BPM006872 Evaluation Form Final.xls
XLS spreadsheet 138 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR076677
- Contract number
- CTR076677
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an evaluation form for Solicitation No. BPM006872 for Supplemental Ammunition Products, involving multiple offerors including Spragues, San Diego, Ammo A-Z, and Shooter's World. The evaluation appears to be for a statewide contract in Arizona, with a comprehensive scoring methodology that assesses vendor capabilities across multiple dimensions including methodology, written narratives, cost/pricing, experience, and company profile.
The solicitation covers ammunition products, with vendors evaluated on their ability to provide goods and services, communication processes, warranty provisions, and organizational capabilities. While most vendors were deemed "Not Susceptible" due to incomplete documentation, Spragues received a total score of 784 out of 1000 possible points, scoring particularly well in methodology (168/168), written narrative (42/60 across multiple sections), and cost/pricing (250/250). The evaluation considered factors such as business operations, potential conflicts of interest, litigation history, market experience, and professional certifications. Pricing details include percentage discounts off federal and Speer pricing, with Shooter's World offering the highest discount at 40%.
View the file
Other files
Show all 36
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Summary
| EVALUATION | ||||||||||
| Solicitation No. BPM006872 Supplemental Ammunition Products Statewide | Spragues | San Diego Not Susceptible (Exceptions Taken) | Ammo A-Z Not Susceptible (Lack of completed required documents) | Shooter's World Not Susceptible (Lack of completed required documents) | ||||||
| 1000 | Combined Total Score | 784 | 483 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 240 | Methodology Total | 168 | 168 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 60 | Written Narrative | Meets | 42 | Meets | 42 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1.0 Clearly state your understanding of the Scope of Work and all requirements. Provide a description of an inter-organizational governance structure and communication process that will support a successful business relationship. Provide a description of how your organization tracks problem resolution responsiveness and end-user satisfaction in a quantifiable manner to ensure quality customer service. | ||||||||||
| 60 | Written Narrative | Meets | 42 | Meets | 42 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.0 Describe the process for communication with the State regarding contract administration, including but not limited to, product changes, price changes and updated vendor information and general communications. | ||||||||||
| 60 | Written Narrative | Meets | 42 | Meets | 42 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 3.0 Provide a narrative to the products available as well as list any availability for services if needed and state what those services are. Pricing for proposed services shall be listed on the State Pricing Document. | ||||||||||
| 60 | Written Narrative | Meets | 42 | Meets | 42 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 4.0 Describe the Offeror’s minimum warranties that are included for all their products and services and how warranty issues are remedied. | ||||||||||
| 250 | Cost/Pricing Total | 250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 510 | Experience and Capacity Total | 366 | 315 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 30 | Company Profile | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1.1 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience in regards to the Scope of Work; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.2 Location in which the Offeror is incorporated; | ||||||||||
| 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | Exceeds | 0 | ||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.3 Full disclosure of any potential conflict of interest between the Offeror and any State employee who functions or has responsibilities in the review or approval of the undertaking or carrying out of the Contract; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.4 A Statement of whether, in the last five (5) years, the Offeror has filed (or had filed against it) any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, whether voluntary or involuntary, or undergone the appointment of a receiver, trustee, or assignee for the benefit of creditors, and if so, an explanation providing relevant details and current status; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.5 A Statement of whether there are any pending Securities Exchange Commission investigations involving the Offeror, and if such are pending or in progress, an explanation providing relevant details and an attached opinion of counsel as to whether the pending investigation(s) may impair the Offeror’s performance in a Contract under this Solicitation; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.6 A Statement documenting all open or pending litigation initiated by Offeror or where Offeror is a defendant or party in any litigation that may have a material impact on Offeror’s ability to deliver the contracted Services; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.7 A Statement documenting all open or pending litigation initiated by Offeror or where Offeror is a defendant or party in any litigation with a public sector client; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.8 Full disclosure of any public sector contracts terminated for cause or convenience in the past five (5) years; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.9 Full disclosure of any criminal or civil offense; | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.10 Offeror shall provide evidence of any Arizona required business license to provide these Services; AND | ||||||||||
| 30 | Meets | 21 | Does Not Meet | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 1.11 Offeror shall provide copies of any professional or industry certifications that represent the Services detailed in this Solicitation. | Offeror response was "none" | |||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.1 What market(s) are your current clients primarily in? | ||||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.2 What experience do you have serving clients in business markets within the State of Arizona? | ||||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.3 What is the range in size of your current clients? | ||||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.4 Provide two (2) examples that exhibit your experience with Materials or Services for clients relevant to the Scope of Work? Provide supporting documentation as a separate attachment and title the document: “Attachment - Company Experience”. | ||||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Meets | 21 | Meets | 21 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.5 In the last five (5) years, did any of your clients cancel their contracts with your company? If “yes”, why? Please provide as much detail as possible. | ||||||||||
| 30 | Company Experience | Exceeds | 30 | Does Not Meet | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 2.6 With what relevant trade and/or professional associations are you involved? How does this participation give you an advantage over your competition? | Owner is a Board Member on National Shooting Sports Foundation | Offeror response was "none" | ||||||||
| Financial Stability | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Meets = The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the RFP. | ||||||||||
| Does Not Meet = The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the RFP or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the RFP or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state. | ||||||||||
| Exceeds | ||||||||||
| Meets | ||||||||||
| No Adm Actions | ||||||||||
| One Adm Issue | ||||||||||
| Two Adm Issues | ||||||||||
| Three Adm Issues | ||||||||||
| Four Issues or Term. | ||||||||||
| No Referral Reassigned | ||||||||||
| <2 Referrals Reassigned | ||||||||||
| >2 Referrals Reassigned |
Rates
| Bids | ||||
| Offerors | Total Cost | Total Points | ||
| Spagues | Pricing per Price sheet provided on 4-18 with per unit pricing | $0.00 | 0 | |
| San Diego | Not Susceptible | $0.00 | 0 | |
| Ammo A-Z | Not Susceptible | $0.00 | 0 | |
| Shooter's World | Not Susceptible | $0.00 | 0 | |
| Percent Discount Off Federal | Percent Discount Off Speer | |||
| Spagues | 0% | 0% | ||
| San Diego | 0% | 0% | ||
| Ammo A-Z | 0% | 0% | ||
| Shooter's World | 40% | 40% | ||
| Lowest Bid | ||||
| Scoring Formula = Lowest Bid/Proposed Bid x 250 |
Total Score
| Offeror | Method | Cost | Experience | Total Score |
| Possible Points | 200 | 250 | 550 | 1000 |
| Spagues | 168 | 250 | 366 | 784 |
| San Diego Not Susceptible | 0 | |||
| Ammo A-Z Not Susceptible | 0 | |||
| Shooter's World Not Susceptible | 0 | |||
| Note: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .