Attachment_3_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf

Attachment 3 - A&E Announcement– Statement of Work

Project Name: Nose Dock 7 Fire Suppression System

Project Number: FTQW 06-2467

4 JUN 14

STATEMENT OF WORK

SECTION 1

GENERAL A-E INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR

FTQW 06-2467, INSTALL NOSE DOCK 7 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM, BLDG. 1232

1.01 GENERAL SCOPE: The A-E shall perform professional architectural and engineering services such as planning, investigation, study, surveying, design, and provide labor and materials to accomplish the work specified in this contract. The A-E shall be responsible for all travel and lodging arrangements and expenses involved in the performance of work under this contract. The A-E shall furnish the Air Force with complete and usable products to include: planning documents, investigative reports, study reports, design analyses, project drawings, technical provisions (specifications), equipment layouts, cost estimates, submittal registers, quality assurance plans, construction bidding amendments (resulting from design omissions), construction contract modifications (resulting from design omissions), and other documents required under this contract to provide complete engineering services for Eielson AFB, Alaska.

1.02 TYPE OF WORK: Work on the project may involve any or all disciplines including, but not limited to:

architectural; civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineering; drafting; surveying;

geotechnical; hazardous materials testing, abatement and remediation; cost estimating; and computer word processing.

1.03 ADMINISTRATION: The Eielson AFB Contracting Officer (CO) is responsible for the administration of the contract. No change shall be made in the provisions of this contract without written authorization from the CO.

The Base Civil Engineer (BCE) monitors the work and services furnished, and evaluates the performance of the

A-E as the Project Manager (PM). The PM is not a CO and has no authority to Contractually bind the

Government or modify the contract.

1.04 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA: The Air Force requires complete and functional designs that are appropriate for the sub-arctic environment of interior Alaska. Design and construction shall conform to the most recent issue of the following standards and publications. The following shall be considered a partial list and not limit the standards which may apply to the project.

A. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standards

B. U.S. Dept. of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Standards and Guidelines

C. State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOTPF) Standards

D. National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) – All codes and standards appropriate to project scope

E. National Fire Code (NFC)

F. AFM 88-3 – Air Force Design Criteria for Buildings

G. MIL HNBK 1 – Fuels Facility Design Criteria

H. MIL HNBK 1190 – Facility Planning and Design Guide

I. EM 385-1-1 – Safety and Health Requirements Manual

J. Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA)

K. Air Force Occupational Safety and Health Agency (AFOSHA)

L. 18 AAC

M. National Electric Code (NEC)

N. National Electrical Safety Code (NESC)

O. International Building Code (IBC)

P. International Plumbing Code (IPC)

Q. International Mechanical Code (IMC)

R. Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC)

S. Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC)

T. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

U. Sheet Metal and Air-conditioning Contractors National Association (SMACNA)

V. Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 08-13 – Incorporating Sustainable Design and Development

(SDD) and Facility Energy Attributes in the Air Force Construction Program

W. Other applicable Air Force Engineering Technical Letters (AFETLs)

X. National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP)

Y. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Z. American Petroleum Institute (API) - Specifications and standards as applicable

AA. American Society For Testing and Materials (ASTM) - Specifications and standards as applicable

BB. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) - Specifications and standards as applicable

CC. Military Standard (MIL – STD) 130, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, Rev G, 1988

DD. MIL – STD 161, Bulk Petroleum Products system Including Hydrocarbon Missile fuels, Rev F, Notice 2

EE. Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

FF. Unified Facilites Guide Specifications (UFGS)

GG. Underwriters Laboratories (UL) – All standards appropriate to project scope

HH. Engineering Technical Letters (ETLs)

II. U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) – All LEED design and construction reference guides appropriate to project scope

JJ. Whole Building Design Guide – www.wbdg.org

KK. Air Force Regulations, Technical Orders and Instructions

LL. Eielson AFB Architectural Compatibility Plan (appendix 1)

MM. Eielson AFB Civil Engineer Design Guide (appendix 2)

NN. Eielson AFB Foundation Design Guide (appendix 3)

OO. Eielson AFB Roofing Standards (appendix 4)

PP. Eielson AFB Door Hardware Guide (appendix 5)

QQ. Eielson AFB Utilidor Design Guide (appendix 6)

RR. Eielson AFB Heating, Ventilation, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Design Guide (appendix 7)

SS. Eielson AFB Supplemental Mechanical Design Guide (appendix 7a)

TT. Eielson AFB Mechanical Insulation Guide (appendix 8)

UU. Eielson AFB Fire Alarm Requirements (appendix 9)

VV. U.S. Air Force Communication and Information System Standard (appendix 10)

WW. Engineering Technical Letter 02-12 -Communications and Information System Criteria for Air

Force Facilities (appendix 10a)

XX. Eielson AFB Utility Metering Requirements (appendix 11)

YY. Eielson AFB Survey and Drafting Standards (appendices 12 and 12a)

ZZ. Eielson AFB Source Area Location Map, Known Contaminated Soil Sites (appendix 13)

AAA. Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE) Information and Forms (appendix 14)

BBB. Eielson AFB Fugitive Dust Emissions Plan (appendix 15)

1.05 REFERENCES: All Air Force Manuals, Publications, and Guide Specifications will not necessarily be furnished. The A-E may acquire them from the Defense Printing Service Detachment Office, Standardization

Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094 or other Federal agencies. The

Special Assistance Desk phone number at Defense Printing Service is (215) 697-2664. Many references and standards are available via the following websites: www.wbdg.org and www.afcec.af.mil/library/index.asp. The

A-E may review any Air Force Manual or publication available at the Base Civil Engineering offices. The

Eielson AFB design guides are attached as appendices to this statement of work.

http://www.wbdg.org/ http://www.wbdg.org/ http://www.afcec.af.mil/library/index.asp

1.06 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTATION: Because only the A-E can be expected to know exactly which record drawings will be useful for his design, the A-E should expect to spend some time in Eielson's Civil

Engineering drawing storage vault locating drawings he might need. The A-E should not expect Government personnel to perform a drawing search for him. "As-builts", shop drawings, and operation and maintenance manuals that the Government may have are not guaranteed to be either accurate or complete. It shall be the A-E’s responsibility to verify any information or data that is given to them by the Government.

1.07 WARRANTY: The A-E shall bring any questions concerning the design to the attention of the Government during the design phase. The A-E shall verify that the final documents have been field checked to eliminate conflicts and interferences and shall provide interpretation of construction documents to clarify any omissions and/or errors to the CO.

A. DISCREPANCIES: The A-E shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all design, drawing, specification, and other services furnished by the A-E under the resulting contract. The A-E shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies in design, drawings, specifications, and other services in a timely fashion to avoid construction delays.

B. INTERPRETATION: During the construction bidding and the construction periods of the project, the A-E shall be available, at no additional cost to the government, to interpret or clarify his plans and specifications, should questions arise. An appropriate number of hours for this effort may be negotiated with the design contract.

1.08 CONCEPT LIMITATIONS: General information and criteria provided to the A-E shall not prevent the A-E from suggesting or using improved methods and designs with functional or cost-saving advantages.

1.09 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIALS: The government shall furnish the A-E with the following:

A. A description of the specific requirements of the investigation and design of this project. See Section

4 of this Statement of Work.

B. An estimated construction cost range.

C. Access to existing drawings of facilities as needed to perform design.

D. Eielson AFB specific Division I specifications (to be tailored by the A-E for specific project requirements). These specifications are attached to Section 4 of this Statement of Work.

E. Pertinent Eielson AFB Design Guides (appendices to this Statement of Work).

F. Examples of applicable government forms to be completed by the A-E such as AF Form 66, Waste

Disposal/Borrow Pit Coordination Review Form, AF Form 103, etc. These are attached to Section 4 of this Statement of Work.

1.10 ENERGY EFFICIENCY: The A-E shall provide life cycle cost analysis as applicable and to include energy conservation measures and payback. A-E shall provide designs that best help the Air Force meet the greenhouse gas reduction and energy efficiency goals set forth by Executive Orders 13423 and 13514.

1.11 LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED): Current Air Force policy requires that all new building construction projects and all major building renovations receive a LEED Silver certification. New industrial facilities or those undergoing major renovation are expected to earn a minimum of

28 LEED points. Similarly, utility projects should earn a minimum of eight points, and airfield and road projects should earn a minimum of 11 LEED points. The A-E design shall include a LEED specification tailored for the project if applicable.

END OF SECTION

Project Number: FTQW 06-2467

SECTION 2

A-E INVESTIGATION SERVICES FOR

2.01 SCOPE OF WORK: A-E investigation services shall include, but not be limited to, participation in the Pre-

Investigation meeting and submission of meeting minutes, the planning, study, field reconnaissance, materials testing, site survey and investigation, and work required to obtain the engineering information and data necessary for the accomplishment of this contract. The A-E shall determine the condition and type of existing utility services, structures, pavements, and soils involved in the project design. The A-E shall place particular emphasis on making an accurate estimate of the location and quantity of hazardous materials affecting the project design.

The A-E shall perform topographic surveys, prepare documents showing existing conditions, conduct fact finding investigations, collect and review project data and records, create alternative design concepts, preliminary estimates of cost and construction timelines, and prepare and present a written investigation report.

2.02 PRE-INVESTIGATION MEETING: The A-E and Government representatives will meet to discuss the objectives and requirements relating to the investigation. The A-E will have the opportunity to interview appropriate government personnel and request any assistance that may be required. Record the proceedings of the meeting, and submit a written summary report (meeting minutes) to the CO.

2.03 COST AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATE: A preliminary construction timeline and cost estimate shall be included with the investigation report. The A-E shall develop initial estimates of construction timelines and submit for each alternative considered. Any minor construction costs (new work as defined by the Air Force) in the project has a limit and therefore must be tracked separately. The A-E shall separate the cost of minor construction work for ease of tracking. If the estimated construction cost differs significantly from the range shown in the Contract, or exceeds the statutory limit (if one exists), or exceeds the Programmed Amount (PA), the

A-E shall notify the CO as soon as practical and shall not proceed until advised to do so by the CO.

2.04 INVESTIGATION REPORT: The A-E shall prepare an investigation report detailing the findings of the investigation and submit it to the CO for approval. Included in this report shall be all soil boring logs, site plans, photographs, hazardous materials surveys and test results, documents describing existing conditions prepared by the A-E, inspection results, engineering data, cost and construction estimates, product literature and technical data required to support their findings, etc. required to perform the requested engineering services. If applicable to the project, the report shall include recommendations for design and estimated design and construction schedules.

After review of the report by the CO, the A-E shall present the report at an investigation review meeting at

Eielson AFB. Changes resulting from the investigation review meeting shall be incorporated into the first design submittal.

2.05 INVESTIGATION REVIEW MEETING: At the meeting the attendees will discuss the investigative report, consider design alternatives, and give technical guidance for proceeding with the design. The A-E shall attend the investigation review meeting at Eielson AFB, take attendance and minutes, and answer review comments. The investigation review meeting shall be scheduled through the CO. The meeting will be attended by the

Government’s project engineer, engineering staff, representatives of the reviewing and using agencies, interested parties, and shall be attended by the A-E’s project manager and necessary staff. Reviewers will submit written comments on the design prior to the investigation review meeting. The A-E shall provide responses to the comments at the investigation review meeting.

2.06 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED: The exact number of documents required for each review submittal, and time frames for their development and review are described in section 4 of this Statement of Work.

SECTION 2

A-E INVESTIGATION SERVICES FOR

2.07 CONTRACTOR’S FURNISHED PRODUCT: The A-E shall provide complete investigation report to the government as specified elsewhere in this statement of work. The investigation report shall be of the highest professional quality and shall provide the basis of as well as options for the design.

Project Number: FTQW 06-2467

SECTION 3

A-E DESIGN SERVICES FOR

3.01 SCOPE OF WORK: The A-E shall perform all services required to prepare and furnish complete construction documents, with addenda and contract modifications as required, for the accomplishment of this contract.

3.02 DESIGN SERVICES: Design services shall include all aspects of design required to provide a complete and accurate set of project documents to be used for obtaining contract construction services. This includes, but is not limited to the following:

A. Familiarization with the scope of the project, general conditions governing the performance of the work, and the conditions under which the project will be constructed.

B. Coordination with base civil engineering and the using agencies to develop functional relationships and detailed requirements.

C. Production of the required design documents.

3.03 STATUTORY DESIGN COST LIMIT: See contract.

3.04 DESIGN DOCUMENTS: The contract drawings to be furnished shall be well prepared, complete, and accomplished in accordance with the best professional practice to show clearly and concisely the type and extent of work to be performed. The drawings shall clearly distinguish new and existing work. The drawings shall be drawn to appropriate scales and dimensioned completely and accurately. Each drawing shall have a graphic scale.

The A-E shall use a standard sheet format and fonts conforming with Eielson’s Drafting Standards. Lettering shall be large enough to ensure legible half-size reduction. Each discipline’s group of drawings shall contain a detailed legend defining all applicable symbols appearing on that discipline’s sheets. The legend shall appear on the first sheet of each group. Standard building material indicators, and symbols for architectural items and for mechanical and electrical equipment shall be used to the greatest extent possible.

A. DESIGN ANALYSIS: The A-E shall prepare a complete and accurate design analysis to support the project design. Each sheet of the design analysis shall be sequentially numbered and shall carry the title of the project, date of analysis, and the designer’s name. The analysis shall be bound and prepared (typed or legibly printed) on 8-1/2”x11” bond paper or standard company form, with 1” left and right margins. The design analysis shall cite specific code references, assumptions, calculation sources, data sources, etc. Calculations and data shall be presented in a neat and logical progression.

The analysis shall include but not be limited to: a brief description of the desired project outcome, anticipated construction schedule, description of existing conditions, site descriptions, existing facility features such as age and type of construction, utilities location and access, photos as necessary or required, electrical-load and lighting-level calculations, structural computations, foundation determinations, plumbing and HVAC calculations, fire suppression flow requirements, life cycle cost analysis, facility energy analyses, computer modeling, etc. A constructability report shall be incorporated into the 95% design analyses (see section 3.08). An updated design analysis shall be submitted at each design / review stage to describe and justify each decision made at that stage. The final design analysis shall present a clear and logical picture of the final design and shall be edited to exclude reference to changes made during the design process.

B. BID SCHEDULE: The A-E shall provide a detailed bidding schedule in the format specified by the government.

C. DRAWINGS: The A-E shall prepare and furnish drawings to show existing site conditions, general layout of facilities, and the extent, type, and detailed requirements of the work to be performed. The preferred full scale drawing size for Eielson AFB is ANSI D (22”X34”), but other drawing sizes may be accepted upon prior approval of the CO. Separate drawings shall be prepared to cover all needed phases of architectural, hazmat, civil, structural, mechanical, fire suppression, electrical, etc. work to be accomplished. The A-E shall provide a detailed schedule of drawings in the format specified by the government for each design project. In addition to hard copy drawings, the A-E shall provide electronic copies of the drawings on CD-ROMs in the Government’s most recent version of

AutoCAD (version 2012 or later) and in read-only Adobe Acrobat Reader (.pdf file) format. Actual number of required copies of drawings to be submitted is described in Section 4 of this Statement of

Work.

D. SPECIFICATION TECHNICAL PROVISIONS: The A-E shall prepare detailed specifications for each category of work for each building trade to meet government standards for competitive bidding.

Included shall be a list of all government-furnished equipment (GFE). If no GFE is to be used, the specifications shall state no GFE is to be used. Specifications shall be written utilizing industry and government standards. Specifications shall conform to the CSI system with CSI-format page numbers centered at each page bottom. The header of each page shall include the project title and project number on the left-hand side and the section number and section title on the right hand side.

The specification Table of Contents shall indicate in the CSI format which sections are utilized and shall include a listing of the number of pages in each section. Brand name references in specifications shall be avoided and may only be used when no suitable standard is available. Such cases must be justified on a case-by-case basis and be approved by the CO. If a brand name is used without a CO approved sole source justification letter the term “or approved equal” shall be used with the basis of design. Specifications shall be tailored to the project and be clear; concise; free of typographical, grammatical, and spelling errors; etc. Specifications shall be typed on 8-1/2” x 11” bond paper with 1” left and right margins. In addition, the complete specifications shall be submitted on a CD-ROM, and in a form compatible with the Government’s most recent version of Microsoft

Word (2010 or later). Actual number of required copies is described in Section 4 of this Statement of

Work.

E. COST ESTIMATE: The A-E shall prepare a detailed construction cost estimate. Estimates shall be broken down into line items by individual task and grouped into major construction categories such as architectural, hazardous material abatement, civil, structural, mechanical, fire protection, electrical, contractor mobilization(s), general contractor requirements, etc. showing labor (man-hours), material costs and equipment costs. Cost estimate shall be marked “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY”. Cost estimate shall be prepared using accurate data reflecting construction costs in the Fairbanks, Alaska area. The estimate shall also reflect accurate costs associated with the particular requirements of constructing on Eielson AFB. The cost estimate shall be prepared assuming construction in Spring /

Summer 2016. Also include an “estimating contingency” line item amount appropriately sized per the level of design, with no estimating contingency costs included in the 95% and 100% submittals.

If the construction cost estimate will exceed the amount programmed by the Government, the A-E shall notify the CO as soon as that determination is made. If applicable, the cost estimate shall be broken down into “minor construction” and/or “repair and maintenance”. The final cost estimate forms shall be signed as official by the A-E. In addition to the hard copy, the final cost estimate shall be submitted on CD-ROM in the Government’s most recent version of Microsoft Excel (2010 or later). Actual number of copies is described in Section 4 of this Statement of Work.

3.05 DESIGN REVIEW: Design reviews shall normally be held at the 35%, 65%, and 95% design stages. After each review, the A-E shall not proceed to the next design stage until given Notice to Proceed (NTP) in writing to do so by the CO. Each review will take up to three (3) weeks, or as arranged/modified during the negotiations of the contract. The A-E shall allow for a total of eight (8) to twelve (12) weeks for government design review on each project. Reviewers will submit written comments on the design prior to each review meeting. The A-E shall provide responses to the comments at the review meetings.

A. DESIGN REVIEW MEETING ATTENDANCE: The A-E shall attend design review meetings at

Eielson AFB, take attendance and minutes, and answer review comments. The review meetings shall be scheduled through the CO. The review meetings will be attended by the Government’s project engineer, engineering staff, representatives of the reviewing and using agencies, interested parties, and shall be attended by the A-E’s project manager and necessary staff. Reviewers will submit written comments on the design that will be provided to the A-E for response.

B. 35% REVIEW: The 35% design package shall be submitted to the CO for approval. Included shall be a preliminary design analysis with basic computations and selection of material types for construction, outline specifications, a Waste Disposal/Borrow Pit Worksheet, preliminary drawings showing planned layouts and indicating layout and content of final drawings, preliminary cost estimate, and the A-E shall also submit the approved investigation review meeting minutes to include investigation review comments and A-E’s response to those comments.

C. 65% REVIEW: The 65% design package shall be submitted to the CO for approval. Included shall be the 65% design analysis, well-developed drawings, draft specifications, final calculations and selection of material types for construction, completed project Waste Disposal/Borrow Pit Plan, draft bid schedule, draft drawing schedule, detailed cost estimate, preliminary AF Form 66, and the approved 35% design review meeting minutes to include the 35% comments and responses.

Drawings should indicate final layouts, details and sections, and initial schedule layouts with some fill-in remaining.

D. 95% REVIEW: The 95% design package, which should be the A-E’s final design package, shall be submitted to the CO for final government review and acceptance. Included shall be the final design analysis, drawings, drawing schedule, specifications, calculations, material selection types, bid schedule, AF Form 66, cost estimate, final estimate of required construction schedule, and the approved 65% design review meeting minutes to include the 65% comments and responses. The

A-E shall have performed and completed Quality Assurance reviews of the design, and thoroughly proofread the specifications.

E. 100% PACKAGE: The 100% package shall be the 95% package with those changes necessitated by the 95% design review. Included shall be the 100% drawings, drawing schedule, AF Form 66, synopsis of work, specifications, design analysis (including calculations, recommended material selections, constructability report), bid schedule, cost estimate, and the approved 95% design review meeting minutes to include the 95% comments and responses.

3.06 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED: The exact number of documents required for each review submittal, and time frames (though subject to negotiation) for their development and review is described in section 4 of this

Statement of Work. All of the architectural and engineering design, design analysis, specifications, and drawings shall be developed into a uniform level for each review submittal. All review plans and specifications shall be boldly marked on each page “FOR ENGINEERING REVIEW ONLY, ___% REVIEW, NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION”. The cover sheet of each document shall be boldly marked with the date submitted.

Document packages shall include:

A. MINUTES AND REVIEW COMMENTS: The A-E shall submit minutes and the annotated review comments to the CO for written approval, within three (3) working days following each review meeting.

B. REVIEW DOCUMENTS: The A-E shall submit the required number of design packages for review to the CO at each review stage. See 3.04, 3.05 and Section 4 for specific requirements.

C. 100% SUBMITTAL: The A-E shall submit the required number of the 100% design documents to the

CO as described in Section 4 of this Statement of Work and meeting the requirements in 3.04, 3.05 and Section 4 of this Statement of Work. Files shall be delivered and labeled clearly with typed project information, to include date, and shall be accompanied by a typed index. Each drawing file shall be made to stand-alone by binding all X-REFs. Include all special font files used, and only use standard AutoCAD font files. Change all menus to standard AutoCAD prior to delivery. Include all

*.ctb (plot configuration) files. If *.ctb files are not used, include list of pen weights.

3.07 CONTRACTOR’S FURNISHED PRODUCT: The A-E shall provide complete project designs to the government as specified elsewhere in this statement of work. The A-E shall provide any product literature and technical data required to support the design. Designs shall be of the highest professional quality and shall be certified by a registered architect, civil engineer, structural engineer, mechanical engineer, fire protection engineer, electrical engineer, or land surveyor, as appropriate. Each final plan sheet shall bear the seal of a

Registered Professional Engineer or Architect.

3.08 CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW: A review of the design for constructability shall be made by the A-E prior to the submittal of the 95% documents. The A-E shall make a site visit during the 95% design phase to determine whether the plans accurately and completely represent existing conditions and to verify that the construction can proceed as designed. The constructability review report shall be incorporated into the 95% design analysis.

3.09 DD FORM 1354, TRANSFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF MILITARY REAL PROPERTY: Prepare a draft

DD Form 1354. On the form, identify all items of new construction and associated values. Identify work classified as repair or maintenance and its total aggregate value in the “remarks” section of the form. Coordinate directly with Eielson’s Real Property office to ensure proper completion of the form. Include the completed form as part of the 95% and 100% design submittals.

3.10 DESIGN DISCREPANCIES: The A-E shall be responsible to clarify any drawings or specifications determined to be unclear to a contractor during bidding or construction. If contract document changes are required due to A-E error or oversight the A-E shall also be responsible for correcting any discrepancies that become apparent during bidding or construction. The A-E shall furnish all necessary labor, drawings, specifications, cost estimates, etc., to the CO to enable modification of the construction contract, and be at no additional cost to the government. The A-E shall have the recommended modifications reviewed and certified by a registered architect or engineer in the appropriate discipline.

Project Number: FTQW 06-2467

SECTION 4

SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN OF

4.01. GENERAL:

A. The Architect-Engineer (A-E) shall perform the services as described in the previous Sections of this

Statement of Work and as described below:

B. The Air Force project engineer for this project is Dave Wilson. Dave Wilson can be contacted in the

Eielson AFB Contract Engineering Flight office in bldg. 2258 (2310 Central Ave.), at 377-1736, or david.wilson.16@us.af.mil to discuss any questions concerning the project requirements.

C. Besides the design and construction criteria listed in Section 1.08 this design effort shall include, but not be limited to NFPA 101 and 409; ETL 99-4 Fire Protection Engineering Criteria – Emergency Lighting and Marking of Exits, ETL 98-8 Fire Protection Engineering Criteria – Existing Aircraft Facilities and

ETL 02-15 Fire Protection Engineering Criteria – New Aircraft Facilities (also pertains to installation of fire protection in existing aircraft facilities without installed fire protection); UFC 3-600-01 Fire

Protection Engineering for Facilities; Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-10141 Planning and Programming

Fire Safety Deficiency Correction Projects; and other pertinent industry standards. Ensure repaired and modified systems will meet applicable State Department of Environmental Conservation and EPA requirements.

Note: ETL 02-15 supersedes ETL 01-2 which superseded ETL 98-7.

4.02. BACKGROUND: Nose dock 7 (bldg. 1232) houses maintenance functions for aircraft at Eielson AFB, Alaska. It was constructed in 1965 (Project 64-36). There have been several renovations and remodel projects since the original construction. After installation of insulated roof panels roof deflection due to snow loads has been an issue with this building. There has been at least one past project that reinforced the roof structure. Asbestos has been abated with previous projects, but some is still present throughout the building.

Presence of lead based paint should be expected. The facility is currently a phase maintenance hangar for F-

16 aircraft. There are offices and a tool room in the facility that support the maintenance operations. There are also offices that support Eielson’s transient alert operations and house crash/recovery equipment. There is currently no fire suppression in the building.

4.03. SCOPE OF DESIGN PROJECT: The work required under this delivery order includes investigation and design services necessary to develop construction documents for a project to accomplish the work described below. Work included in the design is expected to include the following items: selection of equipment, and production of a complete set of documentation, to include specifications, drawings, etc., necessary for the

Government to advertise and award a construction contract for the work. The design requirements shall include (but are not limited to) the following major items of construction which shall result in properly functioning modern fire suppression systems, pertinent fire alarms upgrades and pertinent life safety upgrades for hangar, offices and all other appropriate spaces of facility 1232 (Nose Dock 7).

A. Investigation and design of demolition, relocation and replacement of any existing equipment (electrical power, lighting, and/or other facility systems) required to facilitate installation of building fire suppression systems and appropriate upgrades of fire alarm systems.

B. Investigation of fire suppression systems to include, but not to be limited to evaluation of suitability and recommendations of the various types of systems that could be used in each space. Design shall include installation of fire suppression systems in/at all areas of the building to bring it up to current code.

1. A high expansion foam fire suppression system is preferred in the hangar space.

2. Fire suppressions systems that serve or run thru cold spaces and/or areas within the hangar space shall be dry-pipe systems.

3. Fire suppression systems are required in all the various building spaces. Their requirements shall be the same as they would be for new construction. Required spaces include, but are not limited to the hangar space, building office spaces, storage rooms, tool rooms, bathrooms and modular offices in the hangar space (or as required for new construction).

D. The investigation shall include evaluation of whether or not a separate pumping and storage facility is required to accommodate flow and capacity needed for the new fire suppression systems. Flow data for local fire hydrants are attached to this design synopsis. The design shall include all requirements for construction of a pumping and storage facility if required. For purposes of their proposal – the AE shall assume the pumping and storage facility will be required.

E. Investigation shall include updated flow tests of water supply as required to facilitate a proper design.

F. Investigation shall include analysis of building structural members to include, but not be limited to the roof structural members to determine if upgrades are required to support new fire suppression systems and associated work. The design shall include any required structural alterations.

G. Investigation and design shall include replacement, upgrade and addition of fire alarm equipment as appropriate for the new fire suppression system and as needed to bring fire alarm systems up to current standards.

1. Work shall include communications alterations/upgrades/additions.

2. Work shall include alarm system programming and reprogramming of Eielson’s central fire monitoring and alarm system. All work shall be compatible with Eielson’s existing central fire alarm and monitoring / communication system.

3. Pull stations shall be installed only where required by NFPA 101 and shall be the type that is resettable by key.

H. Investigation and design shall include upgrade and/or addition of life safety equipment to include, but not be limited to exit signs, fire extinguishers, instructional signage, emergency lighting, etc.

1. Includes, but is not limited to installation of emergency lighting in the hallway outside of the male and female bathrooms.

2. Includes, but is not limited to Fire extinguishers (but, only to be included where required by NFPA

101).

I. Investigation and design shall include replacement or upgrade of any interior doors that do not meet fire code / life safety standards with/to doors that do meet these requirements. This work shall include, but not be limited to replacement of the two personnel doors (including the frames and locks) that access the wheel and tire shop.

1. The wheel and tire shop personnel doors shall be heavy duty and lockable – room security is a factor.

J. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The following guidance shall be used for dealing with hazardous materials:

1. Asbestos containing materials (ACM), lead base paint (LBP), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), contaminated soils, and other hazardous materials are present in and around Building 1232 (Nose

Dock 7). The A-E shall anticipate the potential presence of hazardous materials in the design project, and sub-contract with firms who perform testing for hazardous materials and prepare project documents for their remediation. Technical provisions shall be developed such that all requirements for handling, worker protection, and environmental protection at the work site are referenced to

OSHA, EPA, and ADEC regulations.

2. When construction requires special demolition procedures to protect personnel from exposure to excessive levels of hazardous materials, these requirements shall be specified and coordinated with the Eielson AFB project engineer and the Eielson AFB Environmental Element of the Asset

Management Flight. These procedures shall not be less stringent than Federal OSHA and EPA requirements. Mitigation of hazards to workers shall be included in this design project.

3. The following items are a minimum of what shall be included in the project documents when dealing with hazardous material remediation. Project drawings shall denote the location of hazardous materials and provide sufficiently detailed information for their remediation, to include accurate quantities. Project drawings shall also note the location of approved, permitted, on-base disposal areas if available for use during project construction. The most direct haul route, minimizing the exposure risk for personnel, between the project site and disposal area shall also be shown on the drawings. Construction contractor notification and permitting requirements shall be specified.

K. WASTE DISPOSAL/BORROW PIT PLAN: The design shall include a project specific Waste

Disposal/Borrow Pit section. The A-E shall complete the estimated quantities of wastes to be generated and borrow materials required on the Worksheet during the 35% design phase. The Eielson AFB Natural

Resource Manager will then produce a project specific Waste Disposal/Borrow Pit Plan section to be incorporated into the specifications at the 65% design phase. The Waste Disposal/Borrow Pit Worksheet is an attachment to Specification 01030.

L. Investigation and design shall include painting of all existing surfaces that are disturbed by new work where appropriate and painting of all new work where appropriate.

M. Design documents shall require a Construction Warranty – one year on all new work and longer warranty where it is industry standard.

N. The identification and analyses of alternatives (including, but not limited to those discussed above) shall include scope descriptions, the costs and other associated impacts of each alternative.

O. The A-E is expected to include drawings and photographs with the body of each submittal as necessary to adequately describe the work involved. Drawings associated with each submittal shall be of a sufficient size so that details and notes are easily readable. Drawings 11"x17" or smaller shall be bound with the report.

4.04. SCOPE OF WORK: The work includes, but is not limited to the following: attending pre-investigation meeting;

investigating site conditions, options, etc.; collecting and reviewing project data and records; developing design concepts and cost estimates; submitting an investigation report; attending review meetings; making the review revisions requested by the Government; submitting intermediate design documents; and producing a complete design based on the requirements specified above and based on comments received during the Investigation, 35%, 65% and 95% design review meetings.

4.05. TASKS:

A. The investigation and design shall be divided into five tasks. The Contracting Officer will issue a Notice to Proceed for each task. The Government shall neither approve payment for a task nor issue Notice to

Proceed for the subsequent task until all work under the task is complete and the A-E has provided all of the listed Contract Deliverable Items applicable to the task (except draft meeting minutes which may not yet be complete).

B. Pre-investigation and review meetings shall be scheduled by the Contracting Officer and be held at

Eielson AFB. They shall be attended by the Government's Project Engineer, engineering staff, representatives of the reviewing agencies, invited interested parties, and the A-E's project manager and necessary staff. Reviewers will submit written comments on the investigation and design. Comments will be provided to the A-E for response. The A-E may make a presentation at each meeting. The A-E shall record the proceedings of each meeting and submit a written summary report (minutes) of those proceedings to the Contracting Officer for written approval. Draft minutes for each meeting, including the responses to each reviewer's comments shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer within three (3) working days following each meeting.

C. All contract deliverable items for each task (except draft meeting minutes) shall be submitted to the

Contracting Officer at the same time. Approval from the Contracting Officer shall be obtained prior to the submission of contract deliverable items separately.

D. TASK I: Task I includes, but is not limited to attending the Pre-Investigation Meeting and submitting draft and final minutes of the meeting; investigating the project site and applicable existing documents;

interviewing appropriate facility users and maintenance personnel; investigating options; investigating design concepts; producing the required Investigation Report; submitting these documents to the

Contracting Officer for review; attending the Investigation Review Meeting; and submitting draft meeting minutes of the Investigation review meeting to the Contracting Officer.

1. Pre-Investigation Meeting: The A-E and Government representatives will meet to discuss the objectives and requirements relating to the investigation. The A-E will have the opportunity to interview appropriate government personnel. The A-E shall record the proceedings of the meeting, and submit a draft meeting minutes to the Contracting Officer within 3 working days for approval.

2. Data Acquisition and Field Investigation: The A-E shall complete the necessary investigative field work and submit an investigation report to the Contracting Officer. The report produced shall include discussions of all aspects of the work required under the various options investigated -- identify each item of work and discuss any potential difficulties, alternatives to proposed work items, recommendations, construction cost estimate for each concept presented, etc.

3. Cost Estimate in the Investigation Report: The A-E shall prepare investigation cost estimates for the project with a sufficiently large contingency (30%) to ensure that costs do not increase as design proceeds. The cost estimates shall be in both hard copy and electronic format. Electronic format shall be in Excel.

4. Investigation Review Meeting: The meeting for discussing the investigative report will be scheduled by the Contracting Officer following receipt of the Investigation submittal, and will be held at Eielson AFB.

The meeting will be attended by the Government's Project Engineer, engineering staff, representatives of the reviewing agencies, invited interested parties, and the A-E's project manager and necessary staff.

Reviewers will provide the A-E with written review comments regarding his report for his response and action. The A-E may make a presentation at the meeting. The A-E shall record the proceedings of the meeting and submit draft minutes to the Contracting Officer for written approval. The draft minutes shall include the responses to each reviewer's comments and shall be submitted within three (3) working days following the meeting.

5. Contract Deliverable Items: The following items are deliverable as part of Task I:

a. The Draft Pre-Investigation Meeting minutes shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer by email within three (3) working days after the Pre-Investigation meeting. Corrections to the meeting minutes may be required by the Government.

b. Twelve (12) hard copies of the investigation report. This report shall include alternative design concepts, analysis, recommendations, construction cost estimates, and the approved Pre-

Investigation Meeting minutes and shall meet requirements specified in Section 2 of this Statement of Work. These requirements shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for review and for presentation / discussion at the Investigation Review Meeting.

c. Three (3) copies of the entire investigation report on CD.

d. The draft investigation review meeting minutes shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer by email within three working days of the investigation review meeting. Corrections to the meeting minutes may be required by the Government.

E. TASK II: Task II includes, but is not limited to producing the required preliminary (35%) design documents; submitting the required documents to the Contracting Officer for review; attending the 35%

Review Meeting; and submitting draft minutes of the 35% design review meeting to the Contracting Officer for review.

1. Contract Deliverable Items: The following items are deliverable as part of Task II:

a. Twelve (12) copies each of the required 35% design documents -- drawings, outline specifications

(including the waste disposal/borrow pit worksheet), cost estimate, design analysis, and approved/final investigation review meeting minutes. All deliverables shall meet requirements of

Section 3 of this Statement of Work.

(1) Drawings may be half-size, but only if all details are legible.

(2) The preliminary cost estimate shall have a sufficiently large contingency (15-25%) to ensure that costs do not increase as design proceeds. The cost estimate shall be in Microsoft Excel format.

b. Three (3) copies of the entire 35% documents on CD.

c. The draft 35% design review meeting minutes shall be submitted by email within three (3) working days after the 35% design review meeting. Corrections to the meeting minutes may be required by the Government.

2. 35% Design Review Meeting: The meeting for discussing the 35% design shall be held following receipt of the 35% design submittal.

F. TASK III: Task III includes but is not limited to producing intermediate (65%) design documents;

incorporating changes requested in approved review comments; submitting the required documents to the

Contracting Officer for review; discussing these documents at the 65% Review Meeting; and submitting draft minutes of the 65% design review meeting to the Contracting Officer.

1. Contract Deliverable Items: The following items are deliverable as part of Task III:

a. Twelve (12) copies each of the required 65% design documents -- drawings, draft specifications

(including waste disposal/borrow pit plan), cost estimate, design analysis, draft AF Form 66

(submittal register), and approved/final 35% design review meeting minutes, including all comments and responses.

(1) Drawings may be half-size, but only if all details are legible.

(2) The waste disposal/borrow pit worksheet shall be in Microsoft Word format.

(3) The 65% design cost estimate provided by the A-E shall have a maximum contingency of 10%.

The cost estimate shall be in Microsoft Excel format.

b. Three (3) copies of the entire 65% documents on CD.

c. The draft 65% design review meeting minutes shall be submitted within three (3) working days after the 65% design review meeting. Corrections to the meeting minutes may be required by the

Government.

2. 65% Design Review Meeting: The meeting for discussing the 65% design shall be scheduled following receipt of the 65% design submittals.

G. TASK IV: Task IV includes but is not limited to producing 95% design documents; incorporating changes requested in approved review comments; submitting the required documents to the Contracting Officer for review; discussing these documents at the 95% design review meeting; and submitting draft minutes of the

95% design review meeting to the Contracting Officer.

1. Contract Deliverable Items: The following items are deliverable as part of Task IV:

a. Twelve (12) copies each of the required 95% design documents -- drawings, complete specifications, cost estimate, design analysis, completed AF Form 66, Draft DD Form 1354 and approved/final 65% review meeting minutes, including all comments and responses.

(1) Drawings may be ½-size, but only if all details are easily legible.

(2) The waste disposal/borrow pit plan shall be in Microsoft Word format.

(3) The 95% design cost estimate provided by the A-E shall have zero contingency. The cost estimate shall be in Microsoft Excel format.

b. Three (3) copies of the entire 95% documents on CD.

c. The draft 95% design review meeting minutes shall be submitted by email within three (3) working days after the 95% design review meeting. Corrections to the meeting minutes may be required by the Government.

2. 95% Design Review Meeting: The 95% design review meeting will discuss the 95% design and shall be scheduled following receipt of the 95% design submittals.

H. TASK V: Produce final (100%) design documents as defined in Section 3 of this Statement of Work and as described below:

1. Final (100%) Documents: The A-E shall incorporate into the 100% project documents the revisions requested in the approved 95% design review comments. Each plan sheet shall bear the seal of a

Registered…