CDBG_PRO_Housing_Logic-Model_Workbook_Final.docx

DOCX document 38 KB Posted

Attached to
CDBG PRO Housing: Addressing Zoning, Permitting, & Building Code Barriers to Affordable Housing
Solicitation number
GR_4261_PROHOUSING
Issued by
Dane County, Wisconsin

About this file

This is a CDBG PRO Housing Logic Model Workbook document issued by the Dane County Department of Human Services in Wisconsin to guide municipal applicants in developing implementation-ready planning and policy projects that address zoning, permitting, and building code barriers to affordable housing. The document establishes an Activity-Based Logic Model framework requiring applicants to identify local regulatory, administrative, or structural barriers to affordable housing using the Regional Housing Strategy Tool or another documented method, then align each barrier with eligible HUD PRO Housing activities spanning 24-month or 36-month implementation timelines. Applicants must document inputs and resources, planned actions, deliverables, expected outcomes, and broader community impact for each proposed activity. The RFP was released on March 23, 2026, with a question submission deadline of April 3, 2026, and a proposal response deadline of April 24, 2026 at 11:59 p.m., submitted electronically through the Dane County eProcurement Portal. Anticipated awards are scheduled for Summer/Fall 2026, with contracts effective upon execution for one year with mutual renewal options for up to four additional one-year periods.

Category A projects require 36-month implementation with 60 percent milestone completion within 24 months and 100 percent completion within 36 months, while Category B projects operate on a 24-month timeline with 60 percent completion within 18 months and 100 percent within 24 months. Eligible activities include developing or updating housing plans, zoning and land use policies, proposing by-right permitting procedures, establishing incentive programs, reducing land use controls, streamlining permit processing, rezoning proposals, accessory dwelling unit programs, building code reforms, and regional planning models. Only municipal staff may submit applications, and this procurement is restricted exclusively to municipalities within Dane County; multiple municipalities may collaborate if documentation is provided. Dane County vendors receive five additional evaluation points, and adjacent county vendors receive two points. Proposals are evaluated on a 100-point scale addressing CDBG/PRO Housing goals alignment (60 points), cost and budget review (18 points), leverage funds (4 points), narrative description (12 points), and experience and qualifications (6 points); applications scoring 60 or lower will not be considered for funding. Administrative costs cannot be billed; only direct project delivery costs including municipal staff time, professional services, legal services, community engagement, environmental reviews, and impact fees are allowable. Pricing is structured as reimbursement-based payments contingent upon achievement of specified milestones and completion of County-approved deliverables. No specific award values or maximum budget limits are stated in available documentation.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. CDBG PRO Housing – Activity-Based Logic Model A. Applicants must complete the table below. Only complete the rows that apply to the proposed project. The Logic Model table will serve as the primary basis for evaluation, with emphasis on the logical connections among identified barriers, proposed actions, and expected outcomes.

Applicants must identify the barrier using the Regional Housing Strategy Tool: Best Practices Residential Zoning Code Guide to Address the Housing Crisis or another documented method and align each barrier with one or more eligible PRO Housing activities listed below.

Applicant Guidance – How to Complete the Table Barrier Identified Clearly describe the local regulatory, administrative, or structural barrier to affordable housing. Barriers should be identified using the RHS Tool: Best Practices Residential Zoning Code Guide to Address the Housing Crisis or another documented method.

Inputs / Resources List staff, consultants, data, tools (including the RHS Tool), partnerships, or other resources that will support implementation.

Planned Actions Describe the specific policy, zoning, regulatory, or administrative actions the municipality will undertake.

Outputs Identify tangible deliverables (e.g., draft ordinance, adopted code amendment, revised permitting process, completed study, approved policy).

Outcomes Describe the expected result in terms of removing or reducing the identified barrier and advancing housing production, preservation, affordability, or regulatory reform.

Impact Briefly describe the broader effect on housing and the community—e.g., fewer barriers, faster approvals, more units enabled, improved affordability, expanded housing choice, and who benefits (if known).

Completion of all rows is not required. Applicants should complete only those activities relevant to the proposed project.

Activity-Based Logic Model Table (HUD PRO Housing Activities)

Barrier Identified (RHS Tool or other method)
PRO Housing Activity (from HUD NOFO)
Inputs / Resources
Planned Actions (What will you do?)
Outputs (Deliverables)
Outcomes (Barrier Removed / Reduced)
Impact

Category A. Activities – 36-Month Implementation

A. Developing or updating housing plans, community development strategies, and zoning and land use policies such as overlays to encourage multifamily and mixed-use development or access to affordable housing, floating zones (such as redevelopment, workforce housing, or live/work zones in high opportunity areas), incentive zoning, transit-oriented development zones, floodplain management or climate resilience plans, or ordinances to encourage housing development or preservation

B. Developing or updating housing plans, community development strategies, and zoning and land use policies to simplify, streamline, or change overlays that create a barrier to affordable housing development or preservation, such as architectural review or historic preservation overlays

Category B. Activities – 24-Month Implementation

C. Developing proposals for new by-right permitting procedures to streamline affordable housing development and reduce discretionary approvals

D. Developing new incentive programs for affordable housing development

E. Expanding existing affordable housing incentive programs to wider geographies, including high-opportunity neighborhoods

F. Developing proposals to reduce or eliminate requirements related to parking, building height, lot coverage, setbacks, minimum unit size, minimum lot size, floor area ratio, and other common land use controls

G. Establishing incentive programs or flexibilities to enable and promote the adaptive reuse of vacant or underutilized properties for housing or mixed-use development

H. Developing proposals to streamline and modernize local permit processing, such as by enabling one-stop or parallel-process permitting

I. Developing proposals to streamline or eliminate requirements that unduly delay the permitting process or establish unreasonable thresholds for approvals, such as duplicative and burdensome hearings and documentation for variances, rezoning, or similar planning approvals

J. Developing proposals to rezone to allow multifamily or mixed-use development including housing in office, commercial, and light industrial zones

K. Developing proposals to expedite approvals for affordable housing development that meets certain criteria

L. Developing proposals for higher-density zoning for current single-family and multi-family zones, including rezones to allow duplexes, triplexes, or fourplexes by-right in all areas zoned primarily for single-family homes and encourage property owners to ensure that any infill development improves or maintains walkability

M. Establishing incentive programs, designing pre-approved floorplans, or introducing more flexible zoning to enable and promote accessory dwelling units

N. Developing proposals to replace discretionary design review procedures with objective design and development standards

O. Developing proposals to eliminate restrictions on lower-cost housing types such as prefabricated or manufactured homes

P. Developing proposals to update zoning or incentives to facilitate affordable housing on land owned by faith-based organizations

Q. Developing proposals to restructure fee schedules to eliminate burdensome costs for affordable housing development

R. Creating affordable housing planning resources for member jurisdictions

S. Developing regional planning models that enhance location efficiency by focusing on connecting housing, transportation, and economic growth

T. Providing affordable housing developers a first look at tax sale properties and other government properties

U. Developing proposals to eliminate, subsidize, waive, or otherwise reduce fees or other costs of property subdivision that may discourage the construction of affordable housing

V. Developing proposals for policies that incentivize mixed-income development, such as density bonuses for the inclusion of affordable units in market rate properties

W. Developing proposals to reform building codes, including through adopting or modifying model codes or consensus standards, to facilitate more affordable housing or otherwise reduce construction costs

X. Developing proposals to harmonize land-use policies or building codes among adjoining municipalities and facilitate consistent regional development standards that streamline housing development image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .