds may be used for a consultant’s work if it represents a new or expanded scope directly related to the proposed PRO Housing activities. Funds generally may not be used to pay for work that is already completed, already obligated, or otherwise covered by another committed funding source.
Q: Can CDBG PRO Housing funds be used if funding for the project has already been budgeted by the municipality?
A: PRO Housing funds may not be used to supplant any federal, state, local, or private funds that have been previously budgeted, committed, or expended for the proposed activities.
However, projects that already have funding in place may still be eligible if PRO Housing funds are used to supplement existing resources. For example, funds may be used to:
• Expand the scope of the project;
• Enhance project quality or outcomes; or
• Accelerate the project timeline beyond what existing funding would support.
Applicants must show how that PRO Housing funds will result in a net increase in investment or impact, and that the proposed activities could not occur without the PRO Housing funds.
The County will review funding sources and project budgets to ensure compliance with this requirement.
Q: How detailed does the information need to be for the project and project activities need to be in the logic model?
A: Applicants should provide enough detail to enable Dane County to understand what the project and project activities are and what is expected to be completed.
Q: What if things for the projects change after submission?
A: The project may not be able to move forward if there is a substantial change to the project after submission, which includes, but is not limited to, a change in the budget being asked for, project activities, or large changes in projected outcomes. A discussion with Dane County will be required to determine project feasibility and whether they would have been selected for funding if the proposed changes to the project had been included in the submitted application.
Q: How is leverage documented?
A: The budget has space to add the leverage for the application. Documentation confirming leverage commitment will be required during contracting.
Q: If there is a comprehensive redistricting and zone change, and a zone has a neutral impact or a decrease in zoned capacity of the number of homes, respectively, is this still able to be considered for funding?
A: As long as the entire comprehensive redistricting or zone change has a net increase, the activity can be considered for funding.
Q: What happens if the activity reaches the approval stage, but ends up not being adopted?
A: This will depend on the situation and whether a portion is adopted or noted. Specifics can be discussed during the contract negotiations.
Q: One of the category B examples in the presentation was for proposals to eliminate fees for affordable housing. Does it have to be the elimination of fees, or can they be reduced?
A: Not necessarily. One eligible activity refers to restructuring fee schedules to eliminate burdensome costs for affordable housing development, but there is also a separate eligible activity for proposals to eliminate, subsidize, waive, or otherwise reduce subdivision-related fees or costs. Eligibility will depend on the type of fee and how the activity fits within the listed eligible activities.
Q: What is the difference between Category A and Category B activities?
A: Eligible activities in Category A are broader updates to housing policy and housing policy frameworks, and Category B activities are more focused activities for housing development regulatory reforms and incentives.
Q: What needs to be reported?
A: Reporting will differ based on the activities planned, but in general they will be items such as:
• Monthly status reports documenting progress toward milestones, upcoming activities, and any risks or delays
• Milestone-based progress reports tied to project timelines
• Submission of adopted ordinances, resolutions, or implementation materials
• Final report summarizing outcomes, housing impacts, and lessons learned
• Performance measures (report cumulative totals, as applicable):
• Others as required by Federal, State, or County requirements.
CDBG PRO Housing Office Hours Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .