Attachment_S_-_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_FORM.pdf

ATTACHMENT S: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

◊ Sections I through III shall be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provide the questionnaire to three Assessors (personnel or organization who have at least five (5) years of production experience using the Intaglio currency press from supplier) The Assessor, in turn, shall verify information in Sections I through III and complete Sections V through VII. The Assessors shall provide the completed questionnaire to the contracting office point of contact no later than the date and time indicated below. The Offeror shall submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to Assessors.

◊ Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

◊ Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the BEP to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Milagros.Cortes@bep.gov and Gladys.Wilks@bep.gov no later than 12:00 PM EST, Thursday, May 12, 2016.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number BEP-RFP-16-0424 Project/Requirement BEP Western Currency Facility Intaglio Presses

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is correct or incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME &

ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract Initial Final Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

Termination History Convenience Default N/A

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 1 | P a g e 1 1 mailto:Milagros.Cortes@bep.gov mailto:Gladys.Wilks@bep.gov

III. Assessor information for Intaglio currency presses only

Assessor Name

Title Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 2 | P a g e 1 1

V. Performance Evaluation of Intaglio currency presses only

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance of Intaglio printing presses? Were your specifications and expectations met by both the press and supplier?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Overall quality rating of the intaglio currency printing press delivered and installed at your facility by the vendor

Print quality of the press delivered;

please note any specific issues

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 3 | P a g e 1 1

Design of the press to print high depth intaglio images on two sides requiring significant printing pressure

Capability of press to control impression force

Ability of the press to meet your expectations for productivity, plate life, wiper exchange time, and machine availability, Ability of press to run reliably;

metrics are mean time between failure, mean time to recover, and need for unscheduled maintenance.

Please note any specific issues

Ability of the presses to regulate temperature control of the cylinders

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 4 | P a g e 1 1

Capability of the intaglio printing press to produce your currency designs without changes or adaptions

Conformance to Contract Requirements to Specifications of Currency Presses

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

and Integration of Data Collection System into your in-house database

Design and Service of ancillary equipment i.e.

Plating and Roller Coating Equipment

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 5 | P a g e 1 1

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 6 | P a g e 1 1

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Performance

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Time required for the vendor to install, startup, commission and train your staff on the intaglio currency printing press to begin full production

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery

Meeting Milestones

Submitting Deliverables

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 7 | P a g e 1 1

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Management

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

MANAGEMENT

RESPONSIVENESS—

(timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT

MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.)

PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT—

(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 8 | P a g e 1 1 coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF

PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

INTEGRATED PRODUCT

TEAM MANAGEMENT—

(commitment and participation to the IPT process)

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Control

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 9 | P a g e 1 1

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL Exceptional Very

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

COST/PRICE

ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—

(realization of any in accomplishing SOW)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/MANAGE

MENT/COST CONTROL

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 10 | P a g e 1 1

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature Date

ATTACHMENT S: Past Performance Questionnaire Form - BEP-RFP-16-0424 11 | P a g e 1 1