Call for Solutions PANRSA-26-P-0000 039852.pdf

CALL FOR SOLUTIONS

Modern Radar Systems Organic Capability Development

Project Number PANRSA-26-P-0000 039852

Army Open Solicitation (AOS) Number W9124P-26-S-C001

Call for Solution Title Modern Radar Systems Organic Capability Development

Issued By Army Contracting Command – Redstone Arsenal (ACC-RSA), Redstone Services & IT Solutions Branch (CCAM-CAC-B)

Submission Instructions To respond to this Call for Solution, please refer to Sections 7 of this Call for Solution

*Solution Briefs Due Date/Time (Suspense)

28 JUL 2026 at 1700 Eastern Time

Point of Contracts (POCs) for Solution Brief Submission

Contracting Officer: Stephanie Dillon

Contract Specialist: Morgan McGee

Email: usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-advm-cso@army.mil

NOTE: Please advise the cognizant Contracting Officer and Specialist as soon as possible via the emails above if your organization intends to submit a Solution Brief in response to this Call for Solution.

*Any submissions that are received by the Contracting Officer after the suspense date/time listed above will be deemed late and not evaluated. It is the sole responsibility of the company to ensure that its submission is received in the email inbox listed above before the deadline specified.

This Call for Solution may result in the Government awarding Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) contracts or non-FAR agreements in accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 212.70 – Defense Commercial Solutions Opening. Other Transaction (OT) that may be awarded from this Call for Solution are not subject to the FAR or its supplements, as application.

mailto:usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-advm-cso@army.mil mailto:usarmy.redstone.acc.mbx.acc-rsa-advm-cso@army.mil

1. BACKGROUND

Tobyhanna Army Depot (TYAD) serves as a critical maintenance and modernization facility for multiple advanced radar systems across the armed forces. To support the requirements for a family of modern radar systems that share a high degree of structural and technical commonality, TYAD must proactively establish a comprehensive, state-of-the-art organic testing, calibration, repair, and overhaul capability. Establishing this capability within the Organic Industrial Base (OIB) is vital for performing depot-level sustainment, reducing logistical bottlenecks, decreasing reliance on Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), and ensuring the long-term readiness, future adaptability, and peak performance of modernized and emerging radar systems.

2. PROBLEM STATEMENT

TYAD requires modernized equipment and infrastructure to support depot-level repair, overhaul, calibration, and testing for advanced radar systems. Currently, a critical capability gap exists in the specialized infrastructure needed to test high-density Line Replaceable Units (LRUs), execute precise measurements using integrated near-field ranges and specialized anechoic test chambers, and calibrate modern radar arrays on our far-field radar campus.

This requirement is unique because the capability must support four (4) distinct modern radar platforms—the AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and Advanced Range Threat Simulator - Variant 3 (ARTS-V3)—which share key technical parameters but require system-specific test execution and mechanical integration.

Furthermore, to maximize the Government’s return on investment, this new depot capability must be designed with the modularity and scalability required to support future and emerging radar platforms with minimal hardware or infrastructure reconfiguration. A turn-key, flexible, and fully integrated suite of specialized test equipment, measurement chambers, and far-field range infrastructure is required to bridge this capability gap, allowing depot technicians and engineers to perform comprehensive system-level diagnostics in a controlled, safe, and optimized environment.

3. DESIRED SOLUTION OBJECTIVES

The Government seeks a "turn-key" solution consisting of a comprehensive suite of equipment and infrastructure to perform all aspects of modern radar testing, calibration, repair, and overhaul. Any vendor proposing against this Call for Solutions will be expected to execute all aspects of the effort, including project management, site planning, procurement, logistics, installation, validation, testing, and hands-on training.

To allow for maximum procurement flexibility, scalability, and modular implementation, the technical requirements are broken down by individual radar platform (AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and ARTS-V3) within each major capability element. Offerors may propose solutions addressing the entire program or specify which platforms/elements their solution covers.

3.1. General Requirements

a. Turn-Key Delivery & Integration: The vendor must manage all project dependencies, material handling, tools, and labor. They will provide all shipping, delivery, physical installation, tower-climbing operations, setup, integration, safety compliance, commissioning, and validation.

b. Infrastructure Collaboration: While TYAD will provide physical space, tower access, and standard facility utilities, the vendor must collaborate with TYAD engineering personnel to design the physical layout of the workspaces, ensuring optimal footprint configuration and strict compliance with ANSI/ESD S20.20 and OSHA standards.

c. Lifecycle Support & Software Licensing: The proposed solution must include standard warranty coverage, maintenance, and technical support. Crucially, all system software, diagnostics, and testing suites must be provided with perpetual, fully-paid offline licenses that require no recurring subscription or annual renewal fees to maintain full operational functionality.

d. Future Adaptability & Modular Architecture: Proposed hardware and software architectures should align with Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) principles where feasible. The core systems must remain adaptable and scalable to allow TYAD to integrate test profiles, interfaces, and mechanical fixtures for future or emerging radar systems without requiring a complete redesign of the core testing infrastructure.

3.2. Required Capability Baseline

The vendor’s proposed turn-key solution must satisfy the functional requirements of the following four major end-state elements, partitioned by radar platform, while maintaining overall system flexibility for future assets:

a. Element 1: Specialized Test Equipment (STE) for LRUs & Subsystems

This element comprises automated and specialized diagnostic stations capable of testing, troubleshooting, and verifying advanced radar Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) and subsystems.

i. AN/MPQ-64A4 STE: Specialized diagnostic test stations and associated software.

ii. AN/TPY-4 STE: Specialized diagnostic test stations and associated software.

iii. AN/TPQ-53 STE: Specialized diagnostic test stations and associated software.

iv. Advanced Range Threat Simulator - Variant 3 (ARTS-V3) STE: Specialized diagnostic test stations and associated software.

v. Future Radar Accommodation: Software frameworks and interface adapters designed to support expansion to accommodate next-generation radar systems.

b. Element 2: Near-Field Measurement Chambers & Test Ranges

Turn-key near-field electromagnetic measurement systems, fully integrated anechoic chambers, and associated control room equipment to perform array characterization.

i. Near-Field Range (AN/MPQ-64A4 & ARTS-V3): Near-field range system and associated testing equipment.

ii. Chamber Completion (AN/TPQ-53): Completion and commissioning of the existing specialized test chamber.

iii. Future Radar Accommodation: Testing infrastructure designed with scalability to support future array testing.

c. Element 3: Far-Field Range Equipment

Complete instrumentation suite for outdoor, system-level calibration and tracking on TYAD’s far-field radar campus.

i. Common Campus Infrastructure (All Systems): Outdoor target generators, RF monitoring and troubleshooting equipment, mobile tower structures, range control computer terminals, cabling networks, and wireless data links to support system-level far-field calibration across the campus.

ii. System-Specific RF Interfaces (AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and ARTS-V3): High-precision RF horn antennas, interface adapters, and frequency-specific transceiver equipment tailored to the unique operational frequency bands of each respective system.

iii. Future Radar Accommodation: Far-field signal generating and monitoring equipment must allow for easy software-defined frequency adjustments and modular antenna additions to support future, emerging frequency spectrum allocations.

d. Element 4: Depot Support Equipment

Industrial-grade integration, measurement, handling, and transport systems for physical overhaul and repair operations.

i. AN/MPQ-64A4 Support Equipment: Specialized physical overhaul, handling, and transport equipment.

ii. AN/TPY-4 Support Equipment: Specialized physical overhaul, handling, and transport equipment.

iii. AN/TPQ-53 Support Equipment: Specialized physical overhaul, handling, and transport equipment.

iv. Advanced Range Threat Simulator - Variant 3 (ARTS-V3) Support

Equipment: Specialized physical overhaul, handling, and transport equipment.

v. Future Radar Accommodation: Adjustable, modular physical fixtures, lifting adapters, and transit equipment designed with scalable load capacities and mechanical interfaces to accommodate the structural shapes of future radar systems.

4. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES / DELIVERABLES

The anticipated deliverables are outlined below. To support modularity, offerors are encouraged to structure their CLIN Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) by system/platform (e.g., separating AN/MPQ-64A4 hardware from AN/TPY-4 hardware) within these high-level categories.

CLIN Description Qty Unit Delivery / Period of Performance

Modern Radar Capability Equipment Suite (Hardware & Software broken down by capability baselines for the AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and/or ARTS-V3, including elements designed for future radar scalability)

1 Lot [Proposed by Vendor, e.g., XX Days ACA]

Project Management, Site Layout Integration Support, Installation & Commissioning (Collaborative facility design, setup, and tower climbing services)

1 Lot [Proposed by Vendor, e.g., XX Days ACA]

Technical Documentation, Calibration, and On- Site Training (NIST-traceable ISO/IEC 17025 certificates, technical data packages, and operator training)

1 Lot [Proposed by Vendor, e.g., XX Days ACA]

Software Updates, Firmware Maintenance, and Technical Support (Base Year + Option Years post-commissioning)

3 Years Base Year + 2 Option Years

5. AWARDING INSTRUMENT

The Government anticipates awarding a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract or Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) as a result of this Call for Solutions. The final awarding instrument will be determined based on the successful vendor's business size, accounting system capabilities, and the nature of the proposed solution.

6. CALL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTES

6.1 Overview of Submission Phases

This Call for Solutions utilizes a multi-phased evaluation approach:

a. Phase 1 - Solution Brief: Interested vendors submit a concise written brief outlining their proposed capability, integration approach, and commercial viability.

Vendors may propose solutions on all four platforms, a specific subset of platforms, and/or highlight how their infrastructure baseline natively scales to future radar requirements.

b. Phase 2 - Pitch (If Invited): Selected vendors from Phase 1 may be invited to provide a virtual or in-person pitch and technical discussion with Government subject matter experts.

c. Phase 3 - Request for Solution Proposal (RFSP) (If Invited): Highly rated vendors from Phase 2 will receive a formal RFSP to submit a full technical and price proposal.

6.2 General Notes

a. Offerors are reminded that all awards are subject to the availability of funds and the

Government reserves the right to make multiple awards, a single award, or no award as a result of this Call.

b. Only a Contracting or Agreements Officer has the authority to enter into, modify, or execute a binding instrument on behalf of the United States Government. All payment obligations are subject to Congressional appropriations.

c. In order to be eligible for award, offerors must:

i. Possess a Unique Entity ID (UEI) and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award, and maintain active registration throughout the period of performance.

ii. Register in the prescribed government invoicing system (e.g., Wide Area Work Flow).

iii. Accurately represent their small business size and status as required.

iv. Be determined responsible by the Contracting/Agreements Officer and not be suspended, debarred, or otherwise prohibited from receiving an award.

v. Disclose any actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) to the Contracting/Agreements Officer prior to award.

d. Offerors are responsible for monitoring SAM.gov for any amendments or updates to this Call.

e. Notice to Offeror(s): The Government reserves the right to cancel this open Call, either before or after the closing date. If the Government cancels this open Call, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

7. SOLUTION SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

7.1 Phase 1 – Solution Brief

7.1.1 Phase 1 – Solution Brief Content

Solution Briefs shall not exceed five (5) written pages using minimum 11-point font or, alternatively, may take the form of briefing slides not exceeding fifteen (15) slides. The

Government will not consider inserted textboxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information as part of the Solution Brief and will not consider such information in its evaluation. Solution Briefs are intended to be clear and concise.

Solution Briefs shall include the following at a minimum:

a. Title Page (does not count against page limit)

i. Company Name, Title, Date, Point of Contact Name, E-Mail Address, Phone, Address, and Call reference number. If registered in SAM.gov, include the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Unique Entity Identification (UEI) code.

ii. Specifically identify the Call for which the Solution Brief is submitted.

b. Executive Summary (one page)

i. Provide an executive summary of the technology. Brief overview of the proposing company and the proposed turn-key solution, clearly identifying which radar platforms (AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and/or ARTS-V3) and capability elements are covered, and briefly stating how the architecture supports future growth.

c. High-Level Technology Solution/Concept

i. Describe the unique aspects of your solution/concept and its relevance to the respective Call/Topic.

ii. Explain whether the solution/concept is innovative and/or a potential capability.

iii. Describe how your proposed solution/concept solves a capability gap/problem and/or provides innovative technological advancements.

iv. Detail how the proposed equipment and range infrastructure meet the baseline elements in Section 3.2. Describe your high-level approach to project management, logistics, physical setup (including tower-climbing certifications, if applicable), and site acceptance testing for the selected platforms. Explicitly describe how your proposed design remains modular and adaptable to support future or emerging radar systems.

v. Facility & Utility Requirements: Clearly state any specialized power, exhaust, plumbing, structural, or compressed gas requirements necessary for operation beyond standard utilities.

vi. Outline the capabilities and scalability of the solution/concept.

vii. Describe the benefits of your solution/concept as it applies to the respective

Call/Topic.

viii. Explain how the proposed technical approach is feasible, achievable, and supported by a technical team with the expertise and experience to accomplish the proposed solution/concept.

ix. Commercial Viability & Schedule: Describe the commercial readiness (TRL/MRL) of the proposed equipment, estimated lead times for installation, and your strategy to provide ongoing lifecycle support.

d. Company Viability

i. Provide a brief overview of the company. Include a summary of current fundraising to date or a summary of top-line (gross sales/revenues).

ii. If CSO, provide a summary of product/solution commercialization and go-to-market strategy.

e. Intellectual Property Statement/Agreement/Disclosures (does not count against page limit)

i. As needed, include a separate disclosure for each company that would be a participant in the solution/concept.

The Government may be unable to evaluate the Solution Brief if a Company fails to provide the information requested above.

7.2 Phase 2 – Pitch

Phase 2 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be outlined in the invitation to this phase, unless bypassed.

7.3 Phase 3 – Solution Proposal

Phase 3 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be outlined in the invitation to this phase.

8. EVALUATION CRITERIA

8.1 Phase 1 – Solution Brief Basis of Evaluation

During Phase 1, the Government will evaluate Solution Briefs based on the following criteria, listed in descending order of importance:

a. Technical Merit: The degree to which the proposed solution effectively, modularly, and cohesively addresses the requirements for the proposed radar systems (AN/MPQ-64A4, AN/TPY-4, AN/TPQ-53, and ARTS-V3) across the chosen capability elements. This includes evaluating the solution’s design modularity, open-architecture integration, and inherent scalability to support future/emerging military radar platforms with minimal lifecycle disruption.

b. Schedule and Integration Approach: The feasibility and practicality of the vendor’s strategy for project management, collaborative site layouts, equipment delivery, physical installation, safety integration, and system acceptance.

c. Company Viability and Support: The vendor's demonstrated capacity to successfully manage complex systems integration, provide comprehensive training, and deliver sustainable support (including perpetual licensing structures).

(Note: Price is not evaluated in Phase 1 but will be a factor in Phase 3 for invited offerors).

8.2 Phase 1 – Solution Brief Selection Process

Based on the evaluation, the Solution Brief will be categorized as Selected for Further Consideration, Retained for Future Consideration, or Not Selected for Further Consideration.

The selection of one (1) or more submissions into the next Phase will be based on the criteria listed above and funding availability. Solution Briefs considered not to have (1) sufficient merit or relevance to the topic, (2) a Government need, or (3) funds are not expected to be available, the submission may be declined without further review.

a. Selected for Further Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief has been determined to be of technical merit, represents an innovative solution, has achievable schedule, and viable maturity pathway. As such, the Government intends to invite the Company to participate in next phase should funding be available.

b. Retained for Further Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief has been determined to be of technical merit, represents an innovative solution, has achievable schedule, and viable maturity pathway. However, there is no current Government need, manpower and/or funding available. The solution will be retained in a solution repository for future consideration.

c. Not Selected for Further Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief does not represent either the necessary degree of technical merit, technical innovation, or relevance to agency priorities to warrant further proposal effort or consideration.

The Army anticipates Topics may routinely receive more Solution Briefs than resources to award. All submissions will be fairly evaluated, however, only select Solution Briefs will be invited to Phase 2 and/or Phase 3. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of Companies invited to Phase 2 and/or Phase 3. As such, a Company’s solution may be evaluated to be of merit but not invited to Phase 2 and/or Phase 3.

Solution Briefs that are chosen for Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 will be notified in writing as soon as practicable. The Government reserves the right to bypass Phase 2 into Phase 3 to request a formal proposal should funding be available.

9. ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI)

Offerors must identify any potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) with their submission. If an offeror believes a potential OCI exists, they must submit a mitigation plan along with their Phase 1 Solution Brief.

10. SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE

All Contractor personnel performing under this requirement must comply with TYAD installation security policies and OSHA guidelines.

a. AT/OPSEC: Standard Army Antiterrorism (AT) and Operations Security (OPSEC) clauses will be incorporated into the final award.

b. Information Security: The Contractor will not require access to classified information to perform this work. All technical data generated or handled under this effort will be Unclassified / Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).