B08_Attachment 2 - QASP 2022005.pdf
PDF 113 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 95900621R0009
- Issued by
-
Morris K. Udall Foundation
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(vApr2021)
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). DEIA Assessment
Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Surveillance
Method Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional Element 1: Quality of Product or Service
Data Collection Plan
Draft deliverable submitted within 4 weeks following the POP start date.
– AND –
Final deliverable for review within two 4 weeks following the deadline for Udall Foundation feedback/comments.
Draft deliverable submitted within 3 weeks following the POP start date.
– AND –
Final deliverable for review within two 3 weeks following the deadline for required shall be submitted within 2 weeks following the POP start date.
– AND –
Final deliverable for review within one
(1) week following the deadline for submitted within 3 days following the POP start date.
– AND –
Final deliverable for review within three 3 days following the deadline for Udall Foundation submitted within 5 days following the POP start date.
– AND –
Final deliverable for review within two 2 days following the deadline for Udall Foundation
Track Contractor’s performance and provide acceptance by the Program Manager and/or COR in accordance with the CDRL.
DEIA Assessment Report & Recommendations
Draft received twelve (12) weeks after Approval of FINAL Data Collection Plan.
– AND –
Final received five
(5) weeks after receipt of comments.
Draft received ten
(10) weeks after Approval of FINAL Data Collection Plan.
– AND –
Final received four
(4) weeks after receipt of comments
Draft due eight (8) weeks after Approval of FINAL Data Collection Plan.
– AND –
Final due three (3) weeks after receipt of comments
Draft received six (6) weeks after Approval of FINAL Data Collection Plan.
– AND –
Final received two
(2) weeks after receipt of comments
Draft received four
(4) weeks after Approval of FINAL Data Collection Plan.
– AND –
Final received two
(2) weeks after receipt of comments
Track Contractor’s performance and provide acceptance by the Program Manager and/or COR in accordance with the CDRL.
(vApr2021)
Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Surveillance
Method Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional
DEIA Progress Evaluation Framework Metrics
Draft received ten
(10) weeks after Approval of FINAL Assessment Report and Recommendations
– AND –
Final received five
(5) weeks after receipt of comments.
Draft received eight
(8) weeks after Approval of FINAL Assessment Report and Recommendations
– AND –
Final received four
(4) weeks after receipt of comments.
Draft due six (6) weeks after Approval of FINAL Assessment Report and Recommendations
– AND –
Final due three (3) weeks after receipt of comments.
Draft received four
(4) weeks after Approval of FINAL Assessment Report and Recommendations
– AND –
Final received two
(2) weeks after receipt of comments.
Draft received three
(3) weeks after Approval of FINAL Assessment Report and Recommendations
– AND –
Final received one
(1) week after receipt of comments.
Track Contractor’s performance and provide acceptance by the Program Manager and/or COR in accordance with the CDRL.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .