Blairsville ARC26 Score Criterion_docx.pdf

PDF 98 KB Posted

Attached to
Downtown Infrastructure Improvements
Solicitation number
PE-74452-NONST-2026-000000003
Issued by
Ware County, Georgia

About this file

This is a scoring criterion document for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by Blairsville ARC (Area Resource Commission), a Georgia-based organization. The document outlines the evaluation framework for scoring proposals submitted in response to a procurement opportunity designated as ARC26. The evaluation criteria establish weighted scoring categories that will be used to assess bidder qualifications, technical approaches, and overall proposal quality. The document specifies the relative importance of various evaluation factors through point allocations, enabling a standardized and objective assessment methodology for comparing competing proposals. While specific response deadlines, site visits, and bidders' conferences are not detailed in this scoring criterion document, these elements would typically be outlined in the accompanying RFP solicitation materials.

The scoring criterion establishes a structured evaluation process that allows the evaluation committee to systematically assess proposals against predetermined standards. The weighting of individual criteria reflects Blairsville ARC's priorities for the ARC26 procurement and ensures that proposals are judged consistently based on defined performance expectations and organizational objectives. Detailed information regarding pricing terms, contract duration, set-asides, incumbent status, and funding sources would be contained in the primary RFP document rather than in this scoring criterion reference guide, which serves as the evaluation tool for the selection process.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

City of Blairsville RFQ #6-3-26– Engineering and/or Architectural Services

Rating Criterion

CONTACT:

NAME OF FIRM:

FIRM ADDRESS:

Evaluate the Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION

POOR

FAIR

GOOD EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 1 2 3 4

2. Firm’s experience with this type of construction. 1 2 3 4

3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction. 1 2 3 4

4. Quality of reference information. 1 2 3 4

5.

Has Firm had experience with ARC/CDBG/CEFA/USDAR/etc.

projects?

1 2 3 4

6. Is price competitive? 1 2 3 4

TOTAL POINTS

Firm is a Section 3 Business Concern? ____ Yes ____ No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No

Firm can obtain and maintain all Build America, Buy America Act documentation during construction and certify to this action at any potential project(s)’ end? ____ Yes ____ No

COMMENTS:

NAME OF REVIEWER: DATE OF REVIEW:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .