BIR.pdf
PDF 8 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-B-000002
About this file
This solicitation is for janitorial services at the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is seeking proposals for cleaning offices, visitor centers, restrooms and other facilities along the parkway. Proposals are due by July 15, 2022 and the contract is expected to be awarded by September 1, 2022. The term of performance is one base year with four optional one-year extensions. Pricing shall remain firm for the initial term and each optional extension year. The contractor must comply with Service Contract Act wage determinations and ensure at least 50% of labor hours are performed by veterans, disabled veterans or qualified service-disabled veterans.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf | ||
| Results of Bid Opening - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf | ||
| VETS-4212 Form.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Plans - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf | ||
| Pavement Recommendations.pdf | ||
| Route ID_BLRI_C5.pdf | ||
| Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Rip Report_BLRI_C5.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
VA ROUTE 56 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 46.8 FT (14.3 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 46.8 FT (14.3 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1E2 / 1E2040 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 29 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 27.16 (KM PT 43.68)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 11.2 MILES NORTH TO VA ROUTE 814
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 56
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include isolated spalling with exposed rebar on the arch underside, efflorescence and stalactites from arch ring stones and a lack of reflective object markers for the underpass roadway, deterioration of the mortar joints throughout the bridge. Other problems include vertical cracks at both abutment breastwalls.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.6, 60.1,6 REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS AND SEAL CRACKS AS NEEDED.
REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS.
1 LS
59.3 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK LOCATION
FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N
N N G N N N N F G
N G
G G N F G N
N
N
N
N
58.3, 222.4 1/8" WIDE TRANSVERSE CRACKS OVER ABUTMENTS AND ONE IN
NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT 4' FROM NORTH ABUTMENT.
58.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
59.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ARCH UNDERSIDE
ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND RING STONES. SPALLING
WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN ARCH UNDERSIDE AT SOUTHEAST AND
NORTHEAST ENDS.
59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES WITH SOME
ACTIVE LEAKAGE ALONG BOTH ARCH RING STONES.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
MASONRY AND MORTAR JOINTS.
8' LONG VERTICAL CRACK ALONG MASONRY AND JOINTS AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL NEAR CENTER.
60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; CRACKING EXTENDS
THROUGH MASONRY AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST AND
SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS G
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N
19. OTHER N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL N
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 222.7
U.S.G.S. MARKER ON WEST PARAPET AT SOUTH END, "ELEV. 2986',
1962."
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS, 13' - 9", PROVIDED AT BOTH
APPROACHES
PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-8" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.
36.A
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 47 43 78 71
HS 137 124 229 208
TYPE 3 118 107 197 179
TYPE 3S2 174 158 291 264
TYPE 3-3 234 212 300 272
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: FRAME
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 56 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 163 - ROCKBRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-002P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 56
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........002P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140002P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 11.2 MILES NORTH TO VA RO
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1E2 (11) MILE POINT: .............................27.16 (KM PT 43.68)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1E2040 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
46.8 FT (14.3 M)
46.8 FT (14.3 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°53'09.20"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°09'06.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 60 MI (97 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
34.0 FT (10.4 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
29 °
NO
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
1.67 FT (0.51 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.08 FT (4.29 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-JOINT REPAIR.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://79�09'06.80 https://37�53'09.20
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD SKYLINE DRIVE
PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN ASPHALT, NORTH END
SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - GENERA;L UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES ON
UNDERSIDE OF RING STONES ALONG EAST SIDE
PHOTO #7 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE AT
SOUTHEAST CORNER
PHOTO #8 - EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE ADJACENT TO
EAST RING STONES NEAR CENTER OF SPAN
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #11 - VERTICAL CRACKING AROUND MASONRY STONES AND
THROUGH MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT NORTH ABUTMENT
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
RAVINE VIADUCT INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1E8 / 1000 SKEW ANGLE:
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-NEW DECK, PAINT SUPERSTRUCTURE.
LOCATION
196.0 FT (59.7 M)
67.2 FT (20.5 M)
33.9 FT (10.3 M)
29.9 FT (9.1 M)
0 °
NO
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 35.67 (KM PT 57.37)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 86.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. RAVINE
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. The main problem with this structure is surface rusting of the steel superstructure and bearing devices, a condition that continues to progress. Additional problems include debris accumulation in the curblines, on bearing areas, and on beam ends; several cracked stones on the east column at the north pier, a displaced stone at the northeast cheekwall; deterioration of the northwest vertical expansion joint; and open core holes in the deck underside. It should be noted that two cracked tack welds were observed on Beam #5 bottom flange near the south abutment (per the 2014 inspection report).
Since the previous inspection, the wearing surface and approaches have been repaved.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.2,7, 59.2, 60.3
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES, BEARING SEATS, AND BEAM ENDS. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
59.1,2,6 CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL AS NEEDED. 1 LS
58.1 SEAL CRACKS ON DECK UNDERSIDE. 1 LS
60.12 RESET DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL. 1 LS
60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL NORTHWEST VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT. 1 LS
58.1 SEAL CORE HOLES IN DECK. 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK
LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(STRIPING)
F G N N N G G N G
N G
G G N G F N
G
G
G
G
58.1,3 DECK SLAB HAS BEEN CORED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; PAVED
OVER SINCE LAST INSPECTION. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKS
EXTEND FROM CORE HOLES ON DECK UNDERSIDE; MINOR
DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE IN VICINITY OF CORE HOLES,
BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3, CENTER SPAN. MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE AT CORE HOLES AND ALONG LONGITUDINAL
CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON DECK UNDERSIDE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE AND EXTERIOR FACE OF DECK
OVERHANGS, WIDESPREAD ON WEST OVERHANG.
58.2 JOINTS PAVED OVER SINCE LAST INSPECTION; LIGHT TRANSVERSE
CRACKS IN ASPHALT OVER JOINTS AT PIERS.
58.3, 222.4 DECK AND APPROACHES REPAVED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
58.6 MINOR CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND MINOR MOSS
GROWTH IN JOINTS.
58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG
PARAPETS.
59.1 MINOR RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES; MODERATE AT EXTERIOR
BEARINGS.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS G
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS F
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER (CHEEKWALL) F
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (STRIPING)
N N G G G G N F G
223. RETAINING WALL 7
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G G N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2,6 MINOR RUSTING OF BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS, TYPICALLY ALONG
FLANGES. MINOR PACK RUST BETWEEN VERTICAL STIFFENERS
AND WEBS OF EXTERIOR BEAMS.
MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ENDS OF EXTERIOR BEAMS.
MINOR DAMAGE TO SEVERAL WEB STIFFENERS ON EAST SIDE.
BENT STIFFENER ON WEST FACE OF BEAM #5 IN NORTH SPAN.
FROM 2014 INSPECTION REPORT: INDENTATIONS ON FLANGE AND
STIFFENER ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #1 IN SOUTH AND NORTH
SPANS. TWO CRACKED TACK WELDS ON TOP OF BEAM #5 BOTTOM
FLANGE NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.
60.1 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT
WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT TOP.
60.3 MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD AT NORTH ABUTMENT,
WEST BEARING (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).
60.4 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL
BEHIND BEAM #5 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM).
60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;
MODERATE IN SOME LOCATIONS. LEAKAGE STAINS AND
EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.8, 223.1,5 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF NORTHWEST VERTICAL MORTAR
JOINT; MINOR SETTLEMENT AND ROTATION (1-1/4") OF RETAINING
WALL AT JOINT.
60.9 NORTH ABUTMENT FOOTING EXPOSED, 36" H X 11'-8" L ON EAST
SIDE; 11" H X 3'-4" L ON WEST SIDE.
60.12 DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL RESTS AGAINST
BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1 (EAST EXTERIOR BEAM).
60.13,15 MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF PIER ARCHES AND
ON COLUMNS. RANDOM STONES CRACKED ON EAST COLUMN AT
NORTH PIER.
222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT.
222.8 BRIDGE IS ON HORIZONTAL CURVE WITH LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 19 17 31 28
HS 24 22 40 36
TYPE 3 22 20 38 34
TYPE 3S2 31 28 52 47
TYPE 3-3 36 33 61 55
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: INTERIOR GIRDER IN SPANS #2 AND #3
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... RAVINE VIADUCT (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 163 - ROCKBRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-003P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... RAVINE
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........003P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140003P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 86.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 60
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1E8 (11) MILE POINT: .............................35.67 (KM PT 57.37)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1000 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
67.2 FT (20.5 M)
196.0 FT (59.7 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 24.0 TONS (21.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 40.0 TONS (36.3 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°48'02.80"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°11'47.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
29.9 FT (9.1 M)
33.9 FT (10.3 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
29.9 FT (9.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.67 FT (0.81 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N
N - Not over waterway.
1985-NEW DECK, PAINT SUPERSTRUCTURE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://79�11'47.40 https://37�48'02.80
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD ROANOKE
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE NEW
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE
OVER PIERS, OVER PIER 2 SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #6 - WATER SEEPING FROM CORE HOLE THROUGH DECK
NEAR BEAM #2 OF SPAN #2; NOTE RUSTING BEAM FLANGES
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES, BEARING AT
EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL RESTING
AGAINST BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DAMAGE TO WEB STIFFENERS ON EAST SIDE;
NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL INDENTATIONS ON FLANGE AND STIFFENER ON
EAST FACE OF BEAM #1, SOUTH SPAN SHOWN (PHOTO FROM
10/29/2014 INSPECTION REPORT)
PHOTO #11 - ONE OF TWO CRACKED TACK WELDS ON TOP OF BEAM
#5 BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT (PHOTO FROM
10/29/2014 INSPECTION REPORT)
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #1
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #2
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF PIER
ARCH, PIER #1 SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - WATER SEEPING THROUGH MASONRY STONE OF PIER #2
EAST COLUMN ON WEST FACE
PHOTO #18 - DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT
MATERIAL AT NORTHWEST CORNER
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
IRISH GAP BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 24.2 FT (7.4 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 24.2 FT (7.4 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.6 FT (10.5 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.4 FT (9.3 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1F3, 1L3 / 2039E SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1979-JOINT REPAIR.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 37.46 (KM PT 60.25)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 7.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 605
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate deterioration of the parapet masonry mortar joints in some locations, a spall with exposed rebar at west side of south abutment, missing reflective object markers and vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway, and widespread graffiti on the abutment breastwalls.
Since the last inspection, the bridge and approaches have been repaved.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. In addition, consideration should be given to reconstructing the bridge parapets to meet current safety standards.
INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER SIGNS AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE
SIGNS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS
NECESSARY.
1 LS
60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK LOCATION
FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Consideration should be given to reconstructing the bridge parapets to meet current safety standards.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N
N N G N N N N F G
N G
G G N F G N
N
N
N
N
58.3, 222.4 BRIDGE AND APPROACHES REPAVED SINCE PREVIOUS
INSPECTION.
58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS IN SOME LOCATIONS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH;
ISOLATED AREAS OF MORTAR MISSING.
59.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE WHERE SLAB MEETS RING STONES.
59.8 MODERATE TO HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES ON
RING STONES.
59.9 MINOR VIBRATION FELT ON ROADWAY UNDER TRAFFIC (DID NOT
OBSERVE DURING THIS INSPECTION).
60.1 MINOR DETERIORATION OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS IN SOME LOCATIONS (AT CORNERS). MINOR SPALL
WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT
WEST END. WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS;
WIDESPREAD FLAKING OF CONCEALING PAINT.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.
60.8 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT
MATERIAL BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS F
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
14. PILE BENTS N
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
16. FOUNDATIONS N
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G N F N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
222.7 VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT
MARKERS ARE NOT PROVIDED ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
222.8 ON A HORIZONTAL CURVE WITH LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE.
36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-11" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY
GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTH OR MINIMUM HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF
2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 41 37 69 63
HS 74 67 124 112
TYPE 3 50 45 85 77
TYPE 3S2 79 72 133 121
TYPE 3-3 114 103 191 173
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: FRAME
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... IRISH GAP BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - AMHERST
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-004P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 605
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........004P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140004P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1F3, 1L3 (11) MILE POINT: .............................37.46 (KM PT 60.25)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2039E (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
24.2 FT (7.4 M)
24.2 FT (7.4 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 74.0 TONS (67.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°47'54.40"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°13'04.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.8 FT (1.2 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
30.4 FT (9.3 M)
34.6 FT (10.5 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
30.4 FT (9.3 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
1.92 FT (0.59 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.67 FT (4.47 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1979-JOINT REPAIR.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://79�13'04.80 https://37�47'54.40
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD SKYLINE DRIVE
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE; NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS ON
UNDERPASS ROADWAY
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE NEW
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS, WEST PARAPET NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF SLAB
UNDERSIDE, EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE AND
STALACTITES IN RING STONES
PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL AT WEST END
PHOTO #10 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS IN NORTHEAST
WINGWALL
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P
PETERS CREEK ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/20
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.5 FT (9.0 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 33 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-JOINT REPAIR.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 64.86 (KM PT 104.11)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.2 MILES TO VA ROUTE 501
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. PETERS CREEK ROAD (VA ROUTE 600)
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor deterioration of the mortar joints on the parapets and the wingwalls; and missing object markers at the corners of the bridge on the underpass roadway.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS ON
UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.6, 60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS AS NECESSARY.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK
LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .