B09 _ATTACHMENT 1 _ PPQ.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cultural Resources and Curation Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912P920R0010
About this file
This document contains a sample past performance questionnaire for evaluation of contractors on federal contracts. The questionnaire requests information on previous contracts including contract details, performance ratings, client references, and overall comments. Respondents are asked to provide ratings in categories such as quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, and safety on a scale of exceptional to unsatisfactory. Open fields allow for comments on contract performance and willingness to work with the contractor in the future. The past performance questionnaire appears to be a template used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Naval Facilities Engineering Command to evaluate contractors for potential award of cultural resources and curation services solicited under number W912P920R0010. Responses from previous clients will assist the evaluation team in assessing risk for the current procurement.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| _ATTACHMENT 1 _ PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| A12 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| A12 Q and A.PDF | ||
| A22 Updated Solicitation - Combined .pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SAMPLE COVER LETTER
SAMPLE OF COVER LETTER TO BE SENT BY THE OFFORER TO ITS REFERENCES
Date
Name and Address of Reference
Dear __________________________:
We have listed your firm as a reference for work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal for a project advertised by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), St. Louis District. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), an evaluation of our firm’s past performance will be completed by the USACE. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process.
Your firm has been listed as a reference for the work we performed for you on the following project:
(INSERT Project name and contract number)
We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Furthermore, a questionnaire has also been sent to ___________________ of your organization. Only one response from each company is required. If at all possible, we suggest that you individually answer this questionnaire and then coordinate your responses with that of _________________, to forge a consensus on one overall response from your organization. It is preferred that you return your questionnaire to our office by email to virginia.e.bjornson@usace.army.mil. We request your questionnaire be provided by the proposal deadline, which is 18 Jun 2020 at 10:00 CST
If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Virginia E. Bjornson USACE Contract Specialist, at (314) 331-8054
Sincerely, (Offeror’s signature)
Attachments:
1. Instructions to the Reference for completing the Past Performance Questionnaire
2. Past Performance Questionnaire
ATTACHMENT 1
THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, or other)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Rate the Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) To what extent was the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by Contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E VG S M U N |
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E VG S M U N |
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| E VG S M U N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No |
| f) Have there been any indications that the Contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the Contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U N |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this Contractor. |
| E VG S M U N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
PART III – Return Information It is preferred that your questionnaire be returned to the offeror. However, you may also send your completed questionnaire directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at the following email address: Virginia.e.Bjornson@usace.army.mil.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .