B09_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- CONSTRUCTION, REPLACE ROOF AT OCHOPEE RANGER STATI Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5223R0024
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a roof replacement project at Big Cypress National Preserve. The National Park Service is soliciting past performance information on the contractor for a roof replacement project involving installation of shingles. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on the contractor's performance, timeliness, quality of work, and an overall rating on a previous contract. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the National Park Service contracting officer Chad Williams by 5:00 PM EST on August 22, 2023.
The related federal contract opportunity is for roof replacement work at Ochopee Ranger Station. The solicitation number is 140P5223R0024 and is being issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5223R0024_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| B09_Questions_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P5223R0024_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| A04_Statement_of_Work_HalfwayCreek.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5223R0024.pdf | ||
| B03_DOL_SOL_Wages.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5223R0024
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to chad_williams@nps.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior
Region 2, Solicitation Number: 140P5223R0024 for the Roof Replacement with Shingles at Big Cypress National Preserve, National Park Service. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/ current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail:
chad_williams@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to Chad Williams no later than 5:00 PM EST on 22 August 2023.
Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.
If you will not be available on 22 August 2023 for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name:
Alternate POC phone number:
Alternate POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
For Official Use Only mailto:chad_williams@nps.gov mailto:chad_williams@nps.gov
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
For Official Use Only
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed.
Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Timeliness
Ability to
Resolve
Timeliness
Problems
Comments, if any.
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Quality of Work
Comments, if any.
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
I.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .