C260524_PP.pdf
PDF 246 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Landscaping Services
- Solicitation number
- 260524
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is an interoffice procurement plan memo from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) dated August 3, 2026, regarding Invitation for Bid (IFB) 260524 for landscaping services. The procurement utilizes an IFB approach based on selecting the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. The contract establishes a two-year initial term with one optional one-year renewal term. The document references an attached procurement schedule but does not specify response deadlines, site visit dates, or bidders' conference information within the memo itself.
The contract is structured as a firm-fixed price agreement with an initial term budget of $550,000 and a first option term budget of $288,755. The procurement includes prevailing wage requirements and is funded through local Measure M sources. Evaluation criteria are solely cost-based, weighted at 100 percent, with no separate scoring for qualifications, staffing, or work plans. An independent cost estimate has been received, and the requisition number is R001066. The contract includes a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal requirement. As-needed services are projected to represent less than 10 percent of total anticipated costs. Project Manager Christine Herrera and Section Manager Javier Lopez provided concurrence on August 4 and August 7, 2026, respectively.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Revised: 07/20/2010
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Date: August 3, 2026
To: Christine Herrera, Contracts Analyst, Maintenance Resource Management
From: Ellis Hoskin, Senior Contract Administrator, CAMM
Subject: PROCUREMENT PLAN - IFB 260524 “Landscaping Services”
Please review the procurement plan for the subject IFB and advise your concurrence with the contract elements. Include suggested evaluation team members and/or comments. Thanks.
Procurement Type: RFP IFB
Justification (explain the rationale for using the particular procurement type):
An IFB procurement approach is applicable as the selection is based on the lowest responsive, responsible bidder to provide on-call electrical services.
Evaluation Criteria:
PROPOSAL WEIGHT
Qualifications of the Firm N/A Staffing/Project Organization N/A Work Plan N/A Cost 100% Justification:
Award is based on the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.
Contract Type: Time & Expense CTO-Based Firm Fixed Price
Justification (Explain the rationale for using the particular contract type):
A firm-fixed contract is appropriate for this procurement as firms are required to provide services at a fully-burdened, firm-fixed rate per location at an estimated frequency. As needed services are projected to be less than 10% of the total anticipated cost for this effort.
Retention: Yes No N/A
Prevailing Wages: Yes $ No N/A
Procurement Plan, RFP 260524
Revised: 0720/2010
Liquidated Damages: Yes $ No N/A
Procurement Schedule: Attached
Internal Evaluators: N/A
Contract Term: Two (2)-year initial term with one, one (1)-year option term
Funding Source: Local Measure M Federal (CMAQ)
Dollar Amount: Initial Term $550,000.00
First Option Term $288,755.00
Independent Cost Estimate Received: Yes No
Requisition Received: Yes Req. R001066
DBE Goal: Yes No
Date
Project Manager Concurrence:
Christine Herrera, Contracts Analyst, Maintenance Resource Management
CAMM Section/Department Manager Concurrence:
Javier Lopez Section Manager, Contracts and Procurement Date
8/4/2026
08/07/2026
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .