B08.02 PWS Attch 1 Performance Requirement Summary.pdf

PDF 140 KB Posted

Attached to
Sustainment Management System (SMS) Assembly Development
Solicitation number
W9132T25RA002
Issued by

About this file

The Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) document outlines key deliverables and performance standards for the Sustainment Management System (SMS) Assembly Development contract. The document specifies surveillance methods, maximum allowable deviation, and remedies for non-conformance across multiple contract deliverables, including a Post-Award Coordination Meeting, Monthly Progress Reports, In-Progress Review, Draft Assembly Submittal, and Final Assembly Submittal.

Critical performance requirements include developing 4,202 project item assemblies using the Government's Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MII), with strict standards for assembly quality, documentation, and submission timelines. The PRS mandates specific requirements such as ensuring assemblies are complete, logical, constructable, code-compliant, and meet task description intent. Key milestones include an initial in-progress review when 15% of assemblies are developed and a final assembly submittal approximately 210 days after contract award, with data reviews conducted by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and a Government review team from CERL Engineering, Army G9, and NWW.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

Deliverable or Other item surveilled

Reference Number

Standards Maximum Allowable Degree of Deviation

Method of Surveillance

Remedy for Non-

Conformance

Post-Award Coordination Meeting

PWS para.

3.1

▪ Productive meeting with relevant members of the contractor team that results in clarity regarding processes and expectations.

0% COR N/A

Monthly Progress Reports

PWS para.

3.3

▪ Report that adequately describes the progress made in the reporting period (or since the start of the contract).

0% COR Rejection and request for re-submittal.

In-Progress Review

PWS para.

3.5.2

▪ Once 15% of the assemblies have been developed.

▪ Deliverables appear to be following the requirements of the PWS.

▪ Spot checking of more formal requirements described in standard for acceptance for “Draft Assembly Submittal” below.

0% Data review by COR and Government review team

(CERL

Engineering, Army G9, NWW)

Meeting with contractor to re-direct efforts in a direction that more accurately reflects contract requirements.

Draft Assembly Submittal

PWS para.

2.0, 3.0 (and specifically in 3.4);

Para. 3.5.1

▪ Draft submittal has been submitted in accordance with schedule.

▪ Contractor quality control processes have been applied to the submitted data.

▪ All assemblies in the requirement are developed.

▪ All assemblies developed are complete, logical, constructable, code-compliant and meet the intent of the task description.

▪ Details and assumptions of each assembly are property and sufficiently documented in the construction items and assembly levels Notes section (as appropriate).

▪ Ensuring the task assemblies will work properly when re-priced in MII using labor and equipment rate libraries.

▪ Any custom construction items created have been documented (assumptions, 20% Data review by COR and Government review team

(CERL

Engineering, Army G9, NWW)

Re-submittal of the draft will be required (if less than 80% of the assemblies are acceptable.)

POC for researched material price, etc.)

▪ Ensuring the assembly folders have:

o Source tax prefixed with Uniformat level 4

WBS

o Unique source tags o The correct description o The unit of measure set o At most only one (1) level of folders o Project items that link only one level up to the parent folder o No broken quantity Project Item or sub-folder links

▪ Ensuring:

o Contractors are NOT assigned o Direct cost markups are NOT applied o Contractor markups are NOT applied by assigning contractors (JOOH, HOOH, profit, bond, etc.)

o Ownership markups are NOT applied (escalation, contingency, Supervision, Inspection and Overhead (SIOH))

Final Assembly Submittal

PWS para.

2.0, 3.0 (and specifically in 3.4);

Para. 3.5.1

▪ Approximately 210 days after contract award.

0% Data review by COR and Government review team

(CERL

Engineering, Army G9, NWW)

Nonconformities subject to resubmittal.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .