B08_Attach_8_Project_Experience_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LAKE CLARK VISTOR TRAIL SECTION 3 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P9724R0005
About this file
This document is a Project Experience Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity with Solicitation Number 140P9724R0005 for the LAKE CLARK VISTOR TRAIL SECTION 3 project.
The questionnaire requires the offeror to describe the work performed by the prime contractor Sparky's Electrical Company and subcontractor ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co., including any changes to original pricing and schedules, problems encountered and how they were resolved, and successful means and methods that may be implemented on the proposed project. The offeror is also asked to identify which Project Experience elements from the solicitation the contractors' work addresses. Relevant details about the contractors' roles, trade, pricing, and performance periods are provided. The solicitation is being issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service Alaska Region for the project to construct the LAKE CLARK VISTOR TRAIL SECTION 3.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P9724R0005.pdf | ||
| B03_Wage_Determination_AK20240001_07_19_24.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_1_Specs_stage_3.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_10_Past_Peformance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_Attach_5_SF25-16d1_Perf_bond.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_9.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_7_Subcontract_worksheet.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_2_Map___Handbook__Stage_3.pdf | ||
| B08_Attach_3__Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B08_Attach_6_SF25A-16d_Pay_bond.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P9724R0005
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions provided in Section L of the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
Page 1 of 1 6/4/2024
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .