Basis for award.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JB MDL Highline Dock with integrated Scales
- Solicitation number
- FA448425Q0032
About this file
The document is a Basis for Award evaluation guide for commercial items related to a Request for Quote (RFQ) for a highline dock with integrated scales. The evaluation methodology uses the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPPF) approach, with award to be made to a single contractor based on technical compliance and lowest total price. Proposals will be ranked from lowest to highest price, with technical acceptability assessed only for the lowest-priced offeror(s).
Key evaluation criteria include: (1) technical specifications must meet the Statement of Work (SOW) paragraph 3.2 minimum requirements, with an "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" rating, (2) pricing must include line item prices and total price on SF 1449, and (3) the government will use systems like CPARS, SAM, and SPRS to assess contractor responsibility. Failure to provide requested information may result in the proposal being deemed unacceptable and ineligible for award. The government reserves the right to conduct discussions or additional technical evaluations if necessary.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BASIS FOR AWARD
Evaluation – Commercial Items
1. Award shall be made to a single contractor. The basis for award of any contract resulting from this solicitation will be the result of the evaluation of the factors specified utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology. The Government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract. Award will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable, responsible offeror that meets the requirements of the SOW and this solicitation
2. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.
I. TECHNICAL
a. Specifications meet the SOW para. 3.2. minimum requirements.
Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the SOW and solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the
SOW and the solicitation.
II. PRICE:
a. Proposals shall include prices for each line item listed and should include a total price, in order that proposals may be properly evaluated. Offers shall also include the completed SF 1449 and any amendments.
b. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for the total evaluated price. In the event there is a difference between a unit price and the total CLIN amount, the unit price will be held as the intended price multiplied by the number of units. If the offeror shows only the total amount but fails to submit a unit price, the total CLIN amount divided by the quantity will be held as the intended price.
4. The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), System for Award Management (SAM) and Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) as well any other Government-sponsored information available may be utilized to help make a responsibility determination in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.104.
5. The Government will begin the evaluation process with a ranking based on the Total Evaluated Price from the lowest to highest price. Following the price ranking, only the lowest priced offeror(s) will be evaluated for technical acceptability under the non-price factor(s) according to the evaluation criteria set forth in this section. If acceptable, the evaluation will stop at that point and award will made to the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror. If unacceptable, the Government will continue to review proposals in order of price until evaluating one that is technically acceptable and eligible for award. The Government reserves the right to conduct additional technical evaluations as deemed necessary.
6. Failure to provide the requested information may deem the proposal Unacceptable and may not be eligible for award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .