Blairsville ARC26 Score Criterion_docx.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Downtown Infrastructure Improvements
- Solicitation number
- PE-74452-NONST-2026-000000003
- Issued by
- Ware County, Georgia
About this file
This is a scoring criterion document for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by Blairsville ARC (Area Resource Commission), a Georgia-based organization. The document outlines the evaluation framework for scoring proposals submitted in response to a procurement opportunity designated as ARC26. The evaluation criteria establish weighted scoring categories that will be used to assess bidder qualifications, technical approaches, and overall proposal quality. The document specifies the relative importance of various evaluation factors through point allocations, enabling a standardized and objective assessment methodology for comparing competing proposals. While specific response deadlines, site visits, and bidders' conferences are not detailed in this scoring criterion document, these elements would typically be outlined in the accompanying RFP solicitation materials.
The scoring criterion establishes a structured evaluation process that allows the evaluation committee to systematically assess proposals against predetermined standards. The weighting of individual criteria reflects Blairsville ARC's priorities for the ARC26 procurement and ensures that proposals are judged consistently based on defined performance expectations and organizational objectives. Detailed information regarding pricing terms, contract duration, set-asides, incumbent status, and funding sources would be contained in the primary RFP document rather than in this scoring criterion reference guide, which serves as the evaluation tool for the selection process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Blairsville ARC26 RFQ (2) (1) _ June update_d.pdf | ||
| sec_3_solicitation_package_june_2022 (1).pdf | ||
| BABA Applicability Notice (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Instructions for Engineering _ Architect Proc.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of Blairsville RFQ #6-3-26– Engineering and/or Architectural Services
Rating Criterion
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
FAIR
GOOD EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 1 2 3 4
2. Firm’s experience with this type of construction. 1 2 3 4
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction. 1 2 3 4
4. Quality of reference information. 1 2 3 4
5.
Has Firm had experience with ARC/CDBG/CEFA/USDAR/etc.
projects?
1 2 3 4
6. Is price competitive? 1 2 3 4
TOTAL POINTS
Firm is a Section 3 Business Concern? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm can obtain and maintain all Build America, Buy America Act documentation during construction and certify to this action at any potential project(s)’ end? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS:
NAME OF REVIEWER: DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .