B08_Attch2_PPQ_RFQ_140P2026R0055_1.docx

DOCX document 49 KB Posted Apr 23, 2026

Attached to: SOUTHEAST REGION IDIQ MULTI-DISCIPLINARY AE DESIGN SERVICES
Solicitation number: 140P2026R0055
Issued by: Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Apr 23, 2026

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for use in evaluating contractor performance on past projects relevant to Solicitation No. 140P2026R0055, a Southeast Region IDIQ Multi-Disciplinary Architect-Engineer Design Services contract issued by the National Park Service. The questionnaire is structured in five sections: Section A requests offeror company information including legal name, address, UEI number, and point of contact details; Section B captures specific contract information for past projects being submitted as evidence of past performance, including project title, contract number, contract type, awarded and final prices, award and completion dates, period of performance, project location, and client/owner company with a brief scope description. Sections C and D are completed by the reference contact (typically the project owner or client), with the reference providing name, title, organization, phone, email, and signature with date.

Section D contains the evaluation criteria and rating scale, which assesses contractor performance across six primary categories: Quality (workmanship, quality control plan adherence, and technical submittals); Schedule and Time Management (milestone achievement, responsiveness to requests, timely submittals, and issue resolution); Cost Control (handling of design errors and omissions, pricing fairness for modifications, invoice accuracy, and subconsultant payments); Management (project manager oversight, subcontractor coordination, remote location factors, owner relations, and problem-solving flexibility); Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards (regulatory compliance, small business contracting, and subcontracting plan adherence); and Regulatory Compliance (building and life safety codes). Ratings range from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with comment fields for detailed justification. The completed questionnaire must be returned to Contracting Officers Terrell Thompson and Cory Terrell at the National Park Service Denver Service Center by 12:00 PM Mountain Time on June 26, 2025.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
B08_A3_Request_for_Qualifications_-_SER_SB_AE_IDIQ_4.pdf	PDF	Jun 16, 2026
Consolidated_Q-A_SER_IDIQ_Phase_1_3.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 14, 2026
B08_A2_Request_for_Qualifications_-_SER_SB_AE_IDIQ_3.pdf	PDF	May 14, 2026
B08_A1_Request_for_Qualifications_-_SER_SB_AE_IDIQ_2.pdf	PDF	May 6, 2026
B08_Request_for_Qualifications_-_SER_SB_AE_IDIQ_1.pdf	PDF	Apr 23, 2026
B08_Attch1_SF330-21a_1.pdf	PDF	Apr 23, 2026

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P2026R0055

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name

Company

Street Address

Address

City

State

Zip Code

XXXXX

Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact

Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PAST PERFORMANCE)

Project Title

Title

Contract Number

XXXXXXXXXX

Contract Type

Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other

Awarded Contract Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Current / Final Price

$X,XXX,XXX

Contract Award Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Contract Completion Date

XX/XX/XXXX

Period of Performance

XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX

Project Location

Park or Street address, City, State

Client / Owner

Company

Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name

First, Last

Position / Title

Title

Organization

Agency or Company

Phone Number

XXX-XXX-XXXX

Email Address

Signature

Date

XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating

Definition

Exceptional

Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory

Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area

Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?

Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?

Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals?

Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating

Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?

Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?

Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?

Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues?

Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating

Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed design errors and ommissions so as to minimize additional costs?

Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?

Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices?

Choose an item.

Promptly paid subconsultants?

Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating

Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?

Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors?

Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?

Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?

Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?

Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating

Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?

Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?

Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?

Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating

Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?

Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating

Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:

Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by

*This document needs to be submitted in advance of the submittal requirement date of 12:00PM Mountain Time, 26 June 2025

Name

Terrell Thompson and Cory Terrell

Title

Contracting Officer

Organization

National Park Service – Denver Service Center

Terrell_thompson@ios.doi.gov cory_terrell@ios.doi.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Apr 24, 2026.