B08-HT9427-26-R-E001-Attachment-J-AR-220-1.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED

Army Regulation 220 – 1

Field Organizations

Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration– Consolidated Policies

Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 16 August 2022

SUMMARY of CHANGE

AR 220 – 1

Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration–Consolidated Policies

This major revision, dated 16 August 2022— o Adds responsibilities of the Army commands, Army service component commands, direct reporting units, and

Headquarters, Department of the Army staff and agencies and aligns the responsibilities with those established in general orders and other Army publications (chap 2).

o Adds unit status reporting background, and policies on reporting an assigned mission level (paras 4 – 1 and 5 – 7).

o Clarifies the criteria and restrictions that apply to units reporting early (para 4–3g(5)).

o Updates procedures for commanders to lend staff support, in report preparation, to separate units (para 4–4a).

o Clarifies that level 6 will be used to report the status of a measured-area only (para 4–4e(2)(a).).

o Updates policy for the commander’s C-level, subjective upgrade process (para 4–4f).

o Updates procedures for creating and approving supplemental requirements to AR 220 – 1 (para 4–4f(5)).

o Updates policy for timeliness of reporting requirements (para 4 – 6).

o Changes metrics for personnel levels and equipment and supplies on hand (paras 5 – 2 and 5 – 4).

o Revises exemption processes and equipment readiness code designations (paras 5–4d, 5–4g, and 5–4h).

o Revises guidance and removes a requirement to provide lists in the reporting application (para 5–4k).

o Requires explanatory comments from the commander if the unit reports T – 1 and P – 4, concurrently (para 5–6d).

o Directs some commanders to report Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness resilience reporting (para 6 – 6).

o Adds reporting requirements on the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear response enterprise (para 6 – 8).

o Updates force registration details, and updates descriptive designators for some authorization units (chap 7).

o Updates policy on access to and release of information in the Defense Readiness Reporting System–Army (para

9–6a).

o Incorporates Army Directive 2016 – 07 (throughout).

o Rescinds DA Pam 220 – 1, dated 16 November 2011, upon publication of this regulation (throughout).

*This regulation supersedes AR 220-1, dated 15 April 2010; DA Pam 220-1, dated 16 November 2011, and AD 2016-07, dated 1 March 2016.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022

UNCLASSIFIED

i

Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC

*Army Regulation 220 – 1

16 August 2022 Effective 16 September 2022

Field Organizations

Army Unit Status Reporting and Force Registration–Consolidated Policies

History. This publication is a major re-vision.

Summary. This regulation establishes fundamental Army policies for readiness reporting and force registration that are synchronized with, and complemented by, the basic procedures explained in the

Army Readiness Portal and the data entry instructions provided at the Defense

Readiness Reporting System–Army por-tal or embedded in the applicable Defense

Readiness Reporting System–Army soft-ware application. The Army Readiness

Portal serves as a repository where all cur-rent approved Army readiness reporting practices will be available along with sim-ilar guidance from related Army Readi-ness authoritative councils and groups.

This regulation also implements CJCSI

3401.02B, CJCSM 3150.02B, DoDD

7730.65, DoDI 8500.01, DoDI 7730.66, and DoDI 6025.19.

Applicability. This regulation applies to the Regular Army, the Army National

Guard/Army National Guard of the

United States, and U.S. Army Reserve units, unless otherwise stated. During mo-bilization, the proponent may modify chapters and policies contained in this regulation.

Proponent and exception authority.

The proponent of this regulation is the

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 3/5/7. The pro-ponent has the authority to approve ex-ceptions or waivers to this regulation con-sistent with controlling law and regula-tions. The proponent may delegate this approval authority, in writing, to a divi-sion chief within the proponent agency or its direct reporting unit or field operating agency, in the grade of colonel or the ci-vilian equivalent. Activities may request a waiver to this regulation by providing jus-tification that includes a full analysis of the expected benefits and must include formal review by the activity’s senior le-gal officer. All waiver requests will be en-dorsed by the commander or senior leader of the requesting activity and forwarded through their higher headquarters to the policy proponent. Refer to AR 25 – 30 for specific requirements.

Army internal control process.

This regulation contains internal controls in accordance with AR 11 – 2 and identi-fies key internal controls that must be evaluated (see appendix B).

Supplementation. Supplementation of this regulation and establishment of command or local forms are prohibited without prior approval from the Deputy

Chief of Staff, G – 3/5/7 (DAMO – ODR), 400 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC

20310 – 0400.

Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and sug-gested improvements on DA Form 2028

(Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to usarmy.pen-tagon.hqda.list.dcs-g-3 – 5 – 7-odr-all@army.mil.

Distribution. This regulation is availa-ble in electronic media only and is in-tended for the Regular Army, the Army

National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and the U.S. Army Re-serve.

Contents (Listed by paragraph and page number)

Chapter 1

Introduction, page 1

Purpose • 1 – 1, page 1

References and forms • 1 – 2, page 1

Explanation of abbreviations and terms • 1 – 3, page 1

Responsibilities • 1 – 4, page 1

Records management (recordkeeping) requirements • 1 – 5, page 1

Statutory authority • 1 – 6, page 1

The Defense Readiness Reporting System–Enterprise • 1 – 7, page 2

Chapter 2

Roles and Responsibilities, page 3

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) • 2 – 1, page 3

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) • 2 – 2, page 4 mailto:usarmy.pentagon.hqda.list.dcs-g-3 – 5 – 7-odr-all@army.mil mailto:usarmy.pentagon.hqda.list.dcs-g-3 – 5 – 7-odr-all@army.mil mailto:usarmy.pentagon.hqda.list.dcs-g-3 – 5 – 7-odr-all@army.mil

Contents—Continued

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 ii

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy, and Environment) • 2 – 3, page 4

Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) • 2 – 4, page 4

Chief Information Officer • 2 – 5, page 4

Chief, National Guard Bureau • 2 – 6, page 4

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 1 • 2 – 7, page 5

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 2 • 2 – 8, page 5

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 3/5/7 • 2 – 9, page 6

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 4 • 2 – 10, page 8

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 6 • 2 – 11, page 9

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 8 • 2 – 12, page 9

Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 9 • 2 – 13, page 10

Chief, Army Reserve/Commanding General, U.S. Army Reserve Command • 2 – 14, page 10

Chief of Engineers • 2 – 15, page 10

The Surgeon General/Commanding General, U.S. Army Medical Command • 2 – 16, page 11

The Provost Marshal General • 2 – 17, page 11

Commanding General, U.S. Army Forces Command • 2 – 18, page 11

Commanding General, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command • 2 – 19, page 12

Commanding General, U.S. Army Futures Command • 2 – 20, page 13

Commanding General, U.S. Army Materiel Command • 2 – 21, page 14

Commanding General, U.S. Army Special Operations Command • 2 – 22, page 15

Commanding General, U.S. Army Cyber Command • 2 – 23, page 15

Chief, National Guard Bureau and Commanders of Army commands, Army service component commands, and di-rect reporting units • 2 – 24, page 15

Commanders of Army reporting units, garrison commanders and senior commanders • 2 – 25, page 17

Chapter 3

Overview, page 17

Key Joint and Department of Defense policies • 3 – 1, page 17

Key Army policies, references, doctrinal publications, and training resources • 3 – 2, page 17

Key terminology and lexicon • 3 – 3, page 18

Chapter 4

Army Readiness Reporting, page 20

Army readiness reporting overview • 4 – 1, page 20

Army reporting units • 4 – 2, page 26

Reporting unit guidance for report development and submission • 4 – 3, page 27

Preparation, processing, and review of reports • 4 – 4, page 29

Reporting procedures and channels • 4 – 5, page 33

Timeliness of data • 4 – 6, page 33

Unit-report-submission requirements • 4 – 7, page 33

Command relationships, authorities, and readiness reporting • 4 – 8, page 36

Deployability of units • 4 – 9, page 37

Deployed reporting requirements • 4 – 10, page 38

Exempted and excused units • 4 – 11, page 38

Chapter 5

Reporting Status of Resource and Training Measures, page 39

General • 5 – 1, page 39

Personnel level metrics and data • 5 – 2, page 39

Authorized substitutes for required personnel • 5 – 3, page 41

Equipment-on-hand level (available) metrics and data • 5 – 4, page 41

Equipment readiness and serviceability level metrics and data • 5 – 5, page 46

The training level metrics and data points • 5 – 6, page 46

Assigned mission level • 5 – 7, page 48

Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear readiness • 5 – 8, page 50

Capability-level-5 reporting • 5 – 9, page 50

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 iii

Chapter 6

Special and Army-Unique Reporting Requirements, page 52

General • 6 – 1, page 52

Reporting assigned mission levels, in lieu of percent-effective levels • 6 – 2, page 52

Reporting on more than one concurrently assigned mission • 6 – 3, page 52

Reporting on operation plans in support of combatant-commander requirements • 6 – 4, page 53

Determining aggregate equipment on-hand status, by force-structure component and by state or terri-tory • 6 – 5, page 53

Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness resilience reporting • 6 – 6, page 54

Military working dog certification rates reporting • 6 – 7, page 55

Reporting by chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear response enterprise forces • 6 – 8, page 55

Reporting by Army National Guard units with State-assigned missions • 6 – 9, page 55

Reporting by multiple component units • 6 – 10, page 56

Reporting by Army installations and garrisons • 6 – 11, page 56

Derivative unit identification codes reporting • 6 – 12, page 56

Chapter 7

Force Registration, page 57

General • 7 – 1, page 57

Force registration requirement • 7 – 2, page 57

Unit registration • 7 – 3, page 58

Unit maintenance • 7 – 4, page 59

Structure of a unit identification code • 7 – 5, page 60

Basic identity data elements • 7 – 6, page 60

Force registration database • 7 – 7, page 60

Force-management actions • 7 – 8, page 61

Security classification of basic identity data element and Army basic identity data element • 7 – 9, page 61

Releasing and accessing basic identity data element and Army basic identity data element data • 7 – 10, page 62

Chapter 8

Defense Readiness Reporting System–Army, page 62

Army readiness systems • 8 – 1, page 62

Authoritative data sources • 8 – 2, page 62

Data exchange interfaces • 8 – 3, page 63

Army Readiness Portal • 8 – 4, page 63

Applications • 8 – 5, page 63

Database management • 8 – 6, page 63

Operations and maintenance • 8 – 7, page 63

User account management • 8 – 8, page 64

Future capabilities • 8 – 9, page 64

Chapter 9

Security Classification, page 64

Security classification and declassification of readiness status and reports information • 9 – 1, page 64

Security classification of commander’s unit-status-report information and data • 9 – 2, page 65

Security classification of commander’s unit-status reports • 9 – 3, page 67

Security classification of force registration information and data • 9 – 4, page 69

Declassifying and downgrading Defense Readiness Reporting System–Army information, data, and re-ports • 9 – 5, page 70

Access to, and release of, Defense Readiness Reporting System–Army information and data • 9 – 6, page 71

Retention of data • 9 – 7, page 71

Specific policies and procedures for Defense Readiness Reporting System–Army information, data, and reports ref-erencing the entire Army, Army National Guard, U.S. Army Reserve, and other large groupings • 9 – 8, page 71

Specific procedures applicable to auditors, Congress, and the general public • 9 – 9, page 72

Specific access authorizations to readiness data • 9 – 10, page 72

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 iv

Appendixes

A. References, page 74

B. Internal Control Evaluation, page 79

Table List

Table 4 – 1: Status of Resources and Training System category levels (C-levels, four-tier rating scale), page 22

Table 4 – 2: The assigned mission levels (A-levels), page 24

Table 4 – 3: Composite level criteria (personnel, equipment on hand, and equipment readiness), page 28

Table 4 – 4: Report-submission requirements and frequency, page 36

Table 5 – 1: Metrics for determining the personnel level, page 39

Table 5 – 2: Equipment available metrics (high density line item numbers), page 42

Table 5 – 3: Level for percentage of equipment fully mission capable, page 46

Table 5 – 4: Translating the training-readiness level, mission-essential-task-list percentage into a T-level, page 47

Table 5 – 5: Level criteria for assigned mission manning, assigned mission equipping, and assigned mission train-ing, page 49

Table 5 – 6: Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear metrics, page 50

Table 9 – 1: Minimum-classification guidance for mission-essential task list assessments (modification table of or-ganization and equipment units)1, page 65

Table 9 – 2: Minimum-classification guidance for resource and training status measurements (modification table of organization and equipment units)1, page 65

Table 9 – 3: Minimum classification guidance for metrics1, page 66

Table 9 – 4: Minimum classification guidance for overall assessments1, page 66

Table 9 – 5: Minimum classification guidance for commander’s unit status report data when aggregated with other data1, page 67

Table 9 – 6: Minimum classification guidance for commander’s unit status reports1, page 68

Table 9 – 7: Classifying force registration information and data for modification table of organization and equipment units1, page 69

Table 9 – 8: Classification of force registration information and data for table of distribution and allowance units1, page 70

Figure List

Figure 1 – 1: Defense Readiness Reporting System Enterprise concept, page 2

Figure 1 – 2: The Chairman’s Readiness System, page 3

Figure 4 – 1: C-level methodology for overall readiness assessment, page 23

Figure 4 – 2: A-level methodology for overall readiness assessment, page 25

Figure 5 – 1: Process for determining and approving authorized substitute items, page 44

Glossary

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 1

Chapter 1 Introduction

1–1. Purpose This regulation implements the policy, processes, methodologies, and information technology (IT) systems established by the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS), and the Secretary of the Army

(SECARMY), pursuant to their responsibilities under Title 10, United States Code, for determining and reporting the readiness of military forces to conduct their assigned missions. Also it establishes the specific readiness-status-report-ing requirements that are applicable to Army units, organizations, and installations. Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint Staff (JS) policies require military units to report their readiness status for their deliberate, “designed” capa-bilities, and for their “assigned” missions. This regulation provides the authoritative policy to the commanders of

Army units regarding each of these fundamental readiness-reporting requirements. It also synchronizes Army unit-status reporting, and force registration policies, with the basic procedures explained in the Army Readiness Portal https://drrsa.aoc.army.pentagon.mil/.

1–2. References and forms See appendix A.

1–3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms See the glossary.

1–4. Responsibilities See chapter 2.

1–5. Records management (recordkeeping) requirements The records management requirement for all record numbers, associated forms, and reports required by this regulation are addressed in the Record Retention Schedule–Army (RRS – A). Detailed information for all related record numbers, forms, and reports are located in Army Records Information Management System (ARIMS)/RRS – A at https://www.arims.army.mil. If any record numbers, forms, and reports are not current, addressed, and/or published correctly in ARIMS/RRS – A, see DA Pam 25 – 403 for guidance.

1–6. Statutory authority

a. The SECDEF has the following responsibilities and/or performs the following functions related to readiness reporting in accordance with Section 117, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 117):

(1) Establish a comprehensive readiness reporting system for the DoD that measures the capability of the Armed

Forces objectively, accurately, and timely.

(2) Perform measurements at an interval reflected in this regulation as determined by the policy from JS and Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), of critical warfighting deficiencies in unit capability and the level of current risks relative to the capability of forces to carry out their wartime missions. Utilize the unit readiness indicators in required reports in accordance with 10 USC 482.

b. The CJCS has the following responsibilities and/or performs the following functions:

(1) In accordance with 10 USC 117(d), conduct quarterly Joint readiness reviews.

(2) In accordance with 10 USC 153, establish and maintain, after consultation with the commanders (CDRs) of the unified and specified combatant commands (CCMDs), a uniformed system to evaluate the preparedness of each com-mand to carry out missions assigned to the command.

c. Combatant commanders (CCDRs) exercise command authority over their assigned forces in accordance with 10

USC 164.

d. Commander, Special Operations Command exercises additional authority specified by 10 USC 167 for all spe-cial operations forces.

e. Sections 117, 153, and 482, Title 10, USC, provide the requirements and responsibilities for readiness reporting established by Congress.

f. 10 USC 7013 establishes the SECARMY’s responsibility to the National Command Authority for the internal organization, training, logistics, readiness, control of resources and equipment, mobilization, demobilization, admin-istration, support, and discipline of all Army commands and forces, including those assigned to the CCDRs.

https://drrsa.aoc.army.pentagon.mil/ https://www.arims.army.mil/

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 2

g. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is a Federal law specifying the budget and expenditures of the DoD. Each year’s act also includes other provisions.

1–7. The Defense Readiness Reporting System–Enterprise

a. Department of Defense Systems. The Defense Readiness Reporting System–Enterprise (DRRS – E) is the col-laboration of independent Service, Joint, and the OSD readiness-focused IT applications, combined with readiness-specific authoritative data, all related by a common ability to support readiness reporting and assessment requirements.

The DRRS – E complies with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 8410.02 and uses an enterprise of collabora-tive, net-centric IT systems, leveraging DoD-approved, data-sharing strategies and common operating environments to facilitate readiness reporting throughout DoD. Figure 1 – 1 illustrates the DRRS – E concept.

Figure 1 – 1. Defense Readiness Reporting System Enterprise concept

(1) The Chairman’s Readiness System. The Chairman’s Readiness System (CRS) is designed as a management and assessment tool for use by the CJCS, Services, CCMDs, combat support agencies, and OSD, as described in the

CJCS Guide 3401D. The CRS is a processing system, not a specific IT program. In this system, Joint and unit readiness is captured and used to evaluate the preparedness of the U.S. military.

(2) The Defense Readiness Reporting System –Strategic. The Defense Readiness Reporting System–Strategic

(DRRS – S) is the readiness status reporting system described in Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 7730.65 and DoDI 7730.66, and is intended to provide a capabilities-based, adaptive, near real-time readiness reporting system for the DoD. The primary readiness status-reporting construct in DRRS – S is the mission-essential task (MET). This is grouped in a list referred to as the readiness-level (R-level) mission-essential task list (METL). The capability as-sessments provided in DRRS – S are based on the assessment of METs and Joint capability areas (JCAs). The METs and JCAs are derived from the Universal Joint Task List, described in Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Manual

(CJCSM) 3500.04F and promulgated via Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) J–7’s website, ensuring a common lexicon in determining the tasks that are linked to a specific operation, plan, or core requirement. DRRS – S extends current read-iness reporting by adding capability assessments in addition to the resource measurements and overall assessments currently required by the CRS. See figure 1 – 2.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 3

Figure 1 – 2. The Chairman’s Readiness System

b. Reporting systems. The CJCS’s readiness reporting system is known as the CRS, and the SECDEF readiness reporting system is known as the DRRS. Currently, DRRS – S is the IT system that supports both information require-ments. The Services interface with DRRS as determined by law and policy to comply with the requirements directed by the SECDEF and the CJCS, as well as the requirements supporting their unique Service responsibilities. The

DRRS – E is the collaboration of these independent Service, Joint, and OSD systems.

Chapter 2 Roles and Responsibilities

2–1. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) The ASA (ALT) will—

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 4

a. Ensure effective coordination within Department of the Army (DA), of Army readiness and unit-status reporting policies and programs in their assigned functional area of responsibility (AOR), as appropriate or as directed by the

SECARMY.

b. Coordinate new-equipment fielding, replacement equipment, and new-equipment training, to optimize Army readiness and unit-status reporting (see AR 770 – 2).

c. Coordinate with the Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 4 (DCS, G – 4), to develop and initiate program-specific sustain-ment strategies, to support and improve Army readiness and unit-status reporting.

d. Coordinate with the Commander, Army Futures Command (AFC) to help and advise them on sustainment con-cepts, and requirements, for new materiel solutions being considered.

2–2. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) The ASA (FM&C) will—

a. Provide strategic financial guidance for readiness policies, plans, training, and programs executed by the Army

Staff (ARSTAF).

b. Help Army commands (ACOMs) and installations establish and sustain audit readiness within their organization, as directed by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).

c. Work in conjunction with the Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 8 (DCS, G – 8) in the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution (PPBE) process, to fulfill the Army’s Title 10 responsibilities, support the war-fight, build and sustain readiness, and rebuild strategic depth.

2–3. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy, and Environment) The ASA (IE&E) will, in conjunction with the Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 9 (DCS, G – 9), ensure effective coordination within Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) of Army readiness, and unit status reporting policies and programs, in assigned functional AOR as appropriate, or as directed by the SECARMY.

2–4. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) The ASA (M&RA) will—

a. Ensure effective coordination, within HQDA, of Army readiness and unit-status reporting policies and programs, in assigned functional AOR as appropriate, or as directed by the SECARMY.

b. Coordinate changes to mobilization laws and policies to clarify and enhance the deployability status of Army

National Guard (ARNG) and United States Army Reserve (USAR) personnel. Ensure that Reserve Component (RC) organizations maintain capability to meet Army, and externally directed, unit status reporting requirements.

2–5. Chief Information Officer The CIO will—

a. Serve as principal advisor to the SECARMY, and other Army leadership, on matters related to the overall su-pervision of information management and policy for Army readiness.

b. Oversee the policy, governance, and information resource management applicable to unit-status reporting pro-cesses, in accordance with other regulations, such as AR 25 – 1 and AR 25 – 2.

c. Update policies to modernize Army and Joint capabilities supportive of readiness-reporting processes, by work-ing with stakeholders in all Army mission areas. These are the business mission area (BMA), the DoD intelligence mission area (DIMA), the enterprise information environment mission area (EIEMA), and the warfighting mission area (WMA).

d. Develop policies to aid resourcing of enterprise wide Cybersecurity, Data, Cloud, and Unified Network archi-tecture to comply with Army, DoD, and Federal statutory requirements.

2–6. Chief, National Guard Bureau The CNGB (or the Director, Army National Guard (DARNG), if so delegated), will––

a. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring and using unit status data in assigned functional AORs.

b. Use unit-status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses, to determine root causes and possible solu-tions.

c. Set and meet milestone dates for correcting problem areas; consider problems identified in CUSRs; and the status of Army units, organizations, and installations when developing plans and programs.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 5

d. Assist the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) to develop

DRRS – A applications, and the procedures for using readiness-status data to improve the readiness status of ARNG units, organizations, and installations, and to improve the unit status reporting system.

e. Ensure ARNG units have the command guidance and supplementary instructions necessary to accurately report the status of their sustainable readiness (SR), to meet the applicable goals and objectives.

f. Ensure ARNG units are prepared to comply with unit-status reporting requirements resulting from their dual-mission status, as directed by their respective governor or responsible authority.

g. Provide recommendations to adapt or revise mobilization policies and authorities, as required, enhancing and/or sustaining the deployability of individual Army Guardsmen and cohesive ARNG units.

h. Approve the authoritative listing of CDU equipment items and CDU equipment categories recommended by the

CNGB and maintained by the DCS, G – 8, in coordination with the DCS, G – 4 and the Chief, Army Reserve (CAR).

i. In coordination with the DCS, G – 8; the DCS, G – 4; and the CAR; recommend to the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR) the CDU equipment items and the CDU equipment categories that best enable the Total

Army to support civil authorities and most effectively represent the Army’s essential equipping requirements.

2–7. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 1 The DCS, G – 1 will—

a. Serve as principal advisor to the ASA (M&RA), and Army leadership, on personnel readiness.

b. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring, and using, readiness-status data within the DCS, G–1’s respective AOR.

c. Use readiness-status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses, to determine root causes and possible solutions.

d. Set and meet milestone dates for correcting problem areas; consider problems identified in the commander’s unit status reports (CUSRs) regarding the manning statuses of Army units, organizations, and installations when de-veloping plans and programs.

e. Help the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) develop DRRS – A applications, and procedures for using readiness-reporting data to improve the readiness statuses of Army units, or-ganizations, and installations.

f. Synchronize Army manning and Army personnel management policies, to optimize Army readiness and to aid unit-status reporting.

g. Support the development and implementation of policies and procedures, to accurately portray the manning status of reporting units as defined in this publication and the Army Readiness Portal.

h. As the proponent for military occupational specialty (MOS) substitution, help the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR) synchronize the latest MOS substitution data with DRRS – A. To this end, provide to

DAMO – ODR the current MOS substitution information in a machine-readable data set.

i. Ensure synchronization of personnel data systems with the DRRS – A system, and ensure that Commander, Hu-man Resources Command provides the required personnel data to the DRRS – A database, to support the unit status reporting process.

j. Devise and recommend to the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) the necessary revisions and updates to the personnel data points and metrics in unit-status reports (USRs). This is done to support SR, and to improve and sustain their relevance, accuracy, and objectivity, under the supervision of the ASA

(M&RA).

k. Serve as the proponent for the administratively nondeployable personnel criteria.

l. Assist Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) and U.S. Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) to establish def-initions and criteria for determining and reporting the medical readiness of individual Soldiers, to support the unit status reporting process.

2–8. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 2 The DCS, G – 2 will—

a. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring, and using, readiness-status data within respective AORs.

b. Use readiness-status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses, to determine root causes and possible solutions.

c. Set and meet milestone dates for correcting problem areas; consider problems identified in CUSRs and the status of Army units, organizations, and installations when developing plans and programs.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 6

d. Help the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) develop the

DRRS – A application and procedures for using readiness-reporting data to improve the readiness statuses of Army units, organizations, and installations.

e. Help the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) develop and refine security-classification guidance for the information and data contained in the DRRS – A system.

f. Ensure the Commander, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command provides USR management oversight for the reporting units under its administrative control (ADCON) authority, as required by AR 380 – 5 and as appro-priate.

g. Serve as principal advisor to the SECARMY and Army leadership on the training, readiness, force structure, manning, and resources necessary to conduct intelligence and to provide intelligence support to DoD.

2–9. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 3/5/7 The DCS, G – 3/5/7 will—

a. Supervise Army-readiness reporting, and reporting on the Army’s readiness status for prioritization and resourc-ing decisions, as directed by the SECARMY.

b. Approve all waivers, exceptions, or modifications to the policies and unit status reporting requirements estab-lished in this publication, consistent with controlling law and regulations. The directorates of the DCS, G – 3/5/7 will have the supporting and/or associated authorities and responsibilities established in the remainder of this paragraph.

c. Serve as the HQDA proponent for experimentation oversight and policy and will consider the impacts on, and implications to, the readiness status of units when recommending planning, programming, and budgeting actions.

d. As appropriate or as directed, the Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM) will—

(1) Develop and document operating force (OF) and generating force (GF) units and organizations in coordination with the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR); the DCS, G – 1; the DCS, G–4’s Director of Current

Operations, Plans, and Strategic Readiness (DAL – OPO); the DCS, G–8’s Director, Force Development (DAPR – FD);

and the applicable U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) proponent agency. Establish manning and equipping requirements based on the core functions and/or designed capabilities of units, and provide discrete visibility of both the equipment and manning aspects associated with the readiness and capability of crew-served weapon systems and command posts, as appropriate.

(2) Direct unit inactivation, discontinuation, activation, reactivation, conversion, reorganization, and similar ac-tions to minimize adverse impact to Army readiness.

(3) Use the guidelines, processes, and procedures established in this regulation and on the Army Readiness Portal to—

(a) Specify the equipment readiness code (ERC) and pacing items for MTOE and TDA units and organizations in the appropriate formal requirements and authorization documents (see para 5 – 4).

(b) In conjunction with TRADOC, update and maintain tables of organization and equipment, in accordance with

AR 71 – 32 to include ERC, on the Force Management System website (FMSWeb), at https://fmsweb.army.mil.

(c) Update and maintain the authoritative listing of CUSR exempt line item numbers (LINs) in the United States

Army Force Management Support Agency (USAFMSA) database and at FMSWeb.

(d) In conjunction with the Director, Strategy, Plans and Policy (DAMO – SS), and the Director, Operations, Read-iness, and Mobilization (DAMO – OD), oversee and approve force-structure definitions and the categorization of units entered into the DRRS – A system.

(e) As the proponent for authorized equipment substitutes, coordinate within the Cloud Equipping (cQuiP) substi-tutions module, to review and approve the authorized substitute-equipment items to be listed in Supply Bulletin (SB)

700 – 20.

(f) As the proponent for reportable LIN exemptions, coordinate with the DCS, G – 4; the DCS, G – 8; ACOMs; Army service component commands (ASCCs); direct reporting units (DRUs); CNGB; and CAR to review and approve and document approved LIN exemptions.

(g) As appropriate, or as directed by the DCS, G – 3/5/7, recommend to the Director, Training (DAMO – TR) and

TRADOC the criteria and standards used to determine the status of the mission-command systems, and command posts, reported in the USR.

(h) Serve as the DA unit identification code (UIC) manager, and review for approval, all UIC requests submitted to HQDA on behalf of the DCS, G – 3/5/7. Also submit approved requests for initial FR.

e. As appropriate or as directed by the DCS, G – 3/5/7, the Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization will—

(1) Manage the FR and unit status reporting processes to ensure Army organizations and capability elements are properly registered in the authoritative data source (ADS) and that timely, accurate, objective, and uniform reports are prepared and submitted by Army units in compliance with externally directed and Army requirements.

https://fmsweb.army.mil/

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 7

(2) Serve as the focal point for the prioritization, integration, and synchronization of decision making on policies impacting on unit-status reporting and FR processes. This includes policies to establish new or additional requirements and/or to revise or adapt readiness-reporting processes.

(3) Develop requirements for Army-readiness reporting.

(a) Provide requirements to ASA (ALT), materiel developer, TRADOC, and so forth.

(b) Coordinate requirements across ASCCs, ACOMs, DRUs, JS, and OSD.

(4) Develop policies, standards, and procedures for unit-status reporting and FR, to include describing report sub-mission channels and prescribing oversight responsibilities, based on the command and support relationships and authorities existing between Army units, organizations, and installations. Synchronize Army-readiness-reporting pol-icy with OSD and JS-readiness-reporting policies.

(a) Through the reporting system, the program manager provides unit-reporting-application training resources to help establish unit-reporting-application-training programs by the ASCCs, ACOMs, and DRUs.

(b) Establish and provide unit-readiness reporting and force registration governance through existing or new fo-rums. These include the Strategic Readiness Assessment Group, Army Readiness Council, policy boards, unit identi-fication code information officer (UICIO) standards, and knowledge-management products and processes.

(5) Collect unit-status information and data, make audit checks for accuracy, and maintain automated historical records.

(6) Ensure that required reports are submitted, to the JS and OSD, in a timely manner.

(7) Process and distribute unit-status information and data in a usable format to requesting DoD organizations and government agencies.

(8) Establish and maintain an automated methodology for collecting, reviewing, and analyzing unit status infor-mation and data.

(9) Develop and issue guidance for using unit-status information and data before, during, and after mobilization.

Guidance also must be issued to support current operations, contingency operations, and the deliberate planning pro-cess.

(10) Act as a focal point for developing procedures to access and use unit-status information and data, via the

DRRS – A applications.

(11) Keep the Army leadership apprised of the readiness status of Army units, organizations, and installations.

(12) Task ARSTAF agencies and the responsible ACOM, ASCC, DRU commanders CNGB, and/or CAR when applicable, to provide supplemental unit-status information and data, and analyses of unit-status information.

(13) Ensure readiness-reporting policy, and supporting systems and software, are synchronized.

(14) Issue timely supplemental guidance, after initiation of an operational requirement, to clarify unit status report-ing requirements for deployed units, to include personnel deployability and equipment-availability criteria, and for subsequent disengagement, if needed.

(15) Coordinate the development and implementation of appropriate training programs for unit status reporting software.

(16) Act as the ARSTAF proponent for the DRRS – A database and Army’s FR process, and complete these specific tasks:

(a) Develop policies governing the operation of the DRRS – A system and for managing data in the DRRS – A da-tabase, as explained in chapter 8.

(b) The DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR) oversees the management of the DRRS – A and pro-vides guidance and direction to U.S. Army Command and Control Support Agency, and other supporting agencies and contractors, to develop, maintain, and enhance the DRRS – A database-hosting environment.

(c) Manage the DRRS – A database and provide guidance and direction to command UICIOs, unit UICIOs when required, other supporting agencies, and contractors for developing, maintaining, and enhancing the DRRS – A data-base.

(d) Monitor compliance by Army organizations and agencies with FR requirements, and initiate appropriate cor-rective actions when necessary.

(e) Manage and maintain reference files and the master database for DRRS – A at HQDA.

(f) Coordinate with the United States Army Command and Control Support Agency (USACCSA) Network Secu-rity Division, to request opening of communication channels and firewall requests as necessary for mission partners.

(g) Provide validated basic identity data element (BIDE) data to OSD, JS, and Army agencies.

(h) Consider requests for the release of DRRS – A information to external agencies.

(i) Smooth data-exchange interface between the DRRS – A database with the DRRS – S database at the National

Military Command Center.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 8

(j) Provide requested DRRS – A data to external agencies, when authorized by the Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD).

(k) Develop and update memorandums of agreement (MOAs), system interface agreements (SIAs) and data use agreements with ADSs bi-annually and as required. Provide a report of ADS changes to the CIO(SAIS – ADD).

(l) In conjunction with the Director, Strategy, Plans and Policy (DAMO – SS), and the Director, Force Management

(DAMO – FM), oversee and approve force-structure definitions and the categorization of units entered into DRRS – A.

(m) Coordinate the annual CDU equipment list, in accordance with paragraph 6–5c of this publication.

(n) Ensure parent UICs are registered by G–3’s Chief, Force Accounting and Documentation Division

(DAMO – FMP) only, and that inactivations and discontinuances are Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM) ap-proved.

f. As appropriate or as directed by the DCS, G – 3/5/7, the Director, Strategy, Plans, and Policy (DAMO – SS) will—

(1) Recommend to the Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR) the unit status reporting requirements necessary to aid and support global force management (GFM) policy requirements.

(2) In coordination with the Director, Training (DAMO – TR), the Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM), and

Commander, U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM), define and establish the fundamental elements of the process and the data points reported or imported into the DRRS – A database, to enable visibility of the SR of rotational units.

(3) On a quarterly basis, and in coordination with the JS and OSD, update the authoritative master listing on the

Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) unit-reporting application containing the names, numbers, and descriptions of those plans and named operations that may potentially be supported by Army units. In coordination with the DCS, G – 2 provide guidance for the security classification of the information and data contained in this master listing, and act as the HQDA release authority, as required.

(4) In conjunction with the Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM), and the Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD), oversee and approve force structure definitions and the categorization of units that are entered into the DRRS – A system.

g. As appropriate or as directed by the DCS, G – 3/5/7, the Director, Training (DAMO – TR) will—

(1) Serve as the proponent for training readiness, metrics, and assessments.

(2) In conjunction with TRADOC, FORSCOM, and the JS, develop policy, validate requirements, and provide resources for training by units to enable commanders to attain and sustain required levels of training readiness.

(3) Revise and recommend to the Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) the require-ments and criteria established in this regulation, for units to report training readiness status.

(4) As proponent for the T-level assessment, ensure MET proficiency or other future T-level measures, as ap-proved, are synchronized and incorporated into DRRS – A.

(5) Obtain DCS, G – 3/5/7 approval of TRADOC-developed standard METs and METLs. Ensure synchronization of standard METs into DRRS – A.

(6) In conjunction with TRADOC, ensure instructions on the Army’s unit status reporting process are incorporated within institutional training and formal Army courses, as appropriate.

(7) Evaluate, update, and maintain the squad, crew, team-manning information, and related data tables to ensure

DRRS – A data accuracy and relevance, to support commands managing squad, crew, and team capabilities, as docu-mented in MTOE-authorization documents.

h. As the commander of a staff-support agency of the DCS, G – 3/5/7, the Commander, USACCSA will—

(1) Provide and coordinate with DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Readiness (DAMO – ODR) to establish communication channels and firewall requests with JSP.

(2) Provide infrastructure support for housing the DRRS – A environment, with the Joint Services Provider and

Defense Continuity of Operations Integrated Network. This must begin with the initial hand-off process and include adequate storage area network volumes, space, power, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, network connectivity, security/vulnerability monitoring, continuity of operations functionality, and access to facilities and DRRS – A equip-ment. This support must be provided 24 hours a day, 365 days of the year for DRRS – A representatives, installations, and operations.

2–10. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 4 The DCS, G – 4 will—

a. Serve as the proponent for reporting the physical condition of Army equipment and the equipment’s ability, or inability, to perform its intended mission. Advise and assist the ASA (ALT) to prescribe policy and direction for assessing Army-equipment readiness and sustainability.

b. Coordinate and synchronize Global Combat Support System–Army as it supports readiness reporting.

c. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring and using readiness status data within respective AORs.

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 9

d. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring and using logistics-readiness-status data within respective

AORs.

e. Use logistics-readiness-status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses, to determine root causes and possible solutions.

f. Set and meet milestone dates for correcting problem areas; consider problems identified in CUSRs and the status of Army units, organizations, and installations when developing plans and programs.

g. Assist the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) to develop the

DRRS – A application and the procedures for using logistics-readiness-status data to improve the readiness status of

Army units, organizations, and installations. Help to improve the Army’s readiness-reporting system.

h. Review, revise, and adapt appropriate sustainment and logistics-management policies, as required, to support the unit status reporting process for equipment readiness.

i. In coordination with the DCS, G – 3/5/7; the DCS, G – 8; Commander, FORSCOM; Commander, TRADOC; Com-mander, U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC); and Commander, U.S. Army Special Operations Command

(USASOC); develop effective equipping priorities to optimize Army readiness and improve unit status.

j. In coordination with AMC, ensure the U.S. Army Logistics Data Analysis Center (LDAC) synchronizes its data systems, for logistics and supply-management information, with the DRRS – A system and provides the required lo-gistics data to the DRRS – A database, to support the unit status reporting process.

k. As the office of primary responsibility for managing SB 700 – 20, in coordination with DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Force Management (DAMO– FM), ensure the preparation, updating, and maintenance of SB 700 – 20 is accomplished, in accordance with DA Pam 708 – 3.

2–11. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 6 The DCS, G – 6 will—

a. Serve as principal advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Army, and other Army leadership, on matters related to the operational readiness of cyber and signal forces across the Army.

b. In coordination with DCS, G – 3/5/7, implement the prioritization, integration, and synchronization of force struc-ture, equipping, and employment of cyber and signal forces, in support of unit status reporting processes, in accordance with AR 25 – 1 and AR 25 – 2.

c. Develop, maintain, and facilitate the implementation of a secure, seamless, unified network architecture for all

Army mission areas (BMA, DIMA, EIEMA, and WMA).

d. Provide strategy, planning, and implementation guidance to aid unit status reporting, in accordance with HQDA

Regionally Aligned Readiness and Modernization Model readiness standards.

2–12. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 8 The DCS, G – 8 will—

a. Serve as proponent for equipment on hand (EOH) readiness metrics and assessments.

b. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring, and using, equipping-readiness-status data within their re-spective AORs.

c. Use equipping-readiness-status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses, to determine root causes and possible solutions.

d. Set and meet milestone dates for correcting problem areas; consider problems identified in CUSRs and the sta-tuses of Army units, organizations, and installations when developing plans and programs.

e. Assist the DCS, G – 3/5/7’s Director, Operations, Readiness and Mobilization (DAMO – OD) to develop the

DRRS – A applications, and the procedures for using equipping-readiness-status data, to improve the readiness status of Army units, organizations, and installations, and to improve the Army’s readiness-reporting system.

f. In coordination with the ASA (ALT), synchronize the procurement of weapon systems and equipment to enhance unit readiness.

g. Review, revise, and adapt all equipping policies to facilitate timely, accurate, objective, and uniform USRs.

h. In coordination with the DCS, G – 3/5/7; the DCS, G – 4; TSG; Commander, FORSCOM; Commander, TRADOC; Commander, AMC; and Commander, USASOC, develop effective equipping priorities to optimize Army readiness and improve unit status.

i. In coordination with the necessary HQDA staff, participate in the approval process, as required, to recommend to the Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM) the authorized substitute-equipment items listed in SB 700 – 20, appendix H (see DA Pam 71 –32).

AR 220–1 • 16 August 2022 10

j. In coordination with the DCS, G–4’s Chief, Major End Items Division (DALO – SPE), as required, participate in the exemption process to recommend to the Director, Force Management (DAMO – FM) the modernization equipment items exempt from on-hand status reporting in the CUSR.

k. In conjunction with ASA (FM&C), synchronize Army resourcing decisions within the PPBE process to optimize

Army readiness, enhance unit status and support unit status reporting processes.

l. Maintain the authoritative listing of CDU Army equipment items that the CNGB recommended, and the DCS, G – 3/5/7 approved, for use in preparing externally directed reports.

2–13. Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 9 The DCS, G – 9 will—

a. Assign specific staff responsibilities for monitoring and using readiness status data within respective AORs.

b. Use readiness status data to identify problem areas and perform analyses to determine root causes and possible solutions.

c. Set and meet milestone…