B08_140P5123R0002_Attach_0005_PPQ_MALU_Replace_Birth_Home_Lift.pdf
PDF 178 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Remove and Install vertical platform lift that sat Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5123R0002
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to Request for Proposal number 140P5123R0002 from the National Park Service to replace a 750-pound capacity vertical platform lift at the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park in Atlanta, Georgia. The contractor is asked to provide references from previous relevant contracts who will complete the past performance questionnaire, rating the contractor's ability to meet requirements, provide products in a timely manner, meet quality standards, and receive an overall performance rating. The questionnaire requests contract details, ratings in categories of performance, timeliness, quality of work, and an overall rating, along with explanatory comments.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5123R0002_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5123R0002_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| A06_0040597613-02_Drawings_MALU_Replace_Birth_Home_Lift.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5123R0002.pdf | ||
| B08_140P5123R0002_Attach_0007-SVI_MALU_Replace_Birth_Home_Lift.pdf | ||
| B03_140P5123R0002_Attach_0003_WDOL_WD_MALU_Replace_Birth_Home_Lift.pdf | ||
| Construction_Contract_Administration.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_140P5123R0002_Attach_0004_Price_Sched_MALU_Exterior_Replace_Bith_Nome_Lift.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| A06_0040597613-02_Specs-Combined_MALU_Replace_Birth_Home_Lift.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ #140P5123R0002 - Attachment 0005
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation#140P5123R0002 Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Quote
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf, Solicitation Number: 140P5123R0002 for the removal of the existing vertical platform lift on the exterior of the project and installation of a new vertical lift with enclosure and a protective canopy. There are modifications to the interior of the project to improve Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) access and replace the concrete paving immediately surrounding the lift at the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park Atlanta, Georgia per the specification, drawings, and other supporting documents. As part of our quote, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your quote
Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFQ #140P5123R0002.
Alternate POC name:
Alternate POC phone number:
Alternate POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________
E-Mail: _______________________
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title: Phone:
E-mail:
mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20edward_dingle@nps.gov mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20Contracting%20Officer,%20e-mail:%20edward_dingle@nps.gov
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED: |
| II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. |
| Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance |
| Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness |
| Question 4. Quality of Work |
| Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance |
| General Comments: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .