Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Hydrodynamic Numerical Model Development using DELFT-FM

1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL) supports U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) via a broad portfolio of numerical modeling efforts to understand hydrodynamics and its impact on other parameters such as water quality and sediment transport. These tasks involve the technical skills to build and validate a Delft3D model for hydrodynamics and transport. Delft3D is open-source software and facilitates the hydrodynamic (Delft3D-FLOW module), morphodynamic (Delft3D-MOR module), waves (Delft3D-WAVE module), water quality (Delft3D- WAQ module including the DELWAQ kernel) and particle (Delft3D-PART module) modelling. Delft3D has a user base of over 35,000 members world-wide and enables the community to share knowledge through publications and working relationships.

2. MAJOR REQUIREMENTS: To accomplish the work under this effort, it shall be necessary for the Contractor to complete the following requirements.

Required skills for all tasks:

The contractor shall have proficient expertise in using DELFT3D. The contractor shall have proficient expertise and familiarity with numerical modeling of hydrodynamics and sediment transport.

The contractor must also have experience with Adaptive Hydraulics (AdH) and DELFT 2D and 3D model codes for hydrodynamics. The contractor must have experience working on Linux high performance computing machines and the ability to write code in python and MATLAB. The contractor must meet security requirements to access the ERDC High Performance Computing (HPC) machines.

2.1 Base Task:

2.1.1. Delft3D Hydrodynamic Model for Project Alternatives. This includes modifying previously developed Adaptive Hydraulics (AdH) and DELFT 3D numerical models (approximately 500,000 nodes covering 17,000 square miles) input files for use in simulating hydrodynamics, salinity, temperature for proposed project alternatives (not to exceed three mesh alignments with modifications in up to 4 regions).

Run the provided DELFT3D calibrated/validated model on desktop personal computer (PC) or ERDC HPC machines to simulate 1 calendar year of with-project conditions, to include water surface elevations, salinity, temperature, and currents where available.

The period of performance is estimated to be 6 months.

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive. Written (Microsoft WORD) and presented (PowerPoint) instruction on the process taken to build the Delft3D Hydrodynamic model for hydrodynamics, salinity and temperature.

2.2 Optional Task 1:

2.2.1 Delft3D Sediment Model. This includes modifying previously developed numerical model input files for use in simulating sediment transport for proposed project alternatives as developed in the Base Task (not to exceed three mesh alignments with modifications in up to 4 regions). Run the model on desktop personal computer (PC) or ERDC High Performance Computing (HPC) machines to simulate 1 calendar year of with-project conditions.

The period of performance is estimated to be 3 months.

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive. Written (Microsoft WORD) and presented (PowerPoint) instruction on the process taken to update the DELFT3D model for sediment transport.

2.3 Optional Task 2:

2.3.1 Delft3D Modeling support for various locations TBD to support research and development efforts

Task 2A: Initial set up of model for location TBD. (0-500k mesh nodes) This task includes building the necessary DELFT3D mesh, applying appropriate bathymetry data and model driving conditions to include tides, river flows, winds, precipitation, salinity and temperature for the desired model simulation time. This task also ensures that the model runs efficiently on the ERDC HPC computers.

The period of performance is estimated to be 1 month.

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC provided external hard drive. Written and presented instructions on the process taken to build the DELFT3D model. Microsoft Office tools shall be used.

Task 2B: Initial set up of model for location TBD. (500k-1M mesh nodes) This task includes building the necessary DELFT3D mesh, applying appropriate bathymetry data and model driving conditions to include tides, river flows, winds, precipitation, salinity and temperature for the desired model simulation

The period of performance is estimated to be 1.5 months.

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage. Written and presented instructions on the process taken to build the DELFT3D model Microsoft Office tools shall be used.

Task 2C: Initial set up of model for location TBD. (1M+ mesh nodes) This task includes building the necessary DELFT3D mesh, applying appropriate bathymetry data and model driving conditions to include tides, river flows, winds, precipitation, salinity and temperature for the desired model simulation

The period of performance is estimated to be 2 months.

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive. Written and presented instructions on the process taken to build the DELFT3D model. Microsoft Office tools shall be used.

2.4 Optional Task 3:

2.4.1 Delft3D Modeling Support for Engineering With Nature® (EWN®), Applications. The Contractor shall provide advanced Delft3D modeling support to ongoing and future EWN® projects. This task includes generating numerical model input files, running Delft3D simulations (to include hydrodynamics, salinity, temperature, sediment transport, and morphodynamics), and interpreting model outputs to inform design concepts, siting, and optimization of natural infrastructure features in coastal and estuarine systems.

In addition to direct modeling support, the Contractor shall actively conduct in capacity-building efforts by providing six, approximately 1 hour, in-person, small group (1-5 attendees) training sessions to ERDC and EWN team members. These sessions shall be focused on building internal proficiency in Delft3D setup, calibration, simulation, and post-processing workflows to support DoD project applications.

Training materials and documented workflows shall be provided as part of this knowledge transfer activity.

The period of performance is estimated to be 6 months.

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution). A technical memorandum summarizing Delft3D modeling approach, simulation results, and recommendations for project design optimization. Instructional materials and documentation used for team training sessions. A summary report of Delft3D training activities conducted, including participant list, session topics, and key learning outcomes. All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive.

2.5 Optional Task 4:

2.5.1 Delft3D Model knowledge transfer. This task focuses on developing training material specific to

ERDC-CHL projects. The material should include PowerPoint presentation material, sample files, pre and post processing tools and instruction, as well as visualization steps. This task will include aiding CHL engineers and weekly, 1 hour training workshops.

The period of performance is estimated to be 3 months.

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code (source and compiled), and model files (input and solution). All PowerPoint presentations and notes documenting topics covered in the training workshops.

All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive.

2.6 Optional Task 5:

2.6.1 Delft3D Modeling pre and post processing development. This task focuses on creating tools and packages to interpret 2D/3D DELFT input and output for use in CHL analyses, presentations and documentation. These tools should be coded in Python or Matlab and include a Linux and Windows compiled executable. The analysis tools to be developed should include:

Computation of tidal prism, Computation of tidal amplitude, Computation of percentiles and plots of modeled parameters, Computation of maximum, minimum, and average values for modeled parameters over the entire model domain and plotted at specified locations.

Computation of discharge at a line and plotted over time Computation and visualization of residual current magnitude and vectors

The period of performance is estimated to be 2 months.

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code (source and compiled), and model files (input and solution). Written instructions detailing how each process or code is used and functions. All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive.

3. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION/EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS: Access to the ERDC HPC

(contractor must meet security requirements for access). Details of the desired model conditions (domain, freshwater flows, tides, winds, etc.) and the previously developed DELFT model. Field data for model calibration/validation purposes. The ERDC will provide office space and office equipment including computer systems needed and external hard drives for information storage.

4. MEETINGS/REVIEWS: During this effort, the Contractor shall conduct biweekly, at a minimum, web or in-person meetings to discuss progress of the work. The exact date and time of these meetings shall be scheduled to be mutually agreeable for the period of performance.

A kickoff meeting shall occur within two weeks of contract award date to solidify the project schedule, plan regular progress meetings and discuss contract details.

5. TRAVEL: No travel is expected.

6. REPORTS/DELIVERABLES: The following reports and deliverables are required.

Quarterly Reports: Reports describing progress on the project shall be submitted to the COR via email no later than the 10th calendar day following the reporting period and entitled Quarterly Progress Report. These reports shall be as of the last day of the quarter, and the first and last report may cover more than a quarter with prior concurrence of the COR. These reports will provide details of work performed during the previous quarter and work planned for the following quarter. Invoices for partial payment shall be submitted to coincide with submission of the quarterly progress reports, and a copy shall be included as specified in (see Section G). No partial payment will be approved unless the government has received all progress reports which are due with that period.

7. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE: Work will be performed in-person at the ERDC CHL.

8. PERIOD OF SERVICE: The Period of Performance is 24.5 months from contract award date with 6 months for the Base Period plus an 18.5-month period in order to exercise and complete the options prior to the PoP end date.

All of these tasks are independent and can be worked concurrently.

9. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS:

9.1 General security requirements and guidance: The security requirements described below apply to all contract personnel (including employees of the prime Contractor (“Contractor”) and all subcontractor employees) supporting the performance requirements of this contract. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with these security requirements. Questions regarding security matters shall be addressed to the designated Government representative (e.g., Contracting Officer Representative (COR), Requiring Activity (RA) representative, or Contracting Officer (if a COR or other RA representative is not appointed). Contract personnel are critical to the overall security and safety of US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) installations, facilities and activities, and security awareness training contributes to those efforts. The Department of Defense (DoD) and Army security training requirements specified below, if applicable, are performance requirements; all applicable contract personnel shall complete initial training within 30 days of contract award or the date new contract personnel begin performance on the contract. Within five business days from the completion of training, the Contractor shall provide written documentation (e.g., email or memorandum) to the Government representative. The documentation shall include the names of contract personnel trained and which training they completed; the Contractor shall maintain training records as part of their contract files and be prepared to provide copies of training certificates to the Government representative. Contractor personnel and vehicles are subject to search when entering federal installations.

Additionally, all contract personnel shall comply with Force Protection Condition (FPCON) measures, Random Antiterrorism Measures (commonly referred to as “RAMs”), and Health Protection Condition (HPCON) measures. The Contractor is responsible for meeting performance requirements during elevated FPCON and/or HPCON levels in accordance with applicable RA plans and procedures --this includes identifying mission essential and non-mission essential personnel. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the FPCON or HPCON levels at any individual facility or installation change, the Government may implement security changes that affect contract personnel. The Contractor shall ensure all contract personnel are aware of their security responsibilities, including any site-specific requirements identified in local policies or procedures.

9.2 Antiterrorism (AT) Level I training: All contract personnel requiring routine access to Army installations, facilities, and controlled access areas, or requiring network access shall complete initial and annual refresher AT Level I awareness training. Online AT Level I awareness training is available at https://jko.jten.mil/ (website subject to change).

9.3 Physical security and access control requirements: All contract personnel requiring physical access to a federal installation or facility shall comply with the access control procedures of that location. Contract personnel requiring unescorted access to meet contract performance requirements on a DoD installation in the US shall be vetted by the installation/facility Provost Marshal/Directorate of Emergency Services/Security Office using the National Crime Information Center-Interstate Identification Index (commonly referred to as “NCIC-III”) and Terrorist Screening Database (commonly referred to as “TSDB”).

Contract personnel shall comply with all personal identity verification requirements specified in installation/facility policies and procedures. Contract personnel who do not meet requirements for unescorted access to USACE facilities shall coordinate escorted access with the Government representative, as needed.

Contract personnel who receive keys, access cards, or lock combinations that provide access to government-owned property shall comply with key and lock control procedures of the RA.

9.4 Contract personnel requiring a common access card (CAC): Contract personnel will be issued a common access card (CAC) only if duties involve one of the following: (1) both physical access to a DoD facility and access to DoD information systems or networks; (2) remote access to a DoD information system or network using DoD-approved remote access procedures; or (3) physical access to multiple DoD facilities or multiple non-DoD federally controlled facilities on behalf of the DoD on a recurring basis for a period of 6 months or more. Before CAC issuance, contract personnel must have at a minimum, a favorably adjudicated Tier 1 investigation or an equivalent or higher investigation in accordance with applicable Army regulations and Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12). At the discretion of the RA, an initial CAC may be issued based on a favorable review of a fingerprint check and a successfully scheduled Tier 1 investigation with the National Background Investigations Bureau. The RA provides contract personnel with additional information and forms to initiate the CAC issuance process, and/or to initiate background investigations, when required. Contract personnel shall complete these processes within established timelines to avoid delays.

9.5 Suspicious Activity Reporting training (e.g. iWATCH, CorpsWatch, or See Something, Say Something): All contract personnel shall receive initial and annual refresher training from the RA representative on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training provides contract personnel with general information on suspicious behavior, and guidance on reporting suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity.

9.6 Contract personnel requiring access to Government information systems: All contract personnel with access to a government information system (including USACE business systems and CAC-enabled websites) shall comply with applicable DoD and Army regulations, and shall use the organization's UserID- Password Administration and Security System (U-PASS) at commencement of services to request network user accounts. Contract personnel shall complete DoD Information Assurance Awareness training prior to accessing information systems, and annually thereafter.

9.7 Training requirements for the protection of sensitive information: All contract personnel with access to critical information (as identified in the RA's OPSEC Program) shall complete initial and annual refresher OPSEC Level I Awareness training, which is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/, or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html (websites subject to change). All contract personnel with access to Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) shall complete initial and annual refresher CUI training in accordance with applicable Army policy.

9.8 Escorting in classified and/or sensitive areas: In accordance with applicable regulations, all contract personnel who do not possess the appropriate security clearance or access privileges will be escorted in areas where they may be exposed to classified information or operations, sensitive information or activities, or restricted areas.

9.9 Pre-screen candidates using E-Verify Program: Contractors shall comply with the requirements set forth in FAR clause 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification and FAR Subpart 22.18 in using the E-Verify Program at (https://www.e-verify.gov/) (website subject to change) to meet the contract employment eligibility requirements. Contractors are encouraged to cooperate with Federal and State agencies responsible for enforcing labor requirements to include eligibility for employment under United States immigration laws in accordance with FAR 22.102-1(i). An initial list of verified/eligible candidates shall be provided to the COR no later than three business days after the initial contract award. When contracts are with individuals, the individuals will be required to complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, and submit it to the Contracting Officer to become part of the official contract file.

10. CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI): All data to be used in support of this project is unclassified and contains no CUI. In reference to DFARS clauses 252.204-7012 & 252.204-7020 there is no CUI or Federal Contract Information (FCI) involved in performance of this contractual effort.

11. PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITIONS: The performance ratings below reflect definitions at FAR

42.1103 Table 42-1. The COR will use these ratings to evaluate the quality of contractor’s performance.

Performance Rating

Definition

12. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY:

The contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

PERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVE

STANDARD/

ACCEPTABLE

QUALITY LEVELS

(AQLs)

RATING INSPECTION INCENTIVE/

DISINCENTIVE

PWS 4. Kick off Meeting

Standards:

Contractor scheduled project Kick-Off meeting within two weeks of receipt of task order.

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards.

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional cost or extension to the Period of Performance.

PWS 4. Bi-Weekly meetings

Bi-Weekly meetings determined progress regarding ongoing work

Rating task completion according to Table 1

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

and upcoming requirements performance standards.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional

PWS 6. Quarterly Reports

Quarterly reports were submitted according to schedule.

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards.

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional cost or extension to the Period of Performance.

Base Task Delft3D Hydrodynamic Model for Project Alternatives.

Deliverable:

All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional provided external hard drive. Written (Microsoft WORD) and presented (PowerPoint) instruction on the process taken to build the Delft3D model for hydrodynamics, salinity and temperature.

deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Optional Task 1.

Delft3D Sediment Model

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive. Written (Microsoft WORD) and presented (PowerPoint) instruction on the process taken to update the DELFT3D model for sediment transport.

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional cost or extension to the Period of Performance.

Optional Task 2:

Delft3D Modeling support for various locations TBD to support research and development efforts

Task 2A: Initial set up of model for location TBD.

Task 2B: Initial set location TBD.

(500k-1M mesh nodes)

Task 2C: Initial set

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional location TBD. (1M+ mesh nodes)

Deliverable: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution) should be transmitted digitally to the ERDC HPC archive system for storage and/or saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive. Written and presented instructions on the process taken to build the DELFT3D model.

required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Optional Task 3.

Delft3D Modeling Support for EWN DoW Applications.

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code, and model files (input and solution). A technical memorandum summarizing Delft3D modeling approach, simulation results, and recommendations for project design optimization.

Instructional materials and documentation used for team training sessions. A summary report of Delft3D training activities conducted, including participant list, session topics, and key learning outcomes. All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive.

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional

Optional Task 4.

Delft3D Model knowledge transfer

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code (source and compiled), and model files (input and solution). All PowerPoint presentations and notes documenting topics covered in the training workshops.

All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive.

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional cost or extension to the Period of Performance.

Optional Task 5.

Delft3D Modeling pre and post processing development

Deliverables: All data files, notes, reports, computer code (source and compiled), and model files (input and solution). Written instructions detailing how each process or code is used and functions. All saved on an ERDC provided external hard drive

Contractor provided all deliverables based on the PWS.

All Tasks and Deliverables were completed on time and acceptable to the TR and COR

Rating task completion according to Table 1 performance standards

Who: COR will inspect all deliverables.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards and submittals and the ERDC makes every effort possible to provide feedback promptly. However, the contractor is advised to allow at least 10 business days for review and return of accepted deliverable(s).

Generally, 10 business days is sufficient, however longer review windows may be required for unusually large or complex reviews/responses.

Rating task completion according to Table 1.

If the Performance Standards are found to be non-compliant the Contractor / Vendor is responsible for correcting the task(s) to a Performance Rating above Unsatisfactory and the resulting action will require completion of the task(s) at no additional

21.0 SUBMITTALS: The table below describes the minimum documentation that shall be provided to the Government Point of Contact in the time frame specified.

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION PWS SECTION GOVERNMENT

POC

SUSPENSE

Antiterrorism (AT) Level I training PWS, 9.2 COR 30 days from contract award date

Suspicious Activity Reporting training (e.g.

iWATCH, CorpsWatch, or See Something, Say Something):

PWS, 9.5 COR 30 days from contract award date

OPSEC Level I Awareness training PWS, 9.7 COR 30 days from contract award date, and annually thereafter

E-Verify Pre-Screening PWS, 9.9 COR 3 Business Days from Award Date