C04_Attachment IV - Past Performance Questionnaire_1232SA26Q1079.doc
DOC document 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1232SA26Q1079
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for vendors responding to a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for winter nursery services supporting the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Sugar Beet and Bean Research Unit in East Lansing, Michigan. The solicitation number is 1232SA26Q1079, and this is a Total Small Business Set-Aside with a size standard of $2.8 million under NAICS code 111130. The questionnaire serves as an evaluation tool to assess contractor experience and capability in delivering similar services, though the specific questions and evaluation criteria contained within the template are not detailed in the provided file reference.
Respondents to this RFQ should expect to complete the Past Performance Questionnaire as part of their proposal submission. The winter nursery services involve advancing dry bean breeding materials during winter months in a warm climate area to accelerate the breeding program by one generation. As this is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items under FAR Part 12, quotations submitted in response will be evaluated using the criteria outlined in the solicitation, which includes past performance as a key factor in contractor selection and award determination.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment IV
Request For Proposal (RFP) # 1232SA26Q1079 USDA-ARS-MWA East Lansing Attachment IV
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Contractor shall complete the company specific information on this form, contact their clients, forward this form to their clients and request that their clients complete it (verify/concur and score) and send it via email to theodore.blume@usda.gov
This will expedite the response from each referenced source.
CONTRACTOR COMPLETES SECTION 1. CLIENT POC COMPLETES SECTION 2.
SECTION 1:
Name of Contractor: ______________________________________________________
Name of client organization:
Project name and contract/task order number:
Brief description of support provided:
Total period of performance, dates, and total cost/price:
Number of contractor personnel assigned to the project, by skill category:
Name and Title of Technical Point of Contact (POC):
Address of Technical POC:
Telephone number of Technical POC:
Date the Technical POC was contacted for this PPQ:
Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by DATE, and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?
FORMCHECKBOX
Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
SECTION 2:
Please BOLD the rating your Technical POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
1. Overall Technical Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
2.
Quality of work
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
3.
Schedule Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
4.
Cost Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
5.
Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
6.
Would your Technical POC use your company again? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Please BOLD the rating your Contracting POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
1.
Overall Contractual Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
2.
Would your Contracting POC use your company again? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Employee(s) who made the contact with above-named client references:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .