Bid Evaluation.pdf

PDF 142 KB Posted

Attached to
Golf Course Fertilizer
Solicitation number
46200-DNR0000831
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Bid Tabulation Template and evaluation document for a Golf Course Fertilizer Request for Quote issued by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, with Carlethia Jones serving as the issuing officer. The solicitation (46200-DNR0000831) sought a one-time purchase of golf course fertilizer with specifications provided in the bid attachments. All bidders were required to submit responses electronically through the Team Georgia Marketplace by the stated closing deadline. The evaluation document shows that two suppliers submitted bids: Technology International Inc. and Howard Fertilizer & Chemical Company. Award was to be made to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder meeting all specifications.

Technology International Inc. failed the administrative review phase due to incomplete mandatory requirements and failure to submit a Certificate of Non-Collusion, rendering it ineligible for further evaluation. Howard Fertilizer & Chemical Company passed all administrative requirements, including timely submission, mandatory requirements completion, cost submission, non-scrutinized company status, and certificate of non-collusion certification. Howard Fertilizer & Chemical Company proceeded through the second evaluation phase and was ultimately selected as the top-ranked supplier for contract award based on cost. Prior to award notification, Howard Fertilizer & Chemical Company was verified as not suspended or debarred on both state and federal lists and confirmed to meet eVerify requirements, satisfying all final evaluation criteria for contract award eligibility.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Notice of Intent Award.pdf PDF
NoticeofAward.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

02/01/2021 Page 1 of 5 SPD-EP002

BID TABULATION TEMPLATE

Instructions to Issuing Officer: this sample template may be used during the evaluation process for Request for Quotes (RFQs) to document the results of the bid evaluation. The issuing officer may use a document developed by the State Entity or a modified version of the “Administrative Review” tab of SPD-EP001 Administrative Review Requirements Summary Sheet. If using this sample template, please edit as needed to correspond with your RFQ requirements and award scenario. The finalized document (or similar document) should be published with the Notice of Intent to Award or Notice of Award (whichever comes first) to satisfy the requirement to provide public inspection of the recording of all bids received conforming to the solicitation.

Solicitation Title/Event Name: Golf Course Fertilizer

Solicitation No/Event ID:

46200-DNR0000831

Issuing Officer:

Carlethia Jones

Administrative Review:

During the administrative review, the issuing officer reviews all timely bids to determine suppliers’ compliance with several basic requirements.

The purpose of the administrative review process is to identify any responses which are not eligible for further evaluation. Space has been provided for up to seven suppliers. The table may be copied and inserted below if there are additional responding suppliers.

02/01/2021 Page 2 of 5 SPD-EP002

Requirements TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL

INC

HOWARD

FERTILIZER &

CHEMICAL

COMPANY

[Insert Name of Supplier #3]

[Insert Name of Supplier #4]

[Insert Name of Supplier #5]

[Insert Name of Supplier #6]

Timely Submission through Sourcing Tool*

YES YES

Mandatory Requirements (supplier responded “yes” as appropriate and provided all required information)

NO YES

Completed Cost Submission (either as line item or attached worksheet as applicable)

NOT

APPLICABLE

NOT

APPLICABLE

Not Scrutinized Company (see GPM Section 3.5.1.4)**

YES YES

Certificate of Non- Collusion**

NO YES

Bid Bond (typically only application to construction projects)

NOT

APPLICABLE

Overall Results

(PASS OR FAIL)

FAIL PASS

*Unless SPD grants a written exception, all state entities are required to conduct competitive sealed bidding through approved sourcing tools such as Team Georgia Marketplace™ and eSource/Jaggaer. These systems will not allow a supplier to submit a bid/proposal once the solicitation closing date/time has passed.

**By submitting a response via Team Georgia Marketplace™ or eSource/Jaggaer, suppliers automatically agree to the certificate of non-collusion and must also certify that they are not a scrutinized company. If conducting through another sourcing tool with SPD approval, the issuing officer may use form SPD-SP012 Certificate of Non-Collusion to obtain the certification and SPD-SP042 Supplier General Information Worksheet.

02/01/2021 Page 3 of 5 SPD-EP002

Second Phase of Evaluation:

Following administrative review, the issuing officer may proceed with further evaluation of all suppliers that passed administrative review.

Additional evaluation activities may include review/testing of samples, contacting client references (if requested) to verify previous work experience, etc. Examples are included below. Revise as needed to correspond to the RFQ requirements.

Requirements TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL

INC

HOWARD

FERTILIZER &

CHEMICAL

COMPANY

[Insert Name of Supplier #3]

[Insert Name of Supplier #4]

[Insert Name of Supplier #5]

[Insert Name of Supplier #6]

[Test Product Samples] NOT

APPLICABLE

[Verify business is registered with the Secretary of State’s Office and authorized to conduct business in the State of Georgia, as applicable]

NOT

APPLICABLE

[Site visit, if applicable] NOT

[Product demonstration/oral presentation, if applicable]

NOT

APPLICABLE

[Product determined equivalent if brand name referenced]

NOT

APPLICABLE

Overall Results

(PASS OR FAIL)

PASS PASS

Cost Evaluation:

During the cost evaluation, the issuing officer will evaluate the cost proposals to identify the lowest priced supplier(s) using the identified cost evaluation methodology. Factors that may impact the cost evaluation are noted below:

• Price Match Option: If selected by the issuing officer and included as part of the RFQ, then the price match option should be offered to any supplier that meets the following requirement: is (1) a Georgia-based, small business or Georgia Resident small business, (2) that agreed to

02/01/2021 Page 4 of 5 SPD-EP002 price match and (3) submitted a response within 5% up to $10,000 of the lowest responsive and responsible bid. Only applicable if a non- Georgia based/non-small business is the lowest priced bidder.

• Georgia Enterprises for Products and Services (GEPS): for purposes of cost evaluation only, any bid submitted by GEPS will receive a price preference of 8%. Please see GPM Section 5.6.6.6. for additional information.

• Cost Negotiation: State entities may conduct one round of cost negotiations (Best and Final Offer) with responsive and responsible suppliers.

• Reciprocal Preference: only applicable if Georgia-resident suppliers bid but a non-Georgia-resident supplier is selected for contract award.

Please reference GPM Section 5.6.6.5 for additional information.

Best Ranked Suppliers Based on Cost

Please list the top ranked supplier(s) based on cost that will be selected for contract award:

Top Ranked Supplier(s) Estimated Cost (for purposes of NOIA/NOA) Insert #1 supplier HOWARD FERTILIZER & CHEMICAL COMPANY [Add more rows as needed if split/multiple awards]

Final Evaluation Prior to NOIA/NOA:

Prior to contract award, the issuing officer should complete the steps below (plus any remaining tasks identified in the RFQ) to verify eligible for award prior to publishing the results. For efficiency, this final review may be limited to the supplier(s) selected for contract award.

Requirements TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL

INC

HOWARD

FERTILIZER &

CHEMICAL

COMPANY

[Insert Name of Supplier Selected for Contract Award]

[Insert Name of Supplier Selected for Contract Award]

[Insert Name of Supplier Selected for Contract Award]

[Insert Name of Supplier Selected for Contract Award]

Verify Not Suspended or Debarred (both State and Federal Lists) for selected suppliers

YES YES

Supplier Meets eVerify Requirement

NO YES

Pass Sales and Use Tax Check with DOR (only required if

NOT

APPLICABLE

02/01/2021 Page 5 of 5 SPD-EP002 estimated award more than$100,000) for selected suppliers Resolve Contract Exceptions (if any) for selected suppliers Ensure Anti-Boycott of Israel Certification (GPM Section

3.5.1.7 included in contract)

NOT

APPLICABLE

[insert other requirements here]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .