B08 Attachment 2 Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Job Order Contract (JOC) at Fort Huachuca, AZ
- Solicitation number
- W9124A-21-R-0011
About this file
This document contains a past performance assessment questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance assessment questionnaire is a template for evaluating offerors on a Job Order Contract (JOC) opportunity at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. It requests ratings and rationales on compliance, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and general comments from past performance references. The related federal contract opportunity is an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity single award JOC for sustainment, restoration, and modernization projects at Fort Huachuca. The contract period is one base year with four option years, under NAICS code 236220. The 100% small business set-aside has a questions due date of June 17th, 2021 and a proposal due date of July 12th, 2021. The contracting agency is the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Huachuca Division 600 Augur St, Bldg # 22208 Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613
26 May 2021
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W9124A21R0005
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command – APG Fort Huachuca is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the Army Contracting Command – APG Fort Huachuca Division DOC Operations Branch, 600 Augur Ave., Building 22208, Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613-7070, no later than 15 days after receipt of request. Submit your completed questionnaire to Contracting Officer/Specialist’s email address below:
Contracting Officer: Edwin D. Guthrie, edwin.d.guthrie2.civ@mail.mil , 520-533-1517 Contract Specialist: Walter L. Carbajal Jr., walter.l.carbajal.civ@mail.mil , 520-533-6115
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at.
Sincerely, Edwin D. Guthrie edwin.d.guthrie2.civ@mail.mil 520-533-1517 Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .