C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 3a Past Perf Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
Wounded Warrior Outreach and Resource Support Services-Synopsis/Draft RFP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M0026426R0001
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

The document is a Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) Attachment 3a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for solicitation M00264-26-R-0001, issued by the Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region-Regional Contracting Office (MCINCR-RCO). The PPQ is designed to assess a contractor's past performance across four key evaluation areas: quality of performance, schedule performance, management performance, and cost control, using a rating scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional.

Respondents are required to complete the questionnaire and return it via email to bradley.hoover@usmc.mil and cynthia.guthridge@usmc.mil by 31 October 2025 at 10:00 AM ET. The PPQ is part of a solicitation for Wounded Warrior Outreach and Resource Support Services, which will be a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business set-aside contract. The hybrid contract will consist of Firm Fixed-Price line items for services and Cost Reimbursement for travel, with a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, using NAICS code 624190 with a size standard of $16M.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Wounded Warrior Outreach and Resource Support Services-Synopsis/Draft RFP, newest first.
File Type Posted
C.18 Draft RFP.docx DOCX document
C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 3 Past Performance.docx DOCX document
C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 2 Staffing Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 4 Price Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 1 Q&A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
C.18 Draft RFP Attachment 5 Wage Determination.pdf PDF
C.18 Draft RFP PWS Attachment 1 GFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance RFP Attachment 3a M00264-26-R-0001

OFFEROR: [Insert Name] DRAFT

RFP Attachment 3a: Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Assessor

As the Government’s point-of-contact for the contract identified below, completion of this PPQ is requested by the Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region- Regional Contracting Office (MCINCR-RCO) to assist with establishing the performance history for the contractor and contract number identified below in Section I.

Instructions:

Please complete Section III through Section XI and return the completed questionnaire directly to the MCINCR-RCO at bradley.hoover@usmc.mil AND cynthia.guthridge@usmc.mil no later than 31 October 2025 at 10:00 AM ET. Email subject line shall read “M00264-26-R-0001 PPQ Source Selection Sensitive”.

If you have any questions, please direct them to both aforementioned individuals.

Responses to use minimum 10pt font, Times New Roman only.

I. Referenced Contract Data:

Contractor Name:

Contract Number:

Client / Agency:

Period of Performance:

II. Contact Information for Reference:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number/Email Address:

Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Other:

III. Describe the scope of the contract in Section I.

IV. Describe the complexity of this contract in terms of its type (firm-fixed price, cost, etc.), security clearance requirements, deliverables executed, performance metrics, performance in multiple locations, performance outside the U.S., or any other complexity information deemed important.

V. Evaluation

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

VI. 1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Quality of Performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship

Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VII. 2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VIII. 3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Management Performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Responsiveness

Subcontract

Program Management

Management Of Personnel

Integrated Product Team Management

Definitions:

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Subcontract Management: Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.

Integrated Product Team Management: Commitment and participation in the Integrated Product Team process

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

IX. 4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost/Price Estimates

Cost Efficiency

Invoicing

Forecasting Management Cost Control

Definitions:

Cost/Price Estimates: Ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates.

Cost Efficiency: Realization of any cost reductions or operating efficiencies in accomplishing requirements of the Statement of Work.

Invoicing: Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of invoices submitted.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

X. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Individual identified in Section II and completion of form (Sections III – XI):

[Name] Date

XI. ___________________________________ ___________________

[Title]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .