C2024406_Evaluation_Spreadsheet_FinalResults~2.pdf

This is an evaluation spreadsheet for Oregon Libraries E-Rate Needs Assessment (Contract C2024406), displaying scoring results from three independent evaluators across six proposers. The evaluation assessed three criteria: Project Implementation Plan, Work Samples, and Pricing, with each evaluator providing percentage ratings that were converted to calculated points. Columbia Telecommunications Corporation received the highest overall score of 261.30 points and ranked first for contract award, followed by Carson Block Consulting Inc. with 249.20 points. EdTechnologyFunds, Inc. scored 253.10 points and ranked second, while the remaining proposers—Funds For Learning LLC (171.50 points), EdTech Strategies LLC (163.05 points), and Linn Benton Lincoln Education Service District (150.25 points)—ranked fourth through sixth respectively. Each evaluator independently ranked the proposals, with Columbia Telecommunications Corporation receiving the highest normalized score (lower is better) at 5, indicating superior performance across the evaluation criteria.

The evaluation methodology employed a consistent scoring framework across all three evaluators, though individual ratings varied by evaluator and proposer. Columbia Telecommunications Corporation demonstrated strong performance in Project Implementation Plan (ranging 78-100% across evaluators) and Pricing (ranging 97-100%), which contributed significantly to its top-ranked position. The spread in calculated points among evaluators ranged from 34.0 to 97.8, reflecting varying assessments of Work Samples particularly, where some proposals scored as low as 0-10% while others achieved 100%. No specific pricing amounts, contract value, or financial terms are detailed in this evaluation spreadsheet, as it serves solely to document the comparative scoring and ranking of competing proposals based on the established weighted criteria.