BIR.pdf

PDF 8 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-24-B-000002
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

This solicitation is for janitorial services at the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is seeking proposals for cleaning offices, visitor centers, restrooms and other facilities along the parkway. Proposals are due by July 15, 2022 and the contract is expected to be awarded by September 1, 2022. The term of performance is one base year with four optional one-year extensions. Pricing shall remain firm for the initial term and each optional extension year. The contractor must comply with Service Contract Act wage determinations and ensure at least 50% of labor hours are performed by veterans, disabled veterans or qualified service-disabled veterans.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blue Ridge Parkway, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results of Bid Opening - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf PDF
Results of Bid Opening - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf PDF
IFB Solicitation - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf PDF
VETS-4212 Form.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Plans - NP BLRI PVT PRES FY23(1).pdf PDF
Pavement Recommendations.pdf PDF
Route ID_BLRI_C5.pdf PDF
Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf PDF
ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc DOC document
Rip Report_BLRI_C5.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

VA ROUTE 56 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 46.8 FT (14.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 46.8 FT (14.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1E2 / 1E2040 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 29 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 27.16 (KM PT 43.68)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 11.2 MILES NORTH TO VA ROUTE 814

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 56

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include isolated spalling with exposed rebar on the arch underside, efflorescence and stalactites from arch ring stones and a lack of reflective object markers for the underpass roadway, deterioration of the mortar joints throughout the bridge. Other problems include vertical cracks at both abutment breastwalls.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6, 60.1,6 REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS AND SEAL CRACKS AS NEEDED.

REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS.

1 LS

59.3 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK LOCATION

FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N G N N N N F G

N G

G G N F G N

N

N

N

N

58.3, 222.4 1/8" WIDE TRANSVERSE CRACKS OVER ABUTMENTS AND ONE IN

NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT 4' FROM NORTH ABUTMENT.

58.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

59.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ARCH UNDERSIDE

ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND RING STONES. SPALLING

WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN ARCH UNDERSIDE AT SOUTHEAST AND

NORTHEAST ENDS.

59.8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES WITH SOME

ACTIVE LEAKAGE ALONG BOTH ARCH RING STONES.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

MASONRY AND MORTAR JOINTS.

8' LONG VERTICAL CRACK ALONG MASONRY AND JOINTS AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL NEAR CENTER.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; CRACKING EXTENDS

THROUGH MASONRY AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL.

MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AT SOUTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS G

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL N

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 222.7

U.S.G.S. MARKER ON WEST PARAPET AT SOUTH END, "ELEV. 2986',

1962."

VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS, 13' - 9", PROVIDED AT BOTH

APPROACHES

PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-8" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM HEIGHT

REQUIREMENTS OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.

36.A

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 47 43 78 71

HS 137 124 229 208

TYPE 3 118 107 197 179

TYPE 3S2 174 158 291 264

TYPE 3-3 234 212 300 272

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: FRAME

REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 56 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 163 - ROCKBRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-002P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 56

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........002P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140002P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 11.2 MILES NORTH TO VA RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1E2 (11) MILE POINT: .............................27.16 (KM PT 43.68)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1E2040 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

46.8 FT (14.3 M)

46.8 FT (14.3 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°53'09.20"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°09'06.80"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 60 MI (97 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

29 °

NO

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.67 FT (0.51 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.08 FT (4.29 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://79�09'06.80 https://37�53'09.20

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-002P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD SKYLINE DRIVE

PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN ASPHALT, NORTH END

SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - GENERA;L UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES ON

UNDERSIDE OF RING STONES ALONG EAST SIDE

PHOTO #7 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE AT

SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #8 - EXPOSED REBAR ON ARCH UNDERSIDE ADJACENT TO

EAST RING STONES NEAR CENTER OF SPAN

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - VERTICAL CRACKING AROUND MASONRY STONES AND

THROUGH MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT NORTH ABUTMENT

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

RAVINE VIADUCT INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1E8 / 1000 SKEW ANGLE:

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1985-NEW DECK, PAINT SUPERSTRUCTURE.

LOCATION

196.0 FT (59.7 M)

67.2 FT (20.5 M)

33.9 FT (10.3 M)

29.9 FT (9.1 M)

0 °

NO

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 35.67 (KM PT 57.37)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 86.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. RAVINE

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. The main problem with this structure is surface rusting of the steel superstructure and bearing devices, a condition that continues to progress. Additional problems include debris accumulation in the curblines, on bearing areas, and on beam ends; several cracked stones on the east column at the north pier, a displaced stone at the northeast cheekwall; deterioration of the northwest vertical expansion joint; and open core holes in the deck underside. It should be noted that two cracked tack welds were observed on Beam #5 bottom flange near the south abutment (per the 2014 inspection report).

Since the previous inspection, the wearing surface and approaches have been repaved.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

58.2,7, 59.2, 60.3

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES, BEARING SEATS, AND BEAM ENDS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.1,2,6 CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL AS NEEDED. 1 LS

58.1 SEAL CRACKS ON DECK UNDERSIDE. 1 LS

60.12 RESET DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL. 1 LS

60.8 CLEAN AND RESEAL NORTHWEST VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT. 1 LS

58.1 SEAL CORE HOLES IN DECK. 1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK

LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(STRIPING)

F G N N N G G N G

N G

G G N G F N

G

G

G

G

58.1,3 DECK SLAB HAS BEEN CORED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; PAVED

OVER SINCE LAST INSPECTION. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKS

EXTEND FROM CORE HOLES ON DECK UNDERSIDE; MINOR

DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE IN VICINITY OF CORE HOLES,

BETWEEN BEAMS #2 AND #3, CENTER SPAN. MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE AT CORE HOLES AND ALONG LONGITUDINAL

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ON DECK UNDERSIDE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE AND EXTERIOR FACE OF DECK

OVERHANGS, WIDESPREAD ON WEST OVERHANG.

58.2 JOINTS PAVED OVER SINCE LAST INSPECTION; LIGHT TRANSVERSE

CRACKS IN ASPHALT OVER JOINTS AT PIERS.

58.3, 222.4 DECK AND APPROACHES REPAVED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

58.6 MINOR CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE AND MINOR MOSS

GROWTH IN JOINTS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MOSS GROWTH ALONG

PARAPETS.

59.1 MINOR RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES; MODERATE AT EXTERIOR

BEARINGS.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS G

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER (CHEEKWALL) F

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS G

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (STRIPING)

N N G G G G N F G

223. RETAINING WALL 7

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G G N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2,6 MINOR RUSTING OF BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS, TYPICALLY ALONG

FLANGES. MINOR PACK RUST BETWEEN VERTICAL STIFFENERS

AND WEBS OF EXTERIOR BEAMS.

MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ENDS OF EXTERIOR BEAMS.

MINOR DAMAGE TO SEVERAL WEB STIFFENERS ON EAST SIDE.

BENT STIFFENER ON WEST FACE OF BEAM #5 IN NORTH SPAN.

FROM 2014 INSPECTION REPORT: INDENTATIONS ON FLANGE AND

STIFFENER ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #1 IN SOUTH AND NORTH

SPANS. TWO CRACKED TACK WELDS ON TOP OF BEAM #5 BOTTOM

FLANGE NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.1 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AT

WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT TOP.

60.3 MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF GROUT PAD AT NORTH ABUTMENT,

WEST BEARING (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).

60.4 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL

BEHIND BEAM #5 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM).

60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;

MODERATE IN SOME LOCATIONS. LEAKAGE STAINS AND

EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

60.8, 223.1,5 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF NORTHWEST VERTICAL MORTAR

JOINT; MINOR SETTLEMENT AND ROTATION (1-1/4") OF RETAINING

WALL AT JOINT.

60.9 NORTH ABUTMENT FOOTING EXPOSED, 36" H X 11'-8" L ON EAST

SIDE; 11" H X 3'-4" L ON WEST SIDE.

60.12 DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL RESTS AGAINST

BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1 (EAST EXTERIOR BEAM).

60.13,15 MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT UNDERSIDE OF PIER ARCHES AND

ON COLUMNS. RANDOM STONES CRACKED ON EAST COLUMN AT

NORTH PIER.

222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT.

222.8 BRIDGE IS ON HORIZONTAL CURVE WITH LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 19 17 31 28

HS 24 22 40 36

TYPE 3 22 20 38 34

TYPE 3S2 31 28 52 47

TYPE 3-3 36 33 61 55

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: INTERIOR GIRDER IN SPANS #2 AND #3

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... RAVINE VIADUCT (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 163 - ROCKBRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-003P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... RAVINE

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........003P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140003P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 86.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 60

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1E8 (11) MILE POINT: .............................35.67 (KM PT 57.37)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1000 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

67.2 FT (20.5 M)

196.0 FT (59.7 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 24.0 TONS (21.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 40.0 TONS (36.3 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°48'02.80"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°11'47.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

29.9 FT (9.1 M)

33.9 FT (10.3 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

29.9 FT (9.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.67 FT (0.81 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

1985-NEW DECK, PAINT SUPERSTRUCTURE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://79�11'47.40 https://37�48'02.80

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-003P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD ROANOKE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE NEW

ASPHALT PAVEMENT

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE

OVER PIERS, OVER PIER 2 SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #6 - WATER SEEPING FROM CORE HOLE THROUGH DECK

NEAR BEAM #2 OF SPAN #2; NOTE RUSTING BEAM FLANGES

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES, BEARING AT

EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - DISPLACED STONE AT NORTHEAST CHEEKWALL RESTING

AGAINST BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DAMAGE TO WEB STIFFENERS ON EAST SIDE;

NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL INDENTATIONS ON FLANGE AND STIFFENER ON

EAST FACE OF BEAM #1, SOUTH SPAN SHOWN (PHOTO FROM

10/29/2014 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #11 - ONE OF TWO CRACKED TACK WELDS ON TOP OF BEAM

#5 BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT (PHOTO FROM

10/29/2014 INSPECTION REPORT)

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #1

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #2

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF PIER

ARCH, PIER #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - WATER SEEPING THROUGH MASONRY STONE OF PIER #2

EAST COLUMN ON WEST FACE

PHOTO #18 - DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT

MATERIAL AT NORTHWEST CORNER

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

IRISH GAP BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/8/20

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 24.2 FT (7.4 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 24.2 FT (7.4 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.6 FT (10.5 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.4 FT (9.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1F3, 1L3 / 2039E SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1979-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 37.46 (KM PT 60.25)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 7.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 605

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate deterioration of the parapet masonry mortar joints in some locations, a spall with exposed rebar at west side of south abutment, missing reflective object markers and vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway, and widespread graffiti on the abutment breastwalls.

Since the last inspection, the bridge and approaches have been repaved.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. In addition, consideration should be given to reconstructing the bridge parapets to meet current safety standards.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER SIGNS AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE

SIGNS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS

60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK LOCATION

FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Consideration should be given to reconstructing the bridge parapets to meet current safety standards.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N G N N N N F G

N G

G G N F G N

N

N

N

N

58.3, 222.4 BRIDGE AND APPROACHES REPAVED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION.

58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS IN SOME LOCATIONS WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH;

ISOLATED AREAS OF MORTAR MISSING.

59.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON SLAB UNDERSIDE. MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE WHERE SLAB MEETS RING STONES.

59.8 MODERATE TO HEAVY EFFLORESCENCE AND STALACTITES ON

RING STONES.

59.9 MINOR VIBRATION FELT ON ROADWAY UNDER TRAFFIC (DID NOT

OBSERVE DURING THIS INSPECTION).

60.1 MINOR DETERIORATION OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS IN SOME LOCATIONS (AT CORNERS). MINOR SPALL

WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT

WEST END. WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS;

WIDESPREAD FLAKING OF CONCEALING PAINT.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.8 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT

MATERIAL BETWEEN ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

N N N G G G N F N

223. RETAINING WALL N

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

222.7 VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT

MARKERS ARE NOT PROVIDED ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

222.8 ON A HORIZONTAL CURVE WITH LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 1'-11" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT SAFETY

GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTH OR MINIMUM HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF

2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 41 37 69 63

HS 74 67 124 112

TYPE 3 50 45 85 77

TYPE 3S2 79 72 133 121

TYPE 3-3 114 103 191 173

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/15

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: FRAME

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... IRISH GAP BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - AMHERST

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-004P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 605

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........004P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140004P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.0 MILES TO VA ROUTE 603

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. JAMES R. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1F3, 1L3 (11) MILE POINT: .............................37.46 (KM PT 60.25)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2039E (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

24.2 FT (7.4 M)

24.2 FT (7.4 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 74.0 TONS (67.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 99.9 TONS (99.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/20 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°47'54.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°13'04.80"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 35 MI (56 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.8 FT (1.2 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

30.4 FT (9.3 M)

34.6 FT (10.5 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

30.4 FT (9.3 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.92 FT (0.59 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.67 FT (4.47 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1979-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://79�13'04.80 https://37�47'54.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-004P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD SKYLINE DRIVE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE; NOTE MISSING OBJECT MARKERS ON

UNDERPASS ROADWAY

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE NEW

ASPHALT PAVEMENT

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS, WEST PARAPET NEAR MIDSPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF SLAB

UNDERSIDE, EAST SIDE SHOWN; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE AND

STALACTITES IN RING STONES

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #9 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL AT WEST END

PHOTO #10 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS IN NORTHEAST

WINGWALL

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P

PETERS CREEK ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/10/20

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.5 FT (9.0 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 33 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 64.86 (KM PT 104.11)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 1.2 MILES TO VA ROUTE 501

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. PETERS CREEK ROAD (VA ROUTE 600)

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor deterioration of the mortar joints on the parapets and the wingwalls; and missing object markers at the corners of the bridge on the underpass roadway.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. DICKHAUSEN (SEH), T. DZIEDZINA (GEOCAL)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NINA L. DICKHAUSEN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/29/20

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS ON

UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.6, 60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING PLUS PARK

LOCATION FACTOR.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-017P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .