BPA Genetic Testing FAR 52.212-2 Addendum.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Genetic Testing Services for Tripler Army Medical Center, HI
Solicitation number
W81K0225QA024
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 for a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for Genetic Testing Services at Tripler Army Medical Center in Hawaii. The Department of the Army Medical Command intends to issue multiple pre-priced BPAs to responsible suppliers who submit technically acceptable quotations with acceptable past performance and fair pricing. The solicitation (W81K0225QA024) is seeking commercial genetic testing services, with quotes due by 06 MAY 2025 at 10:00 AM HST.

The evaluation will focus on three primary factors: Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price. Quotations must clearly demonstrate how they meet the minimum requirements in the Performance Work Statement to receive an "Acceptable" rating. Suppliers will be assessed on their performance history, with a neutral rating given to those without previous relevant contract experience. The government will conduct price analysis to ensure fairness and reasonableness, and will review federal systems like FAPIIS and SAM as part of the responsibility determination. Multiple BPAs may be awarded to suppliers meeting all solicitation requirements.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Paragraph (a) is hereby replaced with the following:

(a) The Government intends to issue multiple pre-priced Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to the responsible suppliers of goods and/or services whose quotation conforming to the solicitation is technically acceptable, whose past performance is acceptable, and provides a fair and reasonable prices. BPAs will be established in accordance with FAR 13.303, Blanket Purchase Agreements and FAR 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures.

Except communications conducted for the purpose of minor clarifications, the Government intends to evaluate quotes and establish BPAs without discussions. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the quoter's best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

EVALUATION FACTORS. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

Factor 1. Technical Capability Factor 2. Past Performance Factor 3. Price

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (FACTOR 1). The quote should consist of written documentation to provide sufficient narrative and supporting data to address how the quote meets the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement. The following ratings will be used in evaluating each quote:

ADJECTIVE
DEFINITION
Acceptable
Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement.
Unacceptable
Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement.

Note: To receive consideration for award, a rating of "Acceptable" must be achieved for all technical requirements.

PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 2). Performance Confidence Assessment provides insight into a quoter's probability of successfully completing the solicitation requirements based on the quoter's performance record on recent, relevant, and similar contract efforts. The number and severity of problems (if any), the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken (if required) and the overall performance record are taken into consideration.

Each quoter's Past Performance will be evaluated and assigned an adjectival rating. The following rating scheme for Performance Risk will be used:

ADJECTIVE
DEFINITION
Acceptable
Based on the quoter's performance record and the confidence assessment, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the quoter's performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable
Based on the quoter's performance record and the confidence assessment, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: A quoter with a rating of "Unacceptable" will not be considered for award.

Evaluation of past performance will be subjective based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. The currency, content, general trends, and relevance of the information in contractor's performance will be considered.

The Government may also consider and use any additional information from its own files, databases, references provided by the quoter, or from any source, as it deems appropriate. The Government may survey references to verify information provided and may survey other sources known to the Government.

If adverse past performance information is obtained, the respective point of contact will be contacted to obtain additional information about the circumstances surrounding the situation. Quoters will be given an opportunity to address unfavorable reports of past performance to which the quoter has not had a previous opportunity to respond.

If a quoter does not have a past performance history relating to the solicitation, the quoter will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably, and a neutral rating will be given for this factor. A neutral rating is considered acceptable.

PRICE (FACTOR 3) is not rated. Price analysis will be used to evaluate a quoter's price and the extent to which it is fair and reasonable. The Government may determine that a quotation is unacceptable if prices are significantly unbalanced.

BPAs will be established with suppliers who submit quotes possessing all of the following characteristics:

1) Meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors (e.g., Technical and Past Performance),

2) Conforms to the solicitation,

3) Is from a prospective contractor who is responsible (as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 9). (As part of a responsibility determination and pre-award risk assessment, the Contracting Officer will review the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information Systems (FAPIIS) and System for Award Management (SAM)), and,

4) Provides prices that are determined to be fair and reasonable.

Paragraph (b) is hereby addended and reads as follows:

(b) If the Government establishes a BPA with a supplier, the supplier shall indicate acceptance of the BPA by written notice to the Government. The Government may, by written notice to the supplier, at any time before acceptance occurs, withdraw, amend, or cancel the BPA. Note that once a BPA is established, the Government is obligated only to the extent of authorized purchases actually made under the BPA.

(End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-2)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .